275 Comments
User's avatar
The Green Hornet's avatar

The jab however, was quite deadly to pregnant women. Especially in the first trimester.

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

I've read that placentas have changed since the covid shots.

Expand full comment
Geotom's avatar

Still, births and miscarriages are skyrocketing around the Globe! As a result, population control is fully underway!

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

And my J&J vaxxed friend had decidual castshedding in 2021. It was previously rare but not anymore. She was planning to get a booster before this happened to her. Her obgyn told her that it was from the vax and that he was seeing more miscarriages.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

It is unbelievable to me that mothers would drive to Timbuktu just for specific ingredients in formula, but give very little thought to taking an experimental drug that could affect the baby in the womb.

And for the women who breastfeed and took the jab, did they completely forget what they put in their body is going to end up in the milk?

Now, I'm not a female, but this lack of common sense is astonishing to me.

Expand full comment
JudyC's avatar

Well, I am a woman and I’m astounded too! Are these the same women who wouldn’t let a drop of alcohol pass their lips for fear it would harm their unborn child? Sure wouldn’t eat raw cookie dough, or sushi, but they were willing to be injected with an experimental drug? Wow, just wow!

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

They were caring moms, but mistaken in their specific judgment

Expand full comment
Aurora's avatar

Yes. It is a tragic use of free will. I wonder about the levels of deaths post partum. We have seen an increase in suicidal ideation and suicides in the collective. Post partum depression, after experiencing the trauma of lockdowns and isolation during pregnancy, along with the trauma of the mother and the children being born, needs further research. I work with women who have had traumatic experiences when their children are born. The prenatal experiences of the baby will stay in their bodies. Everything the mother feels, consumes, experiences affects the fetus.

Expand full comment
joe jacovino's avatar

amazing what 2000 lbs of coercion will do to ya

Expand full comment
Manketell's avatar

Or forced.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

I know. Exactly!

The power of fear is astounding.

Expand full comment
Geotom's avatar

The ever-present fearmongering from the elite-controlled Mass Media turned people into sheeple, and as sheeple, they make emotional, not logical, decisions! The ability to control the minds of people using the media has been well-honed over the decades. Even the flicker rate on the TV screens was set to reach the spot of the brain that gets mesmerized.

Expand full comment
Feldheld's avatar

People become sheep out of their own free will. It's a kind of cowardice and laziness. Trusting is much easier than being skeptical and distrusting. The media are simply exploiting this epidemic of infantile trust.

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

As one who helped design TV displays, I assure you the field rate was set more by technology than psychology. Back in the day it was impossible to generate the frame rates that are now possible. At least the US runs on 60 Hz unlike the UK at 50 Hz where flicker was even worse.

Expand full comment
Jen Adams's avatar

My daughter-in-law took the jab after the baby was born. She was told that it would be good for the baby to get the spike protein from her breast milk. I cried. Coincidently that baby is two and has been in the hospital six or seven times now with respiratory issues.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

I am sorry. Brings me nothing but sorrow.

Hang in there and stay strong!

Expand full comment
Cristina7's avatar

So sorry about it. It’s heartbreaking.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Petersen's avatar

Poor little baby. This is heartbreaking.

And it’s so hard to get through to people about the dangers of the jab.

Many are too invested in the narrative to deign to question it. Others are too scared to listen (aka “I just can’t handle anything else”).

Expand full comment
Lili's avatar

It can be so frustrating to be a parent and have to sit back watch our children make mistakes. I'm so sorry.

Expand full comment
Thorsten's avatar

Thalidomide. Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

Expand full comment
Hana C. Waumbek's avatar

Peer pressure among 20, 30, 40-something women is astounding, and almost completely overrides common sense. One has to be willing to be an outcast, but motherhood is not a time to be an outcast.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Very good point

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

it's called brainwashed. It resembles stupidity but there's a difference. And this difference is being used by the psychopaths who own everything on the planet to divide and conquer us. We need to talk more of this brainwashing to help more people understand it. Typically they'll be able to see that others are brainwashed before they can see that they are too.

The best way I've seen is to point out how they contradict themselves.

The most frequent contradiction is that you can get them to talk about how the gov't always lies to them, but then the gov't will scare them with a fake problem and then the same who know the gov't is lying sacks of crap will now believe in their solution cause they're scared.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
May 12, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Thank you

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 12, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

It's disgusting the PHA'S used these malicious behavioral control dynamics to beat down pregnant women and school age children.

I'm not blaming them necessarily, I'm just not sure the people who regret their choices during the pandemic have learned the real lesson:

"Nobody is going to take care of you or your babies/ children's health better than you"

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 12, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
pandelis's avatar

reagan .... lol ...

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

And people SHOULD be able to trust their government.

Expand full comment
Geotom's avatar

NOT ANY LONGER! The NWO is controlling your government, and they're genocidial Phycopaths!

Expand full comment
Jayna Dinnyes's avatar

Yeah. The NWO is just the OWD (Old World Disorder) under The Christian Vatican in Rome. It was also in charge of the Nazi GENOCIDE that was particularly cruel to women and babes!

Now, it's THE JABICIDE KILLING OF THE WILLING. What will this soon "morph" into?

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

I completely agree with you.

Expand full comment
Fear's avatar

Never. Why would anyone trust large groups of double digit IQ puppets bankrolled by sociopaths?

Expand full comment
Lili's avatar

But probably NEVER again!

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Dr Nass reports that the ACOG was bribed to promote the vax for pregnant women https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-us-government-paid-the-college. At first they warned against but money changed their mind.

Expand full comment
The Green Hornet's avatar

Firstly, very sorry for your friend.

Secondly, didn’t mean to imply there was no risk in 2 and 3, it’s just lower. Close to 90% however, in trimester 1.

Expand full comment
Aznasimage's avatar

There is so much suffering. These are tales born of nightmares and heartache.

Expand full comment
Freedom2Choose's avatar

That’s very sad. 😢

Expand full comment
Cristina7's avatar

Heartbreaking. 💔

Expand full comment
Alice P. Liddell's avatar

Did the woman believe the covid shot caused the baby to die?

Expand full comment
Andrea Leshok's avatar

My ob tried to convince me to take the jabs when I was pregnant in early 2021. Especially after I gave birth. NOPE! I had another healthy baby this December as well. By the time I was seeing him for that baby he didn't bring up Covid jabs anymore. I think/hope he realizes.

My sil who is double jabbed also gave birth to a healthy baby in 2022. I hope they ended up with saline batches and will continue to be unaffected.

A side benefit of the Covid debacle is that none of my children will ever get another vaccine. Ever. For anything. The jig is up and our family is not the only one who has done a 180 on the childhood "schedule".

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Congratulations

Expand full comment
Sunlover's avatar

It's great that people like you are waking up to the harms of vaccines and choosing to opt out. If a large enough group opts out, perhaps we will see a decrease in the childhood illnesses and autism rates. A true control group that we never had with any of the other vaccines. The book Turtles All the Way Down does a great job of exposing how we were all lead to believe that they were safe and effective.!

Expand full comment
Aznasimage's avatar

You are a rarity now, and should be celebrated. The stats from other Countries are not comforting. We need every child now more than ever.

Expand full comment
Stephenie's avatar

This is the best news in the whole thread! Yay for healthy kids! I’m about ten years too late, but we are done forever too.

Expand full comment
RE Nichols's avatar

A lot more people hate Big Pharma and distrust our medical system.

Shame on all the doctors and nurses who went along with the lie. Especially those who killed patients by feeding them Remdesivir and forcing mechanical ventilators down their throats so they couldn't breathe.

Expand full comment
OpenYourEyes's avatar

And the cultish denial of ivermectin and other safe treatments. It seems completely bizarre, but the incentives were in place.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Yes, that's the silver lining. Many now see the reality that was there long before COVID. That is a very good thing. Can you imagine where we would be if their treatments and jabs had been safe and effective?

Expand full comment
William Conklin's avatar

So how many pregnant women die each year of the flu? If Nine die each year, then none died of Covid because flu deaths were purposely designated Covid deaths by the misuse of a PCR test

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Petersen's avatar

Of course, no one died of flu in 2020. Magic trick.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Agreed. Whatever flu really is (it definitely exists as a clinical syndrome but I no longer believe that patients presenting with such a syndrome are axiomatically infected with an “influenza virus”.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

I have presented an alternate lung physiology in my Substack article titled: we breathe air not oxygen

I say winter presents lungs with dry air and dehydration is the major factor that induces cold and flu symptoms

Dryness being our weak point

I can discard the whole oxygen/carbon dioxide gaseous exchange and show a logical physiological process of hydration at the alveoli sacs.

I hope you can take the time to read it

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Thank you. I am so swamped with material that I probably can’t read it. It does sound like a plausible explanation for acute respiratory illnesses and the apparent contagion that resists experimental replication.

Presumably people vary in their abiiity to regulate airway surface liquid under stressful atmospheric conditions.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

The airway mucosa must condition the incoming air with salt and moisture

100% humidity at the alveoli

The surfactant produced at the alveoli makes bubbles

The bubbles burst upon the alveoli sac capillaries - spraying saline water upon the passing RBCs - the blood cells hydrate

The state changes of the RBCs is from dehydration to hydration- contracted to expanded - dense/dark to bright

The red light monitoring is recording hydration by measuring the light from the RBCs nothing to do with oxygen

There’s more, my article takes you through step by step

It’s a paradigm shift in understanding lung physiology

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Perhaps, but virus crowding out seems more likely. (One rarely gets another viral infection within a month or 2 of another.) Covid (Wuhan strain, anyhow) was not a flu. Different symptomotology, and amantadine (Symmetrel) didn't touch it.

Expand full comment
William Conklin's avatar

Well, it’s possible there was no Covid Wuhan strain, but assuming there was, there’s no proof that it went all over the world except through the PCR test, which wasn’t valid anyway. I don’t know what exactly happened, but I am willing to say that there was a Wuhan strain of Covid, but I don’t think anybody can prove it caused all the death it allegedly csused.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

There was. I'm (thank God, still) living proof. While I dunno whitherall it went, it went through me, and esp. through my bronchi. And what "PCR test"? I've already posted, to get one of whatever validity, one had to present at a hospital and lie about recently returning from China. Yeah, do that if you really want remdesivir and a vent to blow out your lungs. Subscribe to and read Bill Rice, Jr., also including past articles. https://billricejr.substack.com/

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

As I keep saying the Wuhan 'flu thing was a psy-op, a Red Herring, a false flag. It was industrial pollution that caused respiratory disease. The rest was propaganda.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/wuhan-flu

Expand full comment
William Conklin's avatar

Yes, and the PCR test rebranded all colds and flu as Covid. It was the most brilliant psyop in history. I wonder if they have a better one planned?

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Umm.....yes, vaccines deaths and harms are the New Wave. Perhaps it could be the Upsilon variant.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/11/100-up-and-stupid-20-variants/

Or maybe Zekon variant albeit that is not a Greek letter.

Zekon as in ze biggest Kon (sic) yet known to mankind!!!

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

There was no pandemic as evidenced in the all cause mortality data. See Denis Rancourt et al for 100 weeks Data by state, age at death and sex.

Ergo no severe acute respiratory syndrome virus was circulating.

Just lies reinforced by untrustworthy & deliberately contrived PCR clinical diagnostic, which is not capable of yielding meaningful results.

Remove the fake diagnostic & there’s nothing left. There aren’t any consistent features of the alleged covid-19 disease that don’t also occur in “influenza-like Ilnesses” (not necessarily flu).

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Did I miss a requirement for increase in all cause mortality? https://www.dictionary.com/browse/pandemic

Again, no "PCR" was available, and was later contrived.

It most certainly had (pretty much gone by mid-April 2020) identifying features not also occurring in flu, such as bronchial spasms (coronavirus is also known as "infectious bronchitis disease/virus") and nonsusceptibility to amantadine. The persistent headaches of the "variants" may also qualify.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Thanks for citing my work, SaHiB. I agree. The peak of the virus spread had long since occurred by mid-April 2020.

Expand full comment
Phyllis B's avatar

my husband's cousin who is a nurse told us that masks are effective with flu because the virus is much bigger and would more likely be trapped by a mask. But I agree that the miscounting was real; probably a combination of larger virus and lies

Expand full comment
William Conklin's avatar

I think it’s unlikely that masks are effective with the flu virus. It may be bigger than the coronavirus, but not big enough for the mask to pay any attention.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

It is truly sad that health care workers are falling for modern day phrenology by virtue of propaganda....3 years in!

Masking has been demonstrated to have negative efficacy with mitigating the flu or its transmission . We know this because, there were dozens of pre-pandemic studies conducted to determine the efficacy of masks as it relates to the flu.

The reason your friend is falling into this trap is for three fundamental reasons:

1. Can't prove a negative

2. Sunk Cost Fallacy (for PHA's and a majority of public)

3. There's no way to develop a hypothesis that can provide proofs of anything, beyond "belief" and "disbelief", if it's not falsifiable. Find me a study/hypothesis about masks that was inherently falsifiable during covid. Explain to me an experiment at either the individual level or societal level that is capable (in the real world about masks) of being tested for being wrong.

The scientific method was abandoned, precisely because they were simply trying to prove data instead of TESTING the data. And one of the main reasons they did that is because the global experiment would allow them to be able to say, "mistakes were made" ("but not on a net basis"...of course) AND that they were fucking LEARNING...of course...because...you know... it's a very scary NOVEL virus.

This is all a farce because they were never testing anything, other than how much control they could gain and how much power they could wield, unresisted, to meet those ends...and what they could get away with next time.

A quadrillion bits and bytes are nothing but digital detritus in your hypothesis if they can't be tested for falsifiability. And the kicker is masking is just one variable in the grand/global experiment they were conducting, that was based on a multitude of measures that had the same pseudo-scientific properties as masking.

So, not only was masking unfalsifiable, but so was every other variable in the global experiment, that consisted of dozens of measures that the scientific method would've rejected wholesale.

An experiment where every variable is unfalsifiable, is just that; so utterly unfalsifiable that trying to control for confounders (every single measure/variable affected every other unfalsifiable variable) was an exercise in futility...because only one variable has to be unfalsifiable for the entire hypothesis to fail...let alone EVERY single variable inuring unfalsifiability to all other variables!

The perfect Swiss Army Knife for fucking bureaucrats.

Here's 400 + pre-pandemic studies that demonstrate masks are useless against a respiratory virus. Please feel free to share with them:

https://archive.org/details/Masken-Literatur/2023-02-05_exclusive_lead_author_of_new_Cochrane_review_speaks_out-Maryanne%20Demasi%20reports/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
Geotom's avatar

That's totally wrong! Stopping a virus with a mask is like keeping out Mosquitoes with a chainlink fence. About 7% of the reported deaths were from Covid alone, but that doesn't include those from the deadly treatments mandated by Dr. Death Fauci!

Expand full comment
NJ Election Advisor's avatar

Ignorance and fear are the real killers.

Gates

Daszak

Walensky

Soros

Rockefellers

rely on this to get humanity to cull itself.

Expand full comment
RE Nichols's avatar

How about implicit trust of scumbags?

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

ESFJs (Myers-Briggs personality type) tend to do that.

Expand full comment
Andrea Leshok's avatar

ENSJ but almost ESFJ as I'm about 50 percent split on the N/S and didn't fall for it (although I certainly didn't call it right away when it happened at the scale it was happening and did conform to certain requirements (like masking) when I should have held firm from the start). But this was a good preparation for whatever "next time" is because I will be prepared to fight.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Much as I detest it, I'll wear a mask indoors to avoid a fight when I'm trying to shop, etc. (I'd rather let it dry out before I venture back out into the pollen, spores, and pollution.) Sad to say, an N95 mask did not seem to protect me from the adverse effects of these malicious Covidians' shedding. Wicked Pedophilia calls this and related observations of "Vaccine shedding an anti-vaccination myth about the release of infective virus following vaccination" and "misinformation". They erroneously claim "the spike protein generated by vaccination does not shed". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_shedding Heh, perhaps they proved I and others are susceptible to psychosomatic illness. :)

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Did I miss something? I am certain you have a thought in mind. I was expecting murderous, control freaks. : )

They are outgoing, loyal, organized, and tender-hearted individuals who gain energy from interacting with others

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

The other side of the coin is they have a tendency to brush with martyrdom.

But the most susceptible (whether they bought in or not) was the alpha males, who had too much to lose by being a dissident. They were neutralized through the behavioral dynamics, which tightened the grip on the other personalities.

Alpha males loathed other males that stood up. Especially with the mask because they knew they were being emasculated.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Again my opinion, but I don't think any MB personality type is inherently evil. They all have their roles. SJs often have difficulty adhering to the good aspects of their roles, and accepting the roles of divergent personality types. They're too suggestible and conform to social pressure.

Expand full comment
RE Nichols's avatar

Maybe they are way too trusting? They assume everyone in the world is kind hearted and nice. (Nope!)

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

That is truly interesting. I’m looking that personality type and hoping that I am not one.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Just my opinion, but severe social pressure (I noticed it most in Mormonism) pushes people towards that and similar personality types. Fwiw, I don't think introverts easily switch to extroversion. (Don't know, but I suspect thinkers and feelers can switch. And I also suspect habitual use of THC and atypical antipsychotics, perhaps HDTV, too, can induce more sensing behavior. One can switch between judging and perceiving; at least I do.) ISFJs are very similar, but exert less social effect. And I suspect the worst psychopaths are ESTJs. (They know what they do.) All of these detest NTs because they don't readily comply. The NTs in turn resent the control freaks.

Expand full comment
RE Nichols's avatar

Out of the five personality traits I scored high in both neuroticism and openness. Unfortunately this has gained me a reputation of being a paranoid catastrophist. I hate being that crazy person who turns out to be right in the end,

I feel like all the normal people have let me down. I've always distrusted my own judgment (Too WEIRD.) and looked to the social conformists for examples to imitate.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Exceptions to the bell curve are called "sleepers" for a reason; when in the crucible they are the rare individual who has the capacity to resist authority and assert moral autonomy but who are seldom aware of this hidden strength until put to the test.

You are one of those people.

There is no single personality "type" for those people.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

MB only considers 4 traits. What is the fifth? Must be a different classification system to consider neuroticism and openness.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Interesting, I have more to learn and think about. These folks might then be more likely to be “nudged”?

Expand full comment
Baya Sana's avatar

Less than ESTJ's in my experience. I know ESFJ's who called the scam early. I don't know any ESTJ's who did. In fact (thinking of my ex-pastor) ESTJ's love taking charge and being decisive. They don't like waiting around for more info and once they have made one of their quick decisions they tend to be absolutely unwilling to walk it back no matter what evidence comes along afterward especially if their info had come from someone higher up in official authority lines. They don't seem to do reflection and they sure don't join dots.

ESTJ's don't trust scumbags having no credentials. They are super suspicious of outsiders but OTOH will basically worship superiors wielding industry credentials and can't imagine them ever being scumbags because 'authority'!

They are wonderful to have on a team when everything is normal as they don't dither around but make sure things get done and done well.

But they don't adapt to changing situations, they tend to double down on what they already know works from direct experience. They do well in corporate/govt work as they respect authority lines. They fit in and expect you will too. They are drawn to admin/govt type positions and hate being questioned by anyone 'lower' than them in any particular social/work setting.

ALL my most major professional workplace clashes have been with ESTJ or ISTJ types. They tend to be heavily invested in protecting and maintaining institutions, traditions, and TPTB, where as I'm all about how to protect people from the abuse institutions can end up forcing on staff and/or customers due to policies that only benefit the institution.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Differing definitions of F and T? ESFJs differ because they don't all accept input from the same group. I already posted, since ESTJs tend to be direct control freaks, rather than merely subservient, they are more facile than most other types at acting as psychopaths. ESTJs not trusting scumbags having no credentials seems a bit presumptuous. They and their Papieren get absolute authority to determine who is a "scumbag"? Your 'authority' comment suggests even you don't believe that. I would suspect, reflection need Intuition. Sensing types must be forced into it if they are to reflect at all. God be thanked, unless their conscience be thoroughly seared with a hot iron, everyone has at least an underlying vestige of intuition.

Expand full comment
Baya Sana's avatar

Well of course - I've yet to discover any MBTI type who all act the same all the time. When I mention any type's behaviour I'm generalising.

IME ESTJ's certainly won't trust scumbags with no credentials. They venerate those with (approved by mainstream authorities) credentials so, not being very good at intuition, they tend to assume highly credentialed people are good and should be obeyed. If OTOH that person is on a similar level to their own social standing, or may be a threat to their access to resources, then they won't assume such people are good. The opposite in fact.

ESTJ's are quick to assume authority in most social situations if they perceive that no obviously higher authority is present (if one is they will tend to automatically support that person) and part of that is approving others as acceptable or not. Like I said, they don't like to leave things undecided so tend to be the people in any group who yay or nay newcomers. They're not given authority to do so they just take it by virtue of voicing their opinions. Since they tend to be pugnacious most other people let them get away with it - while perhaps privately taking a wait-and-see approach.

Basically STJs tend to enforce/support the status quo. They don't like change but interestingly, as we saw in 2020, will support radical changes/mandates if such are being proposed by status quo authorities. They are used to letting their social superiors do their thinking for them and the notion that those in charge may not know what they are doing is too chaotic to contemplate.

Yes, we all have access to all 8 MBTI functions so there is no excuse although accessing, or taking intuition seriously, seems to be way harder for STJs.

My STJ mother insisted on us doing everything 'by the book' when she was raising us. She has changed a LOT since and I respect her for her willingness to adjust her beliefs over time. Too many won't.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Your insistence on the 'T' aspect of STJs puzzles me. Why do they even have it if they only "think" about preserving their institution or kowtowing to social "superior authorities"?

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Let’s never forget baric.

Expand full comment
Former UK resident's avatar

You missed Fauci.

And Walensky was not the director altho with regards to her crimes, maybe it wouldn't matter that much, whether she was a fake director or a paid puppet actor.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I think these people are lying, stinking bastards. They deserve the very worse we can hand out. I am truly sorry for those who believed this bull. I am so sorry for the unborn.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

I agree, I am also sad

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

A young female relative in the states trusted the "science" and was triple shot, third jab in the second trimester of her pregnancy. By a miracle she brought her baby to term and they both seem fine. But she's done now. The pediatrician pushed HARD to get her to vaccinate her two month old baby at her first well baby visit ("you're risking her life, this is best for both of you, you're right here in the office, might as well just get er done"...blah blah blah) but she resisted. Said fiercely with tears "I wish I'd trusted my gut and never got the third shot".

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

Congrats

Expand full comment
Basina's avatar

God was protecting her & baby. We have an inkling of an idea that certain lots were very toxic & others were mild, moderate & placebos. Sasha Latypova spoke tonight about a research article in Denmark that proved statistically that this was the case. Im sorry I don’t know more at this time, but this is not the first time that Ive heard about the Pfizer toxic lots.

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

Yes I totally agree. She’s a wonderful young woman and I’m so grateful He spared her. It does appear some lots and geographical areas were spared for some reason.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

It gives the illusion of out breaks of the 'deadly virus'. Ha, ha, ha. They won't fool me.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

I think we can say that this is pure logic, although as each person is an individual and there is no such thing as herd immunity, it might be that the individuals immune system status is the prime reason for variance in effects.

Ultimately we cannot know without testing each vial just before injection.

In any event, injecting poisons which is what the ingredients are in part is never a recipe for good health.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and

Expand full comment
Seeking Truth!'s avatar

I believe my pre-born grandchild died as a result of the jab.

And Pfizer knew it in April of 2021!

Naomi Wolf reported on it!!!

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/pfizer-fda-dr-walensky-knew-fetuses

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

I am so sorry and my condolences

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

Kill 20 to save 0. Winning!!!!

As I’m writing this I’m in a department store with the wife. Watching kids walk by all masked up. Cheers to the brain damaged generation.

Expand full comment
RE Nichols's avatar

Thank a Covid Karen for all the harm the stupid bitch has done children.

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

I wanna scream at these kids “your parents are abusers, come home with me instead “

Expand full comment
Charlotte Ruse's avatar

The only thing dangerous about COVID was the mandated jab.

Expand full comment
Sean O'Dalaigh's avatar

Well, well, well whaddoyaknow? Seems obvious that the medical criminal cabal was the cause of these ladies demise. Actually, a young Brazilian lady who works with my wife in Alberta got jabbed so she could fly to / from Brazil to meet the husband - this is when Blackface banned the great unwashed from any and all planes. She also wanted to start a family and she duly got pregnant - sadly she lost the baby at around 3 months and has not managed to get pregnant again. Not saying the usual but it kinda fits. Now, did she or hubbie ever discuss the possibility that it maybe, just might be the you know what. I doubt it☘️

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

The scenario absolutely fits.

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

I think the #s of people who "died with covid" are a lie die to falsely conflating exposures with infections by running too many pcr cycles for *theoretical* dna sequencing.

It was murder for money, plain & simple.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

They have been getting away with murder for years

I believe the flu vax push has been intentional programming to ready the populace for their cv19 remedy

They will have already practiced the death and denial forms we saw in cv19

I bet flu vaxs have been inducing lung cancers and all manner of problems

Flu vaxs never protected, no safety data etc

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

True. The ginormous con that took in so many has been that putting a cocktail of poisons into one's body is a Good Idea and will be good for future health.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

Health is not under pinned by big pHARMa or their entrained distributors

Health equals hydration

Hence the ubiquitous saline drip used for most bodily insults

Hydration equals salt plus water because water follows salt, salt acting as a sponge.

RBCs distribute saline water to thirsty areas - that’s their role.

Nothing to do with oxygen or carbon dioxide

The red light finger monitoring is watching hydration

Dehydrated RBCs are contracted and dark

Hydrated RBCs are expanded and bright

Lungs are rehydrating RBCs

The whole body is constantly adjusting for pressure and water salt balance with our environment

Hence we are like fish

Curious, please read my first article

We breathe air not oxygen

Jane333.Substack.com

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

I noted previously and have read thank you very much. I struggle with my energy/health so taking it all in takes time I'm sorry to say.

As I prefer to give proper review of your detailed analysis, I wouldn't want to say anything at this stage, except that dehydration is a major health issue. I consider most headaches are probably lack of water yet people will take a big pharma pill with a glass of water.

Yet what is doing the benefit? The water rather than any pill that's for sure.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

Yes, agreed, gov/pHARMa generates a multitude of dis-ease from the chronic effects of dehydration or low salt. I see dehydration as the entry way of sicknesses.

If we look at the cold/flu season it coincides with the onset of cold air. The dryness in the outside air coupled with heating in cars and homes drives dehydration and the onset of respiratory distress symptoms.

The hospital’s saline drip is the hero. Once rehydrated, healing begins. The autonomic body is focused on maintaining hydration, it is the number 1 priority.

Hence drinking salted water can be our hero!

It’s probably also why we like to gather along coastlines, we need to breathe the salty air and bathe in the salty water.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Thank you. I wonder if you knew this. 'Disease' is an anagram of 'seaside'!

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/15/why-is-the-seaside-good-for-us/

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

Before he founded - sold a biotech company, Dr Michael Yeadon was in VP of research, respiratory infections & allergies at pfizer. He says flu vaccines didn't do anything, bad or good. They simply did nothing.

Yeadon has been instrumental in fighting the mrna jabs, was if not the the 1st, then among the 1st, to speak out & label the entire covid response a "'depopulation program." I trust his opinion, which is grounded in both biological facts & in depth knowledge of the "people" doing this to us.

The flu (& other) vaxes were pushed to make money, period. It wasn't until Bill Gates came along that vaccines were seen as a way to depopulate. Gates took his same game plan from high tech -- to force dependency on continuous upgrades & "improvements" -- & applied it to "health care" to implement his eugenicist plans.

Now Gates is trying to replace the world's food supply with his manufactured "food" products.

Expand full comment
Jane 333's avatar

Have u looked at the ingredients of these ‘do nothing’ flu jabs? They aren’t saline jabs

Toxins is a better label

And some folk get v sick from them, I’m suggesting they were using the flu jabs to trial what toxins went into the cv jabs

Expand full comment
Surviving the Billionaire Wars's avatar

And I disagree.🤷

Expand full comment
CD's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
shibumi's avatar

For those who were injected and had healthy babies... it will be interesting down the line to see if they are able to have their own children. Because... we just don't know.

But... "safe and effective."

Expand full comment
JMJ's avatar

Yes I know young mothers that were jabbed multiple times and caught COVID while pregnant multiple times but the babies seem fine.

Expand full comment
Nancy in NC's avatar

The government has lied about every aspect of covid, the jab, and anything else of importance for decades. Why anyone would believe anything these lack wits, most doctors or the corrupt media says is a mystery to me.

Expand full comment
Baya Sana's avatar

Excuse me, for purposes of translation it may help to know that, down under, we call them f*ckwits.

Expand full comment
Nancy in NC's avatar

Lol. That gives them too much value.

Expand full comment
Cristobal Alvarado's avatar

"Journalists" should hound representatives of ACOG and the Obstetrics Board and aggressively question them about this obvious corruption. They should all have their licensed revoked, at the least.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Yes they should. And yes they should.

Expand full comment
Peter Wiggin's avatar

Nudged...

...more like pushed off a cliff

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

“Nudge” is the newest main stream dirty word in our language.

Expand full comment