Discover more from Igor’s Newsletter
So, COVID-19 is a Bioweapon After All, The Times Explains
Sars-Cov-2 is a result of bioweapons research, and work of Ralph Baric and Peter Daszak
The article is well-researched and is based on interviews with scientists, intelligence officers, and primary investigators.
The Sunday Times has reviewed hundreds of documents, including previously confidential reports, internal memos, scientific papers and email correspondence that has been obtained through sources or by freedom of information campaigners in the three years since the pandemic started. We also interviewed the US State Department investigators — including experts on China, emerging pandemic threats, and biowarfare — who conducted the first significant US inquiry into the origins of the Covid-19 outbreak.
Covid-19 was a product of bioweapon and vaccine research:
One of the reasons there is no published information on such work, according to all three investigators, is because the shadow project on the mine viruses at the Wuhan institute was being funded by the Chinese military.
The State Department investigators wrote in their report: “Despite presenting itself as a civilian institution, the United States has determined that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has engaged in classified research, including laboratory animal experiments, on behalf of the Chinese military since at least 2017.”
My view is that the reason Mojiang was covered up was due to military secrecy related to [the army’s] pursuit of dual use capabilities in virological biological weapons and vaccines.
A vaccine to shift power
The investigators believe the Chinese military had taken an interest in developing a vaccine for the viruses so they could be used as potential bioweapons. If a country could inoculate its population against its own secret virus, it might have a weapon to shift the balance of world power.
Mind you, a while ago, I also explained that Sars-Cov-2 is a bioweapon:
Note that there is a misconception, and people think that “bioweapons” must be exceptionally deadly. The above-linked post explains that the definition of “bioweapons” means pathogens designed intentionally that are at least somewhat pathogenic.
The Times article highlights research by US-based EcoHealth Alliance and Ralph Baric on humanized mice, which the Chinese seem to have taken further:
Shortly afterwards, the trust was rebranded as the EcoHealth Alliance and Daszak assumed the role of president. The Chinese collaborators who helped put him on the map were also rewarded: $1 million of the Predict grant was redirected to the Wuhan institute.
Tests on humanised mice
The truly cutting-edge experiments were being done in the US by the veteran virologist Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina. He used a technique to fuse together different pathogens by mixing their genes. To test the effect of these lab-created mutant viruses on people, he created “humanised” mice by injecting them with genes that allowed them to develop lungs and vascular systems similar to ours. His ultimate aim was to create a universal vaccine against Sars-type viruses — an objective still not achieved.
Check this out:
I Invented Nothing
I am thrilled that my reports on the origin of Sars-Cov-2 are proving to be accurate. I want to underscore that I did not have access to any secret materials and did not come up with any truly original ideas. Just like most other people, I read the news and read the ideas of others. I tried to discern what hypothesis fits the facts best and reported those to my readers.
My reports were only based on judgments of what was likely to be true and on carefully putting together materials available to the general public.
Around March 2020, it became evident to any open-minded reader of news that Sars-Cov-2 was a lab-designed virus and that the so-called “virologists” were lying about the “natural origin” of Sars-Cov-2. I wanted to share that knowledge with people.
Many Unanswered Questions
Despite the Times article putting the nail in the coffin of “zoonosis theory,” many questions still remain unanswered:
Sars-CoV-2 was a product of bioweapons and vaccine research. What was the intended mechanism of harm for this bioweapon? Prions? Immune system damage? Vaccine? All of the above? What else? We do not know that, yet.
Why did the NIH work on the “Novel Coronavirus Vaccine” in July 2019?
Why do the Times article's authors not mention Moderna-patented nucleotides in Sars-Cov-2?
Why does the article not mention the unusual, HIV-like mechanism of action of Sars-Cov-2, despite even China’s batwoman, Shi Zhengli, describing that action in her Nature study?
Who knew about the upcoming release of Sars-Cov-2, and how did Bill Gates make a surprisingly lucky decision in September 2019 to buy $50 million worth of BioNTech shares? These shares appreciated thirty-fold during the pandemic as BioNTech became the “Pfizer COVID vaccine” manufacturer:
They Called Us “Anti-Science Conspiracy Theorists.”
Remember how suggesting that Sars-CoV-2 was a lab product got us labeled “antiscience conspiracy theorists”? We, the “antiscience theorists,” were accused of killing thousands:
The irony in this, of course, is that it was the virologists who created a deadly pandemic virus, which killed millions of people and still kills hundreds daily.
We Live in Strange Times
We live in strange times when speaking the truth is “anti-science.” Even stranger, exposing criminal wrongdoing by people in power is dismissed as “crazy conspiracy theories.” Doctors lose licenses for giving their patients safe and effective off-label drugs such as ivermectin. All the while, charlatans make nice money promoting non-working, harmful vaccines.
Unfortunately, lies kill. The millions of victims of COVID-19 would possibly be still with us if the creators of the virus came clean and explained how they created it and for what purpose. More lives would be saved if hastily designed “COVID vaccines” were not forcibly given to people who could not benefit from them. Perhaps, the wisdom of making a vaccine from the “spike protein” code from a bioweapon, which carried that spike protein to kill people, could be questioned sooner.
Will any lessons be learned? Will the “COVID reckoning” bring fruit? Or will we be collectively distracted by “shiny objects”? Some recent social controversies that suddenly sprung up, seem to be designed to distract us from more important problems.
Let us know what you think!