MAJOR ADDITION TO THE ARTICLE: The Pfizer study was conducted at Texas Biomedical, whose director (and coauthor of the study) Deepak Kaushal admitted to faking data and falsifying and fabricating experimental methodology. Please read a section of my article discussing that.
Very interesting! I also wondered about that sham group, but I like my articles to touch upon one topic only, so I disregarded it -- but it looks very fascinating.
This just keeps getting worse and worse. The immense subterfuge and decent is mind boggling. I think of the number of liars and cheats it took to accomplish this. I am astounded.
Scott free? Not so. Cant do that and preserve a conscience. Thats the cynics line and it disempowers you and your believers, its a lie, its murder of potential.. Be certain their own selves and future is compromised by every lie they anchor on, just as ours are liberated by our striving for truth.
Truth is that we will win through towards life in abundance.
It is a FACT that they do NOT have a conscience nor empathy.
and so many other very destructive traits,
Their only aim is to WIN at all costs to others - never themselves..
They can turn on the charm while agreeing with you, but ALL the time its THEIR AGENDA only. Especially as they think they are ALWAYS RIGHT and everyone else is too blame.
To these sick people, you are merely there to be used and discarded when you can no longer be useful/manipulated and controlled.
They are DEAD emotionally, but this scenario gives them their own sort of excitement.
I always have hope but I am also a realist. But although they may not be punished her on earth they will be punished when they stand before our God. Their souls will burn in hell for all eternity.
To fear, one first must RESEARCH and READ, just like Igor does.
How many of us, the better ones, have done/do this?
The ruling elites make our lives challenging, so we don’t make time for researching and educating ourselves. It’s easier to believe a “trustworthy” Pravda source.
I do it. I go into the literature everyday. I look that the articles the Igor, Gato, Margaret Anna Alice, Midwest Doctor, Toby Rogers, and Eugyppuis post (i am sorry if I left anyone out). I check Mercola’s references. Did the same thing with RFK, Jr’s book when my interest is peaked. I’m just a regular old fashion science geek, nothing special.
Reading the source material, Dr. Linda, makes you a conspiracy theorizing crank, as the appellation is widely defined, these days.
Even if you are a widely-known epidemiologist or statistician, your demonstrable lack of faith and devotion condemns you out of hand.
Welcome to the vilified subset of your age cohort. Feels rather familiar, doesn't it? You questioned the unsupported and verifiably false narratives of our youth, and you were then a pariah.
Now, your consistency in seeking out facts marginalizes you yet again. Or still.
The youthful seeker becomes an old crank without any change in methodology or objective.
Me too. I read phase 1 & 2. Listened to Dell B, Mercola & several others, read the SARS mRNA animal studies & how at the time of SARS, Fauci touted HCQ as very effective against SARS1. I smelled DECOMPOSING RATS throughout my reading!!!! I knew from the get go this woukd be a shit show if death & injury.
No company can make money from an oil resource where it is more expensive to extract the the oil than where is just squirts out of the ground. Their price will be undercut by the low cost sources. There was no iron crisis when the hematite mines ran out. Taconite is more expensive to mine and process but there is a lot more of it.
Lower grade oil (sand oil, etc.) is more expensive to extract, but there is a lot more of it.
According to the OECD Economics Department and the International Monetary Fund Research Department, a sustained $10 per barrel increase in oil prices from $25 to $35 would result in the OECD as a whole losing 0.4% of GDP in the first and second years of higher prices. http://www.iea.org/textbase/npsum/high_oil04sum.pdf
HOW HIGH OIL PRICES WILL PERMANENTLY CAP ECONOMIC GROWTH
And now, in an effort to ruin my own credibility, there is another story that is far, far out of the mainstream, far out of conspiracy theories. In fact, it borders crazy.
There's a guy by the name of Clif High that does something called predictive linguistics. He has a bitchute channel. Used to program at MS. Parts of what he predicted decades ago have come to pass recently.
His theory, and I'm trying to make it less crazy, is that this is all astrologically based. A certain group of people HAD to act now or they would not have a chance for hundreds of years. Essentially, this is their one chance to rule the planet.
To be honest, that makes as much sense as anything else I suppose.
I don't think he's saying that theory is a fact, it's just that THEY believe it. If they believe it, then they are trying to meet these timelines based on ancient books which could have been written by crazy people in their ancestral bloodlines.
I am very open to what Clif says, and to me, it's OK if he's wrong.
As for the video above, my husband and I watched it yesterday. For those who are not Clif friendly, he says we're heading for a constitutional crisis. Which is not particularly surprising.
This is his telegram channel for those interested-- be warned, it is out there:
That makes no sense. There was a time before we had oil, remember? What about nuclear energy? What about other sources? They exist, but are held back by the people who claim peak oil is a real thing.
Obviously you wrote it and are spamming your hare-brained garbage. Your information comes from the same people who tell us the jabs are safe and effective, government cares about you, and that men can have babies.
I keep coming back to the same thought as well. Just take mainstream journalists. There's probably 70,000 full-time "journalists" who work for corporate-owned or legacy news organizations in America. I really do not know of ONE journalist in this "pack" who has performed serious journalism that challenges any of the authorized Covid narratives. How is this even possible? 0 out of 70,000? Wouldn't there be, say, four or five contrarians in such a huge sample? No. When I and others write that the mainstream press is "captured," I mean that 100-percent of its members are captured ... As in all 70,000.
AGREED or they would be fired and then another journo shall take their place, That replacement shall dutifully read their REUTERS supplied notes (that are emailed to all newspapers, to craft an article too their countries sheep.
Back in the day, before she became a Pfizer shill, the friend who manages clinical trials did contract work. She would never go into details, but did lose one client because she said they were doing Mengele level experiments. She has also said there are major screw ups on every level of the trials, from doctors enrolling people that should have never been enrolled on down.
Of course, now she's with Pfizer, making big $$$$, so it's all good.
Did THEY? he ended in Brazil as did a number of other Nazis.
Operation Paperclip was the cover for many high ranking Nazi party members to be taken to USA and employed with all their SKILLS in war related activities. THey never faced the Criminal Courts as they were far more useful to USA.
Read "Canadian Patriot - Matt Ehret is full of facts and knowledge.
I believe that they did or there was a possible fake report about his death. I now think that there was also one for Adolf Hitler. He, too, may have fled to South America and ended up living in luxury to about 90 on a mountain top in Ecuador. Yeah. And get this, he may have been pretending to be a Roman Catholic priest! A reporter tried to inform the world about this. I know about Operation Paperclip. Thank you for the additional information.
Aug 9, 2022·edited Aug 9, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Thanks Igor,
This 'science' is infuriating. Even though only my undergrad was biology, I was the biology lab director (for non-science majors) at Temple University Japan for 18 years ... constantly thinking of ways to get otherwise disinterested students to be intrinsically motivated to see science as simply a well controlled problem solving process ... just one of many tools to nourish and sustain the species. STEM fields are powerful within their domains, but insufficient by themselves to provide a meaningful quality of life.
I was troubled to see Tess Lawrie's recent Tess Talks interview with a collaborator on a new book, 'The Dark Side of Academia'. I immediately bought the Kindle version, and am seeing the same thing happening in England as is happening here in Japan. The corporate nation-state is hollowing out the humanities and social sciences from the universities. This conveniently places CEOs, politicians, and their bureaucratic functionaries as the only ones 'qualified' to make policy decisions regarding how to use the fruits of the STEM fields.
And now, 'science' as a blunt cover for perverse incentives is causing wreck and ruin throughout the world. Otherwise articulate, educated, and intelligent writers who I follow on substack are just a paper-thin headline away from wording those who have tried to abide by the scientific method as psychopathic.
It is the perverse incentives who have captured institutionalized science who are sociopathic ... more specifically, those 'dark-triad' personality types attracted to power over others ... the pathological narcissists, machiavellian opportunists, and morphologically defined psychopaths among us.
The scientific method (carefully controlled common-sense problems-solving) is now being conflated with the new religion of 'scientism' ... complete with their sanctified gate keepers and authorities.
Einstein, arguably the most famous icon of science was far from secular. Just because his god was the god of Spinoza and Emerson does not mean he was 'secular'. Indeed, he was quite 'spiritual' as was Niels Bohr or Max Born.
Scientists are just like carpenters, housewives, or any other profession. Some are in it for fun, some to pay the rent, some because of chance, some for blind ambition.
Truth is where you find it, if you are looking for it.
RFK, Jr.'s book provides historical context of various events that produced a “New (scientific) Normal” presided over by Anthony Fauci.
In January1961 - three days before the author’s uncle was sworn in as president - President Dwight Eisenhower gave a famous “Farewell Address” where he warned Americans about the the emergence of a “Military Industrial Complex.”
“But Eisenhower made an equally urgent - although less celebrated - warning against the emergence of a federal (science) bureaucracy that could also pose an equally dire threat to America’s Constitution and values,” writes Kennedy.
President Eisenhower noted that “… In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by or at the direction of the Federal government. Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields …
“… Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded …. (We) must … be alert to the danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.”
Writes Kennedy: “Just as President Eisenhower warned, Dr. Fauci’s Covid-19 response has steadily deconstructed our democracy and elevated the powers of a tyrannical medical technocracy.”
My husband is a chemist who does research and development. He is the only person in the office and lab that is not injected. EVERYONE else is, even the 20 and 30 somethings with PhDs that are not at risk.
This is not science it is advertising and marketing masquerading as science (also known as fraud). Sadly, it is a product of widespread corruption, and thus unlikely to correct until the house of cards collapses.
Aug 9, 2022·edited Aug 9, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Hello Elizabeth.
You were a student at TUJ in the late 80's? Just wondering if you and I ever crossed paths? Was that at the Shibuya campus, or Shimokitazawa?
In addition to the biology labs, I taught public speaking and freshman writing ... and was the founding and only member of what eventually became TUJ's 'Adult Continuing Education Program'.. I was probably finishing my Maser's degree in education at TUJ at about that time too.
Just now saw this, so will check out your link now. As for an essay, I could write many, some of which come from my time at TUJ, or earlier as an undergrad back at Chapel Hill and UNC-W. A few anecdotes were hilarious ... some, not so. Even in the early 70's as an undergrad, I observed and thought about the gap between educational ideals ... and the education business.
Will be at the coast from tomorrow for a few days, Misaki and/or Shimoda just a 'Sittin' by the dock of the bay' ... pretending to fish ... but really just itching to chat with the old salts and families out for a day by the sea.
Will be back with you soon,
Cheers,
steve
p.s. Just took a look at your fantastic homepage. I had written another ps to you, but I seem to have erased it by mistake. If you are on Facebook, I think you will see we have a lot in common by looking at my homepage at NipponnoSteve (though still in the Facebook Jail for a few days. Funny how Zuckerberg claims a monopoly on only two of the three Platonic ideals ... 'truth' and 'goodness' ... probably because he couldn't win a 'beauty' contest). The heads up about your page gives me a good ground to stand on regarding how to frame an essay to help understand the social dynamics of what is going on. I'm also a member of the Academia website, and by chance (?) I have been pursuing readings of a common thread between my experiences in Japan and the current plandemic ... dark-triad psychology. I hope to go beyond a bleak analysis with my essay(s) and share some possible pro-social plans of action.
Hi Steve, I am not on Facebook, kicked off in summer of 2020. I'm writing a book about the unvaccinated now., so am busy. I subscribed to your substack. You aer brilliant. Have fun fishing and Genki de!
I was also kicked off of Facebook and Twitter in about the middle of 2021. I now post publicly and freely on MeWe. Thank you for shining a light on us: The Not Shot Lot, The Chosen, and The Survivors' Club!
I have yet to publish beyond Quora, Facebook, or here ... and I am just getting started here, much less publishing a book.
I'd really love to meet you!
I just have off-and-on dueling scars with 'em ... but frustratingly depend on Facebook messaging to pass messages and info to private F.book groups ... mostly in Australia and Canada, but increasingly in America.
Just yesterday, had lunch with a VERY genki 70 year old Japanese lady who had flown in to meet her daughters. I met her a couple of summers ago through a mutual fishing friend born on the same island (Hachijojima). She could pass for mid 40's, but was more happy to verify she felt the same as me . no experimental treatments for her or her adult daughters ... and the suspicion it is part of a planned, multi-faceted power shift similar to what Charles Eisenstein appears to be writing about here with 'The Coronation'. Now HE is brilliant. I am in awe of so many great writers and thinkers here ... Margaret Anna Alice among my other favorites. And of course Igor here.
Depending on the style and organization of your book, would you like me to write a short chapter about how my experience with Japanese culture's strongly embedded self-censorship and compliance to authority ... meshes with how the power-mongers are using that social engineering to nudge the population similar to other countries?
Or would you prefer something more suitable for your homepage?
Either way I am itching to carrying this fight beyond exchanging messages on social media or lunch chats, and am thankful for the opportunity to help out in any way I can.
Am setting up a web video with an underground Australian Facebook buddy within the next few weeks, but as a generalist, I only feel confident in talking about human nature ... but don't we all?
Com'on man! Just have pfaith! Never question "The $cience!"
I'll leave you with some wise words from Brandon (speaking to Don Lemon at a July 2021 CNN Town Hall).
“You got the vaccination? Are you okay? I mean, you seem…” “No, it works.” Or you, you know — or the mom and dad, or the neighbor, or when you go to church, or when you’re — no, I really mean it.
There are trusted interlocutors. Think of the people — if your kid wanted to find out whether or not there were — there’s a man on the moon, or whatever — you know, something, or, you know, whether those aliens are here or not — you know, who are the people they talk to beyond the kids who love talking about it?
I heard rumors of this. Considering this is the first time this kind of mRNA technology has been widely released. You would think these multigenerational studies would be absolutely paramount.
IF I ran this past my friend who manages clinical trials at Pfizer-- in fact, depending on the date and location of the trials, she might have worked on them-- she would simply explain that we were in a pandemic, and they HAD to get a cure to the market as soon as possible. They were doing it for the good of humanity.
That being said, I cannot ask her any of these things; our relationship is tenuous in terms of c0vid, and I'm pretty sure I'm the sane person in her life right now.
In terms of overall "sanity," her family (siblings/ parents) are extremely dysfunctional. Her son is long term unemployed, and living at home. Her daughter has a difficult marriage. My friend--who had a very acrimonious marriage to a very unstable surgeon-- has nothing in her life but work, and is neglecting her own health, almost to the extreme. She is also taking every vaxx offered. Overall, she is not a bad person, and really believes that her job is helping humanity. You know, "saving the world." She has lost her way.
She knows that my husband and I both had c0vid and are both uninjected. I suspect we are the ONLY uninjected people that she knows. Perhaps the other thing I'm doing is proving to her that what she was told is wrong; I will NOT die from c0vid or anything related to it, not will my husband.
You're probably right. I have struggled with the relationship over the past year-- she's 2,000 miles away and we rarely see each other, so there is that.
That being said, she's jabbed, double boosted and will probably get the next one in a month or two. She also has had cancer twice, the first time in her 30s. She is going to have her life shortened by these jabs.
Aug 9, 2022·edited Aug 9, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
I can't really see any other reason for it myself.
It's not like we don't have a long history of previous chemical disasters to learn from.
*Agent orange. But we need it to find the Viet Cong. Bloody trees in the way.
*Thalidomide. Great for nausea. Sucks for your babies though.
*Asbestos. Lightweight, tough, cheap, fire resistant. Never mind that hacking cough
*Leaded gasoline and paints. Because nausea, headaches and seizures are a lot of fun.
*Radium based paints. Who needs teeth, hair or health when your watch dial glows in the dark.
*Isocyanates. We all sort of knew these were dangerous, but lets put giant factories in the middle of densely populated areas and if anything ever goes wrong. Deny. Point. Blame everyone else.
A teratogen is any agent that causes an abnormality following fetal exposure during pregnancy. Teratogens are usually discovered after an increased prevalence of a particular birth defect. For example, in the early 1960's, a drug known as thalidomide was used to treat morning sickness.
How long were the animals suppose to be kept alive for? Till the study ends? I remember them saying mice have short lifespan so we can see what happens from start to finish...
Btw it's hilarious twitter saying animal studies are safe, when that mice document Malone and co talked about got censored, later re-appeared when Pfizer started releasing new FOI documents, showing mRNA goes to spleens, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands etc, another study showed it stays for at least 2 months, while governments/media tell the world it stays in your arm for a few hours.
A mouse lives just 2 years, they could easily and inexpensively keep a couple of dozen mice or hamsters to follow them up at least until April 2021, when the human trials ended...
Exactly. No need to ever torture animals again for poison drug trials. It has been proven that humans will jump at the chance to participate in prototype poison drug trials for free, no payment needed.
". . . participate . . . for free, no payment needed."
Actually, when people volunteer to be guinea pigs for experimental drugs (especially fake vaccines!), they end up paying FOR the privilege by way of their medical expenses for being treated for their injuries! How much do the hospitals and drug companies end up raking in for the hundreds of thousands of very seriously- or permanently-injured, non-informed-consenting experiment participants?
Stuff like, Jikkileaks saying it might cause cancer over the next 5-10 years, we’d probably confirm that with mice within 6 months, then we can prepare to mourn for the ones we know. Sigh
We don't need mice. It's already happening right before our eyes in real time. The spikes knock out the Toll-like Receptors that surveil developing cancers as well as the white blood cells that destroy them, and therefore cases are already "exploding", especially among those who had it in remission.
But human souls exist outside of time-space and cannot be harmed. Everyone is okay no matter how things progress here.
Bret Weinstein showed that the engineered mice used in these studies give false safety signals because they have hyper-repair genes unregulated but live short lives because of that.
Frankly, I hate that the psychopaths use animals in their experiments at all. There are plenty of scientists who know very well how unnecessary it is, and not nearly as useful as it's purported to be.
With thalidomide, I believe there was one breed of rabbits in which birth defects resulted. And of course the doctor who tried to warn the world how dangerous thalidomide could be was marginalized and censored and essentially barred from having any say. Sounds familiar, huh?
Soldiers were told agent orange was harmless. And look how that turned out too. If we didn't learn the first time. Or the second time. How many times do we need to be taught this lesson?
I guess as many times as need be. If we can't see the wolf in sheep's clothing each time, well, there aren't going to be many lambs left, are there...?!
To be quite honest... I'd prefer the animal tests be conducted on humans vs innocent animals...
Why is it ok to experiment on these poor animals?
They derive no benefit from having their eyes pinned open and various chemicals applied to see which will make the best non-irritating shampoo - for humans.
Experiment on humans -- or do not conduct the experiments at all.
Yes! Exactly. I am glad that you say this. And I am glad that there seem to be more people who think like I do.
Do the experiment with humans who agree to make the experiment. Animals can not agree. They are murdered in the name of science. I do not want to have anything to do with companies that make experiments with animals. This is speciesism. Make science without killing anmals. Thank you.
I appreciate your investigating this, Igor. I have heard about all of the animals dying in the tests but haven’t had a chance to research it. Have you come across anything about the ferret tests?
Also, one of my readers mentioned that the experiments for pregnancies were performed on fewer than 50 rodents but didn’t provide a source—if you happen to have info handy about the study, I’d be curious to learn more details. (No worries if not as I can research it myself when I have time.)
On an unrelated note, I just launched my new interview series and would love to interview you for a future entry (email me if you’re up for it). I’m backlogged so no rush, just planting the seed.
I stand corrected, reading Naomi Wolf now...44 French rats over 42 days and not allowed to give birth but they autopsied the babies then decided the vax was safe and effective for women.
As a multidisciplinary problem-solver, I was just wondering if you are seeing, even in substack, a conflation of a distrust in corrupt scientists with a distrust in science? I am afraid that the cultural wars and divisions are increasingly reducing science as a problem-solving process to scientism as a corrupt religion. That in itself, is less troubling than what new, 'one true faith' will emerge to take its place. Maybe the cult of personality in the form of political populism? Or worse, a whole ideology that rejects rational problem solving?
Excellent question, Steven, and I think—at least in the Substack circles I frequent—the distinction between the scientific process and $cientism is crystal-clear for those of us who are genuinely seeking truth instead of conclusions to verify our confirmation bias.
I have not yet seen the YouTube speech, but will do so.
But somewhat troubling, I saw her recent interview regarding 'The Dark Side of Academia' here on substack under Tess Talks, and while I agree with both her and her guest's values, found them to be somewhat naive regarding the petty politics and corruption that have always been in academia.
Just yesterday, I bought the Kindle version of the book, am about 15 % through it ... and thought to myself ... there is absolutely no one in Japan who would have tried to publish the same research as the author tried ... that is, no one whose salary depends on a tenured position. That research was about good management practice, and is intuitively correct for anyone seeking 'truth'.
But 'truth' does not now, nor ever, has seemed to be the priority of Boards of Directors. When I transpose that to the STEM fields, I can't help but to think of Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle', the history of 'Big Tobacco', the work of Rachel Carson, and more recently, the nearly forgotten opioid crisis.
A couple of years ago, I read Robert Friedman's 'The Politics of Excellence' regarding the pettiness and back-room bargaining regarding the Nobel Prizes in the natural sciences, (Einstein's Nobel was a bit of consolation prize for the most famous equation in history being rejected as 'Jewish' science') .. . and there is that nasty social darwinism following on heels of Darwin (just a new 'sciency' spin on old tribalism), the nasty bitterness between Edison and Tesla, and so on. I can guess the waters are much murkier in he humanities and social sciences. And of course, there is the now laughable 'Peace Prize'. War-Lord Kissinger?
As for Japan ... even after 40 years here, I can not name a single non-Japanese of world wide influence in a tenured, or even visiting position in a Japanese university (outside of domains extolling the virtues of a 'unique' Japanese culture).
My own story ... long and needs to be heavily edited and brought up to date, but a common story in Japan ... https://steven45.substack.com/p/beware-the-academic-halls-of-japan On second thought, I do not recommend you read it because your time is MUCH better spent doing what you've been doing.
For a much shorter, and to-the-point read, my comment to Igor here might be enough.
I respect, applaud, and support Tess and those like you and her, and consider myself closer to a Platonic idealist rather than a cynic. But rather than 'restore' true values (presuming a somewhat romanticized version of a past that never was) ... my guess is that she, you, and I are part of the forever-war of mankind against its own worst nature.
'History' has a way of distorting itself to make that past look better than it was. I was shocked to have did a bit of research and found the same nasty politics, dirty money, and feuding even in something as beautiful as the emerging bossa nova movement in late 1950's - early 60's Brazil. Now, though I love bossa nova enough to have learned to play it on nylon string guitar and sing in Portuguese ... I never want to actually visit Brazil, knowing that the Brazil I came to love never existed, save in the imagination of idealists.
Keep up the good fight Margaret.
You and Tess are both inspirations to this dreamer, in this skirmish, of the forever-war.
I wouldn’t consider her naïveté troubling—what’s important is that she woke up to the corruption and is now bent on exposing it:
“It was very illuminating to me at the time: I’ve never worked within an academic institution. In fact, it turns out that I’m a bit of an anomaly: I’m an independent academic, do not accept funding from private industry, conduct research for non-profit organisations only, and I hold no patents related to the work I produce. This made me naïve about how universities operate – I didn’t realise the depth and breadth of dysfunction until relatively recently because despite my research work, I never came into direct contact with it.” (https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/higher-education-keeps-plumbing-new)
Perhaps it’s worse in Japan, but I wouldn’t consider trying to publish research on good management practice naïve. I haven’t watched the video yet so don’t know the details, but there has been a significant amount of research published in the burgeoning science of happiness field over the past decade+, and it’s become a bit of a hot topic, even though it’s contrary to traditional management practices that treat employees as interchangeable cogs instead of valuable members of the company.
Wow, I didn’t know Kissinger was awarded the “Peace” Prize. It’s bad enough that drone-strike–happy Obama got it. What a travesty that’s become.
And what a fascinating (and sad) anecdote about bossa nova!
Just a short note of gratitude for reading and replying. I want you to keep doing what you do best, and lead us forward.
Alas, JMHO, but I think that long before the pre-Socratic Greeks, or Australian aboriginal natives long before the West was even a dream, most humans already knew the difference between what is 'good practice' (intuitively, morally, the right thing to do) and how much they could get away with ... not so different from the observations of Jane Goodall or Frans de Waal regarding just how far alpha males of a chimpanzee troop are allowed to go
Although I may be reaching here, if something as wistful and gentle as bossa nova emerged from such horrible sentiments and behavior in we bi-polar apes, I am guessing the same is true in all domains since the dawn of human history ... the problems of scale (exceeding Dunbar's number), the trolley car problem and other degrees of separation from the direct consequences of our action (whether it be 'outsourcing costs' or the moral problem of automated drone strikes — reminding me of the S.F. short story 'Ender's Game'), the salience of dark-triad personality traits, and conflicting — sometimes contradictory drives which interfere with moral, empathy-driven behavior such as was shown in the conformity experiments of Solomon Asch or compliance experiments of Stanley Milgram, (sigh) let me count the ways.
From pre-history to now, among us now, and always have been, are the 'good' prison guards following the 'superior orders' judged at the Nuremberg trials ... or the good shepherd thinking they are leading their tribe to their rightful place in a brave new world.
But there have always been the wounded healers, the sacrificial lambs, and the altruistic leaders as well. It may be just a conceit on my part, but I aspire to be on that end of the moral spectrum ... back to back, fighting the good fight on the behalf of the next generation ... which I hope to empower to do the same.
Of course it’s suspicious but in my experience and observations everything they do is suspicious when it comes to adverse events to their products. Health regulatory systems also appear purposely designed to hide adverse events to pharmaceutical products. From being trained wrong things on purpose in medical school to the legislation designed to put the fear of god into any dr considering blaming a pharmaceutical product for injury.
The whole health and regulatory system is corrupt and appears designed to be psychologically damaging to drs and patients alike.
i recall dr. richard fleming stating early on, that all animals died on clinical trials of mRNA testing with few weeks. in human lifes that translates in 2-3 years.
fact checkers are mostly journalists ... basically hired guns.
For Igot, Pandelis, Carlos, and all of the wonderful readers, I know that humanized mice either were euthanized or died after the induction of SARS 2 in the Carossimo study. PLUS, the macaques got sick with Lewy body in the Philippens study .Looking forward to finding out more from all of your research....
In December 2020, a variety of regulatory documents Pfizer had submitted to Europe's FDA (the EMA) were leaked and provided a lot of insights into how the Covid vaccines were developed an approved (many of the EMA documents were most likely identical to what was sent to the FDA). Since I have previous experience in drug development and investigational new drug applications (including for COVID-19 therapeutics) I made it a point to download all the documents when they were first posted on an anonymous message board and read through everything that was within them. The key takeaway I got from these documents was that a lot of tests that would normally always be required were waived, and since all of the tasks that were waived were also the ones that were evaluate for specific issues of greatest concern with the mRNA vaccine, I correctly predicted that major issues with subsequently be discovered in this regard (since in reality this almost certainly meant that the tests have been done and Pfizer concluded the data was so bad it was better to pretend they never did the tests).
Additionally, the animal tests were very lackluster and had a variety of issues that normally would have prevented a drug application from being approved for human testing. There were also a variety of other major issues with the Application and concerns voiced by regulators (such as the vaccine not covering variance that were already common in late 2020 or the mRNA degrading and producing potentially concerning proteins). Overall, the thing I found the most frustrating about reading through the regulators comments on Pfizer's application was that my team and other teams I corresponded with or how to infinitely higher standard by the FDA for an appropriate drug application, despite the fact our approaches were not novel and had decades of data showing safety.
That all being said, those EMA documents are really valuable for people who want to understand more of the story that you were discussing, and if you cannot find them online, I can direct you to them.
All of which are being ignored for covid vaccines.
Section 1.1 states:
"1.1 Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) In the pre-approval clinical experience with a new medicinal product or its new usages, particularly as the therapeutic dose(s) may not be established: all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose should be considered adverse drug reactions (my highlighting) . The phrase responses to a medicinal product means that a causal relationship between a medicinal product and an adverse event is at least a reasonable possibility, i.e., the relationship cannot be ruled out (my highlighting). Regarding marketed medicinal products: a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended and which occurs at doses normally used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of diseases or for modification of physiological function (see the ICH Guideline for Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting).”
So in other words - with experimental medicines err on the side of caution and assume the problem was caused by the drug unless or until proven otherwise.
MHRA and other regulators are not doing this but the complete opposite.
Reading your findings reminds me of the general reputation of tech companies which rush to market a new platform and only worry about problems later. mRNA as a "platform" like "software" for your body, is horrifying, as it's trillion dollar signs for a cabal of "investors" colluding to push it through.
Aug 9, 2022·edited Aug 9, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Here are the links to the EMA's public assessment reports - all 4 of them are questionable to say the least and any regulator that is not in thrall to outside interests should have refused the EUAs:
I also wrote this in an e-mail to someone in 2021 but am having problems finding that report again (it's in my filing somewhere but need a link to post it):
"in the EMA leaked document and that the study on rats PF-07302048 is actually section 2.2.2 Pharmokinetics starting on page 45.
A few points on it:
- the only organ it looked at for effects was the liver
- they only looked at how the 2 ingredients were either excreted or urinated out of the body
- they performed no other studies to see the effects on other organs - "No other organs besides the liver were investigated and therefore distribution to other organs cannot be excluded."
A few more quotes as well:
"No traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the vaccine candidate BNT162b2.”
"No validated methods of analysis to support the non-clinical PK/biodistribution studies have been submitted.”
"However, the applicant claims to have used a qualified LC-MS/MS method to support quantitation of the two novel LNP excipients without providing such data”
"Since several LNP formulations were tested in the study it is not completely clear which of the LNP formulation is used in the clinical version of BNT162b2”
I cannot find any mention of it in other documents I have except this comment:
"Nonclinical evaluation of BNT162b2 included pharmacology (mouse immunogenicity and nonhuman primate [NHP] immunogenicity and SARS-Cov-2 challenge studies), pharmacokinetic (series of biodistribution, metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies), and toxicity (2 Good Laboratory Practice [GLP] rat repeat-dose toxicity) studies in vitro and in vivo. A developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) study is ongoing in rats. ""
The difference between 'to the letter of the law' and 'to the intent of the law'. I have a really really hard time with the use of animals for testing, (even humans!) and the injection of the poor animals with our effed up poisons. The way these injections kill is with much pain, as poisonings typically cause. Perverted.
HA! Thanks. I saw that giant headline as well. I assumed some big story was about to break on the animals and they wanted to get ahead of it. I guessed wrong as Nobody but yourself is writing about it.
MAJOR ADDITION TO THE ARTICLE: The Pfizer study was conducted at Texas Biomedical, whose director (and coauthor of the study) Deepak Kaushal admitted to faking data and falsifying and fabricating experimental methodology. Please read a section of my article discussing that.
It is even worse. They had to use a "sham" vaccine and a placebo. As the v caused so much harm compared to the placebo. I wrote about this in May 2021. https://www.facebook.com/tom.hitchcock.716/posts/pfbid02q67PSHUcFcsArRPbLvK2ws9kv11vUZsZQvgEK3QzPaKMZFHAU8y4aKGisgZTTNrBl
Very interesting! I also wondered about that sham group, but I like my articles to touch upon one topic only, so I disregarded it -- but it looks very fascinating.
Probably disappointed that it didn't kill homo sapiens as well as they had expected.
if the spars exercise was representative of their expectations, children were the target that they missed.
Maybe someone else posted on this but Arkmedic (aka twitter-banned jikkyleaks) posted on this same joker today also. Great minds think alike!
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/pfizer-pfraud-episode-11-the-monkey/comments
Check out his stack if you haven't already, if you like Igor's stuff you'll like his too.
Arkmedic = Jikkyleaks?!?
Mind. Blown.
Actually, that makes a lot of sense....!
Thanks for making that connection for me.
I'm shocked too! Their voices are so different
Igor, I obtained proof from the European Medicines Agency that they don't have, or won't share, safety data as the 4th jab is rolled out.
Please venture over to my Stack: https://fackel.substack.com/p/proof-from-the-ema-that-they-dont
Please spread the word! Thanks a lot!
This just keeps getting worse and worse. The immense subterfuge and decent is mind boggling. I think of the number of liars and cheats it took to accomplish this. I am astounded.
My thoughts exactly. Just when I think I’ve lost the ability to be shocked by these criminals and their cheating schemes...
Mind boggling is right😣
Yep -- so why would so many people be willing to be complicit in this massive crime against humanity? what do they fear?
This is what they fear https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220
They fear losing their grant money and some their jobs. But their fear does not make less guilty of mass murder.
In the end, nobody will be tried, nobody will be found guilty, and the murderers all get off scott free, many with blood money lining their pockets.
That's what history shows
NOW is the time to change History. People now KNOW what has happened in the past and not accept blindly.
You are 100% correct
True.😢😡
Scott free? Not so. Cant do that and preserve a conscience. Thats the cynics line and it disempowers you and your believers, its a lie, its murder of potential.. Be certain their own selves and future is compromised by every lie they anchor on, just as ours are liberated by our striving for truth.
Truth is that we will win through towards life in abundance.
Do these psychopaths have a conscience?
It is a FACT that they do NOT have a conscience nor empathy.
and so many other very destructive traits,
Their only aim is to WIN at all costs to others - never themselves..
They can turn on the charm while agreeing with you, but ALL the time its THEIR AGENDA only. Especially as they think they are ALWAYS RIGHT and everyone else is too blame.
To these sick people, you are merely there to be used and discarded when you can no longer be useful/manipulated and controlled.
They are DEAD emotionally, but this scenario gives them their own sort of excitement.
We all do, but some treat theirs very badly, sort of like child abuse, locked in the dungeon
I always have hope but I am also a realist. But although they may not be punished her on earth they will be punished when they stand before our God. Their souls will burn in hell for all eternity.
thats giving up the fight. the guilty who have their AI checking this will be so happy
To fear, one first must RESEARCH and READ, just like Igor does.
How many of us, the better ones, have done/do this?
The ruling elites make our lives challenging, so we don’t make time for researching and educating ourselves. It’s easier to believe a “trustworthy” Pravda source.
I do it. I go into the literature everyday. I look that the articles the Igor, Gato, Margaret Anna Alice, Midwest Doctor, Toby Rogers, and Eugyppuis post (i am sorry if I left anyone out). I check Mercola’s references. Did the same thing with RFK, Jr’s book when my interest is peaked. I’m just a regular old fashion science geek, nothing special.
Reading the source material, Dr. Linda, makes you a conspiracy theorizing crank, as the appellation is widely defined, these days.
Even if you are a widely-known epidemiologist or statistician, your demonstrable lack of faith and devotion condemns you out of hand.
Welcome to the vilified subset of your age cohort. Feels rather familiar, doesn't it? You questioned the unsupported and verifiably false narratives of our youth, and you were then a pariah.
Now, your consistency in seeking out facts marginalizes you yet again. Or still.
The youthful seeker becomes an old crank without any change in methodology or objective.
You are not alone.
Funny you’d say this. Just yesterday, a “young chicken “ called me an old crank. 😁🤷
Me too. I read phase 1 & 2. Listened to Dell B, Mercola & several others, read the SARS mRNA animal studies & how at the time of SARS, Fauci touted HCQ as very effective against SARS1. I smelled DECOMPOSING RATS throughout my reading!!!! I knew from the get go this woukd be a shit show if death & injury.
Kudos to you! 🌹These days “regular old fashin science geek” is an outlier ❤️
Congratulations on being an "old fashioned science geek". I am in awe of you!
☺️
Check out John Paul
https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9oaWRkZW5jb21wbGV4aXR5LnN1YnN0YWNrLmNvbS9wL3NhcnMtY292LTItYW5kLWl0cy1vdGhlci1wcm90ZWlucz90b2tlbj1leUoxYzJWeVgybGtJam96T0RnMU1URXpOU3dpY0c5emRGOXBaQ0k2TmpjMU1EWTFOamdzSW1saGRDSTZNVFkyTURBd05qVXlNQ3dpYVhOeklqb2ljSFZpTFRVNU56azVNeUlzSW5OMVlpSTZJbkJ2YzNRdGNtVmhZM1JwYjI0aWZRLmcxa1loRlJrWl80Qk5nOEJBX1NsekprblpJdEJidjZRWUY3MUIyeGdXYTgiLCJwIjo2NzUwNjU2OCwicyI6NTk3OTkzLCJmIjp0cnVlLCJ1IjozODg1MTEzNSwiaWF0IjoxNjYwMDA2NTIwLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMCIsInN1YiI6ImxpbmstcmVkaXJlY3QifQ.r1cEkCiCaLWVIcWKcQQ8k8xZF_M-QPfVzosPMy_zD9Y?
NO, we cannot believe such evil exists in another being. You are experiencing it now and its going to get worse-
They fear running out of oil? Is that what you mean?
Don't they know that oil is abiotic?
The education system has brainwashed not educated.
Can you point me to an annual report from any oil major that states their reserves are increasing in any of their previously dead oil fields
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
No company can make money from an oil resource where it is more expensive to extract the the oil than where is just squirts out of the ground. Their price will be undercut by the low cost sources. There was no iron crisis when the hematite mines ran out. Taconite is more expensive to mine and process but there is a lot more of it.
Lower grade oil (sand oil, etc.) is more expensive to extract, but there is a lot more of it.
HIGH PRICED OIL DESTROYS GROWTH
According to the OECD Economics Department and the International Monetary Fund Research Department, a sustained $10 per barrel increase in oil prices from $25 to $35 would result in the OECD as a whole losing 0.4% of GDP in the first and second years of higher prices. http://www.iea.org/textbase/npsum/high_oil04sum.pdf
HOW HIGH OIL PRICES WILL PERMANENTLY CAP ECONOMIC GROWTH
For most of the last century, cheap oil powered global economic growth. But in the last decade, the price of oil production has quadrupled, and that shift will permanently shackle the growth potential of the world’s economies. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-09-23/how-high-oil-prices-will-permanently-cap-economic-growth
OIL PRODUCERS NEED $100+ OIL
Steven Kopits from Douglas-Westwood said the productivity of new capital spending has fallen by a factor of five since 2000. “The vast majority of public oil and gas companies require oil prices of over $100 to achieve positive free cash flow under current capex and dividend programmes. Nearly half of the industry needs more than $120,” he said http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/11024845/Oil-and-gas-company-debt-soars-to-danger-levels-to-cover-shortfall-in-cash.html
THE END OF CHEAP OIL Global production of conventional oil will begin to decline sooner than most people think, probably within 10 years
Feb 14, 1998 |By Colin J. Campbell and Jean H. Laherrre http://dieoff.org/page140.htm (originally appeared in the Scientific American)
That is the Peak Oil explanation.
And now, in an effort to ruin my own credibility, there is another story that is far, far out of the mainstream, far out of conspiracy theories. In fact, it borders crazy.
There's a guy by the name of Clif High that does something called predictive linguistics. He has a bitchute channel. Used to program at MS. Parts of what he predicted decades ago have come to pass recently.
His theory, and I'm trying to make it less crazy, is that this is all astrologically based. A certain group of people HAD to act now or they would not have a chance for hundreds of years. Essentially, this is their one chance to rule the planet.
To be honest, that makes as much sense as anything else I suppose.
And yes, I know the idea is crazy.
I don't think he's saying that theory is a fact, it's just that THEY believe it. If they believe it, then they are trying to meet these timelines based on ancient books which could have been written by crazy people in their ancestral bloodlines.
I couldn't remember if they were looking at ancient books, astrological signs or something else.
Basically it's crazy people doing bad things for what many would see as stupid reasons that are actively hurting people.
I have heard Clif High saying that and much more which seems really 'out there' but that does not mean he is wrong....
This is his most recent upload:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8gzV6RD8YQ6x/
I am very open to what Clif says, and to me, it's OK if he's wrong.
As for the video above, my husband and I watched it yesterday. For those who are not Clif friendly, he says we're heading for a constitutional crisis. Which is not particularly surprising.
This is his telegram channel for those interested-- be warned, it is out there:
https://t.me/s/scifiworld0
COVID and the ULTIMATE EXTINCTION PLAN (UEP)
Excellent article. Scarey .
Anyone know a study where all the ferrets died with vaccs? Now I’m thinking maybe they were killed so no info could get out! Now we’re the animals!
That makes no sense. There was a time before we had oil, remember? What about nuclear energy? What about other sources? They exist, but are held back by the people who claim peak oil is a real thing.
You don't even believe any of this and you have an agenda, which is spamming that link. And we all wonder why...
I wrote it ... I am confident that the theory is correct.
Obviously you wrote it and are spamming your hare-brained garbage. Your information comes from the same people who tell us the jabs are safe and effective, government cares about you, and that men can have babies.
and it's been going on for a long, long time
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-history-of-population-control?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-complete-history-of-depopulation
The History of Population Control is Important for Understanding COVID-19
"Consider the source"!
Money astounds easily when you payoffs thousands of accomplices or threaten their jobs.
I keep coming back to the same thought as well. Just take mainstream journalists. There's probably 70,000 full-time "journalists" who work for corporate-owned or legacy news organizations in America. I really do not know of ONE journalist in this "pack" who has performed serious journalism that challenges any of the authorized Covid narratives. How is this even possible? 0 out of 70,000? Wouldn't there be, say, four or five contrarians in such a huge sample? No. When I and others write that the mainstream press is "captured," I mean that 100-percent of its members are captured ... As in all 70,000.
Fun org chart for Wall Street's media Mafia
https://swprs.org/the-american-empire-and-its-media/
AGREED or they would be fired and then another journo shall take their place, That replacement shall dutifully read their REUTERS supplied notes (that are emailed to all newspapers, to craft an article too their countries sheep.
Personally, I'm not surprised by this.
Back in the day, before she became a Pfizer shill, the friend who manages clinical trials did contract work. She would never go into details, but did lose one client because she said they were doing Mengele level experiments. She has also said there are major screw ups on every level of the trials, from doctors enrolling people that should have never been enrolled on down.
Of course, now she's with Pfizer, making big $$$$, so it's all good.
I think it's all set up like a Rat Trap. Once you use your free will to step inside for that piece of cheese, there's no way out.
Mengelefauci? At least they went after Nazi doctor Josef Mengele.
Did THEY? he ended in Brazil as did a number of other Nazis.
Operation Paperclip was the cover for many high ranking Nazi party members to be taken to USA and employed with all their SKILLS in war related activities. THey never faced the Criminal Courts as they were far more useful to USA.
Read "Canadian Patriot - Matt Ehret is full of facts and knowledge.
I believe that they did or there was a possible fake report about his death. I now think that there was also one for Adolf Hitler. He, too, may have fled to South America and ended up living in luxury to about 90 on a mountain top in Ecuador. Yeah. And get this, he may have been pretending to be a Roman Catholic priest! A reporter tried to inform the world about this. I know about Operation Paperclip. Thank you for the additional information.
Thank you Igor for noticing the simple truths that others seem to miss for some strange reason!
Thank you sincerely.
It is very easy to miss truths if you are paid to miss them...
"Evidence is in the eye of the beholder", Science 101 circa 2022.
Igor, that sounds cynical.
Thanks Igor,
This 'science' is infuriating. Even though only my undergrad was biology, I was the biology lab director (for non-science majors) at Temple University Japan for 18 years ... constantly thinking of ways to get otherwise disinterested students to be intrinsically motivated to see science as simply a well controlled problem solving process ... just one of many tools to nourish and sustain the species. STEM fields are powerful within their domains, but insufficient by themselves to provide a meaningful quality of life.
I was troubled to see Tess Lawrie's recent Tess Talks interview with a collaborator on a new book, 'The Dark Side of Academia'. I immediately bought the Kindle version, and am seeing the same thing happening in England as is happening here in Japan. The corporate nation-state is hollowing out the humanities and social sciences from the universities. This conveniently places CEOs, politicians, and their bureaucratic functionaries as the only ones 'qualified' to make policy decisions regarding how to use the fruits of the STEM fields.
https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/fKWshCTwos6Cc0TyPEY9EO/Japan-dumbs-down-its-universities.html
And now, 'science' as a blunt cover for perverse incentives is causing wreck and ruin throughout the world. Otherwise articulate, educated, and intelligent writers who I follow on substack are just a paper-thin headline away from wording those who have tried to abide by the scientific method as psychopathic.
It is the perverse incentives who have captured institutionalized science who are sociopathic ... more specifically, those 'dark-triad' personality types attracted to power over others ... the pathological narcissists, machiavellian opportunists, and morphologically defined psychopaths among us.
The scientific method (carefully controlled common-sense problems-solving) is now being conflated with the new religion of 'scientism' ... complete with their sanctified gate keepers and authorities.
You are onto something. We owe so much to science. It is incredible,
But science can be co-opted to work against us.
Science is supposed to be the rational, secular search for the truth, no? What happened scientists? Where is your truth?
'Secular earch for truth'?
Einstein, arguably the most famous icon of science was far from secular. Just because his god was the god of Spinoza and Emerson does not mean he was 'secular'. Indeed, he was quite 'spiritual' as was Niels Bohr or Max Born.
Scientists are just like carpenters, housewives, or any other profession. Some are in it for fun, some to pay the rent, some because of chance, some for blind ambition.
Truth is where you find it, if you are looking for it.
Cheers from Japan, N.
Eisenhower’s (Unheeded) Warning …
RFK, Jr.'s book provides historical context of various events that produced a “New (scientific) Normal” presided over by Anthony Fauci.
In January1961 - three days before the author’s uncle was sworn in as president - President Dwight Eisenhower gave a famous “Farewell Address” where he warned Americans about the the emergence of a “Military Industrial Complex.”
“But Eisenhower made an equally urgent - although less celebrated - warning against the emergence of a federal (science) bureaucracy that could also pose an equally dire threat to America’s Constitution and values,” writes Kennedy.
President Eisenhower noted that “… In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by or at the direction of the Federal government. Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields …
“… Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded …. (We) must … be alert to the danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.”
Writes Kennedy: “Just as President Eisenhower warned, Dr. Fauci’s Covid-19 response has steadily deconstructed our democracy and elevated the powers of a tyrannical medical technocracy.”
My husband is a chemist who does research and development. He is the only person in the office and lab that is not injected. EVERYONE else is, even the 20 and 30 somethings with PhDs that are not at risk.
This is not science it is advertising and marketing masquerading as science (also known as fraud). Sadly, it is a product of widespread corruption, and thus unlikely to correct until the house of cards collapses.
Spot-on ISL. I completely agree with you.
We are at the brink of a techno-feudal 'dark age'. Reminds me of the screen set for the original 'Blade Runner' or perhaps 'Hunger Games'.
Hi Steven, could you write an essay about your experience? I was a college professor and was a student at Temple / Tokyo in the late 80's. I saw the infiltration in higher ed since when I started in 1992. You have a very interesting analysis to make! I would put it on my website! Here's my latest- https://turningpointnews.org/corona-virus-reports/a-letter-to-people-who-support-covid-vaccine-mandates-in-wa-state
Hello Elizabeth.
You were a student at TUJ in the late 80's? Just wondering if you and I ever crossed paths? Was that at the Shibuya campus, or Shimokitazawa?
In addition to the biology labs, I taught public speaking and freshman writing ... and was the founding and only member of what eventually became TUJ's 'Adult Continuing Education Program'.. I was probably finishing my Maser's degree in education at TUJ at about that time too.
Just now saw this, so will check out your link now. As for an essay, I could write many, some of which come from my time at TUJ, or earlier as an undergrad back at Chapel Hill and UNC-W. A few anecdotes were hilarious ... some, not so. Even in the early 70's as an undergrad, I observed and thought about the gap between educational ideals ... and the education business.
In the meantime a long and winding rough draft that I really need to edit down into short stories or shorter, separate essays can be found here ... https://steven45.substack.com/p/beware-the-academic-halls-of-japan
Will be at the coast from tomorrow for a few days, Misaki and/or Shimoda just a 'Sittin' by the dock of the bay' ... pretending to fish ... but really just itching to chat with the old salts and families out for a day by the sea.
Will be back with you soon,
Cheers,
steve
p.s. Just took a look at your fantastic homepage. I had written another ps to you, but I seem to have erased it by mistake. If you are on Facebook, I think you will see we have a lot in common by looking at my homepage at NipponnoSteve (though still in the Facebook Jail for a few days. Funny how Zuckerberg claims a monopoly on only two of the three Platonic ideals ... 'truth' and 'goodness' ... probably because he couldn't win a 'beauty' contest). The heads up about your page gives me a good ground to stand on regarding how to frame an essay to help understand the social dynamics of what is going on. I'm also a member of the Academia website, and by chance (?) I have been pursuing readings of a common thread between my experiences in Japan and the current plandemic ... dark-triad psychology. I hope to go beyond a bleak analysis with my essay(s) and share some possible pro-social plans of action.
Thank you so much for the heads up Elizabeth!
Hi Steve, I am not on Facebook, kicked off in summer of 2020. I'm writing a book about the unvaccinated now., so am busy. I subscribed to your substack. You aer brilliant. Have fun fishing and Genki de!
I was also kicked off of Facebook and Twitter in about the middle of 2021. I now post publicly and freely on MeWe. Thank you for shining a light on us: The Not Shot Lot, The Chosen, and The Survivors' Club!
Kicked off in 2020?
Now writing a book?
WOW. What a warrior!
I have yet to publish beyond Quora, Facebook, or here ... and I am just getting started here, much less publishing a book.
I'd really love to meet you!
I just have off-and-on dueling scars with 'em ... but frustratingly depend on Facebook messaging to pass messages and info to private F.book groups ... mostly in Australia and Canada, but increasingly in America.
Just yesterday, had lunch with a VERY genki 70 year old Japanese lady who had flown in to meet her daughters. I met her a couple of summers ago through a mutual fishing friend born on the same island (Hachijojima). She could pass for mid 40's, but was more happy to verify she felt the same as me . no experimental treatments for her or her adult daughters ... and the suspicion it is part of a planned, multi-faceted power shift similar to what Charles Eisenstein appears to be writing about here with 'The Coronation'. Now HE is brilliant. I am in awe of so many great writers and thinkers here ... Margaret Anna Alice among my other favorites. And of course Igor here.
Depending on the style and organization of your book, would you like me to write a short chapter about how my experience with Japanese culture's strongly embedded self-censorship and compliance to authority ... meshes with how the power-mongers are using that social engineering to nudge the population similar to other countries?
Or would you prefer something more suitable for your homepage?
Either way I am itching to carrying this fight beyond exchanging messages on social media or lunch chats, and am thankful for the opportunity to help out in any way I can.
Am setting up a web video with an underground Australian Facebook buddy within the next few weeks, but as a generalist, I only feel confident in talking about human nature ... but don't we all?
Cheers ... and thanks again Elizabeth!
Arigato.
steve
Well said.
Com'on man! Just have pfaith! Never question "The $cience!"
I'll leave you with some wise words from Brandon (speaking to Don Lemon at a July 2021 CNN Town Hall).
“You got the vaccination? Are you okay? I mean, you seem…” “No, it works.” Or you, you know — or the mom and dad, or the neighbor, or when you go to church, or when you’re — no, I really mean it.
There are trusted interlocutors. Think of the people — if your kid wanted to find out whether or not there were — there’s a man on the moon, or whatever — you know, something, or, you know, whether those aliens are here or not — you know, who are the people they talk to beyond the kids who love talking about it?
Source:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/03/01/biden-don-lemon-cnn-video/
LOL ... the only thing less coherent is the vice president ... and that makes her even more dangerous.
Great detective work, as always, Igor. I thank you for your diligence.
May God bless you and your family...and keep you safe from what's coming.
Trust the New and Improved Scientific Method... brought to you by Gates and his mobbed up agencies
I heard rumors of this. Considering this is the first time this kind of mRNA technology has been widely released. You would think these multigenerational studies would be absolutely paramount.
Apparently not.
"You would think these multigenerational studies would be absolutely paramount."
Not if you're trying to reduce the world's population by 1/3.
IF I ran this past my friend who manages clinical trials at Pfizer-- in fact, depending on the date and location of the trials, she might have worked on them-- she would simply explain that we were in a pandemic, and they HAD to get a cure to the market as soon as possible. They were doing it for the good of humanity.
That being said, I cannot ask her any of these things; our relationship is tenuous in terms of c0vid, and I'm pretty sure I'm the sane person in her life right now.
The last sentence is interesting "I'm pretty sure I'm the sane person in her life right now" can you clarify?
In terms of overall "sanity," her family (siblings/ parents) are extremely dysfunctional. Her son is long term unemployed, and living at home. Her daughter has a difficult marriage. My friend--who had a very acrimonious marriage to a very unstable surgeon-- has nothing in her life but work, and is neglecting her own health, almost to the extreme. She is also taking every vaxx offered. Overall, she is not a bad person, and really believes that her job is helping humanity. You know, "saving the world." She has lost her way.
She knows that my husband and I both had c0vid and are both uninjected. I suspect we are the ONLY uninjected people that she knows. Perhaps the other thing I'm doing is proving to her that what she was told is wrong; I will NOT die from c0vid or anything related to it, not will my husband.
Prediction:
She will never reckon with the cull.
She will never reckon with the "pandemic".
She will never reckon with adverse events.
You're probably right. I have struggled with the relationship over the past year-- she's 2,000 miles away and we rarely see each other, so there is that.
That being said, she's jabbed, double boosted and will probably get the next one in a month or two. She also has had cancer twice, the first time in her 30s. She is going to have her life shortened by these jabs.
Oh no. 💔
That's the part that people just cannot or will not wrap their minds around.
If you do that you destroy the supply chains and everyone who survives starves
I understand that and you understand that, but do the megalomaniacs understand that?
Paramount? The only thing paramount was concealing the data so the uppity humans wouldn't figure out they were being deliberately exterminated.
I can't really see any other reason for it myself.
It's not like we don't have a long history of previous chemical disasters to learn from.
*Agent orange. But we need it to find the Viet Cong. Bloody trees in the way.
*Thalidomide. Great for nausea. Sucks for your babies though.
*Asbestos. Lightweight, tough, cheap, fire resistant. Never mind that hacking cough
*Leaded gasoline and paints. Because nausea, headaches and seizures are a lot of fun.
*Radium based paints. Who needs teeth, hair or health when your watch dial glows in the dark.
*Isocyanates. We all sort of knew these were dangerous, but lets put giant factories in the middle of densely populated areas and if anything ever goes wrong. Deny. Point. Blame everyone else.
Teratogen:
A teratogen is any agent that causes an abnormality following fetal exposure during pregnancy. Teratogens are usually discovered after an increased prevalence of a particular birth defect. For example, in the early 1960's, a drug known as thalidomide was used to treat morning sickness.
they got plenty of studies ... they know what they are doing ...
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Videos.php/2021/08/03/dr-richard-fleming-the-experiments
Thank you for posting Dr Fleming. Proves they know exactly what they are doing.
of course ...
The western countries where "freedom" is valued, have to be taken down first.
probably deeper than that ...
How long were the animals suppose to be kept alive for? Till the study ends? I remember them saying mice have short lifespan so we can see what happens from start to finish...
Btw it's hilarious twitter saying animal studies are safe, when that mice document Malone and co talked about got censored, later re-appeared when Pfizer started releasing new FOI documents, showing mRNA goes to spleens, liver, ovaries, adrenal glands etc, another study showed it stays for at least 2 months, while governments/media tell the world it stays in your arm for a few hours.
Fraud
A mouse lives just 2 years, they could easily and inexpensively keep a couple of dozen mice or hamsters to follow them up at least until April 2021, when the human trials ended...
I hope some scientists replicate the trial on mice then we'll soon know what happens to humans for the next 50 yrs...
Why? World’s largest phase 2&3 trial is already on…
No kidding! Five billion species-specific guinea pigs!
Exactly. No need to ever torture animals again for poison drug trials. It has been proven that humans will jump at the chance to participate in prototype poison drug trials for free, no payment needed.
". . . participate . . . for free, no payment needed."
Actually, when people volunteer to be guinea pigs for experimental drugs (especially fake vaccines!), they end up paying FOR the privilege by way of their medical expenses for being treated for their injuries! How much do the hospitals and drug companies end up raking in for the hundreds of thousands of very seriously- or permanently-injured, non-informed-consenting experiment participants?
Stuff like, Jikkileaks saying it might cause cancer over the next 5-10 years, we’d probably confirm that with mice within 6 months, then we can prepare to mourn for the ones we know. Sigh
We don't need mice. It's already happening right before our eyes in real time. The spikes knock out the Toll-like Receptors that surveil developing cancers as well as the white blood cells that destroy them, and therefore cases are already "exploding", especially among those who had it in remission.
But human souls exist outside of time-space and cannot be harmed. Everyone is okay no matter how things progress here.
After the injections, cancer up 10,000%
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/08/no_author/government-database-reveals-10000-increase-in-cancer-reports-due-to-covid-vaccines/
I know, that was a sarcastic comment. As for the cancers - lab mice isn’t the best proxy bc they all die from it.
Does Jikkileaks have a Substack?
https://arkmedic.substack.com/
I imagined that at least one or more animals died within a very, very short period so ….goodbye to all of them before it looks like more than chance?
Yes, but are test animal kept for longer periods ?
Bret Weinstein showed that the engineered mice used in these studies give false safety signals because they have hyper-repair genes unregulated but live short lives because of that.
Aren't the human studies for the c0vid injections still ongoing?
Frankly, I hate that the psychopaths use animals in their experiments at all. There are plenty of scientists who know very well how unnecessary it is, and not nearly as useful as it's purported to be.
With thalidomide, I believe there was one breed of rabbits in which birth defects resulted. And of course the doctor who tried to warn the world how dangerous thalidomide could be was marginalized and censored and essentially barred from having any say. Sounds familiar, huh?
Soldiers were told agent orange was harmless. And look how that turned out too. If we didn't learn the first time. Or the second time. How many times do we need to be taught this lesson?
I guess as many times as need be. If we can't see the wolf in sheep's clothing each time, well, there aren't going to be many lambs left, are there...?!
"Frankly, I hate that the psychopaths use animals in their experiments at all..."
Thank you for saying this!
To be quite honest... I'd prefer the animal tests be conducted on humans vs innocent animals...
Why is it ok to experiment on these poor animals?
They derive no benefit from having their eyes pinned open and various chemicals applied to see which will make the best non-irritating shampoo - for humans.
Experiment on humans -- or do not conduct the experiments at all.
Agree. And apparently humans jump at the chance to take prototype drugs, for free! You don't even have to feed or house the humans. Win, win.
Yes! Exactly. I am glad that you say this. And I am glad that there seem to be more people who think like I do.
Do the experiment with humans who agree to make the experiment. Animals can not agree. They are murdered in the name of science. I do not want to have anything to do with companies that make experiments with animals. This is speciesism. Make science without killing anmals. Thank you.
I appreciate your investigating this, Igor. I have heard about all of the animals dying in the tests but haven’t had a chance to research it. Have you come across anything about the ferret tests?
Also, one of my readers mentioned that the experiments for pregnancies were performed on fewer than 50 rodents but didn’t provide a source—if you happen to have info handy about the study, I’d be curious to learn more details. (No worries if not as I can research it myself when I have time.)
On an unrelated note, I just launched my new interview series and would love to interview you for a future entry (email me if you’re up for it). I’m backlogged so no rush, just planting the seed.
CJ Hopkins and I had a blast with the first one:
• “Dissident Dialogues: CJ Hopkins” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dissident-dialogues-cj-hopkins)
Some of these reports refer to other trials of other coronavirus vaccines.
I’ve read about the pregnant rats, I think the number was 28.
Correct and 56% died after jabbing
Do you have a link handy?
I stand corrected, reading Naomi Wolf now...44 French rats over 42 days and not allowed to give birth but they autopsied the babies then decided the vax was safe and effective for women.
🙏🤦♀️
Thank you, Fizzygurl!
Hi Margaret,
As a multidisciplinary problem-solver, I was just wondering if you are seeing, even in substack, a conflation of a distrust in corrupt scientists with a distrust in science? I am afraid that the cultural wars and divisions are increasingly reducing science as a problem-solving process to scientism as a corrupt religion. That in itself, is less troubling than what new, 'one true faith' will emerge to take its place. Maybe the cult of personality in the form of political populism? Or worse, a whole ideology that rejects rational problem solving?
Cheers from Japan.
Excellent question, Steven, and I think—at least in the Substack circles I frequent—the distinction between the scientific process and $cientism is crystal-clear for those of us who are genuinely seeking truth instead of conclusions to verify our confirmation bias.
I see scientists like Dr. Tess Lawrie (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-dr-tess-lawrie) as leading the charge to restore the true values and processes of science and medicine through organizations like the World Council for Health.
This speech by Tess is a profoundly moving summons to restore the integrity of science and liberate it from conflicts of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi2cY_-GMSU&t=17s
Hi again Margaret,
I have not yet seen the YouTube speech, but will do so.
But somewhat troubling, I saw her recent interview regarding 'The Dark Side of Academia' here on substack under Tess Talks, and while I agree with both her and her guest's values, found them to be somewhat naive regarding the petty politics and corruption that have always been in academia.
Just yesterday, I bought the Kindle version of the book, am about 15 % through it ... and thought to myself ... there is absolutely no one in Japan who would have tried to publish the same research as the author tried ... that is, no one whose salary depends on a tenured position. That research was about good management practice, and is intuitively correct for anyone seeking 'truth'.
But 'truth' does not now, nor ever, has seemed to be the priority of Boards of Directors. When I transpose that to the STEM fields, I can't help but to think of Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle', the history of 'Big Tobacco', the work of Rachel Carson, and more recently, the nearly forgotten opioid crisis.
A couple of years ago, I read Robert Friedman's 'The Politics of Excellence' regarding the pettiness and back-room bargaining regarding the Nobel Prizes in the natural sciences, (Einstein's Nobel was a bit of consolation prize for the most famous equation in history being rejected as 'Jewish' science') .. . and there is that nasty social darwinism following on heels of Darwin (just a new 'sciency' spin on old tribalism), the nasty bitterness between Edison and Tesla, and so on. I can guess the waters are much murkier in he humanities and social sciences. And of course, there is the now laughable 'Peace Prize'. War-Lord Kissinger?
As for Japan ... even after 40 years here, I can not name a single non-Japanese of world wide influence in a tenured, or even visiting position in a Japanese university (outside of domains extolling the virtues of a 'unique' Japanese culture).
My own story ... long and needs to be heavily edited and brought up to date, but a common story in Japan ... https://steven45.substack.com/p/beware-the-academic-halls-of-japan On second thought, I do not recommend you read it because your time is MUCH better spent doing what you've been doing.
For a much shorter, and to-the-point read, my comment to Igor here might be enough.
I respect, applaud, and support Tess and those like you and her, and consider myself closer to a Platonic idealist rather than a cynic. But rather than 'restore' true values (presuming a somewhat romanticized version of a past that never was) ... my guess is that she, you, and I are part of the forever-war of mankind against its own worst nature.
'History' has a way of distorting itself to make that past look better than it was. I was shocked to have did a bit of research and found the same nasty politics, dirty money, and feuding even in something as beautiful as the emerging bossa nova movement in late 1950's - early 60's Brazil. Now, though I love bossa nova enough to have learned to play it on nylon string guitar and sing in Portuguese ... I never want to actually visit Brazil, knowing that the Brazil I came to love never existed, save in the imagination of idealists.
Keep up the good fight Margaret.
You and Tess are both inspirations to this dreamer, in this skirmish, of the forever-war.
steve
I wouldn’t consider her naïveté troubling—what’s important is that she woke up to the corruption and is now bent on exposing it:
“It was very illuminating to me at the time: I’ve never worked within an academic institution. In fact, it turns out that I’m a bit of an anomaly: I’m an independent academic, do not accept funding from private industry, conduct research for non-profit organisations only, and I hold no patents related to the work I produce. This made me naïve about how universities operate – I didn’t realise the depth and breadth of dysfunction until relatively recently because despite my research work, I never came into direct contact with it.” (https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/higher-education-keeps-plumbing-new)
Perhaps it’s worse in Japan, but I wouldn’t consider trying to publish research on good management practice naïve. I haven’t watched the video yet so don’t know the details, but there has been a significant amount of research published in the burgeoning science of happiness field over the past decade+, and it’s become a bit of a hot topic, even though it’s contrary to traditional management practices that treat employees as interchangeable cogs instead of valuable members of the company.
Wow, I didn’t know Kissinger was awarded the “Peace” Prize. It’s bad enough that drone-strike–happy Obama got it. What a travesty that’s become.
And what a fascinating (and sad) anecdote about bossa nova!
Hi Margaret,
putting the p.s. here as a priority ... Check out this homepage by Linda oops ... Elizabeth Hanson. I just 'met' her under by comment to Igor, but she was a student at TUJ and returned to academia in Washington state where she is fighting the good fight. https://turningpointnews.org/corona-virus-reports/a-letter-to-people-who-support-covid-vaccine-mandates-in-wa-state
Just a short note of gratitude for reading and replying. I want you to keep doing what you do best, and lead us forward.
Alas, JMHO, but I think that long before the pre-Socratic Greeks, or Australian aboriginal natives long before the West was even a dream, most humans already knew the difference between what is 'good practice' (intuitively, morally, the right thing to do) and how much they could get away with ... not so different from the observations of Jane Goodall or Frans de Waal regarding just how far alpha males of a chimpanzee troop are allowed to go
Although I may be reaching here, if something as wistful and gentle as bossa nova emerged from such horrible sentiments and behavior in we bi-polar apes, I am guessing the same is true in all domains since the dawn of human history ... the problems of scale (exceeding Dunbar's number), the trolley car problem and other degrees of separation from the direct consequences of our action (whether it be 'outsourcing costs' or the moral problem of automated drone strikes — reminding me of the S.F. short story 'Ender's Game'), the salience of dark-triad personality traits, and conflicting — sometimes contradictory drives which interfere with moral, empathy-driven behavior such as was shown in the conformity experiments of Solomon Asch or compliance experiments of Stanley Milgram, (sigh) let me count the ways.
From pre-history to now, among us now, and always have been, are the 'good' prison guards following the 'superior orders' judged at the Nuremberg trials ... or the good shepherd thinking they are leading their tribe to their rightful place in a brave new world.
But there have always been the wounded healers, the sacrificial lambs, and the altruistic leaders as well. It may be just a conceit on my part, but I aspire to be on that end of the moral spectrum ... back to back, fighting the good fight on the behalf of the next generation ... which I hope to empower to do the same.
Cheers Margaret ... you and Tess are awesome.
steve
Primates, like Macaques, are typically reused for multiple studies over time. It seems rather unusual to necropsy them all for a vaccines study.
Of course it’s suspicious but in my experience and observations everything they do is suspicious when it comes to adverse events to their products. Health regulatory systems also appear purposely designed to hide adverse events to pharmaceutical products. From being trained wrong things on purpose in medical school to the legislation designed to put the fear of god into any dr considering blaming a pharmaceutical product for injury.
The whole health and regulatory system is corrupt and appears designed to be psychologically damaging to drs and patients alike.
i recall dr. richard fleming stating early on, that all animals died on clinical trials of mRNA testing with few weeks. in human lifes that translates in 2-3 years.
fact checkers are mostly journalists ... basically hired guns.
For Igot, Pandelis, Carlos, and all of the wonderful readers, I know that humanized mice either were euthanized or died after the induction of SARS 2 in the Carossimo study. PLUS, the macaques got sick with Lewy body in the Philippens study .Looking forward to finding out more from all of your research....
..https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955233/ Carossimo M et al....
Fatal Neurodissemination and SARS-CoV-2 Tropism in K18-hACE2 Mice Is Only Partially Dependent on hACE2 Expression---
----------------------------
----------------------https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v1.full.pdfIngrid PhilippensSARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and induces Lewy body formation in macaques
SUMMARY SENTENCE - SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and Lewy bodies, a hallmark for Parkinson, after an asymptomatic infection in macaques.
In December 2020, a variety of regulatory documents Pfizer had submitted to Europe's FDA (the EMA) were leaked and provided a lot of insights into how the Covid vaccines were developed an approved (many of the EMA documents were most likely identical to what was sent to the FDA). Since I have previous experience in drug development and investigational new drug applications (including for COVID-19 therapeutics) I made it a point to download all the documents when they were first posted on an anonymous message board and read through everything that was within them. The key takeaway I got from these documents was that a lot of tests that would normally always be required were waived, and since all of the tasks that were waived were also the ones that were evaluate for specific issues of greatest concern with the mRNA vaccine, I correctly predicted that major issues with subsequently be discovered in this regard (since in reality this almost certainly meant that the tests have been done and Pfizer concluded the data was so bad it was better to pretend they never did the tests).
Additionally, the animal tests were very lackluster and had a variety of issues that normally would have prevented a drug application from being approved for human testing. There were also a variety of other major issues with the Application and concerns voiced by regulators (such as the vaccine not covering variance that were already common in late 2020 or the mRNA degrading and producing potentially concerning proteins). Overall, the thing I found the most frustrating about reading through the regulators comments on Pfizer's application was that my team and other teams I corresponded with or how to infinitely higher standard by the FDA for an appropriate drug application, despite the fact our approaches were not novel and had decades of data showing safety.
That all being said, those EMA documents are really valuable for people who want to understand more of the story that you were discussing, and if you cannot find them online, I can direct you to them.
Thank you! Pretty much all standards were thrown out.
How's this for a regulatory charlie foxtrot:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/mhra-ema-and-the-chmp
Or ignoring the NHS Vaccination Green Book:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/nhs-green-book
Or why the BBC won't show anything against the narrative:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/bbc-framework-agreement-section-67
All adding up to more than a cock-up by politicians in my opinion.
Especially these standards on how to run trials:
https://www.ich.org/page/search-index-ich-guidelines
All of which are being ignored for covid vaccines.
Section 1.1 states:
"1.1 Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) In the pre-approval clinical experience with a new medicinal product or its new usages, particularly as the therapeutic dose(s) may not be established: all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose should be considered adverse drug reactions (my highlighting) . The phrase responses to a medicinal product means that a causal relationship between a medicinal product and an adverse event is at least a reasonable possibility, i.e., the relationship cannot be ruled out (my highlighting). Regarding marketed medicinal products: a response to a drug which is noxious and unintended and which occurs at doses normally used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of diseases or for modification of physiological function (see the ICH Guideline for Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting).”
So in other words - with experimental medicines err on the side of caution and assume the problem was caused by the drug unless or until proven otherwise.
MHRA and other regulators are not doing this but the complete opposite.
Reading your findings reminds me of the general reputation of tech companies which rush to market a new platform and only worry about problems later. mRNA as a "platform" like "software" for your body, is horrifying, as it's trillion dollar signs for a cabal of "investors" colluding to push it through.
Agreed. I write about this here: https://leemuller.substack.com/p/but-is-it-experimental
Very good points. I also recommend reading this post by Dr. Byram Bridle: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/a-moratorium-on-mrna-vaccines-is
Here are the links to the EMA's public assessment reports - all 4 of them are questionable to say the least and any regulator that is not in thrall to outside interests should have refused the EUAs:
https://ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
https://ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
https://ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/vaxzevria-previously-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
https://ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/covid-19-vaccine-janssen-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
I also wrote this in an e-mail to someone in 2021 but am having problems finding that report again (it's in my filing somewhere but need a link to post it):
"in the EMA leaked document and that the study on rats PF-07302048 is actually section 2.2.2 Pharmokinetics starting on page 45.
A few points on it:
- the only organ it looked at for effects was the liver
- they only looked at how the 2 ingredients were either excreted or urinated out of the body
- they performed no other studies to see the effects on other organs - "No other organs besides the liver were investigated and therefore distribution to other organs cannot be excluded."
A few more quotes as well:
"No traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the vaccine candidate BNT162b2.”
"No validated methods of analysis to support the non-clinical PK/biodistribution studies have been submitted.”
"However, the applicant claims to have used a qualified LC-MS/MS method to support quantitation of the two novel LNP excipients without providing such data”
"Since several LNP formulations were tested in the study it is not completely clear which of the LNP formulation is used in the clinical version of BNT162b2”
I cannot find any mention of it in other documents I have except this comment:
"Nonclinical evaluation of BNT162b2 included pharmacology (mouse immunogenicity and nonhuman primate [NHP] immunogenicity and SARS-Cov-2 challenge studies), pharmacokinetic (series of biodistribution, metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies), and toxicity (2 Good Laboratory Practice [GLP] rat repeat-dose toxicity) studies in vitro and in vivo. A developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) study is ongoing in rats. ""
Found it:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/COVID-19-mRNA-Vaccine-BioNTe24.pdf
The difference between 'to the letter of the law' and 'to the intent of the law'. I have a really really hard time with the use of animals for testing, (even humans!) and the injection of the poor animals with our effed up poisons. The way these injections kill is with much pain, as poisonings typically cause. Perverted.
HA! Thanks. I saw that giant headline as well. I assumed some big story was about to break on the animals and they wanted to get ahead of it. I guessed wrong as Nobody but yourself is writing about it.