Mr Adrian Wong fact-checked my post and found it to be FALSE
Obviously mr. Wong is a shill. Eternal shame to him and his family.
Adrian Wong is a Malaysian shill influencer under the direction of the country's ex-DG of health and is one of his cyber army responsible for countering all challenges to official narratives. Your articles are getting influential among Malaysians and hence he will not let you off. https://murrayhunter.substack.com/p/noor-hishams-private-cyber-army
"Sadly, Adrian Wong displayed an utter lack of understanding of what he was talking about."
The mark of the true Fact Checker (TM).
Everyone should learn to identify logical fallacies.
This site is great: yourlogicalfallacyis.com
Wong is wrong.
Wong has an intersting pic, standing next to a LAPD.....is he under arrest? Highly suspect. "Fact Checkers" are the equivalent to armchair MD's. They do not require a degree, a certification, have oversight or accreditation. They are self proclaimed, corporate appointed ne'er do wells, whose job it is to gaslight normies into believing they cannot understand or research for themselves. Basically, they are calling every person on every side of an issue, a total idiot. So. Please pay NO HEED to such asshats!
All-cause death numbers simply don’t make sense. No respiratory virus would suddenly explode in April and May.
Checked by brain damagef zombies yes.
Wong is a professional “fact checker” with an outfit called techARP.
You must have hit a nerve. Buyer beware.
The Scam Detector's algorithm finds techarp.com having an authoritative rank of 58.20. It means that the business is Active. Mediocre. Common.
Our algorithm gave the 58.20 rank based on 50 factors relevant to techarp.com's niche. From the quality of the customer service in its News industry to clients' public feedback and domain authority, we have considered many important details.
Other factors include, but are not limited to, WHOIS details, IP address, Alexa rank, modern technology used for their website, SSL certificate, and presence or absence on suspicious website lists.
What does "Active. Mediocre. Common." mean? It is a business that's been online for a while. It seems like techarp.com has received both positive and negative feedback (occasionally), just like many other websites. That means that you need to exercise caution if you decide to proceed with using it.
"You've come to the wong place".
Sorry. Futurama. I'll get my coat.
The economy is again - on the verge of implosion ........... https://youtu.be/ZV3ObipKe0Y
I always figure that if it is fact checked, it just means it hit homes!!
Wong's awful, but seems not-as-pathetic as most of the "fact checkers" of our dissident experts like Igor. A low bar, maybe also a sign that the establishment knows its losing the argument.
OT, but I wanted to call attention to a solid 3-minute opening statement by Peter McCullough from Aug 26 highlighted by the essential Vigilant Fox substack. It deserves attention as a kind of quick-summary of the whole kit-and-kaboodle, or what I label the Covid/Vax Disaster: https://pomocon.substack.com/p/the-disaster-in-a-nutshell
Well at least Comrade Wong has a very trustworthy face
they checked because they are threatened by actual FACT! So where do we go on there to call bullshit to his whole argument? Let's do it in DROVES. Hmmm... that's interesting. I made a comment, even gave my email address. They would not let me post it - it appears the wayback machine says this 'fact check' was already archived. Or something. Seems suspect.
But I had fun writing a comment anyway:
First off, you credit the wrong source of this article so your entire fact check is based on a lie. The original source of the article is not The Expose/ Daily Expose. The original article was written by Igor Chudov, who, if you had actually read the article you claimed to have read, you would have seen, was credited for the original article. One wonders if you even read the entire article and the sources of research, since you advise your readers to just skip it, and go to your 'facts.' I don't know which of the Owners someone as self-righteous and cock-sure as you works for, but you should pull this if you want to seem at all credible.
Where do they find these masters of doublespeak like Adrian Wrong?