"So, now we have a full new mystery: Sars-Cov-2 destroys immune T cells just like HIV does, Sars-Cov-2 has a transplanted gp120 HIV insert, and it is that specific gp120 insert that allows HIV to enter lymphocytes via the same LFA-1 receptor!"
Another mystery is how it doesn't qualify as a bio-weapon.
Igor, thanks for the interesting data on SARS-CoV2. However, I may seem unappreciative based upon the comments I'm about to give. I intend them constructively & cordially.
There is a good reason that Peter Duesberg has been a thorn in the side of those promoting the AIDS narrative for 40 years, and that Kary Mullis was an irritant until he died 2.5 years ago. They asked a simple question that could not be answered: "where is the paper that shows HIV causes AIDS?" No one, including Luc Montagnier, could point to the paper (or series of papers working as a whole) that showed HIV caused AIDS. This was true in the early 1990s and its true today. HIV as the cause of AIDS didn't get accepted by publishing a paper. It got accepted when Robert Gallo & Margaret Heckler (Secretary of HHS under Regan), held a press conference and declared it so in April, 1984. AIDS and HIV is the scam that preceded COVID19. It saddens me to see new understandings about SARS-CoV-2 be placed against the backdrop of the AIDS scam. We are going to have a difficult enough time peeling back COVID without tainting it with HIV comparisons.
I again refer you to Peter Duesberg's book, "Inventing the AIDS Virus", which can be downloaded for free:
In the early 1980's researchers were determined to find the virus that caused cancer. Duesberg was one of these researchers, but he had enough integrity to come out and say it wasn't so, without regard to what it would do to his career or getting future grants. But many were determined to find the cancer causing virus. Robert Gallo was one such researcher. But when it was discovered that some people were showing signs of a depleted immune system, he turned his attention to that. Instead of waiting for a new virus to be found, he first tried to shoehorn his HTLV-I virus (that was supposed to cause cancer) into the virus that caused (what would later be called) AIDS.
There were many problems with this theory. First, retroviruses (which HTLV-I) is one, do not kill T-cells. In fact, retroviruses are not known to kill any cells. Retroviruses are "lazy" in the words of Mullis. They don't do much. Mullis called them "harmless passenger viruses" that have been with humans for thousands of years. Furthermore, cancer is a state of cells not dying - they are unable to die, but instead replicate at an uncontrollable rate. So we have a contradiction. If a virus causes cancer, then how can it also kill a cell? How can that virus also cause AIDS?
While Gallo was working on HTLV in the US, Luc Montagnier was doing his own work in France on another virus, that would eventually be called HIV. Gallo offered to help Montagnier with his research. There was a long drama between Gallo & Montagnier that I won't detail here, but it's safe to say that Gallo stole HIV from Montagnier and laid claim to its discovery. It was a huge international issue that resulted in a settlement paid by the US to France, and it was agreed that royalties for HIV tests would be shared with France. Gallo was snubbed the Nobel in 2008 as he should have been. Gallo claimed to have created a cell line cultured from a patient with AIDS to grow HIV. This turned out to be a lie. The virus Gallo had was given to him by Montagnier, and Gallo stabbed him in the back.
There are many with immune deficiency who test negative for HIV antibodies. There are people who test positive for HIV antibodies without any signs of immune deficiency or diseases lumped into AIDS. There are people with low CD4+ cell counts without any signs of deficient immune systems or AIDS related diseases. There are people who are HIV antibody positive with diseases associated with AIDS but HIV cannot be cultured in them. The AIDS narrative is a testimony to crowd madness & groupthink. 40 years later and perhaps multiples of that in billions of dollars of research and we still don't have a single paper showing that AIDS is caused by HIV. The theory does not pass Koch's Postulate, the gold standard for determining if a pathogen is responsible for a disease. I can't represent Duesberg's position adequately in a brief post, but I'll leave you with a question. If HIV causes AIDS by causing T-cell death, how is it that HIV is lab-grown in an immortal T-cell line?
I think it is more helpful to report on what research shows SARS-CoV-2 does to the human body without the linkage to what HIV is claimed to do. We end up paying homage to one murderous scam while trying to unravel another. I'm not an expert on this subject, so if you have any good counter arguments, I would refer you to Duesberg's book. Duesberg, once considered one of the world's best virologists, is now listed in many wiki sites as a "quack" or "AIDS Denialist." But the army of scientists who make a living consuming government funding to do their AIDS research cannot or have not, alone or as a group, been able to counter Duesberg's simple, straight-forward, fact-based case against AIDS.
There appears to be a reduction in t-cell levels after infection with covid, but this appears to be temporary and recovers after about a week.
There also appears to be a reduction in t-cell levels after vaccination, but this appears to be temporary and recovers after about a week. Nevertheless, this might be associated with an increased risk of covid infection during this period and perhaps there are other side-effects.
What worries me is that vaccination appears, at least in some, to induce a state of viral tolerance; that is, the immune system starts to recognise the virus as 'self' and stops producing a strong immune response upon infection -- IMO this explains both the increase in infection risk seen in the data (lower immune response = more virus) and the reduction in hospitalisations/deaths (lower immune response = less risk of cytokine storm). HOWEVER, there will then be prolonged covid infection in those individuals beyond the normal week or so -- if the virus does reduce t-cell levels then you'd expect those individuals to have an increased risk of other diseases and perhaps cancer.
Why is it that, day after day, I keep reading the most interesting and informative articles about covid on a personal blog by a Russian math guy in living in Chicago.
I really appreciate all that you have brought to this "conversation" Igor!
Firstly, a vaccine that drops t lymphocytes and messes with p53 and BRCA should be banned.
Also, glad your lymphocytes recovered after the natural infection.. I'm going to go test mine. Probably the recovery has everything to do with lack of thymic atrophy which is a good sign. Red light therapy has shown positive results on maintaining thymic function.
And....This is exactly why Ivermectin is critical for treatment of "VAIDS" Gp20 is a subunit of the GAG protein:
"Natural product-derived antiviral therapy for HIV virus: Ivermectin (Brand name: Heartguard/Mectizen/Stromectol) increases Heme oxygenase 2 (HO-2) expression, blocks N-myristoylation of HIV-1 Gag protein, disrupts HIV-1 budding, and restricts HIV-1 production via up regulation of its target gene, 25/August/2017, 11.46 pm"
I was looking for an article I had read saying it was similar to a particular snake venom that's considered a potential bioweapon. Couldn't find that. (I do see stuff about treating Covid with snake venom.)
Is there anything nasty that has NOT been inserted into this virus?
I find it suspicious that the paper does not mention if the 22 patients from Shanghai were vaccinated or not. Isn't this an important variable? Thank you for sharing your blood results Igor, I wished other researchers and bloggers were more forthcoming. I just want one vaccinated person to share their before and after tests: blood panel, d-dimer, MRI, HIV/AIDS, and now ECG! Not sure if you heard that now some athletes are requested to get an ECG before the sports activity?
"So, now we have a full new mystery: Sars-Cov-2 destroys immune T cells just like HIV does, Sars-Cov-2 has a transplanted gp120 HIV insert, and it is that specific gp120 insert that allows HIV to enter lymphocytes via the same LFA-1 receptor!"
Another mystery is how it doesn't qualify as a bio-weapon.
I really hope Geert Vanden Bosche takes a good hard look at this also.
Igor, thanks for the interesting data on SARS-CoV2. However, I may seem unappreciative based upon the comments I'm about to give. I intend them constructively & cordially.
There is a good reason that Peter Duesberg has been a thorn in the side of those promoting the AIDS narrative for 40 years, and that Kary Mullis was an irritant until he died 2.5 years ago. They asked a simple question that could not be answered: "where is the paper that shows HIV causes AIDS?" No one, including Luc Montagnier, could point to the paper (or series of papers working as a whole) that showed HIV caused AIDS. This was true in the early 1990s and its true today. HIV as the cause of AIDS didn't get accepted by publishing a paper. It got accepted when Robert Gallo & Margaret Heckler (Secretary of HHS under Regan), held a press conference and declared it so in April, 1984. AIDS and HIV is the scam that preceded COVID19. It saddens me to see new understandings about SARS-CoV-2 be placed against the backdrop of the AIDS scam. We are going to have a difficult enough time peeling back COVID without tainting it with HIV comparisons.
I again refer you to Peter Duesberg's book, "Inventing the AIDS Virus", which can be downloaded for free:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948355_Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus
In the early 1980's researchers were determined to find the virus that caused cancer. Duesberg was one of these researchers, but he had enough integrity to come out and say it wasn't so, without regard to what it would do to his career or getting future grants. But many were determined to find the cancer causing virus. Robert Gallo was one such researcher. But when it was discovered that some people were showing signs of a depleted immune system, he turned his attention to that. Instead of waiting for a new virus to be found, he first tried to shoehorn his HTLV-I virus (that was supposed to cause cancer) into the virus that caused (what would later be called) AIDS.
There were many problems with this theory. First, retroviruses (which HTLV-I) is one, do not kill T-cells. In fact, retroviruses are not known to kill any cells. Retroviruses are "lazy" in the words of Mullis. They don't do much. Mullis called them "harmless passenger viruses" that have been with humans for thousands of years. Furthermore, cancer is a state of cells not dying - they are unable to die, but instead replicate at an uncontrollable rate. So we have a contradiction. If a virus causes cancer, then how can it also kill a cell? How can that virus also cause AIDS?
While Gallo was working on HTLV in the US, Luc Montagnier was doing his own work in France on another virus, that would eventually be called HIV. Gallo offered to help Montagnier with his research. There was a long drama between Gallo & Montagnier that I won't detail here, but it's safe to say that Gallo stole HIV from Montagnier and laid claim to its discovery. It was a huge international issue that resulted in a settlement paid by the US to France, and it was agreed that royalties for HIV tests would be shared with France. Gallo was snubbed the Nobel in 2008 as he should have been. Gallo claimed to have created a cell line cultured from a patient with AIDS to grow HIV. This turned out to be a lie. The virus Gallo had was given to him by Montagnier, and Gallo stabbed him in the back.
There are many with immune deficiency who test negative for HIV antibodies. There are people who test positive for HIV antibodies without any signs of immune deficiency or diseases lumped into AIDS. There are people with low CD4+ cell counts without any signs of deficient immune systems or AIDS related diseases. There are people who are HIV antibody positive with diseases associated with AIDS but HIV cannot be cultured in them. The AIDS narrative is a testimony to crowd madness & groupthink. 40 years later and perhaps multiples of that in billions of dollars of research and we still don't have a single paper showing that AIDS is caused by HIV. The theory does not pass Koch's Postulate, the gold standard for determining if a pathogen is responsible for a disease. I can't represent Duesberg's position adequately in a brief post, but I'll leave you with a question. If HIV causes AIDS by causing T-cell death, how is it that HIV is lab-grown in an immortal T-cell line?
I think it is more helpful to report on what research shows SARS-CoV-2 does to the human body without the linkage to what HIV is claimed to do. We end up paying homage to one murderous scam while trying to unravel another. I'm not an expert on this subject, so if you have any good counter arguments, I would refer you to Duesberg's book. Duesberg, once considered one of the world's best virologists, is now listed in many wiki sites as a "quack" or "AIDS Denialist." But the army of scientists who make a living consuming government funding to do their AIDS research cannot or have not, alone or as a group, been able to counter Duesberg's simple, straight-forward, fact-based case against AIDS.
There appears to be a reduction in t-cell levels after infection with covid, but this appears to be temporary and recovers after about a week.
There also appears to be a reduction in t-cell levels after vaccination, but this appears to be temporary and recovers after about a week. Nevertheless, this might be associated with an increased risk of covid infection during this period and perhaps there are other side-effects.
What worries me is that vaccination appears, at least in some, to induce a state of viral tolerance; that is, the immune system starts to recognise the virus as 'self' and stops producing a strong immune response upon infection -- IMO this explains both the increase in infection risk seen in the data (lower immune response = more virus) and the reduction in hospitalisations/deaths (lower immune response = less risk of cytokine storm). HOWEVER, there will then be prolonged covid infection in those individuals beyond the normal week or so -- if the virus does reduce t-cell levels then you'd expect those individuals to have an increased risk of other diseases and perhaps cancer.
I keep wondering to myself.
Why is it that, day after day, I keep reading the most interesting and informative articles about covid on a personal blog by a Russian math guy in living in Chicago.
I really appreciate all that you have brought to this "conversation" Igor!
Firstly, a vaccine that drops t lymphocytes and messes with p53 and BRCA should be banned.
Also, glad your lymphocytes recovered after the natural infection.. I'm going to go test mine. Probably the recovery has everything to do with lack of thymic atrophy which is a good sign. Red light therapy has shown positive results on maintaining thymic function.
And....This is exactly why Ivermectin is critical for treatment of "VAIDS" Gp20 is a subunit of the GAG protein:
"Natural product-derived antiviral therapy for HIV virus: Ivermectin (Brand name: Heartguard/Mectizen/Stromectol) increases Heme oxygenase 2 (HO-2) expression, blocks N-myristoylation of HIV-1 Gag protein, disrupts HIV-1 budding, and restricts HIV-1 production via up regulation of its target gene, 25/August/2017, 11.46 pm"
https://genomediscovery.org/2017/08/natural-product-derived-antiviral-therapy-for-hiv-virus-ivermectin-brand-name-heartguardmectizenstromectol-increases-heme-oxygenase-2-ho-2-expression-blocks-n-myristoylation-of-hiv/
Not even six degrees of separation…..Who is the person connected to HIV, gp120, and Sars-Cov-2. Hhhmmmmmmm
God rescue us and deliver us!
Yet one more apparent reason for the globalists to deny early treatment, because surely early treatment will mitigate this effect in some way.
These people are evil and demonic. There simply is not any other way to describe the extent and depth of their depravity and maliciousness.
Lord, surround us with your mighty angels! Deliver us from the evil ones! Rescue us by your mighty arm, and soon! Keep us well protected from evil!
The study doesn’t tell if the patients were previously vaccinated or not.
So my unscientific guess that the next vaccine/virus will be aerosolised might actually be more than just me being a suspicious you-know-what?
No wonder the wife calls me Kassandra.
As always - great work
Also, people with life-threatening Covid have high levels of an enzyme similar to rattlesnake venom--
https://todayspractitioner.com/covid-19/discovery-researchers-find-phospholipase-a2-group-iia-enzyme-drives-covid-19-mortality/
I was looking for an article I had read saying it was similar to a particular snake venom that's considered a potential bioweapon. Couldn't find that. (I do see stuff about treating Covid with snake venom.)
Is there anything nasty that has NOT been inserted into this virus?
Fauci owns a patent on gp120 what a coincidence
Confirmed conspiracy theory #45,713,228 registered.
I find it suspicious that the paper does not mention if the 22 patients from Shanghai were vaccinated or not. Isn't this an important variable? Thank you for sharing your blood results Igor, I wished other researchers and bloggers were more forthcoming. I just want one vaccinated person to share their before and after tests: blood panel, d-dimer, MRI, HIV/AIDS, and now ECG! Not sure if you heard that now some athletes are requested to get an ECG before the sports activity?