I trust noone who refuses to debate and/or silences and smears. I chose to trust people who had nothing to gain and everything to lose. That worked well for me throughout this disgusting lunacy.
Trust the science. It gave us electricity. Not really. An inventor gave us electricity. More like engineering gave it to us. Most of medical science DOES NOT WORK.
I believe the end was to reduce the human population which seems to always be the aim of leftists or at least an unintended consequence of their actions.
I say it is time to give them what they want. Reduce the human population. But my method they will likely find distasteful because it includes rounding up the leftists and disposing of them permanently. I don't think at this point we need to dive as deeply as the leftist voters, they are simply useful idiots who have been lead astray. But I do believe we need to start with the politicians and academia and purge the ranks of all that have been corrupted and have beliefs that are no longer realistic.
Start with those who came up with the pandemic and the vaccine and then move to those spouting CRT, trans ideology and other ideas that serve only to divide in the pursuit of power.
It would be cathartic to watch them pay the ultimate price for their deeds and I believe we can dispense with the need for trials in many cases, the evidence is clear and the judicial system already too corrupt to be able to actually dispense justice.
Thank you for your diligent work Igor. It is very much appreciated. Unfortunately I am on 480 a month social security and currently staying in a homeless shelter so am unable to upgrade to paid.
I see two things when HIV and SARS-CoV-2 are connected. The first thing is Fauci, who I believe created both. Second is the colour red, when the rage sets in.
Instinct tells me that he relishes being a mass murderer, and probably touches himself when he considers his global accomplishments.
For 60 years I felt that peaceful yet convincing words combined with good acts was enough. Now I just want blood. Hardly a day goes by that I am not angered, and it does not feel good. (Yet)
I do NOT “trust the science” as an unequivocal source of truth and, even prior to our current “troubles,” I didn’t trust it blindly...but almost.
Now I’ve gone in completely the opposite direction. I have learned more from you and a few others about “the science” than in my college microbiology studies and work in years beyond those.
I feel powerless against these arrogant, soulless scientists and researchers who continue to meddle in these things. I fear for our children...youngest of 7 is now 19. What of them? Will they be able to forge their lives, raise their own kids, carry on traditions, etc.? These things trouble me deeply.
'The science' is making a mess of the civil order.
Incidentally, in the 'trust the science' quilt of titles, there's one with Dr. Joe Schwarz out of McGill. I listened to him for years and even communicated with him on a number of occasions. Always answered. I really respected him.
Then he went full Covid-shill. I contacted him about masks and spoke nothing like the man who preached empirical evidence. I asked him for evidence he was relying on (knowing he would not be able to provide one) to support masks (and I believe mandates even) and he responded by referring to that study in Syria where they put masks on hamsters. I stared at my screen in disbelief (while thinking of Lisa doing her science experiment on Bart).
A. Science is used for forced compliance [plandemic/climate change/men in women's protected spaces].
B. Science is used to affirm fairy-tales (i.e., men/women are interchangeable, the dreaded 'climate change' again) and 'vaccines' are good for you [because they have electrolytes].
C. Science is used as a hard-line religion and all 'non-believers' are heretics, infidels and morons.
"Science is not a person whose trustworthiness we can gauge. Science is a collection of human beings called “scientists,” who have all sorts of motivations and incentives. Some are honest, and some are not. Some can resist groupthink and peer pressure, but many cannot. Science is complicated, fascinating, and often wrong on matters of crucial importance."
During the scamdemic state-run mainstream media news was determined to convince the gullible to believe science is a religion and therefore the mRNA experimental toxin must be a miracle from God. Unfortunately, many were believers in this new found pharma-theology and demonstrated blind faith by taking the plunge, hence were baptized by either Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J. For many the baptism turned out to be a "sacrifice at the alter" as they suffered a stroke, developed neurological conditions, had a recurrence of cancer, or just suddenly died. That's surely a test of "blind faith" which clever skeptics were reluctant to partake in, but church elders, bureaucrats, and Rabbis insisted they participate in this ritual if they wanted to remain part of the "employed" flock.
But in all seriousness, the Wuhan Lab as well as all other biological warfare labs are made possible by a stupendous military budget compounded by Fauci's taxpayer billions which he carefully allocated to ensure his big pharma bosses profited to the max. It should be mentioned, that early on the HIV connection to SARS-CoV-2 was explained away by saying it was an attempt to find a cure for AIDS. It should also be stressed, that someone can contract HIV and never get AIDS. That being said, I think in many cases the mRNA injection triggered retroviruses or cancers which were in remission.
Obviously, science like everything else in life could be good or bad. A knife can cut a piece of cheese, or it could stab someone to death. A laboratory can do life saving research, but if directed by psychopaths the same lab will produce products that could be quite diabolical. That brings to mind the neuralink chip that's suppose to make a paraplegic into a ballerina. Unfortunately, the experimental chimps who were tortured to death by a miracle lithium chip never did a pirouette.
Apr 22, 2023·edited Apr 22, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov
I covered one aspect of Wuhan lab HIV pseudoviruses here:
Root cause of COVID-19? Biotechnology's dirty secret: Contamination. Bioinformatics evidence demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory, unlikely to be a bioweapon but most likely a result of sloppy experiments
In the DARPA world of dual use research of concern, when you say "potential" it probably doesn't have the same connotations as it does for most laymen. Anthrax, examined by Robert Koch in 1870, when he developed Koch's Postulates, to validate causation, had "potential" for spillover, but it's a bacterial agent with the Trouble with Tribbles life of its own, not a virus that requires a living host to replicate, importing problems of control.
Anthrax had potential, but it has an infectious dose of between 8,000 and 50,000 spores, which is not an opportunistic, casual contact disease, and can be controlled.
What is the infectious dose for COVID-19? We've been able to determine this since 1870 through Koch's Postulates, the How Many Licks Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Tootsie Roll Pop Test. And today with E6 Vero cells we don't require a human challenge study.
In February 2020, Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan validated causation through Koch's Postulates on Syrian hamsters, and determined it required 100,000 to ten million particles to infect a Syrian hamster, which should require more to infect a human. This is why no infected animals were discovered at the wet market.
In March 2022, Ben Killingsley finally published his human challenge study results, on only 36 volunteers between the ages of 18 and 25, and he found that after being intranasally inoculated with live, wild virus, only 18 of 36 were infected with just ten particles, a uniquely adapted biological agent, but not everyone was vulnerable to that dosage. Do they have "natural immunity"? No. They just require more.
The Guangzhou restaurant study published in Emerging Infectious Disease, determined it required up to an hour to infect ten people in an area measuring only 30 square meters in a dining room measuring 145 square meters. A total of 93 people were in the dining room, including eight staff who didn't receive enough exposure to be infected. But everyone in that kill box, age 20 to 84, received so much exposure that they had to be hospitalized. Those are the parameters ig the effective range of a standard smoke grenade munition.
In January 2021, John Lednicky, had not only indicated he had determined the infectious dose, but also determined that the viriols are larger than normal for SARS-CoV-2, and possess the ability to defy computational fluid dynamics to mass in the air to deliver a maximum payload to a point and not an area target, suggesting aberrant from nature ionization of the viriols, which may be attributed to the free radicals complications and cytokine storms found in treatment. All of this is in science reports, which most people don't read, and those without the experience and knowledge to make inferences and cross references, it might as well be a foreign language, hidden in open view.
I trust noone who refuses to debate and/or silences and smears. I chose to trust people who had nothing to gain and everything to lose. That worked well for me throughout this disgusting lunacy.
Trust the science. It gave us electricity. Not really. An inventor gave us electricity. More like engineering gave it to us. Most of medical science DOES NOT WORK.
The only remaining question is "To what end?".
I believe the end was to reduce the human population which seems to always be the aim of leftists or at least an unintended consequence of their actions.
I say it is time to give them what they want. Reduce the human population. But my method they will likely find distasteful because it includes rounding up the leftists and disposing of them permanently. I don't think at this point we need to dive as deeply as the leftist voters, they are simply useful idiots who have been lead astray. But I do believe we need to start with the politicians and academia and purge the ranks of all that have been corrupted and have beliefs that are no longer realistic.
Start with those who came up with the pandemic and the vaccine and then move to those spouting CRT, trans ideology and other ideas that serve only to divide in the pursuit of power.
It would be cathartic to watch them pay the ultimate price for their deeds and I believe we can dispense with the need for trials in many cases, the evidence is clear and the judicial system already too corrupt to be able to actually dispense justice.
Covid didn't kill millions. The denial of effective treatments did.
Thank you for your diligent work Igor. It is very much appreciated. Unfortunately I am on 480 a month social security and currently staying in a homeless shelter so am unable to upgrade to paid.
My sincere and humble apologies.
Kevin.
I see two things when HIV and SARS-CoV-2 are connected. The first thing is Fauci, who I believe created both. Second is the colour red, when the rage sets in.
Instinct tells me that he relishes being a mass murderer, and probably touches himself when he considers his global accomplishments.
For 60 years I felt that peaceful yet convincing words combined with good acts was enough. Now I just want blood. Hardly a day goes by that I am not angered, and it does not feel good. (Yet)
I do NOT “trust the science” as an unequivocal source of truth and, even prior to our current “troubles,” I didn’t trust it blindly...but almost.
Now I’ve gone in completely the opposite direction. I have learned more from you and a few others about “the science” than in my college microbiology studies and work in years beyond those.
I feel powerless against these arrogant, soulless scientists and researchers who continue to meddle in these things. I fear for our children...youngest of 7 is now 19. What of them? Will they be able to forge their lives, raise their own kids, carry on traditions, etc.? These things trouble me deeply.
It’s hard to trust the Science when the Science is constantly weaponized by billionaire psychopaths, who pay the scientists.
No, at this time. we can't trust "the science".
'The science' is making a mess of the civil order.
Incidentally, in the 'trust the science' quilt of titles, there's one with Dr. Joe Schwarz out of McGill. I listened to him for years and even communicated with him on a number of occasions. Always answered. I really respected him.
Then he went full Covid-shill. I contacted him about masks and spoke nothing like the man who preached empirical evidence. I asked him for evidence he was relying on (knowing he would not be able to provide one) to support masks (and I believe mandates even) and he responded by referring to that study in Syria where they put masks on hamsters. I stared at my screen in disbelief (while thinking of Lisa doing her science experiment on Bart).
All of McGill is dead to me. Mort. Morte.
Being a super smart, well-educated guy will not compensate for lack of conscience or compassion. Would you trust Dr. Josef Mengele?
Real science is simply a process, not an endpoint one can carve golden false idols from.
Worshipping or "trusting" the $©ience is that false God.
There should always be constant open debate in real science, no matter how absurd it may be.
Science seems suspiciously 'settled' when:
A. Science is used for forced compliance [plandemic/climate change/men in women's protected spaces].
B. Science is used to affirm fairy-tales (i.e., men/women are interchangeable, the dreaded 'climate change' again) and 'vaccines' are good for you [because they have electrolytes].
C. Science is used as a hard-line religion and all 'non-believers' are heretics, infidels and morons.
"Science is not a person whose trustworthiness we can gauge. Science is a collection of human beings called “scientists,” who have all sorts of motivations and incentives. Some are honest, and some are not. Some can resist groupthink and peer pressure, but many cannot. Science is complicated, fascinating, and often wrong on matters of crucial importance."
During the scamdemic state-run mainstream media news was determined to convince the gullible to believe science is a religion and therefore the mRNA experimental toxin must be a miracle from God. Unfortunately, many were believers in this new found pharma-theology and demonstrated blind faith by taking the plunge, hence were baptized by either Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J. For many the baptism turned out to be a "sacrifice at the alter" as they suffered a stroke, developed neurological conditions, had a recurrence of cancer, or just suddenly died. That's surely a test of "blind faith" which clever skeptics were reluctant to partake in, but church elders, bureaucrats, and Rabbis insisted they participate in this ritual if they wanted to remain part of the "employed" flock.
But in all seriousness, the Wuhan Lab as well as all other biological warfare labs are made possible by a stupendous military budget compounded by Fauci's taxpayer billions which he carefully allocated to ensure his big pharma bosses profited to the max. It should be mentioned, that early on the HIV connection to SARS-CoV-2 was explained away by saying it was an attempt to find a cure for AIDS. It should also be stressed, that someone can contract HIV and never get AIDS. That being said, I think in many cases the mRNA injection triggered retroviruses or cancers which were in remission.
Obviously, science like everything else in life could be good or bad. A knife can cut a piece of cheese, or it could stab someone to death. A laboratory can do life saving research, but if directed by psychopaths the same lab will produce products that could be quite diabolical. That brings to mind the neuralink chip that's suppose to make a paraplegic into a ballerina. Unfortunately, the experimental chimps who were tortured to death by a miracle lithium chip never did a pirouette.
I trust the cat will draw blood because he is an artist.
If he were a scientist he'd actually kill me.
Then he'd play with me and dissect me.
Science is deadly, like electricity.
But my cat ain't greedy, he is happy to control me and doesn't try to destroy the world like science did.
I covered one aspect of Wuhan lab HIV pseudoviruses here:
Root cause of COVID-19? Biotechnology's dirty secret: Contamination. Bioinformatics evidence demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a laboratory, unlikely to be a bioweapon but most likely a result of sloppy experiments
https://zenodo.org/record/3766463
In the DARPA world of dual use research of concern, when you say "potential" it probably doesn't have the same connotations as it does for most laymen. Anthrax, examined by Robert Koch in 1870, when he developed Koch's Postulates, to validate causation, had "potential" for spillover, but it's a bacterial agent with the Trouble with Tribbles life of its own, not a virus that requires a living host to replicate, importing problems of control.
Anthrax had potential, but it has an infectious dose of between 8,000 and 50,000 spores, which is not an opportunistic, casual contact disease, and can be controlled.
What is the infectious dose for COVID-19? We've been able to determine this since 1870 through Koch's Postulates, the How Many Licks Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Tootsie Roll Pop Test. And today with E6 Vero cells we don't require a human challenge study.
In February 2020, Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan validated causation through Koch's Postulates on Syrian hamsters, and determined it required 100,000 to ten million particles to infect a Syrian hamster, which should require more to infect a human. This is why no infected animals were discovered at the wet market.
In March 2022, Ben Killingsley finally published his human challenge study results, on only 36 volunteers between the ages of 18 and 25, and he found that after being intranasally inoculated with live, wild virus, only 18 of 36 were infected with just ten particles, a uniquely adapted biological agent, but not everyone was vulnerable to that dosage. Do they have "natural immunity"? No. They just require more.
The Guangzhou restaurant study published in Emerging Infectious Disease, determined it required up to an hour to infect ten people in an area measuring only 30 square meters in a dining room measuring 145 square meters. A total of 93 people were in the dining room, including eight staff who didn't receive enough exposure to be infected. But everyone in that kill box, age 20 to 84, received so much exposure that they had to be hospitalized. Those are the parameters ig the effective range of a standard smoke grenade munition.
In January 2021, John Lednicky, had not only indicated he had determined the infectious dose, but also determined that the viriols are larger than normal for SARS-CoV-2, and possess the ability to defy computational fluid dynamics to mass in the air to deliver a maximum payload to a point and not an area target, suggesting aberrant from nature ionization of the viriols, which may be attributed to the free radicals complications and cytokine storms found in treatment. All of this is in science reports, which most people don't read, and those without the experience and knowledge to make inferences and cross references, it might as well be a foreign language, hidden in open view.