DEBATE: Did Our Health Authorities Actually Take COVID shots?
DEBATE: Did Our Health Authorities Actually Take COVID shots?
Are they TOO SMART to fall for their own BS? Or dumb enough?
I posted an article yesterday, positing that Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla has VAIDS due to his multiple boosters, which caused him to have two COVID infections, separated by only one month:
Many of my readers remarked that Bourla’s announcement must be a lie and that Albert is too smart and too well-informed to take his own shot. Those readers suggested that perhaps Bourla is NOT having COVID for the second time in two months, but is just making stuff up for bivalent booster marketing purposes or to pretend to be vaccinated or some such.
The same types of comments were made when I wrote about Fauci’s Paxlovid rebound or Biden’s Paxlovid rebound. Please read the Biden article as it explains why these quadruple-boosted people are having endless COVID rebounds:
Could it be that these authority people are faking their Covid vaccinations?
Arguments in Support of the “Faking Theory”
Supporters of the “Faking Theory” are saying that these top-level charlatans and medical quacks like Dr. Fauci, or country leaders like Joe Biden, who promoted obviously unproven, experimental, and dangerous snake oil treatments, were smart, understood what was going on, and thus could not take Covid vaccines. So, say proponents of this theory, those leaders are now purposely faking reinfections and Covid rebounds to seem vaccinated and thus avoid scrutiny.
Many of my readers are healthy unvaccinated people, who had Covid once, or never, did not die of Covid, and who have many similarly situated friends and relatives. That colors their thinking. They instinctively understood, based on a variety of theories, the dangers of unproven and aggressively promoted solutions based on failed technologies. So, they question how others in positions of knowledge and authority, would be unwise enough to make the wrong decision and personally take the vaccine.
Since most of us are not scions of medicine or experts in decision making, and yet we figured it out, say those people, surely the sharpest minds promoting this crap know that they are lying about Covid vaccines being “safe and effective”, and thus would avoid injecting themselves with those products, which they have to lie to promote.
They point to videos of fake vaccinations by health leaders.
A founder and president of a Spanish pharma company PharmaMar was caught buying a fake vaccine passport:
Pfizer’s Albert Bourla was also not allowed to visit Israel because he was not fully vaccinated. He possibly was vaccinated later.
Germany’s Karl Lauterbach was also suspiciously caught lying about his booster status.
Arguments Against the “Faking Theory”
Opponents of the “Faking Theory” think that our health leadership, led by the (Bill Gates-sponsored - I.C.) hysterical press, with objectors censored by Google and Facebook, went mad and suspended all critical thinking and was captivated by bad groupthink.
Such opponents use the personal circumstances of “Paxlovid rebounds” and frequent reinfections as prima facie evidence of these people’s vaccination status. They are saying that these specific individuals really took their own poison.
One prominent opponent of the “Faking Theory” is our friend-of-the-substack eugyppius, who suggested that the vaccinators have gone mad (paid link), and also this:
Eugyppius arguments are eloquent, well-reasoned, and worth exploring.
There is a video of Dr. Fauci having Paxlovid rebound and he does look sick:
Gavin Newsom was obviously sick after his booster shot last fall and disappeared from public view for 10 days!
Here’s a remarkable post from Steve Kirsch, who found an INSIDER at the CDC who is giving him information (and I hope that it is not at attempt to leak bad information on purpose). The insider says that the entire CDC is pro-vax and all doubters were pushed out.
In addition, it is one thing for regular people to buy fake vaccine passports (something which I always endorsed), and another thing for famous people to do the same thing without being caught. John Smith surely can find someone who would take $500 in cash, and enter John “into the system” without injecting anything. It is a lot harder for Tony Fauci to do without this being uncovered!
My Own Position
My own position is restrained neutrality, colored by mistrust. I stick their own words to them. I am not a mind reader and I do not have X-ray vision. So I cannot read the minds of Dr. Fauci or Albert Bourla or Karl Lauterbach and I do not have the retroactive penetrating vision to see if they were injected with saline solution, instead of the vaccine, on camera. I am agnostic.
And, to be honest, while I would love to find out what they did to themselves, I do not care that much about it. They are evildoers anyway. As Australia’s Michael Gunner said about something else, their “personal vaccination status is utterly irrelevant”.
What matters is what they did to us, not what went into their arms.
Please also consider the possibility that some of our “pandemic response leaders” possibly faked their vaccinations (like Karnataka health leaders), while some (like Tony Fauci or Joe Biden) did not.
DEBATE
The question deserves a debate. I invite supporters and opponents of the Faking Theory to put forth coherent and well-written arguments in TOP-LEVEL REPLIES.
Start replies with
“FAKED — … … … “ — if you think that they faked their shots
“NOT FAKED - … … … “ — if you think that they did take their own quack medicine
“NUANCED - … … …” — if you take a nuanced position
“SAFE AND EFFECTIVE — … … …” — if you think that vaccines are helpful, safe, and effective, and you think that our health leaders did themselves a favor by honestly getting vaccinated. Yes, if you believe in such things, you are free to voice such an opinion on this substack. Your messages will NOT be deleted!
Please BE CIVIL. When we had our last debate, I promised to DELETE all nasty and impolite replies. Everyone was very nice and I ended up not deleting any messages. So please, be friendly to each other this time also, while vigorously disagreeing and not holding back any good thoughts. We are allies and we do not need to be rude to each other.
If your argument is not getting traction or upvotes, please do not get mad, okay? This is a debate! You might lose it! And that’s fine!
Winners and losers will NOT be announced.
Go ahead!
Just hoping for some feedback... is this debate format useful?
Would you rather have occasional debates, or would you rather not? I am open minded on this. Even if a significant **minority** wants to keep the debate format I will keep it, this is not decided by majority opinion since anyone who does not like debates, can just skip them.
I just want to see what people think about it. Let me know
Not faked. I’m a PhD scientist working in a scientific field. My colleagues are all very smart people, who read the data and are getting Covid multiple times…. But are still proudly signing up for boosters. They believe they are morally superior, smarter, and just BETTER PEOPLE than the “anti-vaxxers.”
It’s a cult-religion.