Answer: just remove most-likely-to-miscarry vaccinated women from the data!
People, sorry for not posting in the last several days: for a couple of days I was not available, and during other days I did not have anything notable to report. I spent money and a lot of time on dead-end scientific studies that did not reveal anything interesting, or other pieces that were not newsworthy.
Twitter is full of garbage and virtue-signaling and not enough interesting news.
So, there was nothing to write about that was worth sending to 55,000 people. I hope you understand.
I saw this story today, if anyone has time to dissect it.
They have found another way on how to make COVID vaccines appear to be "safe for pregnancy".
Read this article: https://news.stanford.edu/2023/11/27/maternal-vaccination-covid-19-lowered-risk-preterm-births-stanford-study-finds/
First of all, funnily enough, they do not give a link to the paper they cite.
Secondly, from what I read on the article above, the methodology used does not appear very rigorous and scientific to me:
"The researchers identified infants with siblings in the California birth records, which allowed them to compare “treated” infants exposed to COVID-19 infection in utero with their “untreated” siblings who did not experience a COVID infection.
The researchers also took into consideration the zip code of the mother’s residence to compare areas that had low and high uptakes of vaccination against COVID-19."
"By January 2022, the impacts of COVID-19 on preterm births dropped to zero, but zip codes that had high vaccination rates saw the harmful effects disappear a year earlier than areas with a slower vaccination uptake."
Seriously?! Just by looking at zip code and overall vaccination rate in the area, they say that the reduction in preterm births is due to high vaccination rate. Have they ever heard of the sentence "correlation does not mean causation"? Have they isolated other factors which most likely are at play here?! Good grief!
"The authors “trimmed” only 0.1% of unvaccinated women, but removed a whopping 7.5% of vaccinated women, most likely to miscarry!"
Why did the authors of the study state that this data-trimming was undertaken?
Are there any instances when this would be considered valid when dealing with two sets of data being compared? If so, under what circumstances?
I feel like I want to read more about VAIDS. I used to see a lot about it and now that I am seeing a lot of it in real life, I don't really hear about it any more.
Igor, why do you hate science so much? Why must you be curious and careful and critical in your analysis, and not just read the social media posts and headlines like everyone else?!
I posted important new info on preventing Covid vax deaths from fibrous clots by Spencer Feldman at https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/special-prevent-covid-vax-deaths. He said the vaxes appear to be extremely sophisticated bioweapons (thus not easy to remedy).
What amazes me is that what you describe is something that no researcher would do in good faith. And vaccine history show that similar behaviors are numerous.
I still believe that most people are honest but the the percentage of bad faith people in the population as a whole is much bigger than I previously thought.
Please Igor, no need to be sorry! You can always be counted on to find something worthwhile! Thank you so much for the investigation you do - you are heloing us EDUCATE ourselves and that is if more value to me than I can express. 🙏💕
The stats are deliberately modified to make it look acceptable for pregnant women to accept the DEADLY INJECTION they call a 'vaccine'. The same goes for those trying to have a family' They end up with still-born casualties -then permanent infertility!
Here's another example of useless and dangerous Covid 'Vax' reality - Airline pilots who were forced by MANDATE to accept the EXPERIMENTAL Covid 'vax' are now far less healthy and susceptible to many more serious health complications that could (and WILL) occur during flights. Myocarditis is rife among Airline staff.
ALL DUE TO THE MANDATED 'SAFE & EFFECTIVE' COVID INJECTION, which is injuring and killing thousands worldwide. All this mayhem and excess death was caused by the DEADLY injections made by companies like Pfizer who dictate a NO LIABILITY CLAUSE if you want to buy their useless but deadly Covid 'cure'. It's simply depopulation.
Example of the inherent dangers we all now face if we choose to keep flying;
"There have been many tragedies this year. Phil Thomas, a young graduate of the Cadiz, Spain, flight training academy, fell ill and died suddenly in April. There were five pilot incapacitations in March including a British Airways pilot who collapsed and died in Cairo, Egypt not long before he was due to fly."
We can either take a rushed course on 'How to pilot a Boing 737' or hope they start to use a PILOT, a Co-Pilot and a SPARE pilot!
All gullible 'patients' that didn't think before participating in an EXPERIMENT, are now all GENETICALLY MODIFIED as was factually covered up by Pfizer and other unscrupulous deadly injection makers.
You should never have allowed them to experiment (Pfuck) with the human body and expect it to get better! It's simply inviting a shorter Life Expectancy or a sudden 'inexplicable' early death.
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer
They play with (modify) stats to make it look acceptable for pregnant women to accept the DEADLY INJECTION they call a 'vaccine'. The same goes for those trying to have a family' They end up infertile - FOREVER!
An Op-ed that examined one aspect of identifying COVID-19 vaccine safety signals has been posted on Trial Site News (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/vaers-safety-signals-for-covid-19-vaccines-764e6c68). The Op-ed identified the frequency of occurrence of VAERS symptoms for three major diseases: Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Neurological Disease, and computed the ratio of total symptom occurrences per COVID-19 vaccine dose. Since these symptoms occurred within ~2.5 years maximum following the COVID-19 shots, effects of latency on longer-term impacts are not known, and far more symptoms could occur when a full accounting of these adverse events over time has been done.
Talk about a rigged game, this is the worst kind of scam. Women everywhere should be outraged. If this doesn't lead to wholesale abandonment of childhood vaccines because of the mistrust in the industry as a whole......
An excellent example of why one should not rely on the abstract.
I have to ask this question. It isn't intended to be crass.
Who wants to bring a baby into this world?
But if they controlled for age it wouldn't really matter whether they took the additional women out or not, would it? Did they give some data controlling for age?