Viral Rebounds are Extremely Rare, Says the FDA
We are on our own, they are hopelessly corrupt or mind-bogglingly incompetent. This includes every level of the medical establishment from the head of the FDA and CDC to your "trusted" doctor who told you to get the shot without doing a stitch of independent research themselves.
The hardest part is admitting it's true. Once that happens, it's shocking at first but eventually liberating to realize that we all have the God-given intelligence and common-sense to research things ourselves and make these decisions on our own.
Same song second verse. Or same refrain second song? Either way I’m hearing a common tune.
Where have I heard words to this effect: He also gaslight numerous victims of recurrence by saying that they are only 1-2%, so they are "rare" and effectively do not matter.
Death and injury from the jab.
To do a new trial in the vaccinated would be for them to admit something has changed in the immune systems of the vaccinated. Something fundamental.
FDA monkeys see only what Pfizer wants, which is green
Federal agencies demonstrate continually that they are now nothing more than politicized toxic trash.
It never changes and never will! On another topic. Does anyone think they will use the RNA technology in dog vaccines? My dog goes Friday for his shots and I’m worried!
I don't know, I think the governors are laughing at us. We are like ants in an ant farm busy building up our colony. Eventually they will tip us out and start again.
Why are we talking about this? We were supposed to "stand with Ukraine"... Oh - wait... it is "Roe v. Wade" now :P...
I will never take an experimental drug that I don’t need, even if it is a “step in the right direction.” That’s ludicrous. It reminds me of the doctors in the 19th century who treated their patients with leeches. No discernible improvement, in fact, just the opposite. Like Chris Farley, Dr Farley should be living in a van down by the river.
1)What was the definition of direct Sars-Cov?
2)Why would anyone with a mild case of COVID need to take a pill to keep them out of the hospital? What are the chances of them being hospitalized without the pill? The claim that it keeps people out of the hospital has a familiar ring to it. WHERE have I heard that before?
3) I thought I read PFFFizer was recommending a longer course of their pills for those who could not clear the virus after taking their pills. Here, this FDA doc sez no.
My MIL was given Remdesivir. I think if she were alive, she might urge caution. Someone made some money on her.
Have you seen this Pf-unny, Pf-izer pf-ind that just came out a day ago???????? "Patients can take more of COVID pill after relapse, Pfizer CEO says" https://www.axios.com/2022/05/03/covid-pill-paxlovid-relapse
"The CEO says"....oh, really...you think!!!
Our medical "guards" are sleeping, paid off, or saboteurs.
... not sure i would want any of my vaxxed friends/family in the new trial... actually am sure... N-O.
If money grubbing Farley isn't going to recommend a 10-day course of Paxlovid, over the current 5 day, what sort of damage is The Pax doing to people in just 5 days?
If you develops horseness from Paxlovid, should you then go to a vet to get Ivermectin?