I got the two vaccines in April/May 2021 and got pregnant in October after my cycles had regulated after all the irregular and excess bleeding after the shots. I did not get another shot while pregnant but my baby suffered an IVH that no doctor has ever found a cause for. These shots should not be given to women of childbearing age
This was obvious early on, if I am not mistaken... Yet they STILL pushed pregnant women to take these shots. They included all pregnant women in the summary, and vaccinated MOST of them in the 3rd trimester, then claimed there was only a 12% miscarriage rate. Clearly, only a baby lost in the first twenty weeks can be counted as a "miscarriage", but by including all babies vaccinated up until week 40, the made an 84% miscarrage rate sound like a 12% miscarriage rate. I put a lot of scathing rebuttals to Pfizer and CDC ads on Facebook ads pushing pregnant woman to get this D*** shot!
"COVID Vaccines Are Most Dangerous in the First Trimester of Pregnancy, Study Suggests"
Vaccines, all of them, whether you're pregnant or unpregnant. Whether you are young or old, all vaccines are most dangerous when you/I decide to have one jammed into our (or your kids) beautiful CNS.
B.S. to they only do damage in the first day or two - to 6 months out. That's not the way they work. Most of the time they cause/create disease over time. Drip. Drip. Drip. To? Unhealth. Disease, Disaster.
There is an error with vaxed individuals. They have total, no infection and infection during gestation. Same numbers! Even for norway. They got it roughly right for unvaxed, at least different numbers wich match.
Fanny fact. The vaxed got more covid during gestation than unvaxed. 11k vs 9.8k aka 18% vs 16.7%.
Their 1,2,3 semesters duplicate numbers a bit, so the sum is more than cases.
The base rate for sweden was given 1,3 per 1000. Now it is more than 2.0? +50%! For the vaxed, it is less than 1.0. Another mrna miracle! Or just another mistake, it is way too large a difference. Miscarriage difference should be within 10%, so no survival bias,in here.
Pre gestation vax rates were ca 50% for vaxed and unvaxed, they only measured vax under gestation.
So no difference there, thinking of survival bias.
First trimester ? At this point exposure to the spike protein in any form is harmful , with injecting it being the most robust means of being exposed to it .
ICAN just announced that the CDC finally relented, and will be sending them the contents of the text box input for the vSafe data that collected adverse event information from about 10 million people.
This is supposed to start coming out in about 10 days, this has the potential to really blow the lid off the CDCs claims of a safe vaccine.
Hi Igor, forgive me for being a sceptic or perhaps naive, but is there a way of telling whether the data presented by this study is “authentic” and credible I.e not cherry-picked or otherwise manipulated to present the original data in the best possible light? Prior to someone like yourself conducting your own analysis? It strikes me as absolutely impossible that a brand new medicinal intervention like this could have anything other than negative outcomes on general foetal health outcomes given the panoply of possible adverse interactions with the various systems of the body among adults and children, how could it. Or for a developing neonate ... it’s absurd, pregnant mothers are told to avoid the salad bar FFS.
Thanks Igor for doing the work on this data that the physicians either don't know how to do or wont because the inferences are unfavorable to the "safe and effective" narrative.
thanks for the interpretation, i took no drugs at all during any of my 3 pregnancies. and was committed to not doing so. i understand that sometimes it becomes necessary but it is always undesirable. there is too much we dont know and much we cant be certain of
Thalidomide, much? The poisonous effect of that drug depended on when the mother took the drug--and as it was intended to limit morning sickness (don't mess with Mother Nature--there's probably much more to that nausea than simple maternal discomfort), which occurs largely during the first three months, that which was created within that first trimester period was that which was damaged. Not to mention diethylstilbestrol--given to prospective mothers ~ 1950--to prevent miscarriage. My mother took DES, having miscarried a baby before me. In 1972, spring, the news came out about the DES babies getting cervical cancer. My mother called me at college to tell me to get checked by the college doctor--I was about 4 weeks from graduation, and 5 weeks from wedding--and I thought 'my life is over before it has begun!" I was terrified.
A reply from a 19 year experienced RN to a recent Dr. David Cartland tweet:
RAISED BY WOLVES 🇺🇲🩺🐕❤✝️
@dogmomjenn
56m
Replying to @CartlandDavid
26 of us from the "covid unit" were fired in '21 for refusing the experimental shot. 6 charge RNs included. Some of the best nurses I've worked with.
We saw what the "pandemic" was (crickets chirping) and what happened after the shot came out (ER exploded with business).
Besides personally knowing a respiratory therapist who got fast growing esophageal cancer out of the blue and died, my friends healthy 20 year old dropped dead and was found by his dorm mate. No conclusions by autopsy. He was an athlete. I'm sure he had an arrhythmia that caused his heart to stop from spike protein damage.
I've been an RN 19 years. I've worked in acute hospital care my entire career. Much of that has been in the float pool, so I see all the adult specialties: cardiac, neuro, surgery, oncology, orthopedics, general medical.
I keep track of all my patients' c-19 Vax history and their hospital presentation. Most have had 2-8 shots at this point. The more shots they've had, the worse off they are, it seems. Many head toward comfort/hospice.
I could recite countless stories of what I've seen over the past three years, but there are hippa laws that prevent me from doing so. It's all the usual stuff: heart attacks, strokes, new onset seizures, brain tumors, uncontrolled afib, cancers coming out of remission and new cancers, vertigo-falls-broken bones(a lot of this), blood clots, super infections, fungal infections, new onset altered mental status and early onset dementia. The stuff you've been hearing about. You probably know someone with one or more of these.
While the pro Vax crowd would call this anecdotal, I know this shot has targeted genetic weakness and accelerated problems that may not have been showing up at all if people's immune systems hadn't been suppressed by the spike protein damage.
I have never seen anything like this in 19 years. Thankfully, I was only off 2 months, but I had to relocate to get a job with exemption. I'm a mole in the system warning my patients and coworkers not to get any more boosters. One person at a time. Aren't nurses one of the most trusted professions? Jenn
Pfizer requested 75 years to release details of these jabs but these "researchers" think four weeks post birth is just fine and dandy to deem these jabs for mother and baby "safe."
I got the two vaccines in April/May 2021 and got pregnant in October after my cycles had regulated after all the irregular and excess bleeding after the shots. I did not get another shot while pregnant but my baby suffered an IVH that no doctor has ever found a cause for. These shots should not be given to women of childbearing age
This was obvious early on, if I am not mistaken... Yet they STILL pushed pregnant women to take these shots. They included all pregnant women in the summary, and vaccinated MOST of them in the 3rd trimester, then claimed there was only a 12% miscarriage rate. Clearly, only a baby lost in the first twenty weeks can be counted as a "miscarriage", but by including all babies vaccinated up until week 40, the made an 84% miscarrage rate sound like a 12% miscarriage rate. I put a lot of scathing rebuttals to Pfizer and CDC ads on Facebook ads pushing pregnant woman to get this D*** shot!
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Yes, it Cross the placenta, through the umbilical cord and achive the fetus.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937824000632
"Transplacental transmission of the covid-19 vaccine mRNA: Evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analysis post-vaccination"
An Op-ed has been posted on Trial Site News titled "Communicable Diseases are not Communicable: Update and Upgrade". It shows the commonality of contributing factors to communicable and non/communicable diseases. It is Open Access, and can be viewed at the following URL: (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/communicable-diseases-are-not-communicable-update-and-upgrade-2dfaa533).
"COVID Vaccines Are Most Dangerous in the First Trimester of Pregnancy, Study Suggests"
Vaccines, all of them, whether you're pregnant or unpregnant. Whether you are young or old, all vaccines are most dangerous when you/I decide to have one jammed into our (or your kids) beautiful CNS.
B.S. to they only do damage in the first day or two - to 6 months out. That's not the way they work. Most of the time they cause/create disease over time. Drip. Drip. Drip. To? Unhealth. Disease, Disaster.
I can't imagine. I just can't.
Babies. Pregnant women.
Diabolical evil...
Hi Igor, look at etable 3 sweden.
There is an error with vaxed individuals. They have total, no infection and infection during gestation. Same numbers! Even for norway. They got it roughly right for unvaxed, at least different numbers wich match.
Fanny fact. The vaxed got more covid during gestation than unvaxed. 11k vs 9.8k aka 18% vs 16.7%.
Their 1,2,3 semesters duplicate numbers a bit, so the sum is more than cases.
The base rate for sweden was given 1,3 per 1000. Now it is more than 2.0? +50%! For the vaxed, it is less than 1.0. Another mrna miracle! Or just another mistake, it is way too large a difference. Miscarriage difference should be within 10%, so no survival bias,in here.
Pre gestation vax rates were ca 50% for vaxed and unvaxed, they only measured vax under gestation.
So no difference there, thinking of survival bias.
JR
First trimester ? At this point exposure to the spike protein in any form is harmful , with injecting it being the most robust means of being exposed to it .
https://hiddencomplexity.substack.com/p/disease-acceleration-nuclear-receptor?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=597993&post_id=141464066&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=n4pq7&utm_medium=email
ICAN just announced that the CDC finally relented, and will be sending them the contents of the text box input for the vSafe data that collected adverse event information from about 10 million people.
This is supposed to start coming out in about 10 days, this has the potential to really blow the lid off the CDCs claims of a safe vaccine.
Hi Igor, forgive me for being a sceptic or perhaps naive, but is there a way of telling whether the data presented by this study is “authentic” and credible I.e not cherry-picked or otherwise manipulated to present the original data in the best possible light? Prior to someone like yourself conducting your own analysis? It strikes me as absolutely impossible that a brand new medicinal intervention like this could have anything other than negative outcomes on general foetal health outcomes given the panoply of possible adverse interactions with the various systems of the body among adults and children, how could it. Or for a developing neonate ... it’s absurd, pregnant mothers are told to avoid the salad bar FFS.
Thanks Igor for doing the work on this data that the physicians either don't know how to do or wont because the inferences are unfavorable to the "safe and effective" narrative.
thanks for the interpretation, i took no drugs at all during any of my 3 pregnancies. and was committed to not doing so. i understand that sometimes it becomes necessary but it is always undesirable. there is too much we dont know and much we cant be certain of
Thalidomide, much? The poisonous effect of that drug depended on when the mother took the drug--and as it was intended to limit morning sickness (don't mess with Mother Nature--there's probably much more to that nausea than simple maternal discomfort), which occurs largely during the first three months, that which was created within that first trimester period was that which was damaged. Not to mention diethylstilbestrol--given to prospective mothers ~ 1950--to prevent miscarriage. My mother took DES, having miscarried a baby before me. In 1972, spring, the news came out about the DES babies getting cervical cancer. My mother called me at college to tell me to get checked by the college doctor--I was about 4 weeks from graduation, and 5 weeks from wedding--and I thought 'my life is over before it has begun!" I was terrified.
Thanks for doing the maths.
I shudder at the first sight of a statistical symbol.
But it does seem that “the” Pharma science likes to delve into the confounding areas of analysis looking for proof rather than truth.
A reply from a 19 year experienced RN to a recent Dr. David Cartland tweet:
RAISED BY WOLVES 🇺🇲🩺🐕❤✝️
@dogmomjenn
56m
Replying to @CartlandDavid
26 of us from the "covid unit" were fired in '21 for refusing the experimental shot. 6 charge RNs included. Some of the best nurses I've worked with.
We saw what the "pandemic" was (crickets chirping) and what happened after the shot came out (ER exploded with business).
Besides personally knowing a respiratory therapist who got fast growing esophageal cancer out of the blue and died, my friends healthy 20 year old dropped dead and was found by his dorm mate. No conclusions by autopsy. He was an athlete. I'm sure he had an arrhythmia that caused his heart to stop from spike protein damage.
I've been an RN 19 years. I've worked in acute hospital care my entire career. Much of that has been in the float pool, so I see all the adult specialties: cardiac, neuro, surgery, oncology, orthopedics, general medical.
I keep track of all my patients' c-19 Vax history and their hospital presentation. Most have had 2-8 shots at this point. The more shots they've had, the worse off they are, it seems. Many head toward comfort/hospice.
I could recite countless stories of what I've seen over the past three years, but there are hippa laws that prevent me from doing so. It's all the usual stuff: heart attacks, strokes, new onset seizures, brain tumors, uncontrolled afib, cancers coming out of remission and new cancers, vertigo-falls-broken bones(a lot of this), blood clots, super infections, fungal infections, new onset altered mental status and early onset dementia. The stuff you've been hearing about. You probably know someone with one or more of these.
While the pro Vax crowd would call this anecdotal, I know this shot has targeted genetic weakness and accelerated problems that may not have been showing up at all if people's immune systems hadn't been suppressed by the spike protein damage.
I have never seen anything like this in 19 years. Thankfully, I was only off 2 months, but I had to relocate to get a job with exemption. I'm a mole in the system warning my patients and coworkers not to get any more boosters. One person at a time. Aren't nurses one of the most trusted professions? Jenn
Feb 8, 2024 · 7:20 PM UTC
https://nitter.cz/dogmomjenn/status/1755673092993806367#m
Four weeks of follow up, eh?
That means the babies die in week #5 and beyond.
Pfizer requested 75 years to release details of these jabs but these "researchers" think four weeks post birth is just fine and dandy to deem these jabs for mother and baby "safe."
Scumbags...