German-Chinese Lab in Wuhan at the Epicenter of the Sars-Cov-2 Outbreak
Christian Drosten was strangely very insistent on burying the "lab origin" theory
Remember how opponents of the “lab-origin theory” published a study purporting to show that the “epicenter of the outbreak” was located far from the alleged source, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and was on the opposite bank of the Yangtze river? (I added “WIV,” circled in red)
Many people, myself included, criticized that study and pointed out that it does not disprove lab origin.
The Brownstone Institute just published a bombshell article - showing that SOMETHING ELSE was actually in the epicenter!
Robert Kogon, a pen name, explains that Wuhan, the location of the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology, was also home to another very important bio laboratory: the German-Chinese Joint Laboratory of Infection and Immunity.
Oddly, that particular biolab was at the exact center of the initial outbreak of Sars-Cov-2!
Here’s the picture from the Brownstone post where I highlighted points 5 and 6, the locations of the universities with the joint German-China biolab:
Brownstone's article continues:
The laboratory is a joint project of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College and the University Hospital of Essen in Germany. Prof. Ulf Dittmar, chair of the virology department in Essen, has also referred to the joint laboratory as the “Essen-Wuhan Laboratory for Virus Research.”
(See interview here [in German]. It should be noted that in the cited interview, conducted in January 2020, Dittmar downplays the dangerousness of the novel Coronavirus and warns against “hysterical” reactions.)
So high profile was the biolab and the relationship with Tongji University that three months before the Pandemic, no one other than Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany, visited the place.
It also has a partnership with the Charité Hospital in Berlin of Germany’s “state virologist” Christian Drosten! Drosten is the chair of the virology department at the Charité.
Drosten, who surprisingly quickly developed the PCR test widely used during the pandemic, was in the infamous email exchange with Dr. Fauci that discussed the outbreak's origin. While other correspondents stated that the chance of “lab origin” could be 50-50 or even 60-40, Drosten was always insistent that they were on a mission to “debunk conspiracies” — and was disinterested in learning the facts.
Drosten accuses his fellow participants of the “Fauci email thread” of coming up with “their own conspiracy theory” — that he is insisting must be debunked!
Or did Drosten already know the “facts” — and insisted on suppressing them? Read his email and decide for yourself. (Note: eugyppius also wrote about Drosten’s emails in the past)
Was Drosten so overloaded with “nCov patient-related work”? As our astute reader J Dixon pointed out, there were only 16 cases of Covid in Germany by that date.
Here’s Drosten and Shi Zhengli, the famous “bat-woman” at the center of controversy about Sars-Cov-2 origin:
The origin of Sars-Cov-2 is murky. The questions, such as who, why, where, and for what purpose, must be adequately answered — and nothing should be dismissed out of hand.
I strongly recommend reading Robert’s Brownstone article.
And if you have a minute, let us know what you think: for what purpose was Sars-Cov-2 developed? Was it an incidental release of an incomplete lab product? Or was it developed intentionally as a worldwide pandemic pathogen?
Bring forth evidence and links if you have any!