On a side note I've worked in a hospital for 15 years. The last 6-9 months the maternity deparment has been insane. What was once a weekly or monthly incident is now happenning every day or far more often. The number of women who go into labour then the alert goes out as something went wrong and she is pushed through into theatre and the docs are calling for blood. Is has happened way to often.
I don't know any stats for how many babies are lost or how many are born with problems I just know what I've seen. I do know that searching the papers for news about strange diseases in new borns gives plenty results for the last year.
Can you keep some private stats yourself? Be really careful with this. Count the number of newborns, and the number where something goes wrong with the baby, and the number of babies who died. That way we can calculate the percent where something goes wrong, and the percent of babies who died. Then later we can try to find a baseline pre-vax.
Don't tell anyone you are doing this, censorship and retaliation is very heavy. Don't even tell your best friend or you could lose your job.
No I can't. The job I am in means I am all over the hospital rather than in the maternity dep and I don't know any details of the patients.
I know when alerts are going out and I will get sent there when problems happen IF it is my turn. A bunch of people take turns though.
I can see how busy A+E is and how many seriously hurt people are coming in. I also talk to patients in the 5 minutes I am with them and I ask them how they are, they usually give some info about what happened to them but I don't know why it happened obviously. Is it a blood clot that caused them to faint? A drop in blood sugar?
I'm not a nurse either. That's what I mean by having no access to medical notes or anything like that. I only know how busy it is and how often alarms are going out.
It wouldn't be fair for me to try to gather stats on what I am seeing as I don't have a good baseline so whatever small amount of data i could gather woulfn't be worth much beyond what I have already said.
I've spoken with nurses however and they are all shocked at how busy the last year has been for the entire hospital - even the number of people falling then breaking an ankle or leg is through the roof!
Prof, he is only reporting on numbers of incidents where assistance is requested. One would be deaf and blind to fail to see that this happens, say, 10x (or whatever) that it happened in the past. If you were maintenance, and saw 10 crash carts per day, which go out over the loudspeaker, vs the 2 per day you used to see, you might come to the conclusion that something had changed lately.
Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
A perfectly healthy breast fed NZ baby aged 5 weeks died within a few days of her mother receiving the first pfizer jab. The baby had a massive gastrointestinal bleed resulting in death. This was mid 2021. We alerted the appropriate people but were told we were crazy to connect it. Many deaths since. Lists are being kept separate to the NZ government lists and one day justice will be served.
It was not my baby and the poor mother is not to blame as she simply accepted the NZ government's lies. In NZ the government is not correctly collecting data and actively discourages doctors from entering vax events into the CARM database. I am not practising at present and so I have spent (along with many others) the last 18 months helping people to enter their injuries and the deaths of their family members. The government then goes through CARM and frequently downgrades our entries. Example : massive CVA is re-labelled TIA. The criminality is just endless.
The fact that people believed blindly will cause many remorseful parents. They believed so thoroughly in the white coats and the CDC that they didn't even check what the ingredients were that was going into their body - or the body of their baby either born or unborn. It's called ignore-ance and that's the real pandemic. Soon I think people are going to start noticing the vaccinated. Because they will be the sickest people on the earth.
Ha, that's what John Bradshaw refereed to it as well, ignore-ance. Never underestimate the power of denial. Or otherwise known as militant ignorance. M Scott Peck, the spiritual psychiatrist defines evil with that term. It doesn't have to be complete denial either, just even the ability to white wash it well will do.
Yes so true. However we have bought into it because we have been too polite to call bs out when we hear it. We need to start doing that every time. When bs is allowed to run rampant, it then becomes like the truth.
I think t healthy people may need to be on guard from possibly being attacked one day from the angry mobs of people who chose to let people lead them to the slaughter. Misery always loves company. A hater told me that I would have to take meds one day. I replied that I'm already taking things for my health. Just not the toxic medicines that some non-terminal people have so much faith in. I doubt they lost as many family members to western medicine as I did before I turned 35.
Lots of Mama Bears out here. I'm one. Sadly, the answer to your question is that the education system has been intentionally dumbed down in recent decades. As a result most people now lack critical thinking skills.
I can concur as I am teacher, not in the state system for years, but working on my own....the dumbing down had already started when I went to University in the early 80's....it has progressively gotten worse. No critical thinking skills, and no curiosity anymore either, which is so crucial to learning. I feel proud of what I doing with children in my little corner of the world, and wish I could do more. Change is coming though..I feel it.
Yes exactly - where are the mothers? The children are waiting to see the mothers stand up for all children. It's not just the children who are being pushed to get dangerous vaccines but also the children who are being sexually abused and tortured by the pedophile rings that run the world.
I think women's "caring" instinct has been intentionally hi-jacked to direct energy outward, towards 'migrants' or towards 'keeping the *community* safe', while migrants and Pharma comport exactly the opposite of safety.
Not for nothing were those UK covid commissions made up of behavioral psychologists and not MDs.
Exactly right. Children were always OFF the table when it came to sex, drugs, etc. At some point in recent times, they became a real target of the establishment.
I'm a programmer (but not on this site) and I've done some testing with this. Your clicking on the heart works, but the page doesn't show it sometimes. Wait 1 minute, then refresh the page. That usually works. But if you click twice, you have just removed the heart click. Don't click twice. Click once and wait.
Dr. Peter McCullough stated in Episode 2, Part 2 of Jonathan Otto's currently airing Brave Series that justice will be served. I know that it will. Whether it be legal, divine justice or both.
They make it as difficult as possible. I had two surgeries this past winter and wanted to do autologous donation if the need arose. My surgeries were not that risky so I did not pursue it.
Sheesh. I hadn't even thought of that. Although I do think about "vaxxidents" and how, even though we kept ourselves poison-free, we are sharing the world with ticking time bombs riding down the same roads with us, expressing their depression and anger around us, etc.
There is definitely a serious need for an organized source of unjabbed blood donors and unjabbed pilots. I just saw a pilot’s video saying that now some wealthy business men are looking for unjabbed pilots and crews for their business jets. And I read that a hospital had refused to distinguish jabbed from unjabbed blood in an emergency where they forced a mother to accept tainted blood or let her child die. The market is quickly appearing for proactive initiatives by people who want to resist dying like muppets at the hands of the CDC’s and the WHO’s minions.
I doubt it will be that hard when sane people with actual will to see what is true are involved. Most of our problems are from brainwashed, insane, complicit medical muppets refusing to rock the boat by admitting what they see and deliberately obstructing people from seeing so they can protect their paychecks.
I guess the short answer is “let the market handle it.” Sort of like a PayPal for blood, maybe? It’s life or death so there is plenty of incentive to solve it. We just need people who value their souls doing the work instead of psychopathic opportunists looking for another profit center to add to their adrenochrome and body parts portfolios.
Actually, there are doctors who have done smears and looked at the difference between normal vs vaxxed blood under a microscope. The two are different. https://www.bitchute.com/video/gSEUkG0AB8J5/
The Red Cross right away refused jabbed donor blood. I read about it in the summer of 2021. Back then I even expected it to make people think :-( or at least think twice before getting the shot. Miscalculation.
Actually that was misinformation that circulated around and it really needs to quit being repeated. When they were requesting convalescent plasma in order to have monoclonal antibodies to give to Covid patients they said they wanted donors who had natural antibodies from having had confirmed cases of Covid and that they could not accept antibodies formed in people who had taken the vaccine. That was to make the antibodies infusions which they are no longer doing. They also stated IF a vaccine came out that used the live virus (which none were created in that manner) they they would require the person wait two weeks till after the vaccine before they could make a blood donation. Vaccinated and unvaccinated can currently donate blood according to Red Cross.
i am almost 72. i am healthy and give blood to red cross about every 8 weeks.
i was asked each time if i had the vax and maybe iirc what brand. i had moderna and azn.
i gave blood in may 2021, i had the first moderna one day short of 4 weeks before the draw. red cross reported i had anti bodies.... i do not know if they were looking for spike protein or mrna.
the last samples they checked for anti bodies was june 2021.
i am pretty sure one of the 5 vials they take when you give are labeled and kept
maybe red cross blood banks can survey vials and see with follow up to the donor vaxx history of/if detected mrna and spike proteins??
Almost everyone has antibodies - due to COV or various human coronavirus infections, as well as from jabs. So I'm not sure exactly what is tested re: antibodies. There is almost no way Red Cross could accurately know who was vaccinated with which vaccine(s) and when/how often. Only if jab antibodies are different from non-jab exposed antibodies could this be known.
With all respect, personally the derision and laughter serves as a release valve for sometimes murderous rage. There, I said it. Thought crime of murder. Unlike those bastards I am unlikely to act. They deserve every nanoparticle of mud and abuse thrown at them. Ridicule is a healthy outlet. We’ll probably have to agree to disagree on this one.
Humour and ridicule are important just as 'serious' information is, but they indeed serve different needs.
To me humour is important but now it is so more than ever: to reduce tension but especially because of emotional connection occuring when you think something is funny and somebody else anywhere in this world that no longer feels mine and worse, never should have felt that way, understands me, feels as necessary to me for feeling being alive, connected, as food and water is to live.
Even when not joining the slapstick conversation between other persons, but understanding it and have fun about it, laugh about it, feels good and feels like healing
There are conversations humoursly for other people, but not for me, and then I just read something else, what does fit me.
It is always present: levels of quality differ a bit, but it is all quite high, emotionally but factually/theoretically as well. And if not? That doesn't matter, because the writer's intentions are okee, good and honest.
I really like reading and writing here in the comments. Honest reactions and people like Mary Lou who say what they think and or feel, even or sometimes even more when I disagree on them or don't understand what message they wished to bring;-))
Gentle reactor, gentle reader, your apologizes are inherently gracefully accepted.
Hence, I owe you, even more apologizes. For not understanding what you ment, and some more apologizes because you were not adressing yourself to me originally. I will try to be a better and modester listener and reader, thank you for that insight!
< World tragedy...> on the funeral execution (went for the cheap package?) 🥸 or on your passing? 😔🙃
Poor taste, I know. Propriety stripped away. If I tell I am wearing a tin foil hat does that afford me any leniency? Or is it straight to the stocks with me, nobody’s buying my tin foil twinkie diet dodge?
Oh excuse me but I forgot to mention that by far most women I know, don't like very much, as we in the Netherlands refer to, with the words 'underpencefun' or 'poop and pee jokes'....( I don't know exact translations... but you will probably immediately understand what I mean I hope ...;-))
Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Yes, it does seem funny - until you live in an area where there are high numbers of gender-confused people and you see someone out walking the dog but you're not sure if it's a he or a she...and I'm not talking about the dog, here!
My kids are going to be growing up amongst 10-year olds who say they're 'lesbian' simply because they find boys annoying and don't like hanging out with them. Geez. Every girl must be lesbian at some point in her life with that definition...
Yes, exactly what I have been saying for some time.
Who among us never felt awkward or uncomfortable in his or her changing body during puberty and teen years? Who of us tomboys didn’t at some point wonder if we were “normal?” but never even considered for an instant that we weren’t female? We knew we were female. We just didn’t relate to the frills and giddiness and silliness (our perception) of typical girls. Nowadays we would be told that we must be boys in girls’ bodies. 😭😭😭
Yep. Tomboy here! Never liked pink (still don't), I climbed trees & played lots of sport and and I still ONLY like lace on a bra if the bra is practical and functional! :-D
If you have the means, move from that place NOW. Not worth it to try to live in that environment. These idiots are BORN offended by everything and everyone.
The problem is that we've just moved 1000km away from a very conservative area to BE in this environment where people hate the covid jabs! I guess a lot of locals haven't thought too much on other fronts, though! :-\
We can't all run off and join a sane community. The Amish had there issues too, although gender confusion is not one of them. Best to limit devices with access to social media and whatever else is sending a demoralizing message.
this must be a casual reference in II Tim 3:7 where it speaks of those 'always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.' Definitely endless material for comedy routines.
Yep, the Chief Medical Honcho in OZ can attest to that. He came up with a 38 word salad that meant nothing and was as obtuse as possible. I honestly cannot understand how most women accept this. My wife is the most gentle person I know and even she was fuming at it.
The speed at which they find these things out is remarkable. Imagine if they did these studies BEFORE recommending poison to nursing moms. What a concept. If people in the real world worked like this, they'd all have been fired a long time ago.
I work on software. I like to think my work is important, but at the end of the day, it's email.
If I pushed out code changes like they pushed out these vaccines (lack of testing, lack of monitoring, covering up criticisms, etc) I'd be fired and rightly so. The big mystery to me is that all my collogues accept as gospel these tenants of safe deployments of software, but were eager to roll up there sleeves for these jabs. So bizarre.
I'm pretty sure it was the word "vaccine" which ensnared most people. If they had called it what it was they would have had zero takers. "Vaccine" has a lot of clout and promise--hopefully not anymore.
And that itself was the result of a lot of spin and PR work. It was no accident that anyone expressing any doubts whatsoever was labeled an "anti-vaxxer" and that meant they were bad and stupid people who didn't believe in science. The last 20 years has seen a massive push towards creating exactly that mind-set, and now we clearly see it was always the "anti-vaxxers" who were the smart, critical thinkers.
The stupid people, the bad people, were those who jumped in kicking the 'anti-vaxxers', while insisting that believing in science means attacking anyone with questions or data they don't like.
Stefan Oelrich, a member of the Board of Management of Bayer and head of the Pharmaceuticals Division:
“I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago in the public—‘would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’—we probably would have had a 95 percent refusal rate,” he added.
i worked in weapon system acquisition as a dod civilian.
we spec'ed how 'systems" are tested against performance and interface spec's. we directed in the contract test design including required alpha and beta risks which were used to determine tests and repetitions, and pass fail.
for aircraft and things hung on them they defined by contract "airworthiness", which required a number of flights and cycles to draw the test risks.
seems to me the objects tested by the vaxxers were too few and incomplete and the alpha and beta risks, were sketchy.
my feel is the risk of accepting a bad design as safe from the vaxx tests is very high
higher than i would put a soul in an airplane with!
Me too Ed. Now retired, but also wrote the risk management plans and conducted the process for MDAP. Makes you wonder who at DoD lead the OpWarpSp processes.
Another thing you will understand, is that if a vaccine takes on average 10 years to develop and test, pushing one out in a few months is likely to be full of bugs.
I think you are missing the point - they knew from the start that this was poison. They tried to avoid pregnant women in their sham trial because they knew what the outcome was going to be. However, these are not just evil but also greedy filth so it was a case of getting more money out of a proven failed product. Yep, they are that demented and are probably thinking that they will get away with it.
No, I know they knew--I was just trying to make a point about how silly it looks to show trial results now. They've known since the 90s because they tried Phase trials and could never get passed the first one. This thing was in the bag long before 2020. Katherine Watt puts it well:
"Whistleblower Brook Jackson has a case against Pfizer related to Pfizer/FDA/DOD clinical trial fraud and US government contract fraud. Pfizer's response? "The ‘vaccines’ are not pharmaceutical products subject to transparency, consumer protections and FDA regulation, but are instead bioweapons produced under contract subject to DOD control only.
An investigation team, working with a team of other data analysts, document the pharmaceutical corporations’ complete deviance from standard FDA protocols for clinical trials, manufacturing, serialization, labeling, distribution, storage and other supply chain phases. Which makes sense once you understand that the companies and their subcontractors are producing weapons to sicken and kill people, not medicines to heal people. By contract, the contents of the vials are legally under complete DOD control from the start of the raw materials and manufacturing chain, right up until the moment the product is injected into a human arm."
Very good points about the DOD. That is how we are now at the stage that they are pushing the octomouse booster (apologies for plagiarizing the name but it is too good).
It would be helpful if you could provide more than 'she said' evidence for that extraordinary claim.
My websearch (with yandex.com) fails to find supporting evidence for 'bioweapons defense' by Pfizer. In Jackson's Lawsuit the DoD is claimed to be a victim by purchasing fraudulently represented products.
Again, nowhere do I find Pfizer using a defense "because they are bioweapons."
“Pfizer claims they can get away with fraud as long as the government would write them a check despite knowing about the fraud,” attorney Robert Barnes said.
A few relevant links with links to the unsealed source documents.
Read this and get back to me. Please don't do that thing where you discredit the meaning of a statement because they chose not to use a certain word. You'd be backing out an argument instead of acknowledging the stated facts.
Pfizer's own defense was that since it contracted with the DOD, the FDA regs do not apply, despite the fact that they went through the motions of that process to cover up the fact that this was an experimental injection, which only purpose is for use as a weapon.
"In other words, if no consumers would buy a product under normal commercial circumstances, but the pharmaceutical companies want to sell it, and the US government wants to conduct research and development on its military applications, the HHS Secretary classifies it as a qualified security countermeasure, the pharmaceutical contractor manufactures it, the US government buys it in bulk, and the US government forces the population to take it."
No, that was NOT Pfizer's argument. Pfizer was playing a dangerous game. It tried to dismiss the Jackson complaint not on its merits (that Pfizer committed fraud) but by asserting that it "never had an obligation to conduct sound, non-fraudulent trials under the terms of its Base Agreement with the US government." (Ex. A to Pfizer's Motion to Dismiss).
What does this mean? It means that contrary to what the American public was told, "the agreement was not a standard federal procurement contract, but rather a ‘prototype’ agreement executed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2371b[.]…" 10 USC 2371b has since been renumbered (how strange!). It’s now 10 USC 4022 - Authority of the Department of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects.
That’s what the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the Covid-19 injection program are: a military prototype project.
The US Congress in 1997 pretended to stop unethical US government experimentation on military personnel, while actually expanding the pool of human subjects for DOD experiments to include the military and the rest of the American population, by moving the experimental programs from the Department of Defense to the Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, and then merging HHS with DOD through subsequent legislation.
So, yes, it is in fact Pfizer's argument that since it quietly, but quite strategically, went through the military channels--which deal with experimental chemicals, research and bioweapons, instead of the usual consumer product channels, it owed no duty to the American people to conduct fraud-free research or studies to get this approved and on the market.
What you are doing is playing a semantic game, but you also miss the importance of how Pfizer (and our gov't) stealthily allowed this all to happen. Because it's a bioweapon.
Probably the majority of the Health/Harm Departments in the world. The fact that the information has not been leaked shows how despicable these people are. A lot of them know everything and are happy to keep it secret.
LOL-Scott Logan is correct. Unless you are El Gato Malo, sarcasm falls short of coming across properly.
I just don't get how anyone, smart or stupid, rich or poor, can't see how ridiculous this whole thing has played out in a shoot first (in the arm) and ask questions later.
My 15 month old granddaughter has breathing issues every time she gets a cold. Not rsv but more like asthma. She has to take a puffer. Has been in the hospital 4 or 5 times for a night or two. Momma got jabbed when she was about 4 months old. I’ve often wondered if that is why she gets so sick from a runny nose. She is still nursing her.
This is exactly what I meant--my son was 18 mos old and after his vaccines had viral-induced asthma, which they called "RSV" since they didn't know what else to call it. He was in the ER 7 times that year and admitted once. Massive doses of dexamethasone and albuterol. All vaccine induced. He's 10 now and still has problems, but just has fewer colds now that he's older. Any time he gets the sniffles, we brace ourselves.
in the summer of 2020, a friend of mine got hired by Pfizer and was managing CV clinical trials. They were experimenting (sorry, doing "clinical tirals") on pregnant women, and WANTED to have the baby born already injected with the poison death jab.
my guess is that the whole breast milk shedding concept is a feature, not a bug.
The remaining batches of Pfraud documents should be very revealing. All Pfraud documents released under court showed that they excluded pregnant women and if they did fall pregnant, they were supposed to be removed from the pool. I did not think that they could be more evil but, yep, this is proof that their evil has no bounds.
This is not egotism - it is pure psychotic behaviour. I suppose that if you are psychopath, you can rationalize everything as in "yeah, a few will pay the price but we will learn so much and make so much money that it will be all worth it".
thanks for that fascinating bit of info. I haven't heard THAT before.
it seems to me what you're saying is that Pfizer thought the lipid nano particles would cross the placenta into the fetal circulatory system. excuse my French, but good fucking grief.
It's worse. They knew or suspected what they were injecting people with could cause reactions in others, from "direct contact" of any kind. This is from their own documentation of the trials:
Occupational exposure occurs when a person has unplanned direct contact with a subject for a vaccine, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These individuals may include caregivers, relatives, and other people close to the subject.
When such exposures occur, the investigator must report this to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of being notified, whether or not an associated secondary adverse event occurs. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event reporting form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY”.
There are also sub-sections for pregnancy and breast-feeding exposure. Of course they knew.
Do you think this is the cause of the blue-green breast milk being reported?
I know we have previously discussed (and hoped) that shedding only occurs for a brief period (few weeks?) after injection, but I suspect (fear) it is longer than that. How long is the big question since there is no long-term clinical data :-(
I've posted this elsewhere on Substack before--my breastmilk turned blue when my twin babies were 4 mos old (this was 25 years ago). It happened when we went on a ski vacation with the kids & grandparents along. I thought I could ski all day and still make a zillion ounces of breastmilk, too. Apparently, I could not; my milk turned super thin and bluish after just one full day of skiing. I took a day off, just laid around, and the milk returned to its rich creamy whiteness. I attributed the thin/blue to excessive physical stress (6-8 hours of intense exercise in brutal weather conditions). I've never verified this theory, but it wouldn't surprise me if the thin blue milk after vaccination is also due to excessive physical stress of a body dealing with multiple horrifying toxins...
My understanding from several research studies I've read, claims the process is forever because the mRNA teaches your cell to replicate the spike protein continuously, what your cell replicates binds with other cells and the process starts all over, which means you'd shed continuously.
It is potentially forever if the mRNA is reverse transcribed, which is entirely likely and which has been demonstrated in vitro in hepatic cells. I'm just giving the 60 day - 15 month time frame because otherwise I might be considered to be speculating. But yes, you are likely right. We need to revert to semi-arranged marriages now so start keeping a list of unvaccinated children similarly aged to your own. These children literally carry the future of humanity on their shoulders.
Not exactly! Thru reverse transcription the mRNA can enter the cell nucleus binding with your DNA and teaching the cell to replicate the mRNA too according to several research papers. And if the injection mRNA programs the cell to produce spike protein then programing the cell to produce more mRNA don't matter does it. Because the cell will continue to produce the spike protein forever once programed right?
That is what I understood from the different articles out there as well. Some of your cells will generate the spike protein for the rest of your lifespan. The worst part about it is that it was done on purpose to overcome the fact that the body tries to "clean up" the foreign MRNA asap. The solution that these lunatics came up with, to a problem that Dr. Malone explained in detail, was to ensure that the spike protein keeps getting produced. I wonder if they have another jab that will "fix" that problem.
So appreciate these articles! I’m a bodyworker and am touching vaxed folks daily. Im constantly worried and wonder if there is any way I can protect myself from shedding. Does shedding happen from skin to skin contact? Respiratory particles? Are there any tests that show if this mRNA is present in me?
This is a particular concern with someone who got one using an adeno-delivery system, which is a live virus that does everything but replicate (unless it regains its ability to replicate, which is also well documented in the literature). Shedding is a known phenomena described in many papers -- here's even a test to measure it, just like the swab ones we use.
2003: Development of an adenovirus-shedding assay for the detection of adenoviral vector-based vaccine and gene therapy products in clinical specimens.
(Wang F. et al., doi: 10.1089/10430340360464688.)
Adenoviral vectors are used widely as gene therapy and vaccine delivery systems. An adenovirus-shedding assay may be performed in clinical trials to monitor the safety of the vector and to investigate the potential relation between clinical symptoms and shed vector virus. This report describes the development and statistical performance of the shedding assay. Live adenovirus was recovered from throat swab and urine samples spiked with E1-deleted adenovirus type 5 vector expressing HIV-1 gag [Ad5HIVgag], in the presence or absence of wild-type adenovirus (WT Ad5).
Several researchers claim there research indicates shedding to unvaccinated can happen through direct contact and respiratory particles. If shedding is occurring as the research shows, you should be able to get a blood test. However, another consideration is if vaccinated are shedding, can you become infected from the vaccine since the mRNA spike protein bioweapon in the injection is exactly the same as in the SARS-COV2 spike protein? If you can, you should be able to get a blood test to check for immunity.
Well the vxx spike is modified - it is a synthetic version with the uridine replaced with pseudo-uridine. This makes the RNA last longer and degrade more slowly, and possibly changes the immune response by increasing IgG-4 (don't quote me on that I am going from memory as a non-scientist), but anyway, there is a definite difference.
I have thought about the sexual transmission angle since reading (long ago now) about the high concentration in testes. Would be interesting to look at two groups of marital couples, husband vaxxed / wife unvaxxed, and husband and wife both unvaxxed, and compare what is found in the wives' blood. You'd need couples where neither is known to have recently had covid, which is hard to guarantee, but still.
That's especially a concern because the spike also localizes to eggs - so if there's a targeted delivery method (ahem), it's going to be in the right place.
The articles I read seem to indicate the spike will be generated for the lifespan of the jabbed person. When they said you cannot un-vaccinate, they really meant it.
To clarify, are you saying breast-feeding mothers who are taking birth control pills when they get the injection wind up having blue-green breast milk due to some sort of interaction?
I'm saying green plasma from women taking birth control pills has long been known. How the shots contribute I don't think anyone really knows right now.
Sep 27, 2022·edited Sep 27, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Is the vaccine a bio-weapon?
Widespread release of an air borne weapon poses a lot of risks and uncertainty. Uncertainty related to wind directions, temperatures and UV light. Uncertainty related to population spread. How do you stop your own allies being inflicted by the disease? What if you didn't release a bio-weapon per se but you instead weaponized the vaccines?
If you exposed 100,000 troops to agent orange, would you expect them to show symptoms straight away, or would those symptoms be delayed by a number of years? Would some however show signs of acute toxicity? Most likely a small handful would, but the majority would only show symptoms years later.
The same is true of most genotoxins and carcinogens. Asbestos, thalidomide or even mitochondrial damage from fluoroquinolone antibiotics (floxed) most often occur months or years later.
If you wanted to use a vaccine as a bio-weapon would you want it to have quick deadly effects and risk raising public alarm, thus limiting the uptake and causing rebellion. Or would it be better for it to seem safe initially so people take it, maybe even multiple times without any idea it's a poison?
Would you prefer the poison to have a single cause of death so doctors treating patients see patterns and then raise alarms, or would it be better to load it with a bunch of concerning mechanisms so one day it's dementia, the next day leukemia and the following a stroke.. those seem pretty unrelated. But what if they're not?
Indeed, and exactly my thoughts in about Oct 2020 when I heard the vax would have the jabbed making spike protein. "That's how I'd do it if I wanted to harm/kill people and get away with it" was my FIRST thought because there would likely be a literal smorgasbord of ill effects that would confuse the heck out of your typical unsuspicious sheeples. I don't even read murder mysteries yet I KNEW in my bones that was the play because it made best sense of the suppression of other treatments and the insane hype being generated for the jab. I even told people as soon as Biden 'won' that the jab would be mandated. Again I was deemed nuts. One learns to not bother waiting for the admission that "you were right". It never comes.
Of course I was not a trusted doctor/nurse so was immediately disregarded as being the paranoid delusional brother/uncle. Thankfully my wife and my parents have learned to trust my intuitions. If anyone else ever admits to I was right I'm betting I'll never hear it said to my face.
My experience of the world is that, more often than not, the people stuck in silos working on solving problems can't see the forest for the trees. Most significant breakthroughs come from outsiders. It's the reason Einstein wasn't a mainstream scientist.
Initially I considered this a possibility but wrote it off as one of low probability. Like worrying about a volcano erupting when you don't even live near an active volcano. Not impossible but unlikely.
But over time, this theory has gone from being sort of crazy to not so crazy as the evidence just keeps stacking up to support it.
The thing is, if 80-90% of the population are poisoned and die over the next 5-10 years. What does that mean for the rest of us?
This is a question I have struggled with for the past year - is this truly a depopulation event where 80% of the world is going to die off in 5 years due to these poison shots, or maybe just 10-20% of the shots are "bad batches" or maybe these are sterilization shots to reduce procreation? I would like to believe it is long term sterilization, but that's the least evil out of these scenarios. The consequences of these shots will likely impact our species in the decades to come.
I wish we really knew. I suspect due to the warp speed manufacturing and logistic chain, there will be some dud batches. But how much? How long? Who knows.
My concern is this, there is a risk whether it is as critical as the worst case scenario or as benign as the best. The risk exists.
In a workplace, we have hazards like fires, electricution, vehicle incidents or falls from height. And so we employ safety controls for those hazards because of the high potential for consequences. No one expects them to happen. In fact they are relatively rare events. But critical risks need to be addressed and this one so far, is being ignored.
An excellent question that I have been pondering. Maybe I need to start thinking about it in a systematic fashion. For example, how would a world-wide 10% reduction in population show up? a 20% reduction?
Bastards. Mitochondria are important. Having energy is nice. Being tired and cranky all the time sucks. Diabetes and liver disease suck even more. Guess what often leads to those conditions... Damaged mitochondria!
Thank you for posting this. I was on a zoom call with Dr. Lee Merritt quite a long time ago now where she said she knew of a baby who died after breastfeeding from a jabbed mom. I tried sharing that info and people told me she must be mistaken, or she's just another conspiracy theorist dr who doesn't understand "real" science. I continue to be so saddened by this madness-and for those people whose ego will not allow them to even consider the truth. Please keep up your excellent work. I always look forward to your articles.
The biggest villains in all of this is the community of physicians. The vast majority of them stood silent while these vaccines were creating victims. They are the ones who are the final guardian of the patient’s health. Yet they failed miserably. There should be a representative group of people charged with oversight of all the physician organizations. They have demonstrated that they are incapable of protecting their patients best interests.
This 1000%. They are complicit. At the very least they should have asked questions and let the "customers" know that they had no idea how toxic the jabs were.
One by one, the conspiracy theories became confirmed facts - like I always said, conspiracy theories about Covid are facts before their time. Unfortunately, the outrage revealed in that paper was all too predictable. The jabs were tested for an effective 28 day period and failed every standard metric. Pregnant women were excluded from the test set and the Pfraud instructions were clear - those that fell pregnant during the test period had to be removed from the test group. Why? My guess is that the filth at Pfraud knew that this was a going to happen so they tried to minimize the chance that the tests will fail (which they did anyway). Moreover, once the jabbing started, they only tracked pregnant women for 3 months. Again why? Normal pregnancies last for 9 months not 3. What did they know and when did they know it (my guess is again from the beginning)?
In the case of the women that just gave birth, there was no testing whatsoever as far as I can tell from the Pfraud documents. Yet, I have seen sick, sick commercials about jabbing all women to keep them and their young ones "safe".
My question is how did the "safe and effective" message for pregnant women and those that just gave birth ever made it out?
The results here in Oz are heartbreaking - babies from jabbed mothers struggle with bugs that previously were not an issue. What is more infuriating is the gaggle of doctors and media trying to look stumped as to what is the cause for this disaster. The channel 9 piece, about 2 months back, was truly disgusting and the only thing missing was climate change and too much carbon. They have committed an unspeakable crime and like all lowlife scum, their priority is to escape accountability instead of putting an end to this horror. One can tell the type of people these scumbags are because NONE have tried to speak up about it - they all go along with the safe and effective lie. How can these doctors and nurses live with themselves? What kind of monster goes about the daily life knowing what they have done and is still being done. Make no mistake, they definitely KNOW and I hope that they will not escape being held accountable.
At this point in time, a simple "Do not jab yourself if you are pregnant or planned to be" would be amazing progress. This needs to stop NOW but in Oz they still jab everyone.
In the US there has clearly been a group of medical experts that have tried to speak out and were censored. That is in stark contact with Oz. The medical community here has been abysmal - they still push for the jabs and the boosters. My point was about the Oz medicos that need to be held accountable for being complicit in this horror and "medical researchers" involved in these jabs that have been quiet when they should have spoken out.
As far as the conspiracies out there? I am not aware of any wild conspiracies that are contradictory - just the following - that the whole thing has been a massive scam (proven), that alternatives effective treatments were available from the start (proven), that the jabs are a complete failure (proven), that the side effects of the jabs are worse than most would admit (proven), that healthy kids and young people were never in any danger (proven), the natural immunity works (proven), that the system was rigged to kill people because it was more lucrative that way (proven) and that others used this scamdemic to abuse power (proven), force measures that were absurd (proven) and tried to control the movement of people and their lives (proven).
Anecdotally, in 2021 I was in the office overhearing a pediatrician who was having a chat with her very pregnant patient, who was concerned about getting the shot because she didn't want to pass it through her breast milk. This pediatrician, who *Runs Breast Milk Research Projects* and had been doing rounds through the ward collecting samples -- her response is, "It's perfectly safe! I got mine in May, didn't nurse for 1 day, and my baby is fine!"
OMG. For perhaps a layperson in the street chatting with someone to say that? OK, maybe, fine. How would they know any different? But for a paediatrician?!?! NOT OK to say that!!
I left Facebook before they had a chance to kick me off....they are evil facilitators in all of this horrific scam. Do not miss it at all, and I see now that that's where the gullible communicate..to their own detriment.
So many friends told me they dont believe in vaccine shedding. Also, they could not believe that I "believe" its real. They never really heard me when I said that "believing" has nothing to do with all of that. They did not want to read the substack articles I pointed out...Most of my friends are public servants or Medical Specialists (UK & Australia). So....the rigidity of mindsets I experienced was almost as painful as the lockdowns and all the other bullshit I had to face while being labelled an antivaxxer...just because i did not want to inject myself with the experimental jab which turned out to be a bioweapon. The sad part is I dont see much changes in Australia...yet.
Hmmm with respect your "being doubtful" doesnt compare with theirs "I cant believe you believe in that". Anyway, I still love all my friends and we are still friends...and there is a part for me that "keeps them at the distance". I cetrainly do not trust their judgments like I used to...
The FOIA'd biodistribution studies and autopsies show S-Protein system wide, so we should expectr some will be shed over time as dead skin cells ablate.
However we should also expect that this will be a miniscule fraction of the exposure you'd get from taking an injection, even if you lick them all over.
Hmm, they are specialists in stupidity not medicine. The whole point of a specialist is to be the best at what they do and that requires an open and especially enquiring mind. Cannot say I am surprised. The medicine courses I have seen here at UWA scare me - they keep reducing the number of hours of anatomy (who needs it right?) and have all kinds social & indigenous BS added to the content. I am sure that it will be comforting to know that your doctor cannot figure out which side your liver is but has mastered the art of the pronouns and is a top influencer...
On a side note I've worked in a hospital for 15 years. The last 6-9 months the maternity deparment has been insane. What was once a weekly or monthly incident is now happenning every day or far more often. The number of women who go into labour then the alert goes out as something went wrong and she is pushed through into theatre and the docs are calling for blood. Is has happened way to often.
I don't know any stats for how many babies are lost or how many are born with problems I just know what I've seen. I do know that searching the papers for news about strange diseases in new borns gives plenty results for the last year.
Scary, sad, pinned
Dr. Naomi Wolf , Any Kelly of DailyClout posted articles and reports about this even back in May
https://dailyclout.io/covid-19-vaccines-pregnancy-risky-business/
JAMA is insincere to not give credit
https://dailyclout.io/daily-clout-report-microrna-the-hidden-rna-in-the-pfizer-vaccine/
https://dailyclout.io/adverse-events-rise-in-babies-breastfed-by-vaccinated-mothers/
https://dailyclout.io/harmful-cytokines-from-vaccinated-mothers-passed-to-breastfed-infants/
https://dailyclout.io/harmful-vaccine-induced-cytokines-passed-to-infants-via-breastmilk/
Can you keep some private stats yourself? Be really careful with this. Count the number of newborns, and the number where something goes wrong with the baby, and the number of babies who died. That way we can calculate the percent where something goes wrong, and the percent of babies who died. Then later we can try to find a baseline pre-vax.
Don't tell anyone you are doing this, censorship and retaliation is very heavy. Don't even tell your best friend or you could lose your job.
No I can't. The job I am in means I am all over the hospital rather than in the maternity dep and I don't know any details of the patients.
I know when alerts are going out and I will get sent there when problems happen IF it is my turn. A bunch of people take turns though.
I can see how busy A+E is and how many seriously hurt people are coming in. I also talk to patients in the 5 minutes I am with them and I ask them how they are, they usually give some info about what happened to them but I don't know why it happened obviously. Is it a blood clot that caused them to faint? A drop in blood sugar?
Thank you so much for sharing your observations. It is not for nurses to keep statistics anyway.
I'm not a nurse either. That's what I mean by having no access to medical notes or anything like that. I only know how busy it is and how often alarms are going out.
It wouldn't be fair for me to try to gather stats on what I am seeing as I don't have a good baseline so whatever small amount of data i could gather woulfn't be worth much beyond what I have already said.
I've spoken with nurses however and they are all shocked at how busy the last year has been for the entire hospital - even the number of people falling then breaking an ankle or leg is through the roof!
Ok so a cleaner , clerk etc ? is making medical assumptions on causality in multifactorial settings by "walking around the hospital and seeing things"
Prof, he is only reporting on numbers of incidents where assistance is requested. One would be deaf and blind to fail to see that this happens, say, 10x (or whatever) that it happened in the past. If you were maintenance, and saw 10 crash carts per day, which go out over the loudspeaker, vs the 2 per day you used to see, you might come to the conclusion that something had changed lately.
I don't get what your post means?
You must be sick with the knowledge.
A perfectly healthy breast fed NZ baby aged 5 weeks died within a few days of her mother receiving the first pfizer jab. The baby had a massive gastrointestinal bleed resulting in death. This was mid 2021. We alerted the appropriate people but were told we were crazy to connect it. Many deaths since. Lists are being kept separate to the NZ government lists and one day justice will be served.
I am so sorry. I also hope that justice will be served swiftly. Pinning
It was not my baby and the poor mother is not to blame as she simply accepted the NZ government's lies. In NZ the government is not correctly collecting data and actively discourages doctors from entering vax events into the CARM database. I am not practising at present and so I have spent (along with many others) the last 18 months helping people to enter their injuries and the deaths of their family members. The government then goes through CARM and frequently downgrades our entries. Example : massive CVA is re-labelled TIA. The criminality is just endless.
The fact that people believed blindly will cause many remorseful parents. They believed so thoroughly in the white coats and the CDC that they didn't even check what the ingredients were that was going into their body - or the body of their baby either born or unborn. It's called ignore-ance and that's the real pandemic. Soon I think people are going to start noticing the vaccinated. Because they will be the sickest people on the earth.
Ha, that's what John Bradshaw refereed to it as well, ignore-ance. Never underestimate the power of denial. Or otherwise known as militant ignorance. M Scott Peck, the spiritual psychiatrist defines evil with that term. It doesn't have to be complete denial either, just even the ability to white wash it well will do.
Yes so true. However we have bought into it because we have been too polite to call bs out when we hear it. We need to start doing that every time. When bs is allowed to run rampant, it then becomes like the truth.
I think t healthy people may need to be on guard from possibly being attacked one day from the angry mobs of people who chose to let people lead them to the slaughter. Misery always loves company. A hater told me that I would have to take meds one day. I replied that I'm already taking things for my health. Just not the toxic medicines that some non-terminal people have so much faith in. I doubt they lost as many family members to western medicine as I did before I turned 35.
You have a very good point. You have sociological insight.
Whatever happened to Mama Bear? Mothers in the past would have gone completely ballistic and never accepted the obvious lies.
Lots of Mama Bears out here. I'm one. Sadly, the answer to your question is that the education system has been intentionally dumbed down in recent decades. As a result most people now lack critical thinking skills.
Same in Germany I'm afraid.
I can concur as I am teacher, not in the state system for years, but working on my own....the dumbing down had already started when I went to University in the early 80's....it has progressively gotten worse. No critical thinking skills, and no curiosity anymore either, which is so crucial to learning. I feel proud of what I doing with children in my little corner of the world, and wish I could do more. Change is coming though..I feel it.
Yes exactly - where are the mothers? The children are waiting to see the mothers stand up for all children. It's not just the children who are being pushed to get dangerous vaccines but also the children who are being sexually abused and tortured by the pedophile rings that run the world.
I think women's "caring" instinct has been intentionally hi-jacked to direct energy outward, towards 'migrants' or towards 'keeping the *community* safe', while migrants and Pharma comport exactly the opposite of safety.
Not for nothing were those UK covid commissions made up of behavioral psychologists and not MDs.
Exactly right. Children were always OFF the table when it came to sex, drugs, etc. At some point in recent times, they became a real target of the establishment.
Children have been used for sex and sacrifice etc for thousands of years. It was never off the table bit talking about it was. Now we talk about it.
❤️-my ❤️not working!
I'm a programmer (but not on this site) and I've done some testing with this. Your clicking on the heart works, but the page doesn't show it sometimes. Wait 1 minute, then refresh the page. That usually works. But if you click twice, you have just removed the heart click. Don't click twice. Click once and wait.
If Like not working - just refresh the page - normally sorts it out. (Actually it usually IS working but doesn't show until page refreshed.)
Now, if anyone knows how to sort out or turn off the predictive text... Drives me nuts!
Text-assistance is often a browser 'feature', but sometimes the website does it with javascript.
On substack, with firefox, I experience no predictive text. Therefore it is likely your browser is doing it.
Thanks Ben. Hmmm... well I've never asked it to and I wish it wouldn't.
Just work on getting mine, then...
😎😎😎
😍
I like every post if mine I can...bitchute a prob...
My very hostile Google reviews, all the like are mine.
Except great work on WEF rant
Dr. Peter McCullough stated in Episode 2, Part 2 of Jonathan Otto's currently airing Brave Series that justice will be served. I know that it will. Whether it be legal, divine justice or both.
Simply saying "NZ GOV" makes one reach for an anti-emetic.
NZ government == NaZi government?
Indeed, while a larger part of the populous NZzzzz
Thank you for what you're doing.
We all have a responsibility to ensure that day comes.
Will the shock never end?
Not in this life it won't be, sadly. Only God is going to give these butchers their just desserts.
Now do the blood supply.
You beat me to it. I never thought I would contemplate banking my own blood, but here we are.
Checked into that - it only keeps for a few months so you'd have to be doing it over and over again - if they will even allow it where you are
It's an accepted option before an operation that you can discuss with your surgeon or anesthesia team well in advance.
They make it as difficult as possible. I had two surgeries this past winter and wanted to do autologous donation if the need arose. My surgeries were not that risky so I did not pursue it.
Sheesh. I hadn't even thought of that. Although I do think about "vaxxidents" and how, even though we kept ourselves poison-free, we are sharing the world with ticking time bombs riding down the same roads with us, expressing their depression and anger around us, etc.
There is definitely a serious need for an organized source of unjabbed blood donors and unjabbed pilots. I just saw a pilot’s video saying that now some wealthy business men are looking for unjabbed pilots and crews for their business jets. And I read that a hospital had refused to distinguish jabbed from unjabbed blood in an emergency where they forced a mother to accept tainted blood or let her child die. The market is quickly appearing for proactive initiatives by people who want to resist dying like muppets at the hands of the CDC’s and the WHO’s minions.
Wondering how you're going to prove you weren't vaxxed. That's not going to be easy.
I doubt it will be that hard when sane people with actual will to see what is true are involved. Most of our problems are from brainwashed, insane, complicit medical muppets refusing to rock the boat by admitting what they see and deliberately obstructing people from seeing so they can protect their paychecks.
I personally would want hard data, such as, nope, no lnps in this blood, no spike mRNA, nothing. Now how is that going to be done?
I guess the short answer is “let the market handle it.” Sort of like a PayPal for blood, maybe? It’s life or death so there is plenty of incentive to solve it. We just need people who value their souls doing the work instead of psychopathic opportunists looking for another profit center to add to their adrenochrome and body parts portfolios.
"Luciferese" is in the vaccines. It lights up under a black light in the veins.
Fluourescence is a glow given off when excited by UV.
Luciferase is a generic term for the class of oxidative enzymes that produce bioluminescence, not fluorescence.
Unlike fluorescent proteins, luciferases do not require an external light source, but do require addition of luciferin, the consumable substrate.
The vials themselves do not glow and emit light in a dark room.
On the other hand, the word 'luciferase' sounds scary and if that convinces someone to not take the gene-jab, fine. Whatever. It's a post-truth era.
It freaken sounds terrifying!!!
Charming folks
Actually, there are doctors who have done smears and looked at the difference between normal vs vaxxed blood under a microscope. The two are different. https://www.bitchute.com/video/gSEUkG0AB8J5/
Perhaps unjabbed antibodies are different? I would think so, but not sure how that could - or would - be tested.
The Red Cross right away refused jabbed donor blood. I read about it in the summer of 2021. Back then I even expected it to make people think :-( or at least think twice before getting the shot. Miscalculation.
Apparently they no longer refuse. And they claim there is no difference.
O I see, they had not been properly instructed at the time. Thanks for the information. Every little bit counts.
Actually that was misinformation that circulated around and it really needs to quit being repeated. When they were requesting convalescent plasma in order to have monoclonal antibodies to give to Covid patients they said they wanted donors who had natural antibodies from having had confirmed cases of Covid and that they could not accept antibodies formed in people who had taken the vaccine. That was to make the antibodies infusions which they are no longer doing. They also stated IF a vaccine came out that used the live virus (which none were created in that manner) they they would require the person wait two weeks till after the vaccine before they could make a blood donation. Vaccinated and unvaccinated can currently donate blood according to Red Cross.
Thank you Ange, it makes more sense this way. I mean I think I get the point. I won't repeat what I read back in 2021.
If I have an accident and need blood - I will choose to take my chances with death rather than inject a CovIDIOT's toxic spew
No kidding.
https://trendingpolitics.com/american-red-cross-under-scrutiny-after-confessing-it-does-not-separate-vaccinated-from-unvaccinated-blood-knab/?utm_source=5843
That’s why Del Bigtree flew to Mexico for his blood transfusion they label their blood spiked or no spike
Here is Gorski shitting his pants over it https://www.respectfulinsolence.com/2021/06/04/bigtree-refused-transfusion-from-donors-vaccinated-covid-19/
Thank you.
I think it's a minority of people who need blood transfusions who are going to have the time (much less the money) to shop around before-hand.
Yes Igor, the blood supply. I haven't read anything about semen. Has it been analyzed?
Got this in my inbox today.
https://genuineprospect.com/2022/09/27/the-horrific-global-blood-supply-crisis-that-no-one-is-talking-about-is-killing-children/
Horrific. This will be the bigger problem
i am almost 72. i am healthy and give blood to red cross about every 8 weeks.
i was asked each time if i had the vax and maybe iirc what brand. i had moderna and azn.
i gave blood in may 2021, i had the first moderna one day short of 4 weeks before the draw. red cross reported i had anti bodies.... i do not know if they were looking for spike protein or mrna.
the last samples they checked for anti bodies was june 2021.
i am pretty sure one of the 5 vials they take when you give are labeled and kept
maybe red cross blood banks can survey vials and see with follow up to the donor vaxx history of/if detected mrna and spike proteins??
Almost everyone has antibodies - due to COV or various human coronavirus infections, as well as from jabs. So I'm not sure exactly what is tested re: antibodies. There is almost no way Red Cross could accurately know who was vaccinated with which vaccine(s) and when/how often. Only if jab antibodies are different from non-jab exposed antibodies could this be known.
Antibodies from the illness are different from the vax created antibodies and can be distinguished with particular tests.
it would take contacting the donors, whose name is linked to the code on the donation
red cross may balk due to privacy and so forth effecting donations
So they would have to take the donors word for it?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/mother-blames-vaccinated-blood-death-one-month-old-baby-died-blood-clot-following-blood-transfusion/
😭😭😭
All of this blood will have to be trashed. Will it be? What a great way to infuse more people with this shit.
Igor, Igor... "chest milk" 😏...
And shouldn't those "mothers" actually be "birthing people"?
let's give crazy a rest, can we agree on that??
With all respect, personally the derision and laughter serves as a release valve for sometimes murderous rage. There, I said it. Thought crime of murder. Unlike those bastards I am unlikely to act. They deserve every nanoparticle of mud and abuse thrown at them. Ridicule is a healthy outlet. We’ll probably have to agree to disagree on this one.
Humour and ridicule are important just as 'serious' information is, but they indeed serve different needs.
To me humour is important but now it is so more than ever: to reduce tension but especially because of emotional connection occuring when you think something is funny and somebody else anywhere in this world that no longer feels mine and worse, never should have felt that way, understands me, feels as necessary to me for feeling being alive, connected, as food and water is to live.
Even when not joining the slapstick conversation between other persons, but understanding it and have fun about it, laugh about it, feels good and feels like healing
There are conversations humoursly for other people, but not for me, and then I just read something else, what does fit me.
It is always present: levels of quality differ a bit, but it is all quite high, emotionally but factually/theoretically as well. And if not? That doesn't matter, because the writer's intentions are okee, good and honest.
I really like reading and writing here in the comments. Honest reactions and people like Mary Lou who say what they think and or feel, even or sometimes even more when I disagree on them or don't understand what message they wished to bring;-))
Gentle reader--I apologize for not making my thoughts clear. I will try to be more articulate.
Gentle reactor, gentle reader, your apologizes are inherently gracefully accepted.
Hence, I owe you, even more apologizes. For not understanding what you ment, and some more apologizes because you were not adressing yourself to me originally. I will try to be a better and modester listener and reader, thank you for that insight!
Well said!👍😊
Thank you☺️
Couldn't have said it better myself ❤...
I joke whenever I can... I wss very very bad today.
I did take my mom off...
It involved A funeral... I find them humorous. Except mine.... World tragedy on mine😎😎😎😎
< World tragedy...> on the funeral execution (went for the cheap package?) 🥸 or on your passing? 😔🙃
Poor taste, I know. Propriety stripped away. If I tell I am wearing a tin foil hat does that afford me any leniency? Or is it straight to the stocks with me, nobody’s buying my tin foil twinkie diet dodge?
Thanks for the outlet!
Conspiracies happen!!!
https://novusordowatch.org/2018/08/conspiracy-catholic-church-true-popes-speak/
It'll be like Diana when I pass!,😎😅😄😆
Tin foil? Conspiracies happen all the time...
I limit#i can handle, they can drain you... Link in a second
On purpose... or more like a 'John Cleese don't mention the war'- kind of situation?
Didn't know reference.. Funny!
I was bad on purpose...
I am also very bad by mistake... I'd figure out much later...til I got married, she'd tell me straight off....
Told county clerk, (fake) priest... Another time, we were cousins prepping for marriage. So she already knew
Oh excuse me but I forgot to mention that by far most women I know, don't like very much, as we in the Netherlands refer to, with the words 'underpencefun' or 'poop and pee jokes'....( I don't know exact translations... but you will probably immediately understand what I mean I hope ...;-))
Why? It is ridiculously funny 🤭...
Yes, it does seem funny - until you live in an area where there are high numbers of gender-confused people and you see someone out walking the dog but you're not sure if it's a he or a she...and I'm not talking about the dog, here!
My kids are going to be growing up amongst 10-year olds who say they're 'lesbian' simply because they find boys annoying and don't like hanging out with them. Geez. Every girl must be lesbian at some point in her life with that definition...
Yes, exactly what I have been saying for some time.
Who among us never felt awkward or uncomfortable in his or her changing body during puberty and teen years? Who of us tomboys didn’t at some point wonder if we were “normal?” but never even considered for an instant that we weren’t female? We knew we were female. We just didn’t relate to the frills and giddiness and silliness (our perception) of typical girls. Nowadays we would be told that we must be boys in girls’ bodies. 😭😭😭
Yep. Tomboy here! Never liked pink (still don't), I climbed trees & played lots of sport and and I still ONLY like lace on a bra if the bra is practical and functional! :-D
But I always knew I was a female.
I never did... I wss very cool, up until about53
If you have the means, move from that place NOW. Not worth it to try to live in that environment. These idiots are BORN offended by everything and everyone.
The problem is that we've just moved 1000km away from a very conservative area to BE in this environment where people hate the covid jabs! I guess a lot of locals haven't thought too much on other fronts, though! :-\
Yes, we live in an insane world... insane on purpose.
We can't all run off and join a sane community. The Amish had there issues too, although gender confusion is not one of them. Best to limit devices with access to social media and whatever else is sending a demoralizing message.
If you want to see how hopeless our civilized society is, go to an HOA meeting. People are crazy. Each in their own unique way, but quite plainly mad.
this must be a casual reference in II Tim 3:7 where it speaks of those 'always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.' Definitely endless material for comedy routines.
You HAVE to laugh at it, because you sure as heck can’t take it seriously!
When people refuse to accept facts and reasoning then after a period of time they deserve to be openly mocked.
LOL
....oh please!
Well, it is generally accepted that we have no idea what a woman is 🤣
Yep, the Chief Medical Honcho in OZ can attest to that. He came up with a 38 word salad that meant nothing and was as obtuse as possible. I honestly cannot understand how most women accept this. My wife is the most gentle person I know and even she was fuming at it.
😜😆
Hey hey, this is Substack. Wokeness is illegal around here
The speed at which they find these things out is remarkable. Imagine if they did these studies BEFORE recommending poison to nursing moms. What a concept. If people in the real world worked like this, they'd all have been fired a long time ago.
I work on software. I like to think my work is important, but at the end of the day, it's email.
If I pushed out code changes like they pushed out these vaccines (lack of testing, lack of monitoring, covering up criticisms, etc) I'd be fired and rightly so. The big mystery to me is that all my collogues accept as gospel these tenants of safe deployments of software, but were eager to roll up there sleeves for these jabs. So bizarre.
I'm pretty sure it was the word "vaccine" which ensnared most people. If they had called it what it was they would have had zero takers. "Vaccine" has a lot of clout and promise--hopefully not anymore.
And that itself was the result of a lot of spin and PR work. It was no accident that anyone expressing any doubts whatsoever was labeled an "anti-vaxxer" and that meant they were bad and stupid people who didn't believe in science. The last 20 years has seen a massive push towards creating exactly that mind-set, and now we clearly see it was always the "anti-vaxxers" who were the smart, critical thinkers.
The stupid people, the bad people, were those who jumped in kicking the 'anti-vaxxers', while insisting that believing in science means attacking anyone with questions or data they don't like.
You are correct. That was the basis of the "trust factor".
Along with MSM created Fear psychosis.
Along with MD treatment protocol payoffs.
Literal sorcery.
Stefan Oelrich, a member of the Board of Management of Bayer and head of the Pharmaceuticals Division:
“I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago in the public—‘would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’—we probably would have had a 95 percent refusal rate,” he added.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/bayer-executive-says-mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy_4318429.html
Wow, you're not kidding. Was it written by the Pfizer communications dept?
Yes! I could feel my blood pressure rising as I kept reading. Hopefully there won't be a second book.
i worked in weapon system acquisition as a dod civilian.
we spec'ed how 'systems" are tested against performance and interface spec's. we directed in the contract test design including required alpha and beta risks which were used to determine tests and repetitions, and pass fail.
for aircraft and things hung on them they defined by contract "airworthiness", which required a number of flights and cycles to draw the test risks.
seems to me the objects tested by the vaxxers were too few and incomplete and the alpha and beta risks, were sketchy.
my feel is the risk of accepting a bad design as safe from the vaxx tests is very high
higher than i would put a soul in an airplane with!
Me too Ed. Now retired, but also wrote the risk management plans and conducted the process for MDAP. Makes you wonder who at DoD lead the OpWarpSp processes.
we were becoming a rare breed when i left ~2019.
It's because people live and think in boxes. Software is software. Jabs are jabs. Heaven forbid the two could be connected!
Another thing you will understand, is that if a vaccine takes on average 10 years to develop and test, pushing one out in a few months is likely to be full of bugs.
I think you are missing the point - they knew from the start that this was poison. They tried to avoid pregnant women in their sham trial because they knew what the outcome was going to be. However, these are not just evil but also greedy filth so it was a case of getting more money out of a proven failed product. Yep, they are that demented and are probably thinking that they will get away with it.
No, I know they knew--I was just trying to make a point about how silly it looks to show trial results now. They've known since the 90s because they tried Phase trials and could never get passed the first one. This thing was in the bag long before 2020. Katherine Watt puts it well:
"Whistleblower Brook Jackson has a case against Pfizer related to Pfizer/FDA/DOD clinical trial fraud and US government contract fraud. Pfizer's response? "The ‘vaccines’ are not pharmaceutical products subject to transparency, consumer protections and FDA regulation, but are instead bioweapons produced under contract subject to DOD control only.
An investigation team, working with a team of other data analysts, document the pharmaceutical corporations’ complete deviance from standard FDA protocols for clinical trials, manufacturing, serialization, labeling, distribution, storage and other supply chain phases. Which makes sense once you understand that the companies and their subcontractors are producing weapons to sicken and kill people, not medicines to heal people. By contract, the contents of the vials are legally under complete DOD control from the start of the raw materials and manufacturing chain, right up until the moment the product is injected into a human arm."
This has been an ongoing plan for decades.
Very good points about the DOD. That is how we are now at the stage that they are pushing the octomouse booster (apologies for plagiarizing the name but it is too good).
I hear it was "decimouse booster" for Moderna. I guess 10 mice makes it better, huh.
Quoting one of the movies that best reflects today's world - Idiocracy - "more better" mice, "more better" jab.
That's great, guess I'll run out and get the Maderna then!
It would be helpful if you could provide more than 'she said' evidence for that extraordinary claim.
My websearch (with yandex.com) fails to find supporting evidence for 'bioweapons defense' by Pfizer. In Jackson's Lawsuit the DoD is claimed to be a victim by purchasing fraudulently represented products.
Again, nowhere do I find Pfizer using a defense "because they are bioweapons."
“Pfizer claims they can get away with fraud as long as the government would write them a check despite knowing about the fraud,” attorney Robert Barnes said.
A few relevant links with links to the unsealed source documents.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-evidence-pfizer-whistleblower-lawsuit/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/cant-make-pfizer-asks-court-dismiss-whistleblower-lawsuit-us-government-aware-vaccine-fraud/
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
Read this and get back to me. Please don't do that thing where you discredit the meaning of a statement because they chose not to use a certain word. You'd be backing out an argument instead of acknowledging the stated facts.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/implications-of-10-usc-2371b-the?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Pfizer's own defense was that since it contracted with the DOD, the FDA regs do not apply, despite the fact that they went through the motions of that process to cover up the fact that this was an experimental injection, which only purpose is for use as a weapon.
"In other words, if no consumers would buy a product under normal commercial circumstances, but the pharmaceutical companies want to sell it, and the US government wants to conduct research and development on its military applications, the HHS Secretary classifies it as a qualified security countermeasure, the pharmaceutical contractor manufactures it, the US government buys it in bulk, and the US government forces the population to take it."
I'm sorry but nowhere in that is stated it was unimpeachable "because it was a bioweapon".
Pfizers argument was "they let us get away with it, so It's okay".
Is that so hard to see?
Nowhere. NOWHERE is the defense "The DoD accepted it BECAUSE it is a bioweapon"
No, that was NOT Pfizer's argument. Pfizer was playing a dangerous game. It tried to dismiss the Jackson complaint not on its merits (that Pfizer committed fraud) but by asserting that it "never had an obligation to conduct sound, non-fraudulent trials under the terms of its Base Agreement with the US government." (Ex. A to Pfizer's Motion to Dismiss).
What does this mean? It means that contrary to what the American public was told, "the agreement was not a standard federal procurement contract, but rather a ‘prototype’ agreement executed pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2371b[.]…" 10 USC 2371b has since been renumbered (how strange!). It’s now 10 USC 4022 - Authority of the Department of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects.
That’s what the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the Covid-19 injection program are: a military prototype project.
The US Congress in 1997 pretended to stop unethical US government experimentation on military personnel, while actually expanding the pool of human subjects for DOD experiments to include the military and the rest of the American population, by moving the experimental programs from the Department of Defense to the Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, and then merging HHS with DOD through subsequent legislation.
So, yes, it is in fact Pfizer's argument that since it quietly, but quite strategically, went through the military channels--which deal with experimental chemicals, research and bioweapons, instead of the usual consumer product channels, it owed no duty to the American people to conduct fraud-free research or studies to get this approved and on the market.
What you are doing is playing a semantic game, but you also miss the importance of how Pfizer (and our gov't) stealthily allowed this all to happen. Because it's a bioweapon.
And they know exactly how successful they have been. Wonder who gets those numbers in real time.
Probably the majority of the Health/Harm Departments in the world. The fact that the information has not been leaked shows how despicable these people are. A lot of them know everything and are happy to keep it secret.
They knew.
People were putting these pieces together back in 2020 when they started talking about jabbing people.
Hiding is good indication they knew
You suggest they didn't . . .
Sarcasm. I guess I'm not that good at it.
Sarcasm does not work great in online posts. Have gotten into trouble myself...unless people actually know you.
I think I just did a bad job at it.
It's not a helpful or useful way to communicate. Being sarcastic makes you feel smart, but doesn't inform the reader. Be straight. Say what you think.
Apologies for suggesting you weren't using sarcasm via my own use of sarcasm
LOL-Scott Logan is correct. Unless you are El Gato Malo, sarcasm falls short of coming across properly.
I just don't get how anyone, smart or stupid, rich or poor, can't see how ridiculous this whole thing has played out in a shoot first (in the arm) and ask questions later.
Dr. Naomi Wolf , Amy Kelly of DailyClout have been publishing their expert teams analysis of the Pfizer trial documents on this topic since May
https://dailyclout.io/harmful-vaccine-induced-cytokines-passed-to-infants-via-breastmilk/
https://dailyclout.io/daily-clout-report-microrna-the-hidden-rna-in-the-pfizer-vaccine/
They have suffered extreme censorship and
Ridicule as a result. Ends up they were 100 correct.
https://dailyclout.io/adverse-events-rise-in-babies-breastfed-by-vaccinated-mothers/
https://dailyclout.io/harmful-cytokines-from-vaccinated-mothers-passed-to-breastfed-infants/
https://dailyclout.io/harmful-vaccine-induced-cytokines-passed-to-infants-via-breastmilk/
While moral and ethical; there is no financial gain in that strategy.
And honestly, it could be done in a day in the lab.
Might explain all the babies sick with RSV etc
1000%
MY child got RSV from one of the vaxxes in 2012-13. Just like that. Motherfuckers.
My 15 month old granddaughter has breathing issues every time she gets a cold. Not rsv but more like asthma. She has to take a puffer. Has been in the hospital 4 or 5 times for a night or two. Momma got jabbed when she was about 4 months old. I’ve often wondered if that is why she gets so sick from a runny nose. She is still nursing her.
This is exactly what I meant--my son was 18 mos old and after his vaccines had viral-induced asthma, which they called "RSV" since they didn't know what else to call it. He was in the ER 7 times that year and admitted once. Massive doses of dexamethasone and albuterol. All vaccine induced. He's 10 now and still has problems, but just has fewer colds now that he's older. Any time he gets the sniffles, we brace ourselves.
Ha. Our newborn intensive department 2021 was packed with RSV at a non-seasonal time and all of the workers were getting it too.
I’ve heard that it is. Along with rhinovirus and many other respiratory viruses.
so, another horror story.
in the summer of 2020, a friend of mine got hired by Pfizer and was managing CV clinical trials. They were experimenting (sorry, doing "clinical tirals") on pregnant women, and WANTED to have the baby born already injected with the poison death jab.
my guess is that the whole breast milk shedding concept is a feature, not a bug.
The remaining batches of Pfraud documents should be very revealing. All Pfraud documents released under court showed that they excluded pregnant women and if they did fall pregnant, they were supposed to be removed from the pool. I did not think that they could be more evil but, yep, this is proof that their evil has no bounds.
Here's the thing: they really REALLY think they are Saving Humanity and are doing God's work on earth. Their egotism knows no bounds.
You are utterly wrong. They are trying to kill us
I'm with you; I believe they're trying to kill us. She works for Pfizer and thinks they're saving the world.
This is not egotism - it is pure psychotic behaviour. I suppose that if you are psychopath, you can rationalize everything as in "yeah, a few will pay the price but we will learn so much and make so much money that it will be all worth it".
thanks for that fascinating bit of info. I haven't heard THAT before.
it seems to me what you're saying is that Pfizer thought the lipid nano particles would cross the placenta into the fetal circulatory system. excuse my French, but good fucking grief.
It's worse. They knew or suspected what they were injecting people with could cause reactions in others, from "direct contact" of any kind. This is from their own documentation of the trials:
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
"8.3.5.3. Occupational exposure
Occupational exposure occurs when a person has unplanned direct contact with a subject for a vaccine, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These individuals may include caregivers, relatives, and other people close to the subject.
When such exposures occur, the investigator must report this to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of being notified, whether or not an associated secondary adverse event occurs. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event reporting form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY”.
There are also sub-sections for pregnancy and breast-feeding exposure. Of course they knew.
Jesus wept, that is insane
JAMA is controlled. Hence, it's worse than they say. They just want to front-run from behind like the rest of the clowns switching jerseys.
Whatever they admit, the truth is worse.
ALWAYS!
The old "limited hangout" at its finest.
speaking of which, don't miss Whitney Webb's podcast "Unlimited Hangout"
I dont know whats more disturbing...this story or the fact its not even mentioned by the main stream media
You have to stop thinking msm is your friend... Or is working for truth
Good one, Rich. So true.
Do you think this is the cause of the blue-green breast milk being reported?
I know we have previously discussed (and hoped) that shedding only occurs for a brief period (few weeks?) after injection, but I suspect (fear) it is longer than that. How long is the big question since there is no long-term clinical data :-(
No idea, I doubt that nanoparticles are so dense that they can change the color of the milk, but it is probably real due to some indirect causation
I've posted this elsewhere on Substack before--my breastmilk turned blue when my twin babies were 4 mos old (this was 25 years ago). It happened when we went on a ski vacation with the kids & grandparents along. I thought I could ski all day and still make a zillion ounces of breastmilk, too. Apparently, I could not; my milk turned super thin and bluish after just one full day of skiing. I took a day off, just laid around, and the milk returned to its rich creamy whiteness. I attributed the thin/blue to excessive physical stress (6-8 hours of intense exercise in brutal weather conditions). I've never verified this theory, but it wouldn't surprise me if the thin blue milk after vaccination is also due to excessive physical stress of a body dealing with multiple horrifying toxins...
Maybe some kind of inflammatory reaction?
Has anyone found out how long shedding occurs in general? Whether from breast milk, or sexual contact or even casual contact...?
My understanding from several research studies I've read, claims the process is forever because the mRNA teaches your cell to replicate the spike protein continuously, what your cell replicates binds with other cells and the process starts all over, which means you'd shed continuously.
It is potentially forever if the mRNA is reverse transcribed, which is entirely likely and which has been demonstrated in vitro in hepatic cells. I'm just giving the 60 day - 15 month time frame because otherwise I might be considered to be speculating. But yes, you are likely right. We need to revert to semi-arranged marriages now so start keeping a list of unvaccinated children similarly aged to your own. These children literally carry the future of humanity on their shoulders.
I understand mRNA reverse transcription, must most people don't know that process. Good comment.
This is false. The modRNA programs your cells to produce spike protein, not more modRNA (they couldn't anyway).
Not exactly! Thru reverse transcription the mRNA can enter the cell nucleus binding with your DNA and teaching the cell to replicate the mRNA too according to several research papers. And if the injection mRNA programs the cell to produce spike protein then programing the cell to produce more mRNA don't matter does it. Because the cell will continue to produce the spike protein forever once programed right?
Our immune system attacks and kills spike-protein-producing transfected cells.
Thanks for your comment.
That is what I understood from the different articles out there as well. Some of your cells will generate the spike protein for the rest of your lifespan. The worst part about it is that it was done on purpose to overcome the fact that the body tries to "clean up" the foreign MRNA asap. The solution that these lunatics came up with, to a problem that Dr. Malone explained in detail, was to ensure that the spike protein keeps getting produced. I wonder if they have another jab that will "fix" that problem.
You can imagine that to be the case but it has not been proven.
So appreciate these articles! I’m a bodyworker and am touching vaxed folks daily. Im constantly worried and wonder if there is any way I can protect myself from shedding. Does shedding happen from skin to skin contact? Respiratory particles? Are there any tests that show if this mRNA is present in me?
This is a particular concern with someone who got one using an adeno-delivery system, which is a live virus that does everything but replicate (unless it regains its ability to replicate, which is also well documented in the literature). Shedding is a known phenomena described in many papers -- here's even a test to measure it, just like the swab ones we use.
2003: Development of an adenovirus-shedding assay for the detection of adenoviral vector-based vaccine and gene therapy products in clinical specimens.
(Wang F. et al., doi: 10.1089/10430340360464688.)
Adenoviral vectors are used widely as gene therapy and vaccine delivery systems. An adenovirus-shedding assay may be performed in clinical trials to monitor the safety of the vector and to investigate the potential relation between clinical symptoms and shed vector virus. This report describes the development and statistical performance of the shedding assay. Live adenovirus was recovered from throat swab and urine samples spiked with E1-deleted adenovirus type 5 vector expressing HIV-1 gag [Ad5HIVgag], in the presence or absence of wild-type adenovirus (WT Ad5).
Several researchers claim there research indicates shedding to unvaccinated can happen through direct contact and respiratory particles. If shedding is occurring as the research shows, you should be able to get a blood test. However, another consideration is if vaccinated are shedding, can you become infected from the vaccine since the mRNA spike protein bioweapon in the injection is exactly the same as in the SARS-COV2 spike protein? If you can, you should be able to get a blood test to check for immunity.
Well the vxx spike is modified - it is a synthetic version with the uridine replaced with pseudo-uridine. This makes the RNA last longer and degrade more slowly, and possibly changes the immune response by increasing IgG-4 (don't quote me on that I am going from memory as a non-scientist), but anyway, there is a definite difference.
I understand that, but they both have the same properties and function. Good comment, thanks.
Spike protein is the product of the modRNA instructions carried to the cells. The modRNA doesn't tell your cells to produce more modRNA.
I have thought about the sexual transmission angle since reading (long ago now) about the high concentration in testes. Would be interesting to look at two groups of marital couples, husband vaxxed / wife unvaxxed, and husband and wife both unvaxxed, and compare what is found in the wives' blood. You'd need couples where neither is known to have recently had covid, which is hard to guarantee, but still.
That's especially a concern because the spike also localizes to eggs - so if there's a targeted delivery method (ahem), it's going to be in the right place.
Spike production can continue for up to 60 days and some studies report 15 months so that is your answer there.
That's a pretty long time span!
It's only 60 days because that was the length of the study. It could be 61 days, or forever.. Pfizer probably has an idea, but they aren't saying.
The articles I read seem to indicate the spike will be generated for the lifespan of the jabbed person. When they said you cannot un-vaccinate, they really meant it.
Except they don't.
Bluish milk is normal. I've had it that colour before and I've read that other moms have as well. No idea why it's that colour but it's not unusual.
Interesting. This is blue-green breast milk and is not normal, according to Naomi Wolf:
• https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/destroying-women-poisoning-breast
No that's caused by the birth prevention pills. "Green plasma" when donor is female using that stuff.
To clarify, are you saying breast-feeding mothers who are taking birth control pills when they get the injection wind up having blue-green breast milk due to some sort of interaction?
I'm saying green plasma from women taking birth control pills has long been known. How the shots contribute I don't think anyone really knows right now.
👍
Is the vaccine a bio-weapon?
Widespread release of an air borne weapon poses a lot of risks and uncertainty. Uncertainty related to wind directions, temperatures and UV light. Uncertainty related to population spread. How do you stop your own allies being inflicted by the disease? What if you didn't release a bio-weapon per se but you instead weaponized the vaccines?
If you exposed 100,000 troops to agent orange, would you expect them to show symptoms straight away, or would those symptoms be delayed by a number of years? Would some however show signs of acute toxicity? Most likely a small handful would, but the majority would only show symptoms years later.
The same is true of most genotoxins and carcinogens. Asbestos, thalidomide or even mitochondrial damage from fluoroquinolone antibiotics (floxed) most often occur months or years later.
If you wanted to use a vaccine as a bio-weapon would you want it to have quick deadly effects and risk raising public alarm, thus limiting the uptake and causing rebellion. Or would it be better for it to seem safe initially so people take it, maybe even multiple times without any idea it's a poison?
Would you prefer the poison to have a single cause of death so doctors treating patients see patterns and then raise alarms, or would it be better to load it with a bunch of concerning mechanisms so one day it's dementia, the next day leukemia and the following a stroke.. those seem pretty unrelated. But what if they're not?
Indeed, and exactly my thoughts in about Oct 2020 when I heard the vax would have the jabbed making spike protein. "That's how I'd do it if I wanted to harm/kill people and get away with it" was my FIRST thought because there would likely be a literal smorgasbord of ill effects that would confuse the heck out of your typical unsuspicious sheeples. I don't even read murder mysteries yet I KNEW in my bones that was the play because it made best sense of the suppression of other treatments and the insane hype being generated for the jab. I even told people as soon as Biden 'won' that the jab would be mandated. Again I was deemed nuts. One learns to not bother waiting for the admission that "you were right". It never comes.
Of course I was not a trusted doctor/nurse so was immediately disregarded as being the paranoid delusional brother/uncle. Thankfully my wife and my parents have learned to trust my intuitions. If anyone else ever admits to I was right I'm betting I'll never hear it said to my face.
My experience of the world is that, more often than not, the people stuck in silos working on solving problems can't see the forest for the trees. Most significant breakthroughs come from outsiders. It's the reason Einstein wasn't a mainstream scientist.
Initially I considered this a possibility but wrote it off as one of low probability. Like worrying about a volcano erupting when you don't even live near an active volcano. Not impossible but unlikely.
But over time, this theory has gone from being sort of crazy to not so crazy as the evidence just keeps stacking up to support it.
The thing is, if 80-90% of the population are poisoned and die over the next 5-10 years. What does that mean for the rest of us?
This is a question I have struggled with for the past year - is this truly a depopulation event where 80% of the world is going to die off in 5 years due to these poison shots, or maybe just 10-20% of the shots are "bad batches" or maybe these are sterilization shots to reduce procreation? I would like to believe it is long term sterilization, but that's the least evil out of these scenarios. The consequences of these shots will likely impact our species in the decades to come.
I wish we really knew. I suspect due to the warp speed manufacturing and logistic chain, there will be some dud batches. But how much? How long? Who knows.
My concern is this, there is a risk whether it is as critical as the worst case scenario or as benign as the best. The risk exists.
In a workplace, we have hazards like fires, electricution, vehicle incidents or falls from height. And so we employ safety controls for those hazards because of the high potential for consequences. No one expects them to happen. In fact they are relatively rare events. But critical risks need to be addressed and this one so far, is being ignored.
An excellent question that I have been pondering. Maybe I need to start thinking about it in a systematic fashion. For example, how would a world-wide 10% reduction in population show up? a 20% reduction?
Less fact-checkers to help us out
I’m wondering as well.
Never thought of myself as a particularly smart/wise but, gosh
with every passing day, month, year I seem to be a lot smarter than many. Funny that when young and being "youthfully arrogant" I trusted
my feelings/instincts without much questioning. Then became
responsible adult and mother relying on those smarter than myself, who "knew better". I know I wasn't "better for it" and now, back to my
old ways but still feeling annoyed for allowing myself being duped.
Einstein was as much of a fraud and marketing campaign as the 'scientists' around the gene-jab campaign.
Same group of people, cohencidentally.
Cipro is in the Monkeypox shots btw. Go look it up. Shocking stuff.
Going to be a bunch of SAE from those shots. Lots of floxxed people coming.
Bastards. Mitochondria are important. Having energy is nice. Being tired and cranky all the time sucks. Diabetes and liver disease suck even more. Guess what often leads to those conditions... Damaged mitochondria!
Thank you for posting this. I was on a zoom call with Dr. Lee Merritt quite a long time ago now where she said she knew of a baby who died after breastfeeding from a jabbed mom. I tried sharing that info and people told me she must be mistaken, or she's just another conspiracy theorist dr who doesn't understand "real" science. I continue to be so saddened by this madness-and for those people whose ego will not allow them to even consider the truth. Please keep up your excellent work. I always look forward to your articles.
The biggest villains in all of this is the community of physicians. The vast majority of them stood silent while these vaccines were creating victims. They are the ones who are the final guardian of the patient’s health. Yet they failed miserably. There should be a representative group of people charged with oversight of all the physician organizations. They have demonstrated that they are incapable of protecting their patients best interests.
I hate to say but I agree
Med School 101 - A patient cured is a customer lost.
This 1000%. They are complicit. At the very least they should have asked questions and let the "customers" know that they had no idea how toxic the jabs were.
The idea that you can create some bureau or office that reliably 'oversees' and 'regulates' is what got us into this mess in the first place.
Please abandon abandon that false idolatry in 'institutions of men'. Have faith in the lord, and be skeptical of government.
"Regulatory Capture" at ALL levels of ALL institutions.
Medicine, Education, Entertainment, Judiciary, Legislative, Executive, etc, etc.
Correct.
One by one, the conspiracy theories became confirmed facts - like I always said, conspiracy theories about Covid are facts before their time. Unfortunately, the outrage revealed in that paper was all too predictable. The jabs were tested for an effective 28 day period and failed every standard metric. Pregnant women were excluded from the test set and the Pfraud instructions were clear - those that fell pregnant during the test period had to be removed from the test group. Why? My guess is that the filth at Pfraud knew that this was a going to happen so they tried to minimize the chance that the tests will fail (which they did anyway). Moreover, once the jabbing started, they only tracked pregnant women for 3 months. Again why? Normal pregnancies last for 9 months not 3. What did they know and when did they know it (my guess is again from the beginning)?
In the case of the women that just gave birth, there was no testing whatsoever as far as I can tell from the Pfraud documents. Yet, I have seen sick, sick commercials about jabbing all women to keep them and their young ones "safe".
My question is how did the "safe and effective" message for pregnant women and those that just gave birth ever made it out?
The results here in Oz are heartbreaking - babies from jabbed mothers struggle with bugs that previously were not an issue. What is more infuriating is the gaggle of doctors and media trying to look stumped as to what is the cause for this disaster. The channel 9 piece, about 2 months back, was truly disgusting and the only thing missing was climate change and too much carbon. They have committed an unspeakable crime and like all lowlife scum, their priority is to escape accountability instead of putting an end to this horror. One can tell the type of people these scumbags are because NONE have tried to speak up about it - they all go along with the safe and effective lie. How can these doctors and nurses live with themselves? What kind of monster goes about the daily life knowing what they have done and is still being done. Make no mistake, they definitely KNOW and I hope that they will not escape being held accountable.
True and I wish you were wrong
At this point in time, a simple "Do not jab yourself if you are pregnant or planned to be" would be amazing progress. This needs to stop NOW but in Oz they still jab everyone.
It is not true that "NONE have tried to speak up about it". I have quite a collection of interviews, speeches and articles from those that did and do.
It's also not true that all conspiracy theories about covid are facts, since some contradict others; thus cannot both be true.
In the US there has clearly been a group of medical experts that have tried to speak out and were censored. That is in stark contact with Oz. The medical community here has been abysmal - they still push for the jabs and the boosters. My point was about the Oz medicos that need to be held accountable for being complicit in this horror and "medical researchers" involved in these jabs that have been quiet when they should have spoken out.
As far as the conspiracies out there? I am not aware of any wild conspiracies that are contradictory - just the following - that the whole thing has been a massive scam (proven), that alternatives effective treatments were available from the start (proven), that the jabs are a complete failure (proven), that the side effects of the jabs are worse than most would admit (proven), that healthy kids and young people were never in any danger (proven), the natural immunity works (proven), that the system was rigged to kill people because it was more lucrative that way (proven) and that others used this scamdemic to abuse power (proven), force measures that were absurd (proven) and tried to control the movement of people and their lives (proven).
Thanks for your response. I missed the context of your comment. Cheers!
I warned my Friends on Facebook...
...but was censored down to a few people and even they initially resisted the truth
Exactly. EVERYTHING goes through the breastmilk. To think otherwise is stupid.
Oh, wait Stupid rules right now! Silly me....
Many of these women won't eat sushi or aged cheese while pregnant, but they will get shot with an experimental injection. Effin' nuts.
Anecdotally, in 2021 I was in the office overhearing a pediatrician who was having a chat with her very pregnant patient, who was concerned about getting the shot because she didn't want to pass it through her breast milk. This pediatrician, who *Runs Breast Milk Research Projects* and had been doing rounds through the ward collecting samples -- her response is, "It's perfectly safe! I got mine in May, didn't nurse for 1 day, and my baby is fine!"
Science at work.
OMG. For perhaps a layperson in the street chatting with someone to say that? OK, maybe, fine. How would they know any different? But for a paediatrician?!?! NOT OK to say that!!
Idiocracy on steroids!
Disgusting…
…they were blinded
Blinded by science…
..or money.
Stupid is…
…as stupid does
I left Facebook before they had a chance to kick me off....they are evil facilitators in all of this horrific scam. Do not miss it at all, and I see now that that's where the gullible communicate..to their own detriment.
So many friends told me they dont believe in vaccine shedding. Also, they could not believe that I "believe" its real. They never really heard me when I said that "believing" has nothing to do with all of that. They did not want to read the substack articles I pointed out...Most of my friends are public servants or Medical Specialists (UK & Australia). So....the rigidity of mindsets I experienced was almost as painful as the lockdowns and all the other bullshit I had to face while being labelled an antivaxxer...just because i did not want to inject myself with the experimental jab which turned out to be a bioweapon. The sad part is I dont see much changes in Australia...yet.
Even I was doubtful about general shedding!!!
Hmmm with respect your "being doubtful" doesnt compare with theirs "I cant believe you believe in that". Anyway, I still love all my friends and we are still friends...and there is a part for me that "keeps them at the distance". I cetrainly do not trust their judgments like I used to...
The FOIA'd biodistribution studies and autopsies show S-Protein system wide, so we should expectr some will be shed over time as dead skin cells ablate.
However we should also expect that this will be a miniscule fraction of the exposure you'd get from taking an injection, even if you lick them all over.
Oh...thank you. Good to know. I have to watch my dog more closely. To make sure he is not licking...anyone.
Hmm, they are specialists in stupidity not medicine. The whole point of a specialist is to be the best at what they do and that requires an open and especially enquiring mind. Cannot say I am surprised. The medicine courses I have seen here at UWA scare me - they keep reducing the number of hours of anatomy (who needs it right?) and have all kinds social & indigenous BS added to the content. I am sure that it will be comforting to know that your doctor cannot figure out which side your liver is but has mastered the art of the pronouns and is a top influencer...