Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hidden Markov Respecter's avatar

This seems eerily similar to the way election result came down in the U.S. about a year ago: Simply proclaim the outcome that TPTB desire, then stay up all night manufacturing supporting details. Vaxx-dissidents should now refuse vaxx simply on a basis of knowing that it is all agitprop now. "If it was such a great plan, why do governments insist upon lying, lies upon lies?" Indeed, it is this growing understanding within the population that may be driving vaxx-refusal. I very much hope so.

Expand full comment
kat's avatar

This CDC study (as well as the Kentucky study) are disturbing presentations of cherry-picked random data with no explanation, written incoherently, and makes my brain hurt. They should have better data than this. I still need to read through it several more times just to understand what they did because it's so oddly constructed. One thing I did come across was the glaring conflicts of interest mentioned in the beginning (Pfizer, and other Pharmeceutical companies). This is unacceptable. Are these studies peer reviewed? I can't tell. Either way; < 10 studies vs >90 studies on the Vax immunity vs N.I battle= Still a landslide in the N.I direction with more convincing data. And by the looks of it, this study also points me in that direction with the huge difference in vaxxed population numbers.

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts