129 Comments
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

it's an insane world when the conclusion of the paper is "therefore more vax/booster is needed"... I suppose this is just setup for the boost every 6 months campaign we are about to go through (like Israel is I suppose)

Here's how I think it's going to go:

1) Booster become mandatory over next few weeks for those cities/states/countries/employers requiring vax passports... if no 3rd shot you are unvaxed (already in force in CA)

2) SCOTUS requires small remedies to OSHA but it goes through in essence

3) We are then "good" (no new restrictions needed) until Sept when 4th dose becomes necessary, based on papers like these. So 4th dose mandate becomes effective.

4) repeat every sept for 2023, 2024, etc.. probably fizzles by then

If you are unvaxed, need to move to red state. This isn't going away

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

Matt: hi phd, we both see a safety signal in mrna for those < 40, and nature says risks to <40 is higher with vax than with covid, so are we sure a mandate makes sense? could it be doing more harm than good in that group? (putting aside the 100 other arguments against mandate)

phd: I don't see any data saying it's worse for < 40

Matt: it's here in nature, and you have sent me several papers from them, so I believe anything they say, per your instruction

phd: well, there's a big picture you are missing, there are public benefits to vaxing everyone even if it causes more myo in some groups

matt: like what?

phd: not filling the hospitals

matt: but hospitals never filled with 40 year olds, heck they never really filled in most places with people of any age

phd: but there are other public health risks to consider, such as long covid

matt: yes but that's individual choice, that doesn't affect public health

phd: you are missing the big picture, the costs of not vaxing people is greater than the tiny tiny harm of vaxing people... in other words the benefit to public health by saving hospitals by vaxing everyone is huge and you are missing that

matt: ok then let's mandate it for everyone > 60, that will save the hospitals and the costs

phd: you are missing the big picture, and I don't want to engage with you on this anymore

Expand full comment

But still somehow this will be the fault of the unvaccinated for their failure to get onboard the Titanic (I mean life boat) for the good of the community (I mean drug companies).

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

I use an umbrella analogy.

It is a hard wind driven rainstorm. You (the jabbed) are carrying an umbrella. Me (the unjabbed pure blood with natural immunity) only have a short run to my car and park in a garage at home, so I am only wearing a raincoat. You obviously get soaking wet while outside waiting for your bus, while I am only slightly damp when I get home. But you blame me for not carrying an umbrella as the reason you got wet.

The stupidity is astounding.

Expand full comment

Your life jacket analogy made me think of these hilarious (and lunacy-exposing) videos by JP:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GukIoZ8d3Ew&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omrVpA14FpY

Expand full comment

Clearly the vaccines are 100% effective.

They will clear the population of the most gullible and stupid amongst us, and their offspring

Safe for big pharma

Effective against sheep

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

So the leaders are telling People to get booster shots during a wave in COVID cases will make them highly vulnerable just at the wrong time.

Categorize under:

“Never vaccinate during a pandemic. It only makes things worse…”

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

What I'm seeing where I live is worse than vaccine failure, actually. Lots of boosted people catching covid right now and suffering worse symptoms than expected from omicron. Not mild. Is my sample skewed (I live in an area with high vax uptake) or are the vaccinated faring even worse than the data suggests?

Expand full comment

Your interpretation of figure 7 is incorrect. This is understandable as it is a confusing graph that shouldn't have been approved (but I would say that as I misinterpreted it the same way at first). Anyway, the only booster data point is the one on the right of each graph -- the others are for two doses of vaccine.

Of course, your general interpretation of what is going on is correct -- the vaccines are performing spectacularly badly and are almost certainly responsible for the very high case numbers seen for Omicron in the west (that's what you get when you've got negative vaccine effectiveness). They're a disaster but governments have to keep up the pretence because the masses will be rather cross when they find out they've been duped.

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

Why is the conclusion more of the same? “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations”

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

short duration "protection" is what darpa intended in the 2013 project with moderna. whay they did not get was safety and responsiveness to new pathogens so the tech went on the shelf until pfizer found the profitability key.

Expand full comment

And that's still *relative* risk reduction. Max Absolute Risk Reduction is 1.3% for any of the experimental drugs, according to published documentation.

Expand full comment

Yet, I just read that they are mandating vaccines for everyone in Ecuador (over the age of 5, I think)...are governments this willfully blind or just all being controlled by Pfizer et al?

Expand full comment

¡No problemo! Schedule the 4th jab 4 months after the 3rd and enjoy your iron-clad vaxx protection again. Rinse and repeat. Then after3, 2, and 1 month. Altogether 10 more months of this nonsense is baked in. Incidentally, that takes us into 7 busters - a nice occult number all by itself. Go into your bunker and come out then - the world will look drastically different then.

Expand full comment
Dec 24, 2021·edited Dec 24, 2021Liked by Igor Chudov

Igor, when you say “protection” am I correct in assuming that you are referring only to the vaccine’s efficacy in preventing infection?

In the new NYT article about Israel considering a 4th dose it states “There was no clear indication of reduced efficacy against severe illness.” So have the original 2 doses have not waned in efficacy? That’s what Fauci was saying when they started selling the public on boosters. Plus the vaccine trials did not even assess their ability to prevent infection!

Me thinks they have purposefully muddied the waters in regards to the world “protection” by using it to mean both protection against infection and protection against severe disease so that you never know quite what they are referring to. In regards to boosters it’s as if they want people to think they are talking about the ability to prevent severe illness and death when in reality they are talking about their ability to prevent infection. If your vaccinated and the vaccine works and your not in an extremely high risk group why would you care about getting infected???

Expand full comment

IT'S BEGINNING TO LOOK A LOT LIKE....https://www.bitchute.com/video/WYkohcm9VRfv/

Expand full comment