I remember being called a conspiracy theorist years ago when I reasoned that climate alarmists intended to tax us for the carbon when we exhale and emit carbon as a byproduct of being alive. Literally taxing us for being alive.
The won't call it a tax. They love euphemisms, like "carbon credits." That can be bought and sold by the wealthy…
I remember being called a conspiracy theorist years ago when I reasoned that climate alarmists intended to tax us for the carbon when we exhale and emit carbon as a byproduct of being alive. Literally taxing us for being alive.
The won't call it a tax. They love euphemisms, like "carbon credits." That can be bought and sold by the wealthy to "offset" their carbon emissions. If you're not well-off, and a net-carbon emitter, then you get to pay for your largess. Remember, we are no different in the minds of our "good stewards" than cattle. And what goes for cattle, goes for us:
Carbon credits issued for cow methane reduction in potential world first
But because they are such good, benevolent stewards, they'll give the poor an option if they can't keep up with paying for their dangerous carbon footprint. Transhumanism will be offered as a great way to reduce carbon footprints, live a virtual reality life that theoretically emits less carbon. Even get to live a grand lifestyle as a rich and powerful person in a virtual world, all wants and needs provided for. Win-win! Living in the real world is expensive, you know, and destroys the planet.
Does this sound as conspiracy today as it did when I first reasoned it as an ultimate end game several years ago?
I remember being called a conspiracy theorist years ago when I reasoned that climate alarmists intended to tax us for the carbon when we exhale and emit carbon as a byproduct of being alive. Literally taxing us for being alive.
The won't call it a tax. They love euphemisms, like "carbon credits." That can be bought and sold by the wealthy to "offset" their carbon emissions. If you're not well-off, and a net-carbon emitter, then you get to pay for your largess. Remember, we are no different in the minds of our "good stewards" than cattle. And what goes for cattle, goes for us:
Carbon credits issued for cow methane reduction in potential world first
S&P Commodity Global, April 14, 2021
https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/coal/041421-carbon-credits-issued-for-cow-methane-reduction-in-potential-world-first
Cow burps are a major contributor to climate change — can scientists change that?
PBS, March 6, 2022
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/cow-burps-are-a-major-contributor-to-climate-change-can-scientists-change-that
But because they are such good, benevolent stewards, they'll give the poor an option if they can't keep up with paying for their dangerous carbon footprint. Transhumanism will be offered as a great way to reduce carbon footprints, live a virtual reality life that theoretically emits less carbon. Even get to live a grand lifestyle as a rich and powerful person in a virtual world, all wants and needs provided for. Win-win! Living in the real world is expensive, you know, and destroys the planet.
Does this sound as conspiracy today as it did when I first reasoned it as an ultimate end game several years ago?