Scientific confirmation of COVID vaccine shedding
I am very curious about the breastfeeding implications. My wife was vaxed while breast feeding my then 7 month old. He has exhibited speech and developmental delays and I wonder if it was the vax through the breastfeeding that damaged him. None of my other children experienced these delays.
We saw this early on in the VAERS reports for infants back when only adults were being jabbed so it is no surprise they were able to test for and find the mechanism of shed. The surprise for me is that they bothered to look. Thanks for continuing to shine light on this. I don't know if you are familiar with (The Naughty Dog )Coquin de Chien sub stacker. He's been going through the Massachusetts vital records and has both a law suit he just filed and a book with the data that is expected out shortly. Here are two related posts on data he found: https://substack.com/notes/post/p-137364701 and https://coquindechien.substack.com/p/its-all-about-the-blood-which-flows. Hope you boost his signal, especially during this fall push to jab again.
I wrote about this on October 8, nearly a year ago:
It is so sad to find out that vaccine particles that are in milk will not be destroyed by digestion(((((
I disagree with the use of the word "Shedding," If the spike protein is taken up by the cells in the manner it was designed using the nano particles, it makes sense it would turn up in the breast milk of vaccinated mothers and infect the unvaccinated child. I use the word infect because that is exactly what is happening, its not "Shedding". This is why I don't sleep or get physical with "Vaccinated" because if its in the cells it will be in all bodily fluids. So it will transmit just like a cold or flu. My understanding was prior to Covid Gates and others were talking up a "Transmissible Vaccine" that once given to a human would spread in the same manner as the disease supposedly immunising the unvaccinated. That begs the question, when you go for a blood test, are they testing on the quiet for evidence of the spike protein in the unvaccinated patients blood.
Not about breast.milk, but i recently saw an article stating anecdotally that sepsis is up.
"In the last fiscal year, Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital in Geneva, Ill., saw a 10% increase in the total number of sepsis patients. There also was a 33% increase in patients who arrived with severe sepsis, signaling the need for effective and timely sepsis treatment, Dr. Steven Coker Jr. said."
Since sepsis is often connected to a messed up immune system, i'd expect more, but can't find the stats.
This might be something for someone to look into...
Well, you got a hand it to them at least they figured out a way to get the bioweapon into newborns. It saves the agony of having a pediatrician, trying to ram it in the babies ass discussions
Covid jabs contaminate _________________.
Go ahead. Fill in the blank.
I think this may finally put paid to the needle-aspiration theory. Like, it had been widely speculated that the worse side effects were possibly the result of failing to aspirate the needle when administering shots. Meaning it stayed in the arm for most people, but sometimes hit a blood vessel and then-- and *only* then-- did it get loose in the rest of the body, and *that's* when you'd see myocarditis and stuff happen.
10 out of 13 subjects suggests this is very much not the case, and that spreading far from the injection site is in fact *typical*.
And as far as I remember, EVs like exosomes, are not cationic/positively charged like those LNP used in the jabs.
Can someone help me with an accurate definition of what precisely is meant by “shedding”? I’ve heard so many variations I’d like to know exactly what is meant when that terminology is used.
One example, “that vaxxed people can ‘shed’ the vax to unvaccinated persons.”
Unfortunately, nothing is going to change until excess death explodes.
Has anyone read if the jabs are contributing to Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS)? I know someone who will need to deliver prematurely because of that.
12 years in the "belly of the beast" - working in the marketing arm of big pharma - taught me that even the most egregious violators of ethics (think Vioxx and the 50K deaths they covered up because PROFITS! Yeah, that was my company) wouldn't dare push a new drug or "vaccine" on pregnant women or breast feeding mothers. Ever. Too risky. Too many unknowns. And the trusty regulators wouldn't hear of it, either. Every new drug was "Pregnancy Category X" until many years of real-world data could be assessed.
So what the hell is going on with C19 injections?! Is it just because the companies were able to push ALL liability on the various governments of the world (see South Africa's disclosed contract with Pfizer), allowing for more PROFITS? Or, is there something else? Why was our government pushing for 100% vaccination rates? That makes no sense from the standpoint of herd immunity. And why was naturally acquired immunity downplayed and ignored as meaningless in the face of 100 years of proven data? Why did the CDC and FDA suppress early and pronounced warnings of vaccine-induced myocarditis? And on, and on, and on.....
I don't think most people are ready for the truth on this stuff. Evil is at work.