31 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
The Great Santini's avatar

Do they owe us an apology? Absolutely. But we owe them and their victims justice. At a minimum, these vaccine happy people should lose their jobs, their licenses and every dime they made from the vaccine. All the money should be put in a fund to compensate the vaccine injured.

Expand full comment
TriTorch's avatar

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong. --Thomas Sowell

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

Imagine if our “educators” were steeped in Sowell rather than Marxism.

Expand full comment
Tim's avatar

Even more so when those people make bucket loads of money on the back of those decisions being implemented.

Expand full comment
An Ominous's avatar

Sowell food...for thought.

Expand full comment
Sirka Sie's avatar

I couldn’t agree more but it will NEVER happen, the more time that goes by the more they will ignore the injured and hope we will too. My view on humanity is at an all time low. I will NEVER comply but man there are so many that do and will for the next Plandemic.

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

I’m surprised at how many are FINALLY waking up. My bandmates were heavily in on the narrative. Guitarist is jab injured. Thought that injury was a “conspiracy theory”. Singer was really all in. Now she knows 4 people who just died suddenly. Now they are listening to what I have to say, paying close attention. My biggest adversary on Covid just admitted that he can’t defend anything anymore and it was all for naught. There is a glimmer of hope.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

maybe we need to attack the tires of every functionary whose business is to do something stupid like visiting a farmer to tell them that their ducks need to be killed because the functionary has been told by his bosses that those ducks have a pathogenic virus. There is of course no proof of the existence of any pathogenic virus anywhere in our "reality", but quit worrying about things like reality.

Then we need to spread the rumor that the whole "pathogenic virus" scam was invented by Michelin to sell tires.

Expand full comment
kertch's avatar

Unless the virus can jump from ducks to humans (a dubious assumption) why kill the ducks? The ducks that survive will develop immunity to the virus, which is usually the vast majority of them. It makes no sense to kill any ducks whatsoever.

Expand full comment
uselesseater's avatar

It makes sense if the goal is to decrease the food supply.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

Kertch, consider that it's perhaps worse than that. There are NO PATHOGENIC VIRUS beasts in reality. It's just a psy-op to use fear as a weapon and maintain the control of the same bastards who use fiat money as a weapon in spite of the real possibility that "good guys" could use fiat money to guide humanity toward better days.

We are agreed that it doesn't make sense to kill ducks other than to eat their lovely flesh.

Expand full comment
Penelope Powell's avatar

The idea that there are no pathogen viruses is an idea being pushed by the Intelligence "community" to drag us back into distraction and disunity. Please don't lend yourself to this ignorant dogmatism.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

and if you have the courage to admit your error, then you should look up the two pathogenic "virus" discovery Nobel prizes. The tobacco mosaic "virus" and the polio "virus.

Read about the experiments which were awarded nobel prizes.

Show me what the control was in each.

For me, my schooling told me that a "control" is not OPTIONAL in a scientific experiment.

I can't find a control in either.

Perhaps you can show me that.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

ok. I get it, I need to act like I agree with you when I firmly believe you to be wrong in the name of unity? That is a psychopathic characteristic you are demonstrating. You have ruled out debate, just want to use negative emotions to manipulate others. Until you grow up a little bit I don't particularly want to be unified with you because with your bad attitudes no success in any domain will be possible. Debate is necessary. When you'll have understood that, you'll be where you need to be.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

then show me your proof of the existence of pathogenic virus. How do you know that you don't have it backwards? My clue that you have it backwards is that you are going to be unable to show me any proof that this alleged non-life form exists.

Are you going to have an open mind about this once you're forced to admit that you have zero proof of the existence of pathogenic virus?

Expand full comment
kertch's avatar

The existence of pathogenic viruses is not the point. Let's say there ARE pathogenic viruses in reality. If so, the measures taken to "protect" us from these "duck viruses" makes no sense. There is no evidence that they can jump from ducks to humans. The genetic differences are excessively large. So killing ducks BEFORE they get the virus is like killing a population of humans BEFORE they get Covid in order to protect the rest of us humans. You know - destroy the village to save it. It's lunacy, at best.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

I was thinking that it was a different sort of lunacy. Reminiscent of "we had to kill the village to save the village" from "America" 's escapades in Vietnam. They are saying that they are killing the ducks to protect other ducks. But the point IS that there are no pathogenic virus particles. They are simply killing birds all over because they don't want people like duck farmers to be able to provide food to their neighbors in exchange for other things which don't need to be passed through the central offices of the Rothschild bank.

They won't be satisfied until they have a cut of everything and they have understood that they'll need to kill the vast majority of us to accomplish this and they won't hesitate for a minute.

Expand full comment
Lili's avatar

This reminds me of a recent speech John Kerry made signaling that agriculture produces around 33% of the global co2 and therefore must be addressed as part of "the solution". If we want to be able to feed the people of the world, we must be prepared to kill off the cattle and destroy the farmlands.......? How does this kind of bizarre logic (or lack thereof) get accepted by the masses? All of this is insane!

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

of course it is. their plan seems to be feeding us insects we can't digest or growing tumors indoors to feed us. They'll probably walk away from the insect idea cause we could do that ourselves, though they could also just make it illegal to grow our own insects because only a big rich company could do it "safely". So they'd protect us all by keeping small business from selling us our insects. Those who survive will need to figure out how to run a small business which is not visible. They'll be firing microwave radiation down on us from the sky (thank Lone Skum (elon musk)). We'll need to take lessons from the vietcong.

Expand full comment
Lili's avatar

I'm kind of hoping I don't live long enough to see all that come about.... :-(

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

I hope you do, not so you suffer, but so that you can see that our lives are a high level (for us) video game. We need to believe that this is the only gig in town to deal with the interesting part. The interesting part is to have the courage to be ready to give up that life for the right cause. The vaccinated who continue to believe the medical scam will die. They could stop believing it now and likely find a way to detox their bodies. Plenty of good researchers who are actually scientists and not gov't or finance shills are finding things. Kurt Vonnegut got it 60 years ago. He suggested that medical science was making us stronger by weeding out the ones who couldn't figure out what it takes to survive. They'll be gone but not forgotten, and they'll all get plenty more chances. Just not in this life.

Expand full comment
BJ's avatar

Look at the bright side of all of this and the reason I believe RFK Jr not only decided to run for POTUS but will also succeed. By next year they will not be able to bury the number of deaths (pun deliberately intended) caused by these lethal injections! KEEP referring to RFK Jr. as anti-vax because when all is said and done EVERYONE will be anti-vax! And, the extra added bonus is his staunch stance for SAFE vaccines and putting an end the captured pharmaceutical industry! This is exactly why they fear him!

Expand full comment
Rob Polans's avatar

Some did it just because management told them to plus there was a $200 bonus that week. A sort of friend did that. poor guy.

Expand full comment
Rob Polans's avatar

I saw his wife with her new girlfriend recently yech.

Expand full comment
Fast Eddy's avatar

Ya... but it protects from severe illness and death!!! hahahahahahaaha

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

no. we need to bring about a system with no incentive to do such horrible things. Anything less, and we'll always be complaining and never be profiting from life.

Expand full comment
Deb Hawthorne's avatar

An apology????

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Absolutely and more. People are dead and permanantly disabled thanks to these moral monsters. Justice should not overlook that fact.

Expand full comment