But in the US anyway, trauma units are usually very good... It's when you have a prolonged stay that things tend to dip... And yeah, these days, there's plenty to be really scared of... I wouldn't want to go to a hospital unless I had a bone sticking out my skin...
I mean... who can we trust these days? Here's a hug, anyway... xo
Thank you very much! I do fully believe you, that is why I wrote what I really mean, and also know from too much personal experiences, not medical btw...., that it IS...a scary situation...
I live in the Netherlands and studied law at universities. I am going to ask my money back, with lots of evidence that the most 'basic' law and minimal features governmental instutes must follow when acting, for example in court verdicts, is completely ignored and they just do something what causes them the least effort. And when there is an official complaint, they start neglecting it, then after persistence they postpone and after that giving a bullshit nonsense reason to help themselves getting rid of the complaint. And then, 5 years later, only 1 in 10.000 people I guess will make it up to there, and all complaints appeared to be correct and the government was wrong. And than you won't even get an excuse without starting a new trial.
That is also really really scares me to death, and this is peanuts compaired to other problems the government causes their citizins which you probably can't even believe when trying hardest...
this 'lawlessness' and things like 'vaccines' and 'war' and 'environmental pollution/climate change (well... 0,8 degrees up last 100 years)'....
We think a lot and we know a lot, and we conclude 'the great reset' and whatever.
I just started thinking...all they let us know about for instance 'the great reset'... is not to inform us, so it must be serving their goals. And so is the rest. The great reset when finished, is not desirable to anyone, not even to the ones who created it... so they are up to something else, and not knowing who is in and for what reason is very very scary, but I know there are also good people, and among them are good fighters of all kinds...they never speak, but act... as less as possible.. only when all other measures fail, and lives are going to be at stake, so I think if this is all true, some bad people are very serious disappearing in near future ... hug to you back..xo :-)
We shall prevail, we shall overcome... someday. When? I couldn't begin to know. It's going to be a long, long, long slog, most likely, because of all the decades and decades of bureaucratic build-up and deliberate brakes on actual progress.
I just wanted to add, too, because it is a serious part of all this, that the scientific evidence I have seen, heavily censored of course, which causes me to trust it a bit MORE than the main-stream blather, is that we are actually in a COOLING phase on this our beautiful planet... And CO2 levels are very, very low... problematically low. I am not a scientist, I just read a lot and have a sturdy brain, and I believe there is no "climate crisis," nor is there any "scarcity"... these are ideas long planted in our brains via the media and I'm sure directly attributable to the obvious conclusion (sarcasm) that there are "too many people" on this planet. I've read that ALL the people in the world could fit into a space the size of Texas. I wouldn't consider that to be "unsustainable."
I'm saying this to you in an effort to 1) ease your concerns and stress level about climate, and 2) spread the word so that the focus remains on how nefarious this PLOT AGAINST HUMANITY really is-- how vicious, murderous, horrible, and absolutely EVIL it is.
In Australia, if you are unconscious, the doctor can determine what treatments you need. This includes vaccines (esp in 2022), and doctors cannot be held responsible if they vaccinate you while you are out. I have a reference about that somewhere, but thank you for kindly allowing me to not go digging for it.
Don't let it get you down. I hadn't been in a hospital in forever and 3 months ago had a mishap which involved losing the distal portion of my middle finger and both it and my ring finger were badly smashed. Dominant hand of course and I came out just fine no jab, no test and no coof.
I got a Jones Fracture of the 5th metatarsal during the shutdown. Turned away from the ER. It should have had immediate surgery and a pin inserted. Instead it healed wrong and now I have a huge lump out the side of my foot. Doc says it needs to be rebroken and reset. No thanks, I will just wear flip flops the rest of my life. Not going near a hospital as all in our area require a PCR Test. Not going to be a prisoner on a Covid ward.
Yes I’m feelin it, our science medical cathedral we have worshiped in is based on superstition and power over others. And money, can’t forget the money.
One can try to minimize the chances of things going wrong in a hospital. If the doctor is old and does not wear a mask, there is a good chance that the training included fundamental anatomy instead of diversity and cultural sensitivities. Moreover, the doctor obviously did not buy into the Covid protocol nonsense. In addition, the fact that they are still around also means that they have not done too many really stupid things with their patients (of course the hospital could be very good at covering it up but I am an optimist). On the other hand, if the doctor is wearing a face shield, mask and asks you for your pronouns, it is time to go. BTW, the chief psycho at Pfizer is a veterinarian by training as far as I know. These days a shaman might be a better choice...
I do not think that psychos like the one at Pfizer have the notion of shame - these are creatures that look at kids as life long customers to be abused in any way possible with their concoctions. In short, these are sick and twisted creatures.
Without the invention of imaging tech doctors would still be in the dark ages anyway. So unless I have a bone through the skin i am not going. Pretty hard to get sacked as a doctor for malpractice. most denied and swept under the carpet.
Great catch. While we're at it, doesn't the Novavax data on miscarriages look quite scary, to say the least: 25 miscarriages, 41 live births, and 56 ongoing. https://www.fda.gov/media/158912/download - page 67. Even in the best case that most of those ongoing pregnancies are successful, doesn't that still amount to a worrisome miscarriage rate?
Even worse, that same Table S14 shows nearly double the incidence rate of neoplasms (tumors) in the Novavax group as the placebo group, in the short study period of just a few months. YIKES. So much for being a "safe alternative" to the dangerous mRNA shots.
Anyway, hope you heal soon, and keep yourself safe in the hospital for sure.
Pregnancy issues are not distinguishable between treatment and placebo groups in the trial data; and miscarriage rate consistent with the overall miscarriage rate of unvaxed in the other, maybe a tick higher, but have seen numbers in the 17-20% range.
But the general reproductive and eye issues (both not merely well enough defined) are notably higher than placebo in the trial data, assuming that data is clean (we know Pfizer gamed theirs) and worth keeping an eye on.
Where do you see that? The only comparisons to placebo that I see for pregnancy issues are incidence rates of 0.11 (6 events) for vaccine and 0.04 (1 event) for placebo, on page 54 in the NEJM document. These numbers obviously don't capture all events anyway so they don't seem very meaningful, but they still suggest a problem although with a lot of uncertainty. And the reproductive system issue increase is notable, as you say.
Most of all, the 86% increase in incidence of neoplasms (tumors) during that short study period is absolutely HORRIFIC, regardless of what anyone says!
Page 54, where the event is “spontaneous abortion” and its 3 for treatment, 1 for placebo…. Though there is another “complete abortion” (1:0). But where it’s nearly 20,000 people in treatment group, vs a little less than half in placebo… so given the small numbers you can’t take anything away.
Side point - the data quality from all of these trials is horrifically bad. Not transparent, super open to gaming… what is the point of an FDA if this is the useless-data garbage that pharma can get away with providing?
Like eye issues…. Huge disparity between groups… but are we talking transient blurred vision, or something more serious?
And this set of data is better than Moderna and Pfizers! Garbage.
the big question is: what is the background rate of miscarriages in the pre-vaccinated or unvaccinated population? maybe women used to have miscarriages at a rate of 500 per 12,000 so the Pfizer shot actually reduced the rate of miscarriages.
this is BS of course, but without the background rate from the good old days before the mRNA shots were introduced, all you can really say is that women who had the Moderna shots had more miscarriages then women who took the Pfizer shot.
the health coach at my doctor's "knew" after two miscarriages in their practice soon after the rollout that the mRNA shots were "messing with women's hormones."
that says still births. and if the rate is 5.89 per 1000, it would be 70.66 per 12,000 in which case, could one claim that the vaccines- any of them- were reducing the rate? so i'm confused or i'm not reading something right or i'm betraying my lack of statistical prowess or something
about 12.5% -- but the denominator in that slide includes ALL pregnant women -- not just under-20-weeks -- which does not change conclusions but makes comparisons difficult.
So if I understand this correctly, the data isn't provided as to number of miscarriages occurring >20 weeks. But then, is the average % of miscarriages <20 weeks several times higher sans vaccination...I'm still confused.
i know they are but i would think there'd be a difference between a recorded miscarriage- where the woman knows she's pregnant and is happy about it and suddenly loses the baby, requiring a D&C and causing some sorrow, and an unrecorded miscarriage, where the women's period is a bit late and then comes on heavy with cramping and solids and no one is the wiser. i had such a miscarriage and it never made the stats because i didn't report it and didn't seek medical attention.
i would think in the case of these vaccine induced miscarriages, they would be the recorded kind
When I was pregnant with me daughter many years ago I had a talk with my OB as he'd done a fellowship on the subject of miscarriages and he claimed the miscarriage rate is way high very early in pregnancy because the woman even suspects she might be pregnant. These women miscarry several days late, notice it's a bit 'off' and then carry on with life. He quoted me 70% loss very early. Needless to say I was surprised!
Well, but the Pfizer vs Modern a relative number was all ages. What would be far more edifying is the baseline rates of no-vax females vs. Pfizer vax vs Moderna vax.
I watched a great vid with Dark Horse / Brett Weinstein, with military/aviators who had dared to speak and were sidelined.
The lady speaking said something along the lines of (paraphrase) "I learned early-on that integrity is what you do when nobody is watching. Well, I found it's much harder to show integrity when everyone is watching." She'd lost loads, but still she refused to buckle.
Courage/bravery is demonstrated by those who are afraid, and yet they persist. Stick with real scientific analysis and your courage will pay off.
Silly accidents aren't so cool, but I will say nothing. Nobody is perfect.
Per the Telegraph newspaper, NHS classifying newborn deaths as stillborns. Coroners can only hold inquests if a baby shows signs of life after being born. Seems to me that all baby deaths should be investigated, no matter the stage of life, before or after birth. I mean, they were all alive at one point in time. Laws need to change. The completely unnecessary and unimaginable loss that these families are enduring is just heartbreaking to me.
No pregnant woman should EVER be inoculated with anything. No exceptions. Baby and mother have a unique biological relationship that should never be disturbed. After birth, natural breast-feeding helps the infant make minute adjustments with the immune system, this can continue up to 2 years. Nature, ........ society should start trusting it again.
Igor, thank you for continuing to share your research and wisdom with us. Especially in light of that criminal vote on the injections for children today, it’s comforting to know there are many who see what’s really happening. I hope you have a speedy and complete healing of your foot. 🕊
Hypothesis: mRNA and adenoviral vaccinations can induce a histamine surge in response to vaccination (these are high reactogenicity vaccines). Diamine oxidase is normally upregulated roughly 500-fold in pregnancy to protect fetuses from elevated histamine levels. Some individuals can be temporarily histamine intolerant (foods, drugs, microbiome, etc.). What could possibly go wrong??? Suggestion: read this post by Igor Chudov
What I'd like to learn is whether getting the shots prior to becoming pregnant (as opposed to while pregnant) is predictive of miscarriage. Loved one in our family got 2-shot series last year and has since had 2 miscarriages.
That is my question as well. I know one woman that got the shot while pregnant, her doctor recommended it and assured her it was safe. Her baby was born w/horrible defects. I have a family member that is pregnant and it is like being on eggshells wondering how things will work out.
Although I love what you write and feel lucky to be able to read your work , you had me at your broken foot on this one . Oh dear , so many things to deal with when the world seems as if it's on fire. I see, where in this case , an ER visit has it's perks . As always, I am getting the benefit from what you do , no matter where you are . Thank you .
Igor, I'm confident you still won't miss a step! Way to play injured.
Nice job. That is good data to have that Moderna is more dangerous in pregnancy than Pfizer, as one would tend to expect. Could the same data be mined to compare the vaxxed women to unvaxxed pregnant women for miscarriages? That would also be good to have for the bigger question of how much more risk of miscarriage do the vaxxes carry over good old fashioned pureblood parenthood.
Perhaps this is in Arkmedics article, which I haven't read yet, or has someone else already done that analysis with this data?
And oh yeah… you’re a braver man than I. If I broke my foot, the last place I’d go right now is a hospital. I’d look up a veterinarian.
I guess I still believe in science haha
Just don't let them put you on a vent or give you remdesivir.
keeping my mouth totally shut
I hope they treat you well, and pray you heal quickly.
I was hospitalized with non-covid pneumonia in August 2022. Staff was fine. Never even brought up covid vaccine.
I'm fine. Fully healed, back to weight lifting and cardio.
Hopefully you'll get great care.
Just curious....private or public hospital...?🤷♂️
Catholic
When someone asks you if you are vaccinated, you say YES!
Good idea!!
It's a bit like that. When you're in someone else's house, it's a different set of rules, eh?
But how can they find out that Covid broke his foot if they don’t test for it?
Trauma units are usually okay, unless you're unconscious, maybe...
Brrr that is really scary Herder!
Sorry, about so many things...
But in the US anyway, trauma units are usually very good... It's when you have a prolonged stay that things tend to dip... And yeah, these days, there's plenty to be really scared of... I wouldn't want to go to a hospital unless I had a bone sticking out my skin...
I mean... who can we trust these days? Here's a hug, anyway... xo
Thank you very much! I do fully believe you, that is why I wrote what I really mean, and also know from too much personal experiences, not medical btw...., that it IS...a scary situation...
I live in the Netherlands and studied law at universities. I am going to ask my money back, with lots of evidence that the most 'basic' law and minimal features governmental instutes must follow when acting, for example in court verdicts, is completely ignored and they just do something what causes them the least effort. And when there is an official complaint, they start neglecting it, then after persistence they postpone and after that giving a bullshit nonsense reason to help themselves getting rid of the complaint. And then, 5 years later, only 1 in 10.000 people I guess will make it up to there, and all complaints appeared to be correct and the government was wrong. And than you won't even get an excuse without starting a new trial.
That is also really really scares me to death, and this is peanuts compaired to other problems the government causes their citizins which you probably can't even believe when trying hardest...
this 'lawlessness' and things like 'vaccines' and 'war' and 'environmental pollution/climate change (well... 0,8 degrees up last 100 years)'....
We think a lot and we know a lot, and we conclude 'the great reset' and whatever.
I just started thinking...all they let us know about for instance 'the great reset'... is not to inform us, so it must be serving their goals. And so is the rest. The great reset when finished, is not desirable to anyone, not even to the ones who created it... so they are up to something else, and not knowing who is in and for what reason is very very scary, but I know there are also good people, and among them are good fighters of all kinds...they never speak, but act... as less as possible.. only when all other measures fail, and lives are going to be at stake, so I think if this is all true, some bad people are very serious disappearing in near future ... hug to you back..xo :-)
We shall prevail, we shall overcome... someday. When? I couldn't begin to know. It's going to be a long, long, long slog, most likely, because of all the decades and decades of bureaucratic build-up and deliberate brakes on actual progress.
I just wanted to add, too, because it is a serious part of all this, that the scientific evidence I have seen, heavily censored of course, which causes me to trust it a bit MORE than the main-stream blather, is that we are actually in a COOLING phase on this our beautiful planet... And CO2 levels are very, very low... problematically low. I am not a scientist, I just read a lot and have a sturdy brain, and I believe there is no "climate crisis," nor is there any "scarcity"... these are ideas long planted in our brains via the media and I'm sure directly attributable to the obvious conclusion (sarcasm) that there are "too many people" on this planet. I've read that ALL the people in the world could fit into a space the size of Texas. I wouldn't consider that to be "unsustainable."
I'm saying this to you in an effort to 1) ease your concerns and stress level about climate, and 2) spread the word so that the focus remains on how nefarious this PLOT AGAINST HUMANITY really is-- how vicious, murderous, horrible, and absolutely EVIL it is.
Sending you hugs. SOLIDARITY!
In Australia, if you are unconscious, the doctor can determine what treatments you need. This includes vaccines (esp in 2022), and doctors cannot be held responsible if they vaccinate you while you are out. I have a reference about that somewhere, but thank you for kindly allowing me to not go digging for it.
Don't let it get you down. I hadn't been in a hospital in forever and 3 months ago had a mishap which involved losing the distal portion of my middle finger and both it and my ring finger were badly smashed. Dominant hand of course and I came out just fine no jab, no test and no coof.
Good to hear! Take care!
Agreed!!! Or a voodoo doctor. Or a witchdoctor.
NO. The Old Testament says to not have anything to do with a witch.
Try a natural healer like an Osteopath, Holistic M.D.,
or Naturepath. Yeah. I wish I could find one here!
Or go to a podiatrist
Do they actually set broken bones?
I got a Jones Fracture of the 5th metatarsal during the shutdown. Turned away from the ER. It should have had immediate surgery and a pin inserted. Instead it healed wrong and now I have a huge lump out the side of my foot. Doc says it needs to be rebroken and reset. No thanks, I will just wear flip flops the rest of my life. Not going near a hospital as all in our area require a PCR Test. Not going to be a prisoner on a Covid ward.
Ask malone or Kory what you should do? Wish you well!!
So sad for you but I understand. I had bunion surgery on one foot
years ago. It was worth it for me. You might try to find a safe and
workable surgical solution.
Depends. Our son had a bad break just below the big toe joint. About 1/8 inch from needing a pin. Our podiatrist set it and put it in a cast.
Yes I’m feelin it, our science medical cathedral we have worshiped in is based on superstition and power over others. And money, can’t forget the money.
Yeah. Bob Dylan once said, "Money does not talk. . .It SCREAMS!"
Hahaha! Indeed.
One can try to minimize the chances of things going wrong in a hospital. If the doctor is old and does not wear a mask, there is a good chance that the training included fundamental anatomy instead of diversity and cultural sensitivities. Moreover, the doctor obviously did not buy into the Covid protocol nonsense. In addition, the fact that they are still around also means that they have not done too many really stupid things with their patients (of course the hospital could be very good at covering it up but I am an optimist). On the other hand, if the doctor is wearing a face shield, mask and asks you for your pronouns, it is time to go. BTW, the chief psycho at Pfizer is a veterinarian by training as far as I know. These days a shaman might be a better choice...
Good advice regarding doctors who spend too much time focusing on D.I.E.
Regarding the chief psycho at Pfizer, shame-on him.
I do not think that psychos like the one at Pfizer have the notion of shame - these are creatures that look at kids as life long customers to be abused in any way possible with their concoctions. In short, these are sick and twisted creatures.
My "shame-on him" was a weak attempt at making a pun out of the word "shaman".
Or, based on admission scores, pick the Asian one (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Indian)
Without the invention of imaging tech doctors would still be in the dark ages anyway. So unless I have a bone through the skin i am not going. Pretty hard to get sacked as a doctor for malpractice. most denied and swept under the carpet.
Why? Because they would not only set the bone(s) but give out some Ivermectin samples just in case?
Like a Albert Bourla? I hear he’s accepting patients for his next billion, err.. vaccine.
My new argument against the pro choice crowd.
“Relax…no one’s taking away your abortions, you still have the COVID vaccine for that.”
🙌👍 Nodding my head, too.
Awesome!
Get better soon!! and without getting mauled by the hospital ;)
Better not let the doctors see what you're writing :))
Oh yeah, hadn't thought of that. They might try to take him out like a mainstream medicine doctor version of a Jason Bourne World sleeper agent.
Kicking ass is dangerous occupation! (Assume that’s what happened to your feet:))
Have a speedy recovery
Great catch. While we're at it, doesn't the Novavax data on miscarriages look quite scary, to say the least: 25 miscarriages, 41 live births, and 56 ongoing. https://www.fda.gov/media/158912/download - page 67. Even in the best case that most of those ongoing pregnancies are successful, doesn't that still amount to a worrisome miscarriage rate?
Its randomized clinical trial also had a 60% increase in reproductive system disorders versus placebo: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2116185/suppl_file/nejmoa2116185_appendix.pdf - page 48 under Table S14.
Even worse, that same Table S14 shows nearly double the incidence rate of neoplasms (tumors) in the Novavax group as the placebo group, in the short study period of just a few months. YIKES. So much for being a "safe alternative" to the dangerous mRNA shots.
Anyway, hope you heal soon, and keep yourself safe in the hospital for sure.
Pregnancy issues are not distinguishable between treatment and placebo groups in the trial data; and miscarriage rate consistent with the overall miscarriage rate of unvaxed in the other, maybe a tick higher, but have seen numbers in the 17-20% range.
But the general reproductive and eye issues (both not merely well enough defined) are notably higher than placebo in the trial data, assuming that data is clean (we know Pfizer gamed theirs) and worth keeping an eye on.
Where do you see that? The only comparisons to placebo that I see for pregnancy issues are incidence rates of 0.11 (6 events) for vaccine and 0.04 (1 event) for placebo, on page 54 in the NEJM document. These numbers obviously don't capture all events anyway so they don't seem very meaningful, but they still suggest a problem although with a lot of uncertainty. And the reproductive system issue increase is notable, as you say.
Most of all, the 86% increase in incidence of neoplasms (tumors) during that short study period is absolutely HORRIFIC, regardless of what anyone says!
Page 54, where the event is “spontaneous abortion” and its 3 for treatment, 1 for placebo…. Though there is another “complete abortion” (1:0). But where it’s nearly 20,000 people in treatment group, vs a little less than half in placebo… so given the small numbers you can’t take anything away.
Side point - the data quality from all of these trials is horrifically bad. Not transparent, super open to gaming… what is the point of an FDA if this is the useless-data garbage that pharma can get away with providing?
Like eye issues…. Huge disparity between groups… but are we talking transient blurred vision, or something more serious?
And this set of data is better than Moderna and Pfizers! Garbage.
Get well soon, friend!
A broken foot is "asymptomatic covid" in hospital speak...
the big question is: what is the background rate of miscarriages in the pre-vaccinated or unvaccinated population? maybe women used to have miscarriages at a rate of 500 per 12,000 so the Pfizer shot actually reduced the rate of miscarriages.
this is BS of course, but without the background rate from the good old days before the mRNA shots were introduced, all you can really say is that women who had the Moderna shots had more miscarriages then women who took the Pfizer shot.
the health coach at my doctor's "knew" after two miscarriages in their practice soon after the rollout that the mRNA shots were "messing with women's hormones."
please be careful behind enemy lines!
that says still births. and if the rate is 5.89 per 1000, it would be 70.66 per 12,000 in which case, could one claim that the vaccines- any of them- were reducing the rate? so i'm confused or i'm not reading something right or i'm betraying my lack of statistical prowess or something
about 12.5% -- but the denominator in that slide includes ALL pregnant women -- not just under-20-weeks -- which does not change conclusions but makes comparisons difficult.
So if I understand this correctly, the data isn't provided as to number of miscarriages occurring >20 weeks. But then, is the average % of miscarriages <20 weeks several times higher sans vaccination...I'm still confused.
i know they are but i would think there'd be a difference between a recorded miscarriage- where the woman knows she's pregnant and is happy about it and suddenly loses the baby, requiring a D&C and causing some sorrow, and an unrecorded miscarriage, where the women's period is a bit late and then comes on heavy with cramping and solids and no one is the wiser. i had such a miscarriage and it never made the stats because i didn't report it and didn't seek medical attention.
i would think in the case of these vaccine induced miscarriages, they would be the recorded kind
When I was pregnant with me daughter many years ago I had a talk with my OB as he'd done a fellowship on the subject of miscarriages and he claimed the miscarriage rate is way high very early in pregnancy because the woman even suspects she might be pregnant. These women miscarry several days late, notice it's a bit 'off' and then carry on with life. He quoted me 70% loss very early. Needless to say I was surprised!
Or not - they may just unfold as you described - a late, heavy period.
Miscarriage is age stratified and that would be important in analysis of the data. By age 40, 40% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage.
Explained in my linked article
Well, but the Pfizer vs Modern a relative number was all ages. What would be far more edifying is the baseline rates of no-vax females vs. Pfizer vax vs Moderna vax.
Igor, you've been kicking ass for ages and now you've broke your foot. Curious to know which hardass you just took on and how hard you kicked them.
Keep on kicking; you have another foot!
I wish it was from kicking ass
I watched a great vid with Dark Horse / Brett Weinstein, with military/aviators who had dared to speak and were sidelined.
The lady speaking said something along the lines of (paraphrase) "I learned early-on that integrity is what you do when nobody is watching. Well, I found it's much harder to show integrity when everyone is watching." She'd lost loads, but still she refused to buckle.
Courage/bravery is demonstrated by those who are afraid, and yet they persist. Stick with real scientific analysis and your courage will pay off.
Silly accidents aren't so cool, but I will say nothing. Nobody is perfect.
I hope they give you top-class painkillers.
Keep going Igor. We value you
Very disturbing information from Dr. John Campbell. See. https://youtu.be/wj4rE0LrpR0.
Per the Telegraph newspaper, NHS classifying newborn deaths as stillborns. Coroners can only hold inquests if a baby shows signs of life after being born. Seems to me that all baby deaths should be investigated, no matter the stage of life, before or after birth. I mean, they were all alive at one point in time. Laws need to change. The completely unnecessary and unimaginable loss that these families are enduring is just heartbreaking to me.
I also saw it -- very timely!
A very good, but very sad point.
No pregnant woman should EVER be inoculated with anything. No exceptions. Baby and mother have a unique biological relationship that should never be disturbed. After birth, natural breast-feeding helps the infant make minute adjustments with the immune system, this can continue up to 2 years. Nature, ........ society should start trusting it again.
Igor, thank you for continuing to share your research and wisdom with us. Especially in light of that criminal vote on the injections for children today, it’s comforting to know there are many who see what’s really happening. I hope you have a speedy and complete healing of your foot. 🕊
Hypothesis: mRNA and adenoviral vaccinations can induce a histamine surge in response to vaccination (these are high reactogenicity vaccines). Diamine oxidase is normally upregulated roughly 500-fold in pregnancy to protect fetuses from elevated histamine levels. Some individuals can be temporarily histamine intolerant (foods, drugs, microbiome, etc.). What could possibly go wrong??? Suggestion: read this post by Igor Chudov
What I'd like to learn is whether getting the shots prior to becoming pregnant (as opposed to while pregnant) is predictive of miscarriage. Loved one in our family got 2-shot series last year and has since had 2 miscarriages.
That is my question as well. I know one woman that got the shot while pregnant, her doctor recommended it and assured her it was safe. Her baby was born w/horrible defects. I have a family member that is pregnant and it is like being on eggshells wondering how things will work out.
Although I love what you write and feel lucky to be able to read your work , you had me at your broken foot on this one . Oh dear , so many things to deal with when the world seems as if it's on fire. I see, where in this case , an ER visit has it's perks . As always, I am getting the benefit from what you do , no matter where you are . Thank you .
:-)
Speedy bone knitting.
Maybe not in WARP SPEED because you know just how safe and effective that pace works .
Igor, I'm confident you still won't miss a step! Way to play injured.
Nice job. That is good data to have that Moderna is more dangerous in pregnancy than Pfizer, as one would tend to expect. Could the same data be mined to compare the vaxxed women to unvaxxed pregnant women for miscarriages? That would also be good to have for the bigger question of how much more risk of miscarriage do the vaxxes carry over good old fashioned pureblood parenthood.
Perhaps this is in Arkmedics article, which I haven't read yet, or has someone else already done that analysis with this data?
Read his article, I can't write at length but arkmedic wrote a good one
It's in my article...
No, but love your clarity on statistics.