Vaccination Increases MIS-C!
I have not read all of this material yet; just wanted to reiterate that YOU ARE A PRICELESS GEM ~ who else is even toying with the idea of pouring this amount of time, energy, effort, and commitment to truth-seeking into this type of oversight? (Possible trick question, in that we all know the answer is "virtually NO ONE." ) THANK YOU ~
These covid jabs may result in more deaths than every genocidal story I've ever heard, or not heard about in human history. And the people behind this program appear to have no intention of shutting it down. I falsely assumed last year that covid jabs would be a thing of the past after 50K+ adverse effects had been reported. This insanity on steroids!
This is why people are still wearing masks, getting boosted and lining their children up for these gene therapies. Public health officials are lying!!! It’s so infuriating. In my mind, it’s not a case of educated vs uneducated when considering who is falling for this crap. It’s a case of who trusts public health officials vs those who have a little bit of skepticism. Those with a little bit of skepticism are those who are willing to see that public health officials are cooking all the data to support this insanity. My only question is whether or not the people making up all these stupid fake studies (or rather fake conclusions) are just brainwashed into being useful idiots, or if they are protecting their own self interest and careers, or trying to cull the population, or usher in a biomedical fascist system? Or who knows what else might be there motivation. I’m sure there are many, many different reasons people are signing on to junk science. This reminds me of the study the CDC put out showing that masks work. Or the studies from pharma showing the “vaccines” work. It’s all garbage. I hope I never need medical care. I’ll be doing everything in my power to avoid our current medical system. Time to go work in my garden.
Ugh. I just don’t understand how people can live with themselves after being this intellectually dishonest. I blame them for all those still living life constantly terrified of this virus and I blame them for the deaths of who have died from the aftermath of this insanity. I have a friend who literally wears a mask and has hung an air purifier about her neck to walk around with. I am not making that up. My sister and I invited our cousin to lunch this summer at a restaurant and when she arrived she had a panic attack because she had not been in a restaurant for two years. And she was even hospitalized after her vaccine and was still planning to keep getting doses! Trusting people are being victimized every single day by these “scientists” who basically commit outright fraud. How do we make it stop? Who will prosecute these crimes? There just too many involved that it feels insurmountable.
Excellent analysis, Igor!
This is how epidemiology science is done nowadays. Instead of analyzing data and drawing conclusions from them, the “conclusion” is made beforehand (COVID vaccines significantly improve this or that) and to support this “finding,” the data is then arbitrarily selected and tweaked to fit that conclusion.
Most people, including medical professionals, are unable to uncover these shinanigans, because they lack the required mathematical and statistical skills. That’s why we’re so thankful for your articles!
I would just like to point out that there’s a link between the inflammatory response caused by the COVID vaccines (both acute, such as MIS-C, and chronic inflammation) and the suppressed ability of the vaccinated people’s immune systems to fight against infections and cancer:
If you have armed forces (= the immune system) dragged through an ongoing war against a practically indestructible opponent (= chemicals and toxins in the COVID vaccine), the armed forces won’t be readily available to fight on yet another front (= against infections and cancer cells). And when they arrive, they’d be tired, less effective and more likely to miss the opponent, causing even more collateral damage than usual - which leads to further inflammation.
There are more reasons for the suppression of both acquired and innate immunity by the COVID vaccines, but this is one of them.
What do you call people who compare vaccination v. covid?
Morons, because they fail to realize the vaccinated people can get covid and you will almost certainly end up with the same people in both groups.
Since nobody is ever, truly, 'fully vaccinated' -- there's always another booster around the corner -- I suppose the CDC could argue there were zero MIS-C cases amongst the "fully vaccinated" ;-).
That sounds ridiculous, of course, but it's the reductio ad absurdum of ignoring cases that happen in the first 14 days post-jab, or even worse, considering them 'unvaccinated'.
When you take a pill you're considered medicated. Ask the police or customs.
The 14 day rule where people are injected and counted as unvaccinated is meant to skew reality.
We all know plenty of people who got covid immediately after the jab. It is clearly statistical fraud.
Igor, thank you for all the work you must have put in to this. I think you said it took you 9 hours! I love the way you explain stuff. I’m right on the edge of not understanding it all but you pull me through it every time, if I concentrate hard enough! Keep up the good work 😀
I read this whole argument carefully. It seems to me that you reallocation of children into the correct categories is completely defensible. Indeed, it seems to me that a complete stretch to exclude so many vaccinated children. It is almost as if the paper's authors had an agenda. Lastly, this kind of data manipulation in publications should be caught through peer review. The fact that it isn't speaks volumes on the state of the medical profession today.
Absolutely brilliant & superb clarity of presentation
At this point, we could probably assume that the CDC has access to the 'missing' data and would have included it if it were positive, so.....
Thank you so much, Igor, for your excellent analysis on MIS-C in relation to the vaccine. It is one of the issues I was looking at myself last spring. I even published an article on my Substack last April that asked whether public health officials were actually faking child deaths, using the MIS-C diagnosis, to pressure parents into vaccinating their children. (Sadly, there is some evidence for this.)
When I looked at the CDC studies at that time, I found the same thing you found here: The studies were heavily manipulated, specifically by picking and choosing which patients to include and exclude. I wrote: "...for months the CDC has been using the threat of MIS-C to frighten parents into vaccinating their children. However, MIS-C has been linked in published reports to both Covid-19 and the Covid-19 vaccine. Whether the vaccine or the virus is more likely to cause MIS-C is unclear. The CDC appears to be going out of its way to suppress any data that could answer this question...."
In fact, every vaccine-related study I looked at from the CDC was heavily manipulated in exactly the same way: The researchers included the children who could help them make their case for the vaccine and found arbitrary reasons to exclude hundreds of children that would have weakened their case for the vaccine.
I eventually gave up looking at CDC-sponsored studies because it was so time-consuming and ultimately, disappointing to realize just how dishonest the agency was. I'm glad you haven't given up, though, because this information still needs to get out there.
Ultimately, these types of studies, where the sample size is small and patients can be excluded for arbitrary reasons, need to be abolished altogether -- and government funding for them banned outright. Large studies that compare health outcomes in vaccinated (including a single dose of ANY Covid vaccine) vs. unvaccinated, with no easy way to manipulate the outcome, are the only honest method of determining vaccine safety and efficacy. Everything else belongs in the garbage.
You mean, Multisystem Inflammation is more likely
when giving a vaccine that mixes decades of molecular design tricks that specifically aim to ignite acute severe inflammatory response?? (with the theory of provoking lasting immune memory)
Igor, you are demonstrating a flaw that all CDC Studies have, including their atrocious VSafe Pregnancy study, that I urge you to look at next.
The CDC remove subjects from the study, they cherry pick subjects they want included, and most Importantly they do not test all subjects of a large cohort and Control groups- they do not test ALL subjects for blood and tissue bio markers of the outcome measures, side effects, Infection, S Spike Protein levels, nor Specific Antibody levels.
In the CDC Pregnancy Study they never confirmed any subjects Pregnancy with a blood test!! They used a small time frame, they never confirmed a birth nor a miscarriage nor tested all subjects for blood bio markers of side effects or Complications of pregnancy nor did they examine any fetus!!
I commend you for analyzing the Fraudulent CDC STUDIES! Now we must go to court- the CDC and FDA must be served a cease and desist desist order!
Just what should be the punishment for deliberately harming children? For such malice? Simple question. I believe there is a simple answer.
great catches igor! how about this for a possible confounder: how many of the unjabbed kids had parents who were jabbed? shedding maybe?
Yet another new category from the DOJ:
You might be a domestic terrorist if your kid has NOT had MIS-C.