Pfizer Confidential: 1 infant DEATH vs 1 Successful Birth
Pfizer and FDA Knew: Breastfeeding Sheds Vaccine to Infants
Hat tip to Claus L who reminded me that new Pfizer documents were released.
Summary: Only two births were recorded, one was successful and another resulted in infant death. Breastfeeding indeed affects infants and proves mRNA vaccine shedding by breastfeeding mothers.
1 Infant Death For Every Birth
An interesting finding in Pfizer’s postmarketing report on page 12:
270 Pregnancies occurred and were reported (this includes normally progressing pregnancies that had no time to end yet)
One Pregnancy resulted in a “normal birth” (congratulations)
Another birth reported resulted in a “neonatal death” (death of the newborn)
No other births were reported
238 pregnancies had NO outcome because they were still ongoing
There were 25 spontaneous abortions (occurring early in pregnancies) and one “foetal death”. Spontaneous abortion happens in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. There were 7 more terminations of pregnancy.
If I was a regulator, and if a company presented a product that results in a 50:50 proportion of infant births to deaths, I would personally be alarmed. I would ask for a pause in giving it to women who could get pregnant until more investigations can be done.
Apparently, FDA was not at all alarmed by this, did not tell us, but decided to refuse publishing of documents showing that. All they said is that it was “safe and effective for pregnant women”. Because science.
Breastfeeding Sheds Vaccine
Perhaps the most interesting is the sheer number of adverse effects involving INFANTS who were breastfed by vaccinated mothers:
Out of 133 breastfeeding vaccinated mothers reported, there were 17 cases of adverse events in breastfed infants. Three of them were “serious”.
These adverse events show that breastfeeding while vaccinated is not “harmless passing of antibodies”. It created adverse events, including SERIOUS adverse events, in those breastfed infants.
Despite that, the media kept insisting that there are “no Serious COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects”, and “no shedding”, which was a lie, as we now know.
I would say that mothers and pregnant women were misled by the "FDA” and so called “health experts”. They were also misled by people like “Bill McCarthy”, a policy and journalism major who wrote the above gem, who has no health science background, and who misled pregnant and breastfeeding women for money along with the rest of corporate media.
What do you think?
EDIT (6 months later) addition:
Astute reader ChrisCoonsToupee located the VAERS entry for this dead infant.
Why is the data still pending on 238 pregnancies? This always seemed very intentional: stop tracking pregnant women before an outcome (either live birth or fetal death). But these women don't stay pregnant forever if they were in a late 2020 trial ALL would have had or lost their babies by now. It's the simplest most obvious thing to track. And the guy writing the factcheck looks about 20 years old and is unlikely to ever be pregnant or breastfeed, no matter what the science says...
Many will have completely lost trust in the medical establishment over this COVID vaccine programme and who can blame them? The most egregious offence was going outside the high risk groups, i.e. the over 65s. Even if the vaccines had turned out to have a high rate of serious adverse events, as is the case, they could have apologised and claimed it was a worth a try in the vulnerable elderly and not too much damage would have been done in terms of life years lost or loss of trust. Once they went into younger groups and pregnant women, knowing the likely adverse event profile, you can only conclude either a nefarious intent (which could be profits over patients or something worse) or utter incompetence. Either way, they shouldn't ever be trusted again. We need root and branch reform.