Is someone actually saying that infant mortality would have been reduced if the babies had been killed before they were born? I'm a pro-choice person, but that logic is kind of twisted.
"In possibly the most amusing twist, ABC News found a “health expert” who laid the blame for increases in child mortality on Republicans, abortions, and the Supreme Court."
Apparently white people, Jews, Christians or heterosexuals were unavailable to take the blame this time.
I’m not aware of any other Covid skeptic who's asked this question: WHY would it be so important to push the start date of virus spread back several months? In this speculative deep dive, I identified several possible answers to this question.
Restrictions to abortions' access will eventually benefit childrens health, because these operations are harmful for women and they might have pregnancy issues later in life when they decide to have babies.
However, as we know infant and neonatal mortality has increased in all heavily vaxxed countries, where abortion legislation has not been changed recently. How will legacy media spin this fact?
I'm intrigued by the fact that infant mortality increased from 2001 to 2002 (20 years ago). They were phasing out thimerosal from infant vaccines in that time period. (No need to actually RECALL vaccines loaded with mercury - it's just babies we're talking about!) The phaseout happened from 1999 to about 2002. My older daughter was born in 2000.
I'm sure you know this, but the US has about the highest infant mortality rate in the developed world, and it has the most aggressive vaccine schedule in the world. It's the only country that vaccinates all infants for Hep B when Hep B isn't endemic. The only thing one can say that's good about the US vaccine schedule is that they took mercury out of most of the vaccines, but they replaced it in a lot of cases with aluminum, and the dangers of aluminum (and other adjuvants) is not well known.
Also, the infant mortality rate went down in 2020 - we think it's probably because so many babies were missing their routine vaccines because of COVID.
So white women still have the advantage over minorities even with a higher infant mortality rate. I guess that's a good thing what with depopulation and such. Why the negativity? 😉
I would be far less angry if this was all entirely voluntary with fully informed consent.
But it was mandated in the most insidious ways, sneering , belittling, threatening livelihoods and worse, leaving most feeling they had no choice. This makes it culpable homicide in my eyes.
Igor are you sure about sepsis being caused by immune suppression? That's not what the Wikipedia article says. It says the immune suppression follows the first stage of sepsis, doesn't it?
Is someone actually saying that infant mortality would have been reduced if the babies had been killed before they were born? I'm a pro-choice person, but that logic is kind of twisted.
"In possibly the most amusing twist, ABC News found a “health expert” who laid the blame for increases in child mortality on Republicans, abortions, and the Supreme Court."
Apparently white people, Jews, Christians or heterosexuals were unavailable to take the blame this time.
Am I the only one concerned about Minoritized Communities?
I retract my previous vote... it WAS global warming after all!
Just look at what that bad boy is up to:
https://www.sciencealert.com/a-shocking-number-of-americans-face-death-from-future-heat
By far the biggest driver of infant mortality is abortion.
“Word Salad”, now there’s a picture worth a thousand bits of shredded lettuce.
Does anyone know what is going on with the OPENVAERS website? It hasn't updated in over a MONTH!
Thanks for another important story, Igor!
I’m not aware of any other Covid skeptic who's asked this question: WHY would it be so important to push the start date of virus spread back several months? In this speculative deep dive, I identified several possible answers to this question.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-pandemics-start-date-had-to-be?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
You cannot make that up. Infant mortality is caused by not killing enough infants.
Restrictions to abortions' access will eventually benefit childrens health, because these operations are harmful for women and they might have pregnancy issues later in life when they decide to have babies.
However, as we know infant and neonatal mortality has increased in all heavily vaxxed countries, where abortion legislation has not been changed recently. How will legacy media spin this fact?
I'm intrigued by the fact that infant mortality increased from 2001 to 2002 (20 years ago). They were phasing out thimerosal from infant vaccines in that time period. (No need to actually RECALL vaccines loaded with mercury - it's just babies we're talking about!) The phaseout happened from 1999 to about 2002. My older daughter was born in 2000.
I'm sure you know this, but the US has about the highest infant mortality rate in the developed world, and it has the most aggressive vaccine schedule in the world. It's the only country that vaccinates all infants for Hep B when Hep B isn't endemic. The only thing one can say that's good about the US vaccine schedule is that they took mercury out of most of the vaccines, but they replaced it in a lot of cases with aluminum, and the dangers of aluminum (and other adjuvants) is not well known.
Also, the infant mortality rate went down in 2020 - we think it's probably because so many babies were missing their routine vaccines because of COVID.
So white women still have the advantage over minorities even with a higher infant mortality rate. I guess that's a good thing what with depopulation and such. Why the negativity? 😉
So if they had been aborted thee would have been less infant mortality? Is that what they are trying to say?
I would be far less angry if this was all entirely voluntary with fully informed consent.
But it was mandated in the most insidious ways, sneering , belittling, threatening livelihoods and worse, leaving most feeling they had no choice. This makes it culpable homicide in my eyes.
Igor are you sure about sepsis being caused by immune suppression? That's not what the Wikipedia article says. It says the immune suppression follows the first stage of sepsis, doesn't it?