I'm sure they did, and were reassured that no matter the results, they could say ivermectin didn't work: if it didn't, then they would ignore the p value. If it did, it would not be statistically significant. They must have s**t their pants when it worked so well it almost reached significance even with the low power.
I'm sure they did, and were reassured that no matter the results, they could say ivermectin didn't work: if it didn't, then they would ignore the p value. If it did, it would not be statistically significant. They must have s**t their pants when it worked so well it almost reached significance even with the low power.
I'm sure they did, and were reassured that no matter the results, they could say ivermectin didn't work: if it didn't, then they would ignore the p value. If it did, it would not be statistically significant. They must have s**t their pants when it worked so well it almost reached significance even with the low power.
Nah, the last ditch effort is to abort the trial (as I think was done for a UK trial). no need for new undies.