Disagree that this is the first clear evidence of intentional malice.
Large body of such evidence are US public health-police state laws adopted since 1983
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
A smaller piece of evidence, but still significant, is DOJ refusal to join and investigate Brook Jackson's F…
A smaller piece of evidence, but still significant, is DOJ refusal to join and investigate Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case, and Pfizer's April 22, 2022 motion to dismiss in which they argue that they're not guilty of defrauding US government because US government hired them to do a military prototype, manufacturing demonstration project, *not* a vaccine development project, and therefore Pfizer never had any legal obligation to comply with laws governing conduct of valid clinical trials.
Pfizer, in making this argument, cited
1. the US procurement law under which it contracted with DOD,
2. the US government/FDA/DOJ's Sept. 2020 to April 2022 failure to investigate or prosecute Jackson's initial whistleblower claims
3. the US government's ongoing fulfillment of payment obligations to Pfizer; and
4. the text of the July 2020 DOD procurement contract Base Agreement and Statement of Work.
Disagree that this is the first clear evidence of intentional malice.
Large body of such evidence are US public health-police state laws adopted since 1983
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
A smaller piece of evidence, but still significant, is DOJ refusal to join and investigate Brook Jackson's False Claims Act case, and Pfizer's April 22, 2022 motion to dismiss in which they argue that they're not guilty of defrauding US government because US government hired them to do a military prototype, manufacturing demonstration project, *not* a vaccine development project, and therefore Pfizer never had any legal obligation to comply with laws governing conduct of valid clinical trials.
Pfizer, in making this argument, cited
1. the US procurement law under which it contracted with DOD,
2. the US government/FDA/DOJ's Sept. 2020 to April 2022 failure to investigate or prosecute Jackson's initial whistleblower claims
3. the US government's ongoing fulfillment of payment obligations to Pfizer; and
4. the text of the July 2020 DOD procurement contract Base Agreement and Statement of Work.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/implications-of-10-usc-2371b-the
Also the furin cleavage site is evidence of intent.
https://gab.com/documentavi/posts/108806412539605900
Fits with the several (maybe all) Chief Health Officers in Australasia who are military.
Thankful for Brooke Jackson