453 Comments
User's avatar
TnDoc's avatar

NEVER forgive. NEVER forget. This sociopath is directly responsible for many thousands of innocent German deaths. I certainly hope that he is fully boosted - and, his family... What an arrogant fool.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

If we forgive them, they will do it again

Expand full comment
Username's avatar

Yes. In the Christian formulation, a person is forgiven only if they repent from what they did.

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

Forgive them for your own benefit and health. And then, with a clear head and heart, hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity. Period.

Expand full comment
George's avatar

Amen to Coldwaterman. Spiritual forgiveness is personal.

Crimes commented are a matter of man-made laws which have man-made penalties. We have processes to deal with those involved in crimes and murder.

He should as God for forgiveness.

One this is sure, "And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment" Hebrews Chapter 9.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

You have it right George. Even if one of these completely repented, he would have to face A criminal court.

Judges might take it into account, but wouldn't need to.

In this case, mass murder using the state to do so? You don't get worse.

Throw in mass murder of children...

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

In the Christian formulation isn't it 'an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth'? How could they ever repay the debt against the victims of their inhumane wielding of power? The damage isn't even over yet - a whole generation of children will never recover fully in psychological terms - and there is more and more evidence that the heart conditions and cancers created by the jabs will be a permanently feature for the super-boosted members of the community, as well as extra susceptibility to be infected with the newer variants (currently being 'created' in the labs). The death toll can only go on rising.

Expand full comment
Username's avatar

"An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" is the pre-Christian, Old Testament approach. Jesus presented a new approach.

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

That is true, but it is very hard to imagine the dead 'turning the other cheek', and their devastated families are under no such edict as far as I have read the NT.

Expand full comment
DawnGolden's avatar

No problem. We'll forgive them after we hang them. New Testament says: " As you sow, so shall you reap"

We will help them reap what they deserve.

Expand full comment
Robyn S's avatar

Yes. You have to be alive to turn the other cheek!

Anyway, turning the other cheek to sociopaths who push this stuff will only serve to make you suffer more. Turning the other cheek works when the other side may have some compassion left. Sociopaths don't have that. So it doesn't work on them.

A full-on attack where you give no quarter and expect none and take no prisoners...now THAT is how these bastards unfortunately work :-(

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

No amnesty.

Amnesty ain't yours to give Username. Send them a package of cookies if you want.

They need to hang.

Expand full comment
Walt_Kowalski's avatar

I see a lot of non-Christians and Christian pacifists/liberals saying "turn the other cheek." Hello!!! Being slapped on the face is a minor aggression that damages the PRIDE but does no serious or permanent damage to the body. "Turn the other cheek" is not a call to pacifism or submission to abuse, but rather a call to swallowing your pride to protect you from unnecessarily escalating a situation.

Expand full comment
Username's avatar

To my mind, the key is whether the offender repents from his transgression. If the moral force of calling them out on what they did isn't enough to bring about repentance and reform, then all bets are off. 😉

Expand full comment
Abu Maven's avatar

Hamurabbi Code.

Expand full comment
Nitram's avatar

The golden rule.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Actually death penalty is sanctioned, even necessary. Catholic Church, Pope Saint Pius V has good writings on this.

Expand full comment
Former UK resident's avatar

Yeah sort of. But I find many Christians displaying that kind of attitude tho. Like Stew Peters.

I am not into Christianity and grew up in a non Christian environment. It's interesting to observe how these people interpret and apply the idea in a real life situation.

Expand full comment
Zade's avatar

No that is not Christian. That was Old Testament only, the lex talionis. It was meant to teach the Israelites not to indulge in the blood feuds common everywhere in their world. It was an advance, at the time. But Christian behavior doesn't demand "eye for eye, tooth for tooth".

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

The Old Testament is also part of the Christian religion, whatever the moderating effect of the New Testament may have been. Ultimately, no code should be needed to determine whether or not 'forgiveness' is on the table for those who commit the worst crimes. A better way to settle that is by balancing the claims of the victims and their families against the claims of the 'We didn't Know Any Better" crowd. If not 'knowing' (i.e. unless you are told by something ubiquitously called 'Science' that seeing that you've injured and destroyed people by performing your 'job' is a matter you should be concerned about) is their sole defense, perhaps they are all morally and intellectually bankrupt?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 31, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mary Lou Longworth's avatar

Actually the demands of grace are much more. Jesus did not nullify the Law, he came to fulfill it. (Matthew 5:17-20)

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Yes, this is a unique situation: repenting and/or paying for such a crime that it continues unabated. Legal opinions?

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

First rule of legal-deniability: NEVER admit any liability or wrong-doing. Here is Australia the Government is firmly digging in its heels and expressly continuing the 'Safe and Effective' propaganda as well as the mandates - deliberately using the excess deaths data as proof of how vulnerable people are to dying from C0vid f they are not up to date with their 'Boosters'. Since this story doesn't deviate in the slightest from their original chosen narrative - no matter that it flies in the face of evidence on the ground - most sheeple just accept it at face value. I fear for that reason, that if there were to be an uprising in Australia, it would most likely focus all its anger and hatred towards the unjabbed freedom fighters.

Expand full comment
Well now, isnt THAT special...'s avatar

Forgive its ok. FORGET NEVER. And forgiveness has nothing to do with sending them to jail when that's where these people belong. Send fauci too

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

Agreed! I am defining "forgive" as "letting go of the boiling anger and white-hot fury that we all feel". This is what we must do for our own sake. As in, our personal health. (I am speaking to myself, as a veteran prone to very dark, berserker flights of fantasy about what I would do to all these people. Not good for my health.)

Forget? Never. Prosecute to the full extent? Yes. Never Comply? Yes.

Expand full comment
Victoria's avatar

Righteous anger wins the day. Time for forgiveness comes later.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Only that way can we renew and strengthen codes of behaviour that can prevent this evil. Banish it!

Expand full comment
Stephen Sams's avatar

Forgive only when forgiveness is asked for

Expand full comment
Robyn S's avatar

And also when it is not consciously asked for - but where you can see the other person needs it to heal - and move on.

But will these sociopaths all over the world 'heal' or 'move on' to become better people? Highly unlikely! They've mostly got pretty rotten track records...and people don't really change.

Most of these sociopaths don't need forgiveness. Not from us, anyway. They need to forgive themselves first - but I doubt many of them will achieve that in their lifetime!

It is not up to us to save these monsters. It is up to us to save ourselves.

Expand full comment
Zade's avatar

Not exactly. We forgive, period. But that doesn't mean we don't confront where possible and demand justice.

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

What does it mean for the victims of crime to 'forgive' the criminals? If we are to exact justice then the word 'forgiveness' is nothing more than self-congratulatory window dressing. Forgiveness entails release from culpability - a pardon. There should NEVER be a pardon for the concerted, remorseless crimes these people have committed. Let's not forget that that death toll from this is going to far eclipse the death toll from the second world war - and will have continued consequences in terms of sterility of young people all over the world - similar to the effects of the atom bombs in Japan - except on a far greater scale. We are at the start of a tsunami of deaths, miscarriages and mental illness the likes of which have never been seen on Earth. Whereas it was thought that if you survived the clot-shots you would be ok, it is becoming known that there are long-term and permanent injuries and mutations of the human genome involved.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

The victims aren't exacting justice. The government is.

And people can still call for execution without hatred. One reason is to stop future acts

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Sadly government in Chinada is the criminal, and has lost the moral authority to mete justice. So we must remove their legal authority. Most are power hungry and demon-possessed. The ones at the top especially. Heads should roll, but i know they won’t.

Expand full comment
Vasilija Wilson's avatar

In my life I can say this I can Never NEVER Forgive or Forget to new Politics Mafia and New Hitler Nazis Politics in 21 st Century to send so many people to Dead and many destroyed there FUTURE as Vaccinated people are not being able to get back to what they were before vaccinations

Many Millions and millions out of Work unable to feed their family members

All these idiots are destroying human dignity

Send these idiots to Heal for goods

Amen

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

I hear your pain, because I feel it too. This IS a new Hitlerite era, even though so many people are still not recognising that. We are at the start of a major apocalypse, and we will need to muster our anger and non-compliance in order to keep their worst excesses from being easily achieved. So far, I am sad to say, not nearly enough anger or even acknowledgement of suffering, exists . People are still determined to put a positive spin on things, even if their bodies have been wrecked by jabs.

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

They need some public humiliation and to be divested of their ill gotten gains.

Expand full comment
Robyn S's avatar

It won't change them all being dirty, rotten scoundrels, but it will make their climb to the top again quite difficult without material support.

Expand full comment
Lysias's avatar

If he wants to be forgiven, let him reveal everything that he knows about the criminal conspiracy.

Expand full comment
Username's avatar

This is what I had in mind:

"If your brother sins against you, rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him." -- Luke 17:3

Expand full comment
Happiness: AViewpoint!'s avatar

Oh they’ll repent.....then they’ll do it again 2025.

Expand full comment
Original Owner's avatar

Just because you forgive a person doesn't mean you are in any way obligated to trust that person in the future. Nor does it mean (IMHO) that you don't seek to recover damages as provided by law.

To me, forgiveness mainly means clearing your mind of hatred and resentment. Mainly because those are burdens you carry, and you will benefit from putting them down. Not that I do that to anything like perfection.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

The government will put them to feath.

And we should all pray not to hate.

But this is business... So it won't happen again

Expand full comment
Overcomer's avatar

What you gonna do with a prisoner who repents, let him out of jail? No of course not he will still have to pull his time for his crime. We can forgive if they have a heart broken with grief for what they have done even even old george S. himself, that does not negate the fact they stand trial and if found guilty, shot, hanged, lit up, jabbed. They have to pay for their crime, here, or there. Revelation 20:11-15, hoss.

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

Good points. I defined "forgiveness" as letting go of personal hatred and seething anger towards these monsters. I do that for my personal health. Perhaps that is not what forgiveness means.

Regardless, I firmly believe that these mass murderers need to be executed for their crimes against humanity, whether or not the "justice" system agrees. But we can do that without hatred or anger, just quiet determination and tireless tenacity.

In truth, when the masses who've been jabbed against their will wake up to face the reality of what was done to them, the violence is going to be overwhelming.

Expand full comment
Overcomer's avatar

They are going to be mad and in their wrath looking for blood!

Expand full comment
Candice's avatar

Unfortunately, no. Most are so brainwashed, and the media so tightly controlled, the masses will never face the reality of what was done, and is being done. They'd have to actively seek out information and sources of their own volition outside of what they casually hear in passing or read in blips of headlines as they mindlessly scroll on their phones.

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

Strange to quote that text in support of your point. Your text shows men being judged by their works it is true, but it specifically ends with that judgment being overruled based not on any works or choice of the one being judged but only based on the character of God(I can defend the viewpoint that this 'Another book' that was opened is the 'Scroll' from ch5 that is only opened by 'the Lamb that was slain' ie the Way of the Cross, if need be)

The mercy of God is given especially to those that we think it ought not to be given to. It is to 'the poor' that the Gospel is preached, that is the last, the least, the lost, the losers.

Whether or not a prisoner ought to be released if he repents(literally 'think again' has new thoughts; a new mind in Greek and Latin), depends on why he is in prison. If he is there retributively then his state of mind makes no difference, although certainly in the case of murder, which I hope will be the charge that those responsible for the Plandemic are convicted on, I would say that sitting in a jail cell is not retribution, retribution requires their death, and I am still campaigning for a community stoning on that score. If he is there for the sake of personal rehabilitation then it makes all of the difference. If he is there for public order, ie as an example, then it is a debatable point, that is it depends on exactly what lesson is trying to be taught.

Which reason or reasons is appropriate in this life, for human justice, is no easy answer. Which reason or reasons motivates the Lord is beyond my understanding.

Expand full comment
Overcomer's avatar

What are you talking about being overruled? What scripture are you using, book, chapter, verse?

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

It's in your own text. Read it again. Judgment based on the works written in the books and then, none of it matters because of 'Another Book'-the Book of Life. Your text doesn't support your point.

Expand full comment
Olle Durks's avatar

As christians we forgive, no strings attached. Jesus, on the cross, forgave his persecutors.

But there is also the matter of the laws of the land. The laws of probably most countries have biblical laws and principles as their basis. The law must follow its course.

Forgiving is an act by the affected party that frees him/her from the power that the perpetrator holds over him/her. Application of the laws in question is necessary to reward the perpetrator for his/her acts and to demonstrate to society how criminals are dealt with.

Expand full comment
Robyn S's avatar

That doesn't work out so well when all the judges are bought! :-(

Expand full comment
Olle Durks's avatar

Agreed, and that seems to be the case across the world. Before justice is served something else has to happen. We, our side, are so civil. We demonstrate mostly peacefully and we talk while the Lauterbachs transgress the law and kill. When the masses are pushed into a corner just enough they may lose their civility. Before that happens more people need to wake up.

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

As Igor suggested, the question of repeating the behavior is crucial to the question of forgiveness. The Lord said, 'If someone strikes you let him strike the other cheek.', He never said let a madman run around hitting your grandmama and your children. And, really, no Christian has ever seriously proposed that forgiveness has anything to do with that situation.

It might be worth noting that Apostolic morality despite all of their lovely things to say about forgiveness was rather severe. They seemed quite comfortable with the Lord striking down Christians for lying(Ananias and Sapphira Acts ch5) or believers being struck with sickness(1 Corinthians 11). If someone says that they only approved of the Lord taking vengeance I point to Matthew 18, which specifically deprives violators of the protection of religion, generally understood to then leave them to the just punishment of their actions. Every Christian society has practiced some sort of discipline, most agreed that church councils could impose any penalty short of death and for that turned them over to the state.

I hope that when the time comes for justice that the emasculated, fluffy modern christianity will stay at home or keep its mouth shut that day and we can have something more historical and sensible, or we could trust the unbelievers to get that right, their track record lately is truly inspiring.*rolls eyes*

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

Great comment.

A lot of Christians have never opened a bible, let alone thought about what it actually says. Interpretations from the pulpit are good enough for them. Love your last sentence!!!

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

Repentance requires redress.

Expand full comment
Overcomer's avatar

You talking about Christ and forgiveness?

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

No. The Lord attends to His own affairs. I do not presume.

For 'repentance' in this context, read 'apology'.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Those first to speak contritely have a chance to come clean. The hour is late.

I expected legislators to walk across the House of Commons over this long ago. Weak socialist bastards of the party of Evil.

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

They.ve all been promised a place at the banquet table of the Globalists - If they knew anything of history, they would know that running dogs are always disposed of as soon as they have outlived their usefulness, in case they get too big for their boots and turn on the hands that fed them.

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

"running dogs" .. an excellent expression too many have forgotten.

Expand full comment
Agent 1-4-9's avatar

By "It's hard to ask for forgiveness", he's saying he doesn't need forgiveness because he did what was right at that time. He's already saying he WILL do it again.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

This is why we really do need to "drain the swamp." It's for our own good .... or at least the good of our children and grandchildren. I keep arguing that Covid might have given us the one mechanism to actually do this (drain the swamp). We have a rare opportunity here to expose all the crooks, liars and incompetent "leaders." We need to take advantage of this opportunity. If we can't drain the swamp after this, when will we?

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

With the corporate media the way it is, they will turn any replacements into swamp creatures begging for their bowl of drool

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Leopard doesn’t change its spots ... ever.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I’m guessing even genetic manipulation cannot accomplish that feat.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

...But, what if that leopard self-identifies as a gold fish?

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

🥲😮🙈

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

I like your handle.

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

My kids made it as a joke at the dinner table ! 🤣

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Perhaps you can add this to your report- Lauterbach is now the subject of a criminal complaint in Germany.

Lawyer files criminal charges against Karl Lauterbach- Charges: murder, manslaughter and serious bodily harm

The air for Karl Lauterbach (SPD) is getting thinner and thinner. After the suspicion that a party-affiliated advertising agency had been commissioned seemed to be substantiated, the coalition partner in the person of the FDP politicians Wolfgang Kubicki and Gerald Ullrich began to withdraw from the Federal Minister of Health. The first voices from the opposition are calling for the public prosecutor in the affair about the alleged "nepotism of the SPD comrades" (left-wing politician Sören Pellmann). As outrageous as these allegations may be, they could soon become by far the least of the problems for Karl Lauterbach and some of his employees. In connection with the propagation of the “vaccination free of side effects”, which will last at least until December 2022, there is even a suspicion of murder, manslaughter, serious bodily harm resulting in death and numerous other criminal offenses. At least in the eyes of the lawyer Wilfried Schmitz. He has therefore filed a criminal complaint against Karl Lauterbach and “all other employees of the Federal Ministry of Health who may still be involved” with the Berlin public prosecutor’s office.

...

The lawyer's criminal complaint against Karl Lauterbach and the possible accomplices to the Berlin public prosecutor's office dates from January 16, 2023 and includes the following allegations: suspicion of dangerous and serious bodily harm (in office) resulting in death according to paragraphs 223, 224, 226, 227, 340 StGB , manslaughter and murder in accordance with Sections 212 and 211 StGB, negligent bodily harm in accordance with Section 229 StGB, negligent homicide in accordance with Section 222 StGB, all possible criminal offenses in accordance with Sections 94 and 95 AMG and all other possible criminal offenses and forms of participation according to the StGB, War Weapons Control Act and/or International Criminal Code.

https://reitschuster.de/post/rechtsanwalt-erstattet-strafanzeige-gegen-karl-lauterbach/

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Great info

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Allen, are these criminal complaints A way to pacify us, with no teal intent?

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Absolutely!

Expand full comment
Werner's avatar

I fear that they will attempt to do it again irrespective of whether we forgive them or not

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Agree. The only thing that will stop these is incarceration for life or the noose.

Expand full comment
Vigilant Amalek Snow Leopard's avatar

And if you don't get to the real *them*, *they* will do it again.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Yes! Definitely need to get above Minion pay grade to the Dr. Evil ranks.

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Will the “ real” Obama stand up… AI will fool many .

Expand full comment
Skye's avatar

For some crimes there can never be forgiveness only elimination. Totally agree with your comment Igor!

Expand full comment
DawnGolden's avatar

We'll forgive them right after we hang them all.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Roger that!

Expand full comment
Happiness: AViewpoint!'s avatar

Sorry Igor.....my Activity page of notifications disappeared......it just says “No Activity” on my comment page. I went to support and tried to put in a request but it wouldn’t send. They were there this morning.

Expand full comment
Socrates999's avatar

I'm having same problem

Expand full comment
Happiness: AViewpoint!'s avatar

We’re you able to send a support request?

Expand full comment
Socrates999's avatar

Yes. Working again. My suspicion is there was a Cyber attack against sub-stack because of all the stuff like this

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

They will try to do it again anyway!

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

I believe it is necessary to see them as psychopaths. Not as an excuse at all. Just monsters like Mengele, Hitler, Stalin. Many many others.

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

KW Norton, I agree with you. And I think that is why it verges on impossible for the bulk of the public to see the situation for what it is. Most people cannot conceive of monsters who look human, but are so unlike an emotionally intact person that there is a line they cannot cross in their thinking. People cannot acknowledge that such monsters walk among us and that society is arranged in such a way that they tend to find their way to positions of power.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

Agreed

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

If they are psychopathic and their actions are due to this mental disorder, they cannot be held legally or morally responsible.

Why give them that way out?

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

I am not a psychiatrist and cannot make diagnoses. No one has suggested they get a way out. It is a general observation. A real diagnosis would entail psychiatric evaluations. A legal way out would entail legal proceedings. There is a lot to it.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

At a seminar with psychiatrists and other professionals that I attended a while ago titled "Personality Disorders in High Functioning Professionals," the presenter, a former Director of Forensic Mental Health, diagnosed Hitler with OCPD, but I already knew that. Most of the attendees didn't. Hitler was overconcerned with ethics. That was probably behind his vegetarianism and a contributor to the Aktion T4 Nazi euthanasia program, similar to the jabs.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

I have called them high functioning psychopaths for some time. I see the signs of toxic narcissism in our society, fed by social media, everywhere. I do think there is a link here to all of this. I think acknowledging this is important to our all being able to heal. Revolutions are both inner and outer. I see this as a kind of consciousness revolution.

Expand full comment
Nick's avatar

Psychopathy is not a disorder, it is a different kind of brain, different from the rest. The psychopaths are almost like a slightly different species of humans, almost a sub-species, They have been with us since the beginning. They are the ones all religious traditions call "evil" "demons" etc.. There is no cure. They are born that way. They have a lot of survival advantages so their genes survive in the gene pool and never go away, just like evil never goes away.

Psychopathy == evil. No cure. No accomodation is possible. They need to be isolated, supressed, incarcerated, lobotomized or killed off. But they will always survive because of the inherent advantages of psychopathy - lack of empathy and fear - especially in the extreme end when combined with high intelligence. It is really facinating subject as long as you are not victimized by one of them.

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

For anyone that cares to spend an hour listening James Corbett (corbettreport.com) did an excellent episode some years ago entitled "Our Leaders are Psychopaths". Very informative and it sheds some nice light on how we may have gotten into the trouble we're in. Here's a link to the video. https://youtu.be/DPf5i84BqcA

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Yes, psychopaths definitely do have a different type of brain anatomy to neurotypicals but so do OCPD. OCPD appears to be the most common PD of serial killers. A lot of psychopaths are low functioning whereas OCPD are high functioning. Mental health literacy for OCPD is very low including among mental health professionals. Canadian serial killer Colonel Russell Williams was classic OCPD. So was "Katie" from the Manson family. Derek Chauvin appears to be OCPD. So does Bryan Kohberger, although I have no idea if Kohberger is guilty or not of the crimes with which he has been charged. Both high functioning psychopaths and OCPD are attracted to the job of CEO. The ranks of the US Senate appear to be full of psychopaths. So do the ranks of senior public health bureaucrats but they're also full of OCPD.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

I would like to see recognition of the harm psychopaths cause and once diagnosed, a restriction on their ability to obtain positions where they can harm others. Since we have so many social structures that are pyramidal, the can have way too much negative effect.

Expand full comment
Happiness: AViewpoint!'s avatar

Well with his education he wants us to believe he doesn’t know what a virus is or how the pathogen spreads.

Expand full comment
Happiness: AViewpoint!'s avatar

Or is there brainwashing going on and cloning"..............perhaps not human monsters. .......

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

He's OCPD, Hitler's personality disorder, IMO. It's often comorbid with psychopathy. It's disgusting that the Germans keep electing these types. Bring on Nuremberg 2!

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

In all fairness to the Germans, it's not just them. OCPD is a disorder of overcontrol, very similar to psychopathy when dialled up and often comorbid with it. It's the disorder behind the mandates.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Agree. It is everywhere among our toxic narcissist world leaders. They and the 100% self elected ones of the WEF.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Yes, there is a subtype of OCPD that Millon, the originator of the DSM personality disorders classifications, referred to as the "bureaucratic compulsive (with narcissistic features)." It's linked to several sadism subtypes: "enforcing sadism (with compulsive features)" (common in law enforcement and judges)," "spineless sadism," and "tyrannical sadism." These clowns actually get their rocks off on hurting and harming people.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Thanks. I tied it to this in a post awhile ago. Several posts I think. Interesting that some much “less civilized” societies were ruthless about rejecting these types. We are the only species which tolerates this. They destroy from within. The hollowing out of our societies is extreme. The tolerance for the abuse cycle and codependency is extreme.

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Interesting the whole question of the *wrong* types getting the jobs requiring the opposite characteristics.

Pyromaniac firefighters, fondler paramedics, murderer health officials, voyeuristic social workers, sadistic... .

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Probably true. The people that rise to these levels are invariably horribly traumatized by life and, IMO, if there are certain genetic codes present then they are pushed into becoming actual psychopaths. Sadly, I don't think that can be "fixed" short of incarceration or execution.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Psychopathy is a disorder of undercontrol. OCPD is a disorder of overcontrol but in intense form it's very similar. It's quite common to have both OCPD and psychopathy. OCPD is linked to sadism.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Good info.

Expand full comment
Nitram's avatar

Read up on Stalins Trofim Lysenko. How he killed millions with his pseudoscience and also notice how dissidenter were handled. That's more describing today. Traudeu is probably fantisizing about extending his suicidefacilities into Aktion t4.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

They had 75 year warning from all of mankind.

They need to face trial and pay , if guilty.

These are extremely arrogant and wicked men.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Agree!

Expand full comment
Boudicca's avatar

There must be a reckoning and a reaping. I won't be forgetting or forgiving. We need gallows, firing squads, guillotines.

Expand full comment
Blair's avatar

I can almost assure you that he nor any of his family members are vaccinated with the most sacred miracle elixir.

Expand full comment
Jackson Slater's avatar

I want to know what exactly is causing these excess deaths. It would be foolish the claim that the excess deaths could only be caused by one thing (vaccines) after we subjected the world to years of lockdowns, inactivity, mental health issues, developmental issues, loss of loved ones, not to mention the actual long-term side effects that COVID may cause as well. The vaccine should be investigated under the umbrella of potential causes, but it would be a statistical oversight to omit so many other variables that may have potentially caused these excess deaths.

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

All products of the plandemic, so same guilty parties.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

IMO, there are multiple contributing factors, but the bioweapon "vaxxx' was the coup de grace

Expand full comment
Jostein Hove-Henriksen's avatar

Nobody–not willing to admit guilt–will be forgiven!

But, if he confesses his guilt,

resign all his positions,

tell EVERYTHING he knows about ALL the other accomplices,

and after serving at least 20 year of his lifetime imprisonment,

I'd say we should give him absolution.

Expand full comment
Cairn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

He's starting to sound like a hero, if he does all that you suggest.

First to do it might be a hero, then thousands of other perps will be * me too* heroes. :)

Expand full comment
JG's avatar

He won't and they won't be. They knew what they were doing.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

GoebbeIs said "I have no sympathy. No sympathy! We didn't force the German people. The German people gave us the mandate. And now you cry because your little throats are being cut." You get what you vote for.

Expand full comment
Free Billy's avatar

Yes Mr Goebbels, but why did you push for that mandate? Why did your big throat and big brain get you to the point of creating the vote in the first place? This is why the Goebbels of today must pay for their crimes with their lives, as they are complicit in so many deaths.

Expand full comment
God,seriously's avatar

Not the family. He should pay for his crimes, but leave the family alone. We are not like them.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Indeed. NO AMNESTY, and NO QUARTER!

Expand full comment
John Sbrochi's avatar

I was thinking of a different 4 letter word that starts with "f".

F*ck.

Vanna, I want to buy a vowel.

Expand full comment
Orca's avatar

"Harvard-trained" is now synonymous with "Safe-and-Effective"!

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

One of the biggest lessons from the past few years; "Never confuse credentials with credibility".

Expand full comment
Orca's avatar

The saddest part of this insanity is that Havard students are still mandated to be boosted. They can't even do simple risk/benefit analysis even now. There is no longer any excuse, and they should be liable for further injuries!

Expand full comment
Florida Prophet's avatar

The irony is piquant. This Poison Ivy League sociopathic academic fraud Haahvad, that still displays on its gateposts the word “VERITAS,” will by natural selection gradually eliminate itself from the august genome of institutions of higher learning purporting to seek and teach TRUTH.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Same with Yale: LUX ET VERITAS (Light and Truth).

Expand full comment
Stephen Verchinski's avatar

Schools of Divinity.

Nuff said.

Eugenics.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

So true. Haaavuuhhd is such a joke these days, a mere shadow of a parody of its former self.

Expand full comment
Stephen Verchinski's avatar

Agreed. Even bury their past. philisophical promotion of war and even war against natural systems. No precautionary principle for them.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I think all the Ivy League schools have similar mandates. I don't think it's sad though. I'm glad! Maybe it's not nice to feel that way, but it's just the self-preservation instinct kicking in.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Columbia did at least and I haven't heard anything about withdrawing it. But why glad? All these young innocent children getting poisoned?

That Deagle prediction was for an 80% reduction in US population. Being part of the 20% left is not going to be any picnic.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Anybody attending an Ivy League school these days has to be considered an enemy of freedom, justice, decency, basically all that is good in the world. They are destroyers. I'm sure there are a few exceptions, but you can't hold your fire in a war for survival because there might be a few nice guys among the enemy ranks.

Expand full comment
Nick's avatar

Furture elite tyrants, unless things change. So I understand his emotion. Even as students they are mostly F'ing arrogant, entitled scumbags. They can take their SAT scores and the Harvard degree and stuff it where the sun dont shine. Traitorous scumbags all, I spit on them.

Expand full comment
Andi Hofmann's avatar

Observe the amygdala damaging effect many “injections” even before the CoV have.

See, control is more easy for dehumanised robots, kids that got their soul kicked out of the center, fetting more closer to the narcissistic state.

Find a mirror making people realise that and evoking an urge to heal.

Then only the difficult healing can begin.

On levels of physiology (re-functionalising tissue, eg DMS0, or micellarly solved chromolynium or hyalurone, and progesterone, etc. I suggest to adopt Prof. Kostoff’s Alzheimer pdf’s to “defunct amygdala”.

Then treat acis of psyche and infirmation exchange between cells (and body to world) as well. Just now, I read a book about russian information therapy. Totally new concepts for me. Think transformation and it becomes reality. The hard stuff.

Expand full comment
Rhymes With "Brass Seagull"'s avatar

Indeed, if that infamous Deagle prediction is true, it may actually be WORSE to be part of the surviving 20%.

Expand full comment
Andi Hofmann's avatar

It is a test of compliance.

We have to find totally adequate responses like antidotes 100% neutralising any injections.

(And totally adequate responses to the war waged on the people by subsets of their own government. )

I dabbed a beginning lyme infection with CIO2(aq) 0.3% 1:1 with DMS0. Worked, as it is quite on-site sometimes for week(s). Different for PEG2k medical device.

I think pretreating the tissue with a cotton wound application soaked with it and or co-injecting it afterwards would do. Would need something to break up the layers of PEG. Without hurting phospholipides. Hm.

I also think one could purify blood with CIO2, “life” in me and you, see COMUSAV protocols (pdf’s), (observe NOAEL of 3mg per kg body weight, and distribute it in 5-10 portions; the daily dose in one helping is too much; most protocols use only 1/3 of NOAEL systemically. Shown to not damage stem cells up to 0.3% for dental care, root canal disinfection, where it is diluted by diffusion and circulation rather quickly) or in stored blood as it helps inactivate spike, taking away autoimmune pressure, and de-coagulate even spike knitted micro blood clots.

It also softly soothes irritated ir irritable immune systems, but here more aggressive inorganic antiseltics like traditional cures with NaHClO, H2O2 (also inhalative for systemic treatment, see Dr. Levy : an at home treatment that can cure any virus), or O3 blood reinjection may be more beneficial, but safety band of them is narrower. So dose more carefully.

Find out useful timing of first treating oxidatively, later replenishing antioxidants. Especially for stored blood.

All the best!

Expand full comment
Freedom's avatar

“Never confuse credentials with credibility”- wow- that’s profound! Yes- huge lesson!!

I tried to warm my brother of the poison injections before he got his daughters injected, I can still hear his words “my doctor said they are perfectly safe”

Expand full comment
Well now, isnt THAT special...'s avatar

True. Those South Florida faux nurses are proof of that!

Expand full comment
Katarina Christoforou's avatar

When I read Harvard above I thought that means nothing to me now. I judge by actions nowadays not the cost of your education.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Yes, it's become a red flag, far from a badge of honor.

Expand full comment
CaliforniaLost's avatar

GW Bush went to Harvard. The shine has been off that medal a long time ago.

Expand full comment
T and J's avatar

Harvard trained is now synonymous with Woke and Group-Think and Curated , and on and on.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Yes. I just got the Columbia magazine - it was entirely filled with climate initiatives.

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

Let's not leave out nepotism

Expand full comment
Ann K.'s avatar

Coincidentitis!

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

Maybe. But the one I wonder about is Johns Hopkins.

Expand full comment
Andi Hofmann's avatar

Prolonged arm of darp@?

Expand full comment
Barbelo of the Pleroma's avatar

According to Twitter, Ron Unz has proved us all wrong and there is nothing to see here. Biomedical scientist and statistician here by the way.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I wrote a column on this once. Forget the virologists, where were the statistics professors when all this fear campaign was being ramped up? Wasn't there ONE college statistics professor somewhere in America who would say, "Listen guys, this disease poses no real health risk to healthy college students." They spent their entire adult lives getting these statistics degrees, and understanding probabilities and "risks" ... and the one time we could have used their input/expertise, they were all afraid to speak up.

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

John Ionnaidis did (stanford biostatistician) EARLY ON. Also the co-gigners of the The Great Barrington Declaration

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

That's true. And we saw what happened to them. It's not like their colleagues in the Statistics Departments of colleges all across America rallied to their defense. I kept thinking about this when the debate about cancelling sports was going on in the spring of 2020. Wasn't there any college stats professor who served on any of those Health Advisory Councils who would say, "close to zero statistical risk" of serious illness or death for these student-athletes. And this was KNOWN at the time. To say it wasn't known is a lie and revisionist history. We had statistics on who WAS dying ... and it wasn't healthy college students or student-athletes.

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

Yes and perhaps one major reason for this silence is the fact that the vast majority of statisticians, biostatisticians, sociological and epidemiological statisticians are often funded by huge grants from the usual sources: pharma, university academia etc for their FTE% on various grants. Their livelihood at stake... same with the docs, nurses and everyone else pushing the jab. Edward Dowd's actuarial statistics on excess mortality may prove to be a nail in the coffin. He was NOT part of the pharm-medico-defense department fraud. He had nothing to lose from them. As an aside, James Lyons-Weiler's brilliant study of childhood vaccines using Dr. Paul Thomas (Oregon pediatricians) outpatient visit data analyzing the vaxed vs. unvaxed children was brilliant. The very statistics we need but are crushed because they are so very damning of the pharmaceutical industry.

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

Bill, also your very own research into why the Red Cross Blood supply waited months and months to be tested for early Covid is brilliant. I worked on a study where stored blood of Hepatitis B vaccine study participants (circa 78-82) was later tested retrospectively for early possibility of HIV once HIV/AIDS broke out in the mid-80s. Very similar to the Red Cross Blood.. This should be standard operating procedure in Epidemiology. They in fact did find early infections. These are the kinds of studies needed but go begging. I can think of many more, too.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Thanks, Bawls. We're supposed to believe this was the only tranche of "archived" blood in America that could be tested for antibodies? And then it took almost one year to publish the results of that study. The first tranche was only 1,900 units of blood. How long does it really take to test 1,900 units of blood for antibodies? What if they had tested that blood in late February or even early March 2020? And then publicized the results of that study? And took questions from the press. Questions like: Doesn't this study prove that people were already infected by this virus in November?

It's the things they could have done but didn't do that provides us with the greatest "tells" IMO.

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

Your point about the "only tranches" of blood is key. I do not know how long to test one sample of blood for any given antibody ( a lab person could address this) but they have factory level testing machines that can surely test many multiples of samples at the same time. 1900 units (samples? specimens? aliquots? ) seems paltry and I would **guesstimate** a high- throughput industrial scale lab could do 1900 distinct samples in less than a week including quality control.

But more to the point -- if we were dealing with a WHO defined (and later, re-defined) "pandemic" you are surely right on the money: WHY WAIT SO LONG TO TEST when the tools and samples are/were available and in place. I am appalled they only managed to test 1900. Meanwhile, I understand they ENTIRELY stopped testing for flu for most of the duration of the "pandemic".

Another interesting fact related to "blood supply" is that Judy Mikovits, in researching Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, discovered that a huge percentage of those who suffered from it had a much higher than average mouse leukemia virus (and other zoonotic viruii) in their blood which she plausibly postulates could ONLY have come from successive vaccinations of vaccines that were made from mouse, monkey and other animal derivatives all of which lead to autoimmune diseases such as CFS. Also it lead to very disturbing questions about the integrity of the blood supply as a whole. This freaked out the entire clinical research establishment. It is well documented in her book as well as RFK's book. Thus, she was driven out of research...

Finally what could have been done but did not... I agree 1000%. They know but they don't want us to know.. Every clinical and probably most epidemiological research studies in this country (some of which go on for years or decades) actually draw buckets of blood as part of the research protocol. This blood is stored for years to be made available to approved researchers. One study I was on (AIDS) drew many tubes EVERY six months. Half the samples went to CDC or NIH central repositories and the rest were retained at the local university or clinic co-sponsors of the study. I hazard a guess that this blood is also kept frozen for decades. Those approved can get to it... no one else. Again, a speculation on my part. Here's a thought we should be drawing PRE and POST vaccination blood samples on a statistically sound cohort of every demographic (age, sex, racer, socioeconomic status comorbidities, babies, elderly ) every few weeks for up to 10 years (if they survive that long). We should be tracking biopsy results and correlated to vax status. Every unknown cause death (at a minimum) ought to be autopsied by an independent pathologist if any such creature other than Ryan Cole MD can be found.

Yes, I feel I am whistling in the wind.. will be laughed out of the room for such an oturageously "Expensive" (yes it is) proposition. But it would no doubt be cheaper than all of money stolen to procure contracts for the utterly useless PPE, masks etc.

Expand full comment
Mrs. McFarland's avatar

College students could have greatly contributed to greater herd immunity had they not been quarantined to their dorm rooms and or sent home.

Expand full comment
ChrisCoonsToupee's avatar

Any dissent was crushed, deplatformed, or paid off.

Expand full comment
Freedom's avatar

Statistician Matthew Crawford (Rounding the Earth Newsletter on Substack) has been speaking up since the beginning.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

The power of censorship.

Expand full comment
Catkins's avatar

There is professor Norman Fenton in the UK but they’ve tried to bury him and dishonour him too.

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

Afraid or threatened in some form?

Expand full comment
Grasshopper Kaplan's avatar

Unz is despicable rubbish, although he publishes others who are not, like Mike Whitney.

Sad to have to go thru him to get the goods I wish someone else would give.

I puked after reading his drivel....

Expand full comment
jumping irving's avatar

Ron Unz and Steve talked telecon, I don't know what came out of it? What would happen if everyone nebulized with H2O2?

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I do daily.

Expand full comment
jumping irving's avatar

If everyone Nebulize with H2O2, no more sinus headaches/no more virus of any type ever/no stuffy nose. There would be no lockdowns, covid 19, no deaths from jab. We run drug co. out of business. Dr. Linda, do you tell your patients to nebulize? Or, does the Federation of State Medical Boards prevent you from doing that?

Expand full comment
AJF's avatar

It works!

Expand full comment
Jerms 9654's avatar

Not sure about the media in Germany but none of these excess deaths are mentioned in the US media.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

The groupthink in the Establishment media is 100 percent. We need some statistics professor who can tell us the probability that out of, say, 40,000 mainstream journalists, that none would write ONE skeptical Covid story ... in three years. There must have been millions of Covid stories written in that time span. And none challenged the official narrative? How is this even possible?

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

The Establishment media was literally paid to spread the narrative. They know they are 100% complicit and are doing all they can to hold out against the onslaught of evidence. It's not working. Even some liberals are seeing through the gaslighting, as they witness with their own eyes the damage being done to themselves and those around them.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I am waiting with bated breath for the first prominent mainstream journalist to say "damn the torpedoes" and write a real and honest story. Of course, I don't think this journalists could even do this. He might write the story, but his editor and publisher wouldn't let him send it out into the world. And then he'd be fired.

Still, he could start his own Substack and publish the story there. And then tell everyone that his bosses didn't let him publish that story. That would be a hell of a story. Maybe Project Veritas (or perhaps Tucker Carlson) would do something on it. Nobody else would.

Expand full comment
Mel's avatar

Before you claim hero balls galore, ie, Tucker, Malone, PV, or anyone else, read the latest essay by the great playwright C. J. Hopkins, now living in New Normal Berlin… His essays can be found on the Consent Factory site. Limited hangouts abound, dear Bill. Our “independent” journalists only think they are edgy, but are usually just playing it safe. Because if they decided to go all out…. Well, we all know what would happen. Keep going all out though. You can get away with it-just don’t put your heroes on a pedestal. Trump is still pushing the jabs, the ultimate in Swamp Creatures, along with dementia Joe.

Expand full comment
George's avatar

The stories that question the mainstream narrative are not amplified. They are there if you know where to look. Bill Casey, I believe, said when everything Americans believe is a lie, the CIA will have done their job. It seems they’ve done their job with Covid.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I agree that you can find those stories ... if you look hard enough and know where to look. We all do know where to look ... but most Americans don't know where to look and aren't even interested in looking for alternative sources of information. But if the mainstream media "narrative" changed (if the MSM did real journalism), "the masses" couldn't miss that. That would get their attention. But, alas, that's not going to happen.

Expand full comment
Lysias's avatar

People in the Soviet bloc knew enough not to believe stories in their media after they had seen enough ridiculous stories.

Why can't people in the West do likewise?

Expand full comment
Peter 🔒's avatar

AI writing fake news. That's how.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

I am seeing more information regarding that speculation. El Gato wrote about that possibility today

Expand full comment
BAwls's avatar

This handiwork goes back centuries. The interviews with HOTEZ are absolutely chilling. It is his clarion call that things are definitely about to get worse. In one clip he actually stated that the mis-disinformation crowd and antivaxxers are equivalent to "terrorists", at the very least there messages need to be taken out by the DHS, DOJ etc. VERY FRIGHTENING.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

They are cowards with their backs against the wall. They aren't going to break stride on their narratives. They will be dangerous as the truth continues to come out and they must face the music.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I think we have to call out ALL of them ... by name. If I ran for office, I'd do it. Just go down the names in the staff box of your state's largest newspaper. "You could have done something; you could have done something; you could have done something, you could have done something ..."

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Ring leaders, middle managers, young leaders, all downstream partners and facilitators.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

It would be a never-ending list. I'd just stick to the most egregious offenders ... which would include all the journalists and editors at influential news organizations. And a lot of Big Wigs who have never been challenged before.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Where do you draw the lines? It certainly isn't just media folks.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I'd draw the line at people who could have "changed the narrative" ... and didn't. The press. Public health "experts." Trial lawyers who took a pass on doing their job. Government officials. Big Tech (for their censorship of life-saving information). Bullies in academia. CEOs of big corporations that mandated vaccines and masks. All the leaders who could have spoken up and made a difference ... but didn't.

Expand full comment
Dr Linda's avatar

The only place you are likely to see the data or numbers is on substack

Expand full comment
Luc Lelievre's avatar

Since March 11, 2020, I have understood that the Corona crisis was an intended "coup d'Etat" for MURDERING people.

Luc

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

In the strictest sense of Christian theology, the words of Christ and Church orthodoxy, yes, we should forgive.

Alas, the problem I have here is that they weren't just mistaken. Their hubris brought them to a place where they were repugnant in their rhetoric and behaviour towards their fellow man.

Not without a full contrite apology and appreciation for the damage done to the civil order should there be forgiveness. No amnesty. And we may in fact be past the clemency stage.

We can forgive but we must never forget.

Expand full comment
MacGuffin's avatar

Where does 'whipping them through the streets and hanging them from the walls of the Red Keep' slot in to the 'Forgive but don't Forget' sequence? Before forgiveness, or after? I want to be there for that.

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

Good question.

Expand full comment
Lysias's avatar

No forgiveness until they reveal all that they know about the criminal conspiracy.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 30, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

I agree in general terms but also urge caution in the fact that these days many 'convicted murderers' are later proven innocent by the use of DNA technology. Of course, in the present case we do not have that burden of proof to worry about. They all acted in concert out in the open for all to see and suffer. They should definitely be taken out of circulation so they can never repeat their crimes - and as an example to future 'Fuhrer's and tin-pot dictators' in the public AND corporate realms. Perhaps if we actually imposed the most draconian punishment "French Revolution style", we might dispose of a lot of bad genes in the human race - thereby saving a lot of future problems from occurring - but of course the clean-up would have to be extremely far-reaching to obtain that result. The family lines that orchestrated the whole operation have been in existence (and control) for over two thousand years. Hard to root that kind of fungus out completely.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

I couldn't help but read your first sentence as if it pertained to the threat the unvaccinated presented to society. Because in the beginning, that was the sentiment.

Expand full comment
Overtheblues's avatar

Kim, I do feel that too - and if people just willy-nilly took a convicted person as being guilty (or if a group of jurors with such primitive beliefs about 'unvaccinated' (using their terminology, not meaning it's actually a vaccine) declared an unjabbed person as a public threat) then many horrible scenes of 'retribution' killing might have ensued. It was actually a small but gnawing fear I had during that period in the plandemic - as in: "what if someone - or a mob - attacks me for not believing the govenrment's spiel"? Even today one has to be careful when speaking about the jab-stat - so many are still lining up for their 'boosters'.

Expand full comment
Sirka Sie's avatar

I’m all outta life preservers, I guess some are gonna have go out with the undertow and I hope it’s a strong one.

Expand full comment
agent Roger W.'s avatar

The effect of not prosecuting crimes is equivalent to forgiving crimes.

As long as the victims believe there was virus and a new disease, the bad guys need not fear prosecution.

Expand full comment
baker charlie's avatar

He seems to have the same potato head cranial deformities and beady eyes as Gates and Zuckerberg. Maybe the phrenologists were on to something.

Expand full comment
Grasshopper Kaplan's avatar

Igor, this all must clearly be Russia's fault, like every other problem the Arrogant West faces and ignores, how come he didn't blame Putin?

I don't believe this, but he would have said it if it would fly....

Expand full comment
Madame DeFarge's avatar

Actually, Russia is our FRIEND, not our enemy. Our ENEMY resides in America. Ten million China-Virus-Fascists. China Joe & His Vice-Ho. The FBI, CIA, DOJ, CDC, NIH, FDA... Your next door neighbor. Your Demonrat politicians. The Deep State. The Wall Street Elite. The Homo-Cabal. The Woke. BLM. Antifa. The WeLoveOurIllegals. The Abortion Brigade. The MutilateTheirChildren Conspiracy. The Censors. And more.

Attila and Our Huns will, sooner or later, wipe these Mortal Enemies from the face of the earth.

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

As a former Airborne Ranger Infantry Officer who commanded combat soldiers with the 25th Infantry Division (Light) during Operation Desert Storm, I have come to the same conclusion; the enemy is within. The vampire squid-like power structure IS the domestic enemy of the constitution I once took an oath the defend against. Period.

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Not at all sure Russia is our friend. I don't believe we have any at present. The things which we have allowed to be done in our names...

Expand full comment
Porge's avatar

Wow! Madame, that was quite the list. I was out of breath just reading it!😊

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

#MistakesWereNOTMade (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem), mothereffer (that was for Kommandant Karl, not you, Igor :-)

Expand full comment
Jeff76's avatar

We didn't know any better

We made mistakes

Just following orders

Mother 'effing psychopathic liars. Can't tell if they are evil or egotistically delusional. Doesn't matter, the results are evil. They had time to correct and didn't.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

🎯

I did my best to spark momentum for #FireKarlLauterbach in this piece:

• “Letter to the German Bundestag” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-german-bundestag)

Maybe it’ll catch on now.

Expand full comment
Ann K.'s avatar

The situation is fluid. The science has evolved. Barf.

Expand full comment
Bull Dog's avatar

Slowly and then Suddenly I have realized that the most "advertised" scientists are almost always industry and/or government propaganda sluts.

Harari of WEF says it best, science is no longer about Truth, it is about Power.

Igor, can you do a substack on the importance of watching NEVERAGAINISNOWGLOBAL.COM documentary. It is released today. Cheers

Expand full comment
KW NORTON's avatar

Appreciate the link.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Real science was captured and corrupted. And real watchdog journalism was completely captured and corrupted. Both professions are supposed to exist to identify and report the truth. The fact that both have been completely captured puts that thing called "the future" in a scary light. In a scary darkness.

Expand full comment
The Cynical Optimist's avatar

Thank you for the link!

Expand full comment
Gina Borggrebe's avatar

The fear these scientist and politicians instilled in men is beyond forgivable! The ramifications of this and the vaccine mandates will haunt mankind. No, the question will NEVER be, do we forgive but How do we deal with these disgusting humans so this is an example to anyone else who attempts to disrupt/destroy humanity!

Expand full comment
ChrisCoonsToupee's avatar

Who was still afraid after the George Groyd riots in 2020?

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

It's unforgivable that many who should know better seem willing to forgive people like Lauterbach. It makes me wonder how they were bright enough to see the truth about the plandemic. Such people can never, ever, be counted on for anything, simply because their motivations are corrupt. It's who they are (or WHAT they are might be a better word), and they ain't changing.

Expand full comment
Lysias's avatar

People who take the words of Jesus seriously are not corrupt.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

You really don't even need big macro studies to understand Covid posed no risk to school children. Many of us have children who attend K-12 school. Simply ask yourself, how many of my children's classmates were hospitalized from Covid? How many died from Covid? 99.9 percent of parents with school kids aren't going to know of ONE student from their town or schools that died or was hospitalized from this illness. I have a 7-year-old and 11-year-old child. Three years into Covid I don't know of one of my children's schoolmates who even had to be hospitalized from Covid, much less died from it.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

BTW, my wife is a high school teacher. In January 2020, she came home from school one day and said that "half" of one of her class was out with flu symptoms or some virus. As it happens, I was in bed sick at the same time. I won't say all of those sick students (and me) had Covid, but a bunch of us probably did. By the time school was cancelled in mid-March, nobody was getting sick or had those symptoms. All through April 2020, nobody I was aware of us was suffering from a terrible cough, chills, fever, etc. The virus had already peaked. But those students who got sick weren't having to be hospitalized and none died.

Expand full comment
ForkInSocket's avatar

Our kids haven't even had covid yet, that we know of. A lot of their vaxxed friends have, of course. None hospitalized though. This was apparent in March 2020, when it arrived in the US to absolutely no effect outside of nursing homes.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

"Covid" had no effect in nursing homes. These vulnerable people were killed by administrative diktats which included toxic medications, neglect and assorted deprivations and anxiety producing actions.

None of these "vaxxed" kids are getting "covid" as they are simply having their immune systems being vaporized and and then being plagued by opportunistic infections.

PCR and antigen tests tell you exactly zero.

Expand full comment
ForkInSocket's avatar

Yes I agree that the protocols were deadly. But old people do die of these things like the flu and on the diamond princess all of the deaths were over 70. Which is what the data still shows today.

I disagree that the tests tell you zero. The antigen test tells you there's a protein there, that shouldn't be. I have done a lot of antigen tests and the only time they ever flagged positive, the subject was clearly sick, with something that produces proteins that are detected by that stain. Personally I think the cov virus theory seems like a plausible explanation.

Expand full comment
ChrisCoonsToupee's avatar

Diamond Princess death toll was something like 7 out of 700, so 1%, and all that died were over 70 as you said.

It's safe to say more than 1% of people jabbed are dying of ALL causes.

Even Pfizer's own data from the first 2.5 months, shows 2.9% of the people they sample DIED. (1,223 died / 42,086 sampled = 2.9%)

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Expand full comment
ForkInSocket's avatar

Yes, and none of the much younger crew...

The samples in that post marketing report are all people with declared adverse events though.. not the population as a whole. So it's not as bad as it sounds.

That said I think the death rate will be in excess of 1% when all is said and done, hopefully not much higher. I could see it getting to 10% or more if some of the worse outcomes come to pass e.g. 30% rates of "some" heart damage over 10 years, annual shots, nightmare rubbery clots, VAIDS, IGg4, ADE, CJD ... And on and on

Expand full comment
ChrisCoonsToupee's avatar

Everybody in that Pfizer report has one thing in common though.

They're JABBED.

Notice they redacted the total number of jabs, but others extrapolated the headache data to around 500,000. 2.9% of 500,000 is 14,500 dead.

What they're dying of is irrelevant. The only variable for the jabbed is the jab.

But whatever is reported in the mainstream will be a lie.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I think it had arrived a lot earlier than March 2020, but point taken. I checked my daughter out of school one day with a sore throat and a slight fever - in January 2020. She was fine two days later. But I got sick two days later. And I was in bed for a week with all the Covid symptoms. My son had mild symptoms too. None of us have had PCR-confirmed Covid since.

Expand full comment
ForkInSocket's avatar

Yes sorry I was being a bit vague. It might very well have arrived much earlier .. people at work were getting sick with something flu like nov and dec 2019 .. but even based on the official start in Seattle, by the time the freakout started in March, it was clear this was anything but an emergency.

I suspect the kids got it at some point and shook it off, and I'm not sure about myself, I just got it a few weeks ago for apparently the first time but it's possible I had a super mild case ages ago. This time it was one day of flu like symptoms followed by a persistent headache and lethargy for about a week.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

I wasn't calling you out at all. Whenever I get a chance to highlight "early spread," I take it! I do this because I think all of the other scandals are getting a lot of attention - the vaccines, the masks, the lockdowns, the denied treatments, even the iatrogenic deaths, collateral damage, etc. What's missed from this listing of all the scandals is the scandal that the "experts" missed the real start-date of the pandemic IMO. The timeline and chronology has always been off. I think this is to protect the people and organizations who really know where, when and how this virus was really created and began to spread. For example, this German expert SHOULD have known this virus was already spreading well before mid-March 2020. Maybe he didn't know this at the time, but he could have figured this out in a hurry ... if he just looked at all the evidence .... which he refuses to do. So my main point is: Don't trust the experts.

Expand full comment
ForkInSocket's avatar

No worries, I wasn't taking offense, just i was on a phone and typing is difficult so I was glossing over some of the details.

I agree with the idea of early spread and in fact I think that early spread, or spread of another virus with high levels of cross-immunity, changed the response in different locales. There seems to be decent evidence that large parts of asia also were protected by past viruses, at least until they took the shots...

I also think what you are saying about some people in the know deliberately obfuscating the origin and timing of this virus to buy time and hide culpability. Maybe Event 201 was actually a planning session taking place AFTER the release/escape for example. And was it a release or escape, or an early release by the wrong people.. and when was the vaccine actually developed? in an afternoon :)? When it takes 6 months for an omicron update that is obsolete before it left the factory... and where did omicron come from?

There are tons of question marks here. I feel a little baffled, there's a lot of data points swirling around but there is a lot of hidden data that may make it difficult to untangle.

Expand full comment
Lysias's avatar

I and the friend with whom I share a house had what we thought were bad colds in late October 2019. We live less than a mile from the Forest Glen Annex of Fort Detrick in Silver Spring MD.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

"Covid" posed no risk to anyone.

There was no viral event that caused mass death and that 6 week "spike" seen in Spring 2020 was entirely due to administrative slaughter and hospicide- this is well documented. To remain ignorant on this matter and/or sidestep these facts is inexcusable at this point for anyone who sits at the head of the table of the "Covid dissidents."

All of the “Covid deaths” are fraudulent and inventions from the Pharma/medical/media cartel.

The vast majority are medical murder.

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

Not unless he gets a tattoo on his forehead that reads, "I'm an asshole".

That goes for all of them. And they know who they are.

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar

He's not truly sorry if he blames other people.

Expand full comment