132 Comments
User's avatar
Philosopher of Medicine's avatar

You aren't implying the vax isn't safe for pregnant women are you? That would be to promote vaccine hesitancy - which is a punishable crime in these parts! The vax is safe for everyone and everything, including zoo animals and wild rhinos. A doctor I know is on his way to vaccinate a quarantined anaconda right now!

Expand full comment
M. Andersen's avatar

Very good:-)

Jessica Rose after her investigation says:

"Ladies, if you are on the fence about whether or not to keep proceeding with injecting yourselves with what I am calling ‘this shit’, please consider waiting. There is nothing wrong with taking time to assess a complex situation. In fact, it is quite intelligent and self-responsible to do so."

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-female-reproductive-issues-in

I strongly agree.

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

How does an anaconda wear a face mask - it has no ears to hang the mask off? Sticky-back plastic?

Expand full comment
Philosopher of Medicine's avatar

Anacondas are extremely smart creatures. they only wear p100s when they are out grocery shopping. They don't care about the looks they get from others. Because of this the anaconda population has survived for eons without ever being decimated by the contagious pathogen known as a virus that causes pandemics. Now that they are being forcibly vaccinated anacondas will be even healthier and stronger!! For more information on the nature of contagious pathogens, see the following newsletter :

https://thelifesavingdrugillusion.substack.com/p/save-the-world-from-deadly-viruses

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Sperm is made up of proteins...the vaccine is made up of slimy, creepy modifier spike protein MAKERS... Spike proteins are bad v00j00, that's well established...

Question: Is male 'vaccinated' sperm transferring spike proteins????

A nudder question: Are spike proteins the ultimate end game of humanity?

A nudder nudder question: Will the spike protein babies who survive live for very long? Will they be basically AIDS babies? <--that part makes me cry.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

What about vaxxed females, do they shed the spikes during sex? Any idea? I am not being totally serious but I wm wondering.

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

You had better be serious about it; it is even possible having sex is not prerequisite when mere proximity will do, like sharing a bed. As a side note, I refuse to carry the vaxxed in my car.

The issue of transmission (shedding does not quite cut it) has been discussed by the five doctors in Critically Thinking with Dr. P. & Dr. T. (Bitchute; Dr. Tenpenny on Gab for reference). Dr. Merritt was subject to it when treating vaxxed patients, with prolonged nosebleed from which she does not normally suffer. Esp. women seem to be affected (pheromones?), but also men have experienced trouble.

Expand full comment
M. Andersen's avatar

Very interesting and thank you for sharing.

In Denmark we had an article about a sensitive vaccine-free female hotel owner who felt bad when being near vaccinated. She was being ridiculed for only wanting vaccine-free customers.

I felt for her.

How can people condemn what they do not comprehend?

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Ah, so this segregation is to keep the uninjected safe.

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

The injected mask wearing mind laundered make me sick too.

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

I hope the hotelier stuck to her guns; contagious vaccination has become an issue. It used to be that science fiction was something projected into an unlikely future, but now we seem to be in the thick of it, transhumanism and all. Clif High looks at reality through the sci-fi prism:

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HBBwqdoMy7Gz/

If you look at his Most Viewed items, #1 concerns shedding, and so does #3 on the list.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

While your question may have been snarky, you've hit on a developing area of science: transmission of exosomes to others, the first physiological explanation for the phenomenon of shedding. See p. 409-411:

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23

also: https://www.jimmunol.org/content/207/10/2405

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

The Seneff paper is as disturbing as it is interesting. A "must read". I suspect I might have become affected by the vax during a social visit with friends who were double jabbed. So I'm avoiding socializing with them now. I'm doing okay so far as my only symptom of concern is not debilitating.

Expand full comment
M. Andersen's avatar

"Based on these results in murinemodels, we postulate that mRNA-based vaccination of healthy individuals will result not only in Ab responses but also cellularimmunity"

No Ab responses and/or no cellularimmunity?

Sorry mom your baby just were not vaccine healthy! Sorry Grandmom, you and dad were just not vaccine healthy enough!

Who the heck should this vaccine protect if not the babies, the old and the fragile?

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Saline would have been safer and more effective.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Their whole womb would be a spike factory too which explains spontaneous miscarriages. *shudder*

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

If the vaxxed women were to be made to understand that they have done that to themselves...I suspect they'd lose their minds and end up in an asylum.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Wondered that to, exosomes

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

Which begs the question .... if a super hot babe came onto you at a bar... and you knew she was vaxxed ... would you still complete the act? There is the saying 'she's so hot I'd let her give me AIDS'... does that apply here?

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Well, uh..if you really think about it...'AIDS' didn't spread in a vacuum. Just enough a-h0les in the world with zero [or too many ha-ha] effs to give.

One must always be reminded that there are serial killers amongst us and I ain't talkin' Captain Crunch.

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

You had better be serious about it; it is even possible having sex is not prerequisite when mere proximity will do, like sharing a bed. As a side note, I refuse to carry the vaxxed in my car.

The issue of transmission (shedding does not quite cut it) has been discussed by the five doctors in Critically Thinking with Dr. P. & Dr. T. (Bitchute; Dr. Tenpenny on Gab for reference). Dr. Merritt was subject to it when treating vaxxed patients, with prolonged nosebleed from which she does not normally suffer. Esp. women seem to be affected (pheromones?), but also men have experienced trouble.

Expand full comment
Bartram's avatar

I'd suggest that the greatest risk is that the vaccines produce microclotting in the mother's blood. This then would reduce the ability of the placenta to carry oxygen / nutrients to the foetus.

If this is the case then you might expect problems similar to women who smoke during pregnancy -- reduced birth weight, slight cognitive impairment, etc.

I note that the problems associated with smoking during pregnancy took many years to identify, even though the risks are rather significant. This is typical of problems with drugs -- even rather pronounced effects can be difficult to identify unless you actually go out and look for them.

Beyond that, there's a risk that some vaccine side effects are passed onto the unborn child, either directly (mRNA crosses the placenta) or indirectly (autoantibodies are generated by the mother, pass through the placenta, and then produce autoimmune problems in the growing foetus).

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

Wearing an N95 mask (or any mask for that matter) reduces oxygen flow to the mother and the unborn child and results in babies being born extra stupid. They already have a stupid gene passed from the CovIDIOT mother hence the extra stupid outcome

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Okay, this is where it gets sinister.

Some of the vaxx batches have AIDS/Mad Cow/Gene Edits et al

Gene editing A.I. microbots identify your faulty genes and dispose of you if you have a certain percentage of %cancer %heart disease %diabetes

Et al

Think about that.

Mankind already unleashed an effed up flu...

You think mankind can't make the 'cure' more terrifying?

Expand full comment
Hidden Markov Respecter's avatar

The interesting and perhaps good news is that there are some vaxx enthusiast lefty bloggers out there with R.N. (or more) after their name, and (somewhat) surprisingly, they want to get pregnant. So they looked at the data. Found none. Started asking/poking around, found a dearth of data. Started vociferously demanding data and got blown off. Day by day, angry lefty vaxxhappy Karens are turning quietly and then loudly to the smart side that will not make a decision in a vacuum. Welcome to the club, Karen.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Cool. Got any examples? Twitter tweets?

Expand full comment
Hidden Markov Respecter's avatar

I read 3 yesterday from blogs as small as mine. I will make it a point to capture links and report back.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Fringe Minority's avatar

Please do. I love a good Karen story.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Great

Expand full comment
Redpill's avatar

You have no idea how many people on the left have been in unison with you. Did you ever think that the vaccine cartel has hired thousands of trolls to pose as left minded people online to continue to divide & conquer. If you have been following vaccines for the last 15-20 years you would know this has been a tactic of pharma & the government to push the vaccine agenda for children who by the age of 18 would have received 72 doses of 16 vaccines and if they can add this covid crap that will make 74 doses because of boosters. Pharma also has blanket liability from lawsuit for children's vax. They use the same playbook for covid as for children's vax-FEAR PORN.

Does this sound familiar: UNVACCINATED CHILDREN ARE INFECTING VACCINATED CHILDREN WITH MEASLES. CHICKEN POX ETC SO THEY MUST SUBMIT TO VACCINATION OR THEY CAN'T GO TO SCHOOL.

You didn't think that the play unvaccinated people are infecting the vaccinated with covid was new? The CDC/pharma/Fauci has been using the fear porn on parents for about 15 years. Yes, they have used professional trolls to push that agenda and create chaos between parents who want to vax and those that don't. Maybe it's time people take a good long look at children's vaccines and ask why are there only outbreaks of illnesses in highly vaccinated communities-same as with covid.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Truth is a beautiful thing. It can be hated, it can be fought but it can never be denied.

Expand full comment
Unacceptable Fringe Minority's avatar

"You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality" - to paraphrase Ayn Rand

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

BAM!!!!!!!

Expand full comment
Freedom's avatar

That’s a great quote! Fauci sure is doing his best to deny it 😝. Even in the midst of truth having been exposed. Funny and pathetic.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Hard to believe that someone that age never overcame his douche nozzle and grew an actual brain. Oh wait He's SCIENCE! Obviously he is oblivious to the Frankenstein reference in that very proclamation.

Expand full comment
Diana's avatar

My nurse friend told me the reason OB/GYNs weren't (for the most part) speaking up against vaccinating pregnant women is because many of them are scared of catching covid from their patients. She told me there's no way they'll speak up about adverse events because they think it's more important in the long run that everybody receive the injections.

Now, that anybody could STILL believe those things I consider indefensible, and yet...I trust my friend that they do.

Expand full comment
Andrew Venner's avatar

That is sick.

Expand full comment
Kelliann's avatar

They see the side effects. 50 percent increase in post menopausal bleeding (they come in for D&C).

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

But the vaxx doesn't stop transmission, it increases it ... do they not see that? The boosters reduce infection only briefly, to the same rate as the unvaxxed, the double-jabbed get more Covid. Soon, the triple-jabbed will be in the same boat as the current twice-poked.

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

UK keeps better maternity data than just about any other country on earth. There's no way they don't *have* data after August from 2021. The question is: when are they legally obligated to release that data? The only thing I've seen from the UK after August is that investigation into a spike in neonatal deaths in Scotland in September.

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

Are there any countries publishing this data after August 2021? Considering the rollout began Dec 2020, and pregnancy is 9 months, well, this info would be more revealing than some study that ended Feb 2021?

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

So if they want to hide this info, maybe we can look at the rate of births and compare it to the year before? Similarly to how we investigate deaths from clot shots, look at all cause mortality and compare to previous year.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Public health Scotland investigating a spike in neonate deaths, pretty much doubled. Think this was around August, September last year

Expand full comment
Mark Luersen's avatar

They stopped reporting too? If so, incredible. There has to be at least one country or significant geographic area that reports this? I wonder how many successful births there have been in the most heavily vaccinated countries? Not to say a success is exactly successful, I have seen some terrible videos of babies shaking or bleeding. Awful.

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

It’s crazy, everyone has left planet earth and are circling the moon

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

Where you need to enquire is funeral homes. Perhaps a couple months ago I saw a short video of a British funeral director (not John O´Looney, but ca a generation younger) with a 3-year experience. He stressed he had never seen so many dead babies (either aborted and/or stillborn), and that his establishment was running out of space to keep them on ice. If memory serves right, he said while normally there would be one or two, suddenly there were ten or a dozen.

Expand full comment
MHV's avatar

My father is an undertaker and he reports that he’s never been so busy. None of the COD’s are Covid or Covid-related.

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

Someone claimed SCI in the U.S. reported revenue doubling yoy last October. I did not check for there was little reason to disbelieve it.

Expand full comment
Kelliann's avatar

Saw that too

Expand full comment
Robert's avatar

Good point

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

One could expect an increase in pregnancies due to Lockdown.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

I heard the birth rate is lower, I think people have more kids when the environment is positive and life feels secure. And then the vax fertility issues as well.

Expand full comment
lapogus's avatar

This was the original report on the post natal mortality spike which happened in September. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/19726487.investigation-launched-abnormal-spike-newborn-baby-deaths-scotland/

October's numbers were lower, so September may be a been just a freak month. But that said, the September spike may have been due to the timing of when the first cohort of pregnant women in Scotland were jabbed. There is data I think from the USA or Canada which suggests which trimester is also critical for the resultant damage to fetus.

Expand full comment
lapogus's avatar

This suggests it's the first term which is the worst - https://twitter.com/loneran47841994/status/1482033279889035269

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

I haven't found any, and I've been looking! Alberta seems to have actively pulled maternity data after July 2021, which piques my curiosity even more.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Can you tell us what do you know about it? What data was pulled?

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

That's all I know. I wish I knew more. I documented my inept flailings in tedious detail here:

https://methylethyl.dreamwidth.org/12752.html

But all I've got is that every single maternity-data related page on Alberta's open data site gives the message "Effective July 30, 2021 csv file downloads have been removed for this dataset." each one updated August 13, 2021. We're talking at least eighteen different pages: all stillbirths, male stillbirths, female stillbirths, infant deaths, birthweight, gestational age at birth, etc. For example:

https://open.alberta.ca/opendata/alberta-annual-stillbirths-totals

I have no idea what's going on there, I'm terribly curious about it, and it'd be awesome if someone who actually knew what they were looking at would chime in-- for all I know it's a completely innocuous case of "Linda from records retired and nobody can make sense of her files". But the timeframe is suggestive. By my count, that update happened about seven weeks after the big vaccination push for people between the ages of 20-39 in Alberta (i.e. childbearing age). Their downloadable data that is actually available goes through 2020.

Ontario's even more irritating because their maternal-outcomes data goes until June 2020, and then, on the SAME PAGE, they "debunk" claims of high stillbirths (those claims surfaced in November), by citing... data that only goes until June. And in Ontario, it looks like (because they vaxed old people first), they didn't get to 60% of childbearing-age people vaccinated until mid-August. Here's that Ontario page:

https://www.bornontario.ca/en/news/stillbirths-in-ontario-2021.aspx

Expand full comment
Bartram's avatar

The weekly update of the same data is ridiculous.

The safety of the vaccines during pregnancy (or even whether there are risks of prior vaccination for pregnancy) is extremely important; you don't find out if there has been a problem in development until birth unless it is a terrible problem (limbs missing, etc), and many problem don't become apparent until the baby is about 1 year of age. Thus you think that they'd be expending huge efforts to track any potential problems -- but instead they're behaving as though the data to August is 'enough' and that there's no need to update.

I'd be slightly sympathetic if there was a dire emergency and that the numbers affected were low -- but they're trying to get every single pregnant woman in the western world vaccinated. They could readily spend a tiny fraction of the money that is used for tracking/testing and get some really good regularly updated information.

But, of course, they don't want to do this -- if a problem emerges then it is the authorities' fault for encouraging vaccination. If they just do the minimum then the problems probably won't be found for a while, at which point those in power currently will have moved onto their next job and they'll be able to say 'but nobody knew'. In the UK this is called plausible deniability, and it is a tool that politicians know about and use strategically.

They should be forced to do much more work investigating potential issues with the vaccines (all, not just in pregnancy) -- so long as those currently in power are the ones that chose what investigations will be undertaken we'll not see any rigourous investigations into vaccine risks.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

What is happening is a CRIME. Instead of collecting data, CDC is an ad agency for Pfizer and a bad news coverup crew.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Can we just flucking address the fact that this is still an EXPERIMENTAL drug drummed up by the same mad scientists who unleashed the disease for which they readily had the 'cure'?

Good gawd. I feel too woke. <--met with laughter and tears

Expand full comment
Bartram's avatar

Just to give one example of the time taken to diagnose a developmental problem, Foetal Alcohol Syndrome, a serious developmental problem resulting from the mother drinking (lots of) alcohol during pregnancy, is typically diagnosed between 9 and 18 months of age.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Krikey! What a horrific and relevant analogy. :(((((

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

Of course, that one's complicated by the part where, in order to get a FAS diagnosis, mom has to *admit* that she drank (lots of) alcohol while pregnant. Which is a big part of why it takes so long, and why a lot of them never get dxed.

Expand full comment
Lioness of Judah Ministry's avatar

Premeditated Genocide. They have all the truth any thinking person needs to realise that this vax is an evil experiment on humanity, in their own documents nobody is reading:

The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan" Welcome to the Medical Inquisition

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-safety-of-mrna-vaccines

Pay attention to the predictive programming, the next phase of the Plandemic might be coming soon: Get Ready For The Next One The Next Plandemic: Smallpox, Marburg, or both? https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/get-ready-for-the-next-one

All planned years in advance:

The Olympics Rituals of 1992/2012 "Predicted" The Corona Operation: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-corona-end-game-addendum

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Spike proteins serving as an abortifacient brought to you by the pro abortionist, scorched earth wachadoodles.

Expand full comment
Jestre's avatar

That confidence interval is huge lol. If I remember correctly, the vaccinated also had more premature births

Expand full comment
HenriO's avatar

They only hide the bad data. There is also silence in a related area: what is the incidence of birth defects in mothers who were injected before they got pregnant? (We know the “vaccine” lipid nanoparticles have an affinity for the ovaries.)

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

If the data that they are releasing is bad ... assume the real data is much worse.

Expand full comment
Freedom's avatar

I have a niece expecting her first child in March. I’m anxious/scared for her and her unborn child. (She has been inoculated)

Expand full comment
David Watson's avatar

"Do the math" is the fundamental problem for this whole disaster. Math illiteracy is a growing problem in prosperous western nations, both for the public who are being herded to panic, and their government and bureaucratic masters who are cracking the whips. Our decline is driven by unwillingness to learn hard sciences and the failure of the education system to teach it. Destructive political decisions are actually made by credentialed charlatans who present misleading information to decision makers unequipped to question them.

"Innumerancy" was a fun book on this topic several decades ago. Still relevant.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Math is racist, Western centric and makes disadvantaged people feel bad.

Expand full comment
David Watson's avatar

Victims of racism usually don't realize they construct the basis for that racism by avoiding learning things (like math) they need to compete in life. Uncompetitive people of any color get disadvantaged. They made a movie about a ghetto teacher that forced kids to learn math. I wonder how they turned out. If they were successful it might make a good sequel. Otherwise, maybe the racists are right. A lot of people prefer it that way. I'd bet on the kids.

Expand full comment
David Watson's avatar

Here's some clues -- https://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/09/prweb279988.htm

Jaime Escalante, East LA. Kids turned out well.

Expand full comment
NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter's avatar

CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG

How did Moderna's 2015 patented code end up in SARS-CoV-2 and what were they developing in 2017?

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/ctcctcggcgggcacgtag

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

great article

Expand full comment
M. Andersen's avatar

Thats extremely relevant and interesting. Newspunch also has the story.

https://newspunch.com/smoking-gun-moderna-patented-man-made-sars-cov2-gene-sequence-in-2018/

Expand full comment
Paul Budney's avatar

I fear medical science and science in general have become politicized

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

I have seen a video with two Canadian doctors- Dr Nagase and Dr Mel Bruchet. In the video they purport that one hospital had, I believe, 38 stillbirths over 6 months and they said they verified all the women were vaxed. I did not see any hard data to back up these claims.

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

The first part of the video discusses the stillbirths.

Expand full comment
Yarrow's avatar

Yeah, I've been trying to track down their sources, but it's all "we heard this from some doulas"-- impossible to verify at this point. But Canada does have some sort of mandatory open-data type reporting for these numbers. They have to be made public. The problem is the reporting lag-- anywhere from six to more than twelve months, depending on what state/province/country you're looking at.

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

Right. what happened to Dr Bruchet is frightening, but I would like data to back up the claims regarding the stillbirths.

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

Jessica Rose looked into VAERS; it provides a good outline of the issues. https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-female-reproductive-issues-in

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

OMG. Please find the video and link it!

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

Ok. I have to switch to my laptop. I saw it on Jessica Rose’s sub stack.

Expand full comment
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ's avatar

Thankies. It's so important!

Expand full comment