They Tried Hard NOT to Find Anything!
I finally figured out how to ask people who might answer, without taking up bandwidth!
Unrelated... Need help with finding something:
Do you know any examples of vaccine advocates or activists, or misinformation fighters, who were hurt by vaccines, or had relatives who died, and yet CONTINUED or DISCONTINUED their advocacy?
I already know about Michel Goldman from the Atlantic/Brian Mowrey article, and Aseem Malhotra, but need more examples.
I guarantee if it’s in the body it’s going to show up in the breast milk. That’s how breast milk works.
CDC employees celebrated the removal of Del Bigtree on Youtube.
Bigtree has been far more accurate and truthful than the CDC ever was.
Congrats CDC. Losers.
What about plain old logic? If I drink alcohol that alcohol surely travels through breast milk, as does garlic, spicy food, and medication of all types— even lotions, soaps, and hair dye. But I’m supposed to suspend the belief, pending a “scientific study,” that a chemical injection into my bloodstream would somehow NOT find its way into my breast milk?
Are we so stupid anymore that we need a peer reviewed study of 113 samples to confirm what a village idiot would know without even thinking about it! I’m so tired of these science fights! Let’s stop buying into this gaslighting era mantra “it’s not real unless you can prove it by methods we select” bullshit. Common sense, gut intuition, confidence in basic knowledge, folks.
My main question is whether gates and cdc are directing the scam or being directed to support it. Bills involvement of so many aspects of this disaster seems to support him being in charge. I hope he lives long enough to explain his actions in the new Nuremberg trials.
Gates is pure evil
Bill Gates is a big funder of the WHO. As recently as 2014 WHO was involved in attempting (and in some cases succeeding) in making a large number of African women infertile without the women's consent or knowledge. The WHO started working on ways to reduce population in the 1990s - possibly a little earlier. They formulated a vaccine for tetanus combined with HCG - to cause antibodies to HCG - a hormone important for maintaining pregnancy. It is too awful to realize these people play games with other people's lives with no thought or care. It's hard for me to wrap my brain around that kind of evil.
This is a movie put out by Children's Health Defense about the African women: https://infertilitymovie.org/
Thirteen samples taken? That’s not science. If 1 in 100 found toxicity in vaccinated milk that is too much. ‘1% isn’t much.’ ‘1% of babies died!! That’s not much?’ ‘Well...99 lived’. They take 13 samples from seven women only and declare it is safe? Why not the same amount from each woman? Why not right after, 24 hours later, one week later, one month later, three months later? How about someone vaxed during pregnancy, vaxed one week after birth, etc. neither study is properly done.
This is how these evils do psyops: pay off some corrupted scientists through multi-layers of funding, publish bogus papers with fake data, quote the paper with their media puppets and bots to push their narratives. We are seeing the same tactics from virus origin, early treatments, vaccine safety...
After doing a Grand Genetic Experiment where 60% of the world population got the substance and 40% left for control, no bad study surprises me anymore. We have a new record, everything else pales in comparison.
Although, calling it an "experiment" is unjust, they knew what they were doing.
All these "official" sponsored studies seem to have been designed in such a way as to present a pre-designated outcome. Built to mislead, not study. This includes the pfizer trials themselves and the conflation of relative and absolute efficacy.
This includes a heap of the safety studies and how they have been released. The whole thing screams corruption through and through. The devil really is in the details.
Thanks and well caught, excellent analysis.
there are two ways to manipulate studies : one is the use of faulty statistical analysis and the other, amply illustrated here, is through the study design and protocol. This happens far more frequently than some would imagine and, sadly, even the Peer review process (where relevant) doesn't always pick up such design abuse.
A third element to this is that such studies find it difficult to get funding other than from a party with a vested interest in the outcome. Again as well illustrated here. Such is the world of "science" and medical "research" today. Like so many aspects of the world we find ourselves living in today, it needs a fresh start.
I remember very well media here poo-pooing any dangers posed by the miracle winkccine to the menstrual cycles or breastfeeding or anything of that nature in 2021.
Obviously they were looking with their heads up their asses. It’s hard to see anything but poop
Sorry I was crude in my first post. You did a great job explaining. Nicely done. Now if any of them would just care enough to be honest and maybe a little poorer. That would be wonderful.
Bill Gates has mommy dearest issues.