450 Comments

The Energy Transition Story Has Become Self-Defeating

There is still a widespread belief that it is possible to transition away from fossil fuels, a myth which is contradicted by an ever growing body of evidence. Not that the previous model — based on coal, oil and gas — was even a slight bit more sustainable: we are talking about finite resources after all. However, the “energy transition” was a far more easier sell, than admitting that we have reached the end of growth, and that a long winding road back to a much simpler life is what awaits. Meanwhile, the real crisis (climate change), has proved to be a far more complex topic than what could be “tackled” by turning a few coal fired power plants off, and wishing for the magic unicorn of the Hydrogen economy to materialize… Where did it all go wrong? What kind of transition is possible then?

Let’s start by making a simple statement first: There has been no energy transition ever taking place in human history. Neither in the 19th century, when coal came into the picture, nor in the 20th with the advent of nuclear, or in the 21st, for that matter, with the widespread adoption of wind and solar. As the term implies, it would’ve required us to abandon a viable energy source in favour of another, ramping down the old one in advantage of the new. That would’ve meant leaving vast reserves of the old energy source out there, untapped. That has never happened, and never will, for a simple reason: the Maximum Power Principle.

The MPP posits that complex systems (like the human economy) tend to evolve in ways that maximize their power intake or energy throughput. Which means, that as long as there is a viable energy source out there, we will not stop using it: It has to run out first, or become otherwise unavailable for us. (And as the history of climate conferences show, that pretty much seems to be the case with fossil fuels.) In a nutshell: no, there is no such thing as an “energy transition” — only addition to the existing mix.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4e0fd934-8772-472d-9206-607d609fc960_1000x685.png

The second thing which needs to be stated here, is that energy efficiency is not a solution for two reasons. First, it too violates the Maximum Power Principle — and thus puts the entity reducing its overall energy intake into a major disadvantage; effectively allowing other entities to outcompete it. Since we are living in a competitive environment, where the weak gets eaten/occupied/robbed/colonized/etc. this cannot allowed to happen. As a result energy saved by efficiency measures will always be used up in other ways (usually by increasing economic output). And while we could debate how this is a bad thing from a moral standpoint, this is the world we live in. Just take a look at the chart below:

The other reason, why energy efficiency cannot possibly save the day (not even in a benign, cooperative environment) is the Jevons-paradox, put forward by an English economist William Stanley Jevons in 1865. The phenomenon named after him occurs when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource (like coal) is used, but the falling cost of use induces increases in demand. Likewise, if you were to give up coal use in favour of “renewables” all it would achieve is to make coal much cheaper elsewhere, and thereby drive up its use. The same goes for gasoline (vs electric cars) or any other form of energy saving. Unless an energy source gets physically banned worldwide, or becomes less available due to depletion, its consumption cannot be expected to fall — no matter how detrimental its use proves to be on the long run.

Now, with these two factors in mind take a look at the first chart above. Have you noticed the plateauing (or the taper off) of fossil fuels: first coal, then oil, and as of late: natural gas?

Was there any ban on their use globally? No?

THE PUNCHLINE!!!!

Then why did they stopped growing? Due to the energy transition — which never was — or perhaps because of energy efficiency measures [sic]? Or maybe, because we have arrived at hard limits to their extraction? Take a minute to ponder on that.

More https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/the-energy-transition-story-has-become

Expand full comment

People around the world need to wrap their heads around this thought: they aren't going to stop until we make it stop. Voting won't help you. Our lives as we know them are already over, it's only a matter of when. We need to accept that and do what is right for our children.

Expand full comment

I sure hope everyone gets the message: This is why we can't vote our way out. They'll rig the election if they can. If they can't, they'll frame the people's choice for a crime. And if that proves inconvenient they'll just shoot him.

Expand full comment
May 21Liked by Igor Chudov

We live in interesting times.

Expand full comment
May 19Liked by Igor Chudov

There were other leaders who have opposed the covid vaccines and the WEF/WHO program. Had they lived they would have likely called for an inquiry on the outcome of the C19 shots.

President of Tanzania, John Magufuli submitted samples of goat, bird, motor oil, paw paw fruit for a PCR test. Announced that the fruit, goat and bird samples came back “positive”

Magufuli opposed the covid vaccines for Tanzania. Magufuli died March 2021.

President Pierre Nkrurunziza kicked the WHO out of Burundi in May 2020. Nkrurunziza died in June 2020.

Haitian President Jovenel Moïse opposed the covid vaccines for Haiti. Moïse was assassinated July 2021. Soon after Haiti received the first C19 vaccines.

There were other leaders who opposed WHO or the covid vaccines:

Prime Minister Hamed Bakayoko of Ivory Coast, Madagascar’s ex-President Didier Ignace Ratsiraka, to name two others.

Expand full comment
May 17Liked by Igor Chudov

Breaking news out of the UK. Shocking AZ death stats. The real reason the AZ jab was pulled from the market? Patsy for the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna jabs?

https://x.com/james_freeman__/status/1791545328832827827

Expand full comment
May 17Liked by Igor Chudov

Don't be idiots, this guy who shot the president was a English MI-6 lowlife aho workin on foreign assignment. These jackals are stationed in each country as the least likely politician posible to not arouse suspician. If they wore suits they would look obvious but this jackal is a hippie lookin so is low key. Learn history as the UK MI-6 faked Hitler as he was a MI-6 agent designed to kill German factory production since UK cars suck.

Oh and the jackals in MI-6 HQ had an ad hiring new agents that were career street criminals. This shows you that the clean look that the TV gives Jim Bondo is all B.S. The real agents do the stinkiest nastiest rotten stuff like this. Thats why the UK sucks so bad as their Bankers are the top shareholders in Pfizer and all Military Aid to Zelenski, their blood relative I believe as they all go to same synigog.

Expand full comment

Why does it feel like one big mafia is running the world and trying to cull the population?

Look into the money-changers and we might get to the bottom of what’s really going on. Btw, Jesus was right. 😎

Expand full comment
May 17Liked by Igor Chudov

There is a gap in Kat A X link

Expand full comment
author

Yes, the gap is on purpose, otherwise substack converts the twitter link to a NON-WORKING twitter applet

Expand full comment
May 17Liked by Igor Chudov

I think he pissed off a lot of international figures with his demand for investigation. It was also reported in the Italian news that he was against sending more arms to Ukraine.

Expand full comment

In this new normal, whoever deviates from the official discourse will be eliminated. There is not and never was democracy, everything was a deception.

This is unstoppable, the real content of the covid vaccines can no longer be hidden. It was already demonstrated in 2021 by Dr. Campra that vaccines contain a deadly toxin called reduced graphene oxide. Any politician who goes against them will be eliminated. We have seen it many times.

Expand full comment
founding
May 17Liked by Igor Chudov

Not surprised. Corporations murdering people is now out in the open. Boeing has murdered two whistleblowers. One shot dead during a pause in his testimony. Another poisoned with something sophisticated. It's not working. Ten more whistleblowers have appeared.

It's all about slipshod construction of the graphite fiber 787, the Dreamliner. Faulty assembly leaving gaps where assemblies were combined. These gaps will intensify stress, leading to brittle fracture of the entire air-frame. It is worse than you think. There is no good test to find these flaws in rigid composite structures. We have a recent example

The submersible, Titan, was criticized for dangerous construction of its foot thick graphite fiber hull. The problem was there is no valid test to confirm if the hull was sound. I don't know if it is economically feasible to test such a large structure at twice the maximum pressure is would see in use. One would want to test it at least once a year. Crack initiators can grow under pressure with no warning that failure is imminent. A DC10 had an engine fail because of a grain of sand in the surface of a cast, high speed rotor of an engine led to brittle fracture of the rotor. The engine exploded and took out the flight controls. That rotor was found in a farmer's field, so we know what the crack initiator was.

The Titan famously imploded while nearing the sunken Titanic. It had been there before. Pressure was higher than the maximum pressure in a diesel engine. The air inside would have been compressed to a white-hot bubble about the size of a breadbox before the ice-cold water quenched it a millisecond later. After cooling, there would have been very tiny bubbles at that depth.

So Boeing is murdering whistleblowers. If they are correct, the flaws will cause brittle fracture and there will be no warning. Dreamliners will simply break up in mid-flight with no warning at all. All the result of McNerney who destroyed ethics at Boeing after doing the same at 3M. William Briggs wrote a tedious book, "Uncertainty." One has to understand his book is about soft, mushy data involving people. Not hard data like the values of resistors made in a production line. Six-Sigma assumes hard data on products being developed, involving the uncertain desires of customers. Briggs's book absolutely destroys six sigma without ever mentioning it.

Is there any direct connection from Pfizer to the assassin? I doubt it. It is just like the anti-gun people who love school shootings. They don't need to point a killer at a school. They just create the conditions to assure that a mass shooting will occur at some school. Until shown data that disproves it, I believe these are childhood vaccine damaged kids, put on SSRI drugs that drive them insane when they quit taking these highly addicting, and usually useless drugs. Only about 1/3 of the people using them benefit. 2/3's are damaged by them. Some quit the harmful drugs and withdrawal caused them to do extreme harm to themselves or others.

Expand full comment
May 16Liked by Igor Chudov

An Op-ed has been posted on Trial Site News titled "PhotoBioModulation: Overview of the Pubmed Literature on Low Level Light Therapy" (https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/photobiomodulation-overview-of-the-pubmed-literature-on-low-level-light-therapy-272cafd0). PhotoBioModulation (PBM), also known as Low-level light therapy (LLLT), is a type of optical therapy that uses red or near-infrared lasers or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for medical treatment. The Op-ed provides a comprehensive overview of the published literature, and also examines the use of PBM for treating four of the major adverse effects following Covid-19 vaccinations (Cardiovascular, Neurological, (where blood clotting has been included in the Cardiovascular and Neurological categories), Autoimmune, and Cancer. The Op-ed is available Open Access at the link above.

Expand full comment
May 16Liked by Igor Chudov

"They" can't hide any more how DESPERATE "they" are to coerce their goals on the global populace ...

Is this is a sign of changing tides or not ??? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

Only time will show ...

Expand full comment
May 16Liked by Igor Chudov

Keep us posted, please, Igor.

Expand full comment
May 16Liked by Igor Chudov

Always ask myself didnt they know they'd be targeted? Why the public proximity? Why did JFK do the motorcade? Our enemy is the spawn of Satan , they have no conscience, no remorse , no sympathy and an unbridled hatred for white anglo-aryan people and their true God.

Expand full comment

They almost immediately said he was a lone wolf assassin. That tells you everything you need to know.

Expand full comment
author

now blaming "right-wing" for assassination attempt against a right-wing president. please help me make it make sense

Expand full comment

They also claim that the assassin is pro-Russian, connected to Russian nationalists, shooting at a pro-Russian prime minister.

Expand full comment