272 Comments
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Well, at least they didn’t have pictures of pregnant men on the google search!!! 🫃🫃🫃

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Great idea. Wow! Those are some superb sleuthing skills you got there.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

To be fair, since everything is stretchy now anyway I barely wore any maternity clothes with my baby born in December. It could be a factor. But we know births are unfortunately trending down.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

But BIRTHING PEOPLE clothing is selling like hotcakes!

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

What would it look like if adjusted for the percentage of the US population that was NOT jabbed. The drop in fertility for the jabbed would be much higher. The 15% drop is being diluted by the unjabbed.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Maybe they don’t want to bring kids into a crappy world or neutralized by gender changing hormones. Apparently, a lot of young men find porn more attractive than woke women.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Climate change and gas stoves for certain, I know for a fact the gas stoves are in use for the record setting gaslighting for the pas three years.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

CDC hasn't reported birth rates since 2020. Not suspicious at all.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/fertility_rate/fertility_rates.htm

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Japan is worried about their low birth rate (a record low). Also, the death rate is a record high.

https://slaynews.com/news/experts-raise-alarm-japan-population-plummeting/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter

Expand full comment

Bwahahaha, Google, the masters of obfuscation, data hiding and cancelling, yet again forget about the Law of Unintended Consequences:

That their Trends Search can be used to uncover what they go to great lengths to cover.

Now you have published this, will you go back to see if these same results can be obtained? i.e. will Google fudge the results to hide the results?

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023·edited Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Can I add a small group to that category? I've known a few females who had no partners and were not pregnant and yet they would buy baby clothing and look into maternity wear, bc they were desperately wanting to have children. They would def look up on the internet and search those items to fulfill their fantasy and desire.

I wonder if people are not only physically unable to conceive but also if they are losing sexual libido too bc of the jabs.

Expand full comment

Wow! Great indictor Igor!

Australian parents seemed to have got into it during the lockdown, or maybe they were just bored at home, searching (no - births actually did go up), but the decline in 2022 is ferocious!

I was using an indicator of infant vaccine adverse events reported to the TGA as a decline in parental trust in vaccines, but it may well indicate decline in births.

Expand full comment

Considering today's young woke generation, it would be infants born to the infantile. Not an appealing prospect.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Sex was banned in the UK during lockdown for non-cohabitating couples. Of course it didn’t apply to government ministers or Imperial College professors

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/06/covid-lockdown-sex-ban-chris-whitty-matt-hancock/

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

The women are having their uterus removed and they’re taking testosterone so they can compete in men’s sports

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023·edited Mar 10, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov

Would a more direct measure of US live births be the consumption of diapers?

I suspect this statistic is available. Seasonality of sales would likely correlate to the spring baby boom as well, so an estimate of the rate of new births could be made each year.

I worry more that we are actually facing a kind of STD where vax that is in the gonads can be sexually transmitted to a partner or a child. If it is, then contamination will reach 100%. Sexual transmission of this sort in addition to vax could account for the persistently lowered birth rates.

(Edit - when I say ‘child’ above I mean ‘child resulting from sex between partners’

Expand full comment