Igor’s Newsletter

Share this post

Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed

www.igor-chudov.com

Discover more from Igor’s Newsletter

Independent thoughts
Over 53,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed

UK: boosters to become NEGATIVE after 17 weeks

Igor Chudov
Dec 23, 2021
164
Share this post

Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed

www.igor-chudov.com
129
Share

This is a short post — but the two studies cited have incredible implications.

Turns out, as was pointed out many times here, that negative effectiveness of vaccines and rapidly waning (and soon going negative) effectiveness of boosters against Omicron, received another and very important scientific confirmation.

Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study

It turns out that just three months after “primary vaccination”, VE against Omicron turns into very negative territory. Instead of being a protective device, like a life jacket, vaccination instead becomes harmful, like a chain attached to an ankle.

Boosters to the Rescue

The mRNA magic soup does restores “protection”, but in a very odd manner:

  • the first two weeks past the booster shot give the vaccinee stronly NEGATIVE or at least NO protection (depending on primary series). This is why people who received a booster shot, are not considered “fully boosted” until two weeks pass after the jab. The infections occurring in these first two weeks are not officially counted “against” the booster, overstating effectiveness of this treatment. This is discussed in my article “Boris Johnson's Biggest Blunder”.

  • Then at two weeks, according to the UK, booster becomes great again, and vaccinees enjoy “protection”, however only amounting to measly 55%. However, booster protection starts declining right away. By just extrapolating the line, booster protection may evaporate after about 17 weeks. (nobody knows exactly when, but you get the idea)

  • So the boosted have two terrible first weeks, then a few decent weeks, quickly turning into so-so protection, and going to no protection again in 17 weeks, give or take.

If this is not “vaccine failure”, then what is?

164
Share this post

Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed

www.igor-chudov.com
129
Share
129 Comments
Share this discussion

Denmark: Vaccine a DANGER to the vaxxed

www.igor-chudov.com
Matt
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

it's an insane world when the conclusion of the paper is "therefore more vax/booster is needed"... I suppose this is just setup for the boost every 6 months campaign we are about to go through (like Israel is I suppose)

Here's how I think it's going to go:

1) Booster become mandatory over next few weeks for those cities/states/countries/employers requiring vax passports... if no 3rd shot you are unvaxed (already in force in CA)

2) SCOTUS requires small remedies to OSHA but it goes through in essence

3) We are then "good" (no new restrictions needed) until Sept when 4th dose becomes necessary, based on papers like these. So 4th dose mandate becomes effective.

4) repeat every sept for 2023, 2024, etc.. probably fizzles by then

If you are unvaxed, need to move to red state. This isn't going away

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
39 replies by Igor Chudov and others
Matt
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

Matt: hi phd, we both see a safety signal in mrna for those < 40, and nature says risks to <40 is higher with vax than with covid, so are we sure a mandate makes sense? could it be doing more harm than good in that group? (putting aside the 100 other arguments against mandate)

phd: I don't see any data saying it's worse for < 40

Matt: it's here in nature, and you have sent me several papers from them, so I believe anything they say, per your instruction

phd: well, there's a big picture you are missing, there are public benefits to vaxing everyone even if it causes more myo in some groups

matt: like what?

phd: not filling the hospitals

matt: but hospitals never filled with 40 year olds, heck they never really filled in most places with people of any age

phd: but there are other public health risks to consider, such as long covid

matt: yes but that's individual choice, that doesn't affect public health

phd: you are missing the big picture, the costs of not vaxing people is greater than the tiny tiny harm of vaxing people... in other words the benefit to public health by saving hospitals by vaxing everyone is huge and you are missing that

matt: ok then let's mandate it for everyone > 60, that will save the hospitals and the costs

phd: you are missing the big picture, and I don't want to engage with you on this anymore

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
2 replies
127 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Igor Chudov
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing