I sense your frustration at this point, sir. It’s showing. But name calling is counter productive and is a turn off. I now skip your posts, full well knowing myself at this point what is really going on. It all goes straight to Satan and his reliance on humans to do his bidding. Including Masons. Take care.
I sense your frustration at this point, sir. It’s showing. But name calling is counter productive and is a turn off. I now skip your posts, full well knowing myself at this point what is really going on. It all goes straight to Satan and his reliance on humans to do his bidding. Including Masons. Take care.
Sorry, but what name calling did the post do? He pointed out associations that bind the conspirators. Are you saying we can't name names or organizations? Pooh that.
How would the post be written differently to convey the accurate data and not be in your eyes "name calling."
Is it the "dummy" at the beginning? I took that as a play on words, not name calling.
We cannot continue to be so thin skinned that we miss the forest because we are offended. Isn't that a lot of what's wrong with the extremists of the day? "You must call me by my pronouns! I am so hurt!" How is avoiding damning information because it has the word, "dummy" in it really any different?
You are of course welcome to read and respond as you feel appropriate. Full respect for that. And full respect for calling it out. But don't ignore the message for a single word that offends you and miss the connections of what's going on. Too much is at stake to not at least read the data.
Could you explain how "dummy" in this context is a play on words? I guess I'm a bit slow on the uptake. To me that first sentence reads as you would likely read, "It's the masons, idiot."
I sense your frustration at this point, sir. It’s showing. But name calling is counter productive and is a turn off. I now skip your posts, full well knowing myself at this point what is really going on. It all goes straight to Satan and his reliance on humans to do his bidding. Including Masons. Take care.
Pretty much exactly what I was going to say. Name calling does not serve "Scientific Progress" (both person and topic area).
Sorry, but what name calling did the post do? He pointed out associations that bind the conspirators. Are you saying we can't name names or organizations? Pooh that.
How would the post be written differently to convey the accurate data and not be in your eyes "name calling."
Is it the "dummy" at the beginning? I took that as a play on words, not name calling.
We cannot continue to be so thin skinned that we miss the forest because we are offended. Isn't that a lot of what's wrong with the extremists of the day? "You must call me by my pronouns! I am so hurt!" How is avoiding damning information because it has the word, "dummy" in it really any different?
You are of course welcome to read and respond as you feel appropriate. Full respect for that. And full respect for calling it out. But don't ignore the message for a single word that offends you and miss the connections of what's going on. Too much is at stake to not at least read the data.
Could you explain how "dummy" in this context is a play on words? I guess I'm a bit slow on the uptake. To me that first sentence reads as you would likely read, "It's the masons, idiot."
The original was "it's the economy, stupid" from the Clinton campaign in '92.
Many people use that turn of phrase with a different word than "economy"
It was a play on that.