So my kids were kicked out of their art classes for not taking an experimental genetic treatment they didn't need in the first place and which is now banned in the UK for their age group? Gotcha.
biden made a deal with phrama. he bought the jabs and they will (maybe) lower a few bucks on some meds to make the old doddery look good for elections. they can do that since they made Billions now.
Authorisation for Temporary Supply
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2
(BNT162b2 RNA)
concentrate for solution for injection"
from the UKs MHRA, the recommendation is for pregnant women to not get it due to lack of safety data.
Thank you, it seems you are right. It appears one of the relevant public health sites left up old information and never updated it to reflect the later recommendation. This was discovered and was assumed to be one of these quiet changes, similar to this one about younger kids. But apparently not? That's very disappointing.
The FDA in the USA was forced by a court order to release the study data of the mRNA vaccine trials. It is damming to say the least and the pharma companies are already being hit with criminal malfeasance charges. They thought they were going to push off the studies being released for 75 years. It didn’t work out that way so now all these governments around the world will have to answer for blindly following LIES.
Nobody anywhere read the documents - They were too busy counting their multi million $$ fee money!
And then the U.S. Govt paid pfizer & moderna $55 billion for their poisons! Isn't that about the same as they donated to Ukraine? Amazing - for a country that's SO broke... Ah well, they can always keep printing more. What inflation?
Data is being collected as we speak, these shots are experimental released under “Emergency Authorization “. Funny, you tell someone to take extra vitamin D or C and they act like it’s rat poison, but will line up and inject some unknown crap in their arm no questions asked…I know of two couples who flew back to Michigan from Florida to get these shots.
I wonder how Biden is gonna skate around the UK data...once he gets to hear from it maybe in many months in a few lucid moments of his maybe...his immidiate repsonse will be TRUMP..that TRUMP he made me do this!!
Good news from the Netherlands tonight: one day after a prominent news article opining the lack of lockdown, curfew and mandatory vaccination measures in our new permanent corona law (why we even need it is beyond me), I enjoyed a very large face to face event with all the parents of new middle schoolers, the selection of which was quite fraught last year in the throes of corona madness. Anyway, bumping into old contacts from across town, one parent who vaxxed herself and her child under duress said to me: so much of what they told us is lies. We cannot maintain the farce for one moment longer. I did a happy dance inside! Even if seeing just one of my posts was a small part of her feeling comfortable enough to say that, I can pat myself on the back. And I know I have an ally if they try to pull this shit for another winter. Well, as long as she has found her backbone for real this time.
One step at a time insteap of no steps for 2,5 years is massive improvement for blind-sheep-people! I actually started to think it might be impossible.
When people like them have to change their minds, it is not easy, I guess, and the person in casu problaby needs like another 2,5 years for being able to see to what the Ukraine 'war' is really about;-))
Yes it is! And of course you don't want to fight over it on your childrens school, because you want to be a good example to them, and or you have far better things to do etc
Given how compliant people are these days receiving a "not recommended" label from the government works as if it was banned. Basically the government is telling doctors they are on their own from now on, which is a powerful deterrent as what doctors want most in life is to avoid liability.
Next question -- what makes it appropriate for someone 12 years and one second old to get the shot, when not the moment prior? Is there some special biological process that makes the mRNA "safe and effective" at age 12?
My thoughts exactly, why is it good for a 13yr old? Or a 20yr old? Etc….this concept reminds me of the “minimum wage” issue here in the states and if $15 is enough well why not $20….frustrations that there is no answer
Or $2.15 which I earned as a tipped employee in 1981 and is still in effect with little change in several states at least until recently. It's all fuckery. All of it.
I just love the one where they say that sex/gender was something pushed on good and pure tribes of completely noble savages by colonists. That shit makes me LOL.
To me it appears like it’s a game to them. Ignore the data, try to force the vaccine, push it to the point where it’s obvious that people have drawn the line… then backtrack after you’ve gotten everyone vaccinated who’s going to take it and say “Oh look, the science has changed! Don’t take it! We’re here to keep you safe!”
It’s a pattern that’s playing out in a lot of countries….
Saw your attempt to establish a dialogue with AB on his Substack re: Ivermectin. Thank you for your class and humility. I hope at some point the two of you will have a discussion. We need more open-minded dialog like this.
I am going to sound harsh and I do agree that we all have blind spots or maybe short sighted BUT he has a huge following. He has a responsibility . When called on it he ignored it, just like a child. I like at his stuff but that’s about it. I completely understand that other people have completely different opinions. I respect that. I may change my mind. I think we just had a substack on being open minded.
I directly anathematize Berenson on one issue and he doesn't respond to anything (his belief abortion is bad, but what are we going to do? He could be a bullshit traitor theology teacher at bullshit Georgetown)
I've been doing some background reading on ivermectin. Today's curious find: In the 2017 edition of the "Physician's Desk Reference," which (I thought) was a prime medical guide, I can find almost no mention of ivermectin. I found* one product, a topical creme for rosacea. I find this rather odd, since we are talking a drug that has been in worldwide use for nearly half a century, millions of users per year. Now granted, tropical parasitic disease is quite rare in the US, but still, thousands of Rx are written for this drug yearly. Hardly discussed in the bible of drugs? Very odd!
*I don't discount the chance I've overlooked something. Nevertheless, I've been able to find other drugs I was interested in.
usa will have schools, jobs and universities mandating a bivalent jab based on nih accepting an inference based on 8 mice who all failed the challenge while having a [variable] display of antibodies.....
it's also interesting to learn that Paul Offit's objection to recommending the bivalent boosters was that the only evidence for efficacy is that these boosters merely increase antibody levels by a factor of 1.5 to 1.7. that's all we know about them.
and (this is the interesting part), we already know from earlier studies back in December 2020 on the original Moderna and Pfizer vaccines that *even if you DOUBLE the quantity of circulating antibodies, it DOES NOT RESULT IN BETTER CLINICAL OUTCOMES*.
Offit raising any objection at all to the new booster is a very curious about-face. For him to badmouth the miracle potions should be as startling as it would be if the madam of a house of ill repute were to author an op-ed denouncing fornication. Offit is a total vaccine whore, going back decades with Fauci and a frequent face in the media. His name appears at least 62 times in the e-book version of RFK Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci." My speculation: Offit knows the game is up and is trying to cover his ass as best he can.
I also find this really startling. I developed what I would have to call a hatred of Offitt when I was pregnant with my first and did a really deep dive into vaccine stuff. He is not a good guy. And he doesn't care if the vaccine isn't effective -- he might make that claim, but he is worried about far bigger issues than that, like Nuremberg trials.
He's an odd case. He's historically been pro-vaxx, but yet, apparently does sometimes press the brakes. I believe he was also against the recommendation for boosters earlier this year (or late last year) because there again, it didn't make sense to him to just perpetually keep antibodies high given the the new omicron reality: we're all gonna get it.
More interestingly, and this may have been political, but back in the Dubya administration when the anthrax scare happened, there was a proposal to start vaccinating large numbers of people against smallpox out of fear that smallpox bioterrorism might occur somehow. And Offit opposed this publicly because the risks of the smallpox vaccine were too high! (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Offit#Smallpox_vaccine)
Years ago I took my oldest to a normie pediatrician for her 4 month appointment. She had never been vaccinated and the pediatrician and I were discussing a select/delay vaccination schedule
Even the normie ped was like “yeah that one pretty much useless” re: rota vax
Offit is the patent holder of a rotavirus vaccine. So he occasionally puts up a little bit of resistance but he is firmly entrenched
Edit: years later my children have received 0 vaccines
Mine too. They're young adults now. Some of my friends who didn't vax ran into a lot of friction with doctors but I must have come across as intimidating AF (I think I did actually) because I normally met with essentially no resistance. I hope you have had an okay time of it.
Thanks! I found a pediatrician here in DFW that accepts parents that don’t vaccinate and it’s pretty chill it’s just “are you vaccinating today” and I say “no” and that’s it. But honestly I don’t understand people who say “I luuuurve our ped!” Because I just want someone whose presence I can tolerate for 5 min every other year? But maybe I’d feel different if I had sick children. Congrats on your unvaxxed kiddos my oldest is not quit 4 but I’ve been having more conversations with her about getting jabbed: some of her friends are unvaccinated but some of her friends have normie parents who jab. And we talk about my husband’s old job that told him to put a needle in his arm and he said NO. Even today she was asking me if his new job told him to put a needle in his arm 😂 (the answer fortunately is no)
Anyway do you have any advice for how to talk to unvaccinated kiddos about vaccination?
i do not know much i am a management scientist who did product acceptance tests on new stuff before fielding.
that said the inferences from nih in all this display a dangerous liberty toward ignoring consumer and producer risk.
well, the producer risk was set at zero, while consumer risk of passing a false inference is way higher than would be accepted if the producer could be sued
I don't understand the language of consumer risk and producer risk. But I think you have an interesting way to analyze what's going on with the vaccines.
When you say that the producer risk was set at zero, does that mean that we assumed the producer would make no mistakes?
consumer risk is the risk of accepting the hypothesis, in vaccine case that it "works" when the vaccine really does not work (or is safe). Short accepting a false statement.
producer risk is the risk of rejecting the hypothesis that is things is safe or works, when the thing actually is safe or works. shorter rejecting a true statement.
The ph 3 tests were such as to have a very low chance of rejecting the vaccines whether safe or not.
same issue are seen in why the f-35 fighter has not passed operational test more than 20 years in development and production!
too many preliminary acceptances were false so the plane cannot pass real tests.
Yes, while that's a sobering problem for those who feel compelled to take the jab, I still made sport of the new booster in one of my cliques, composed entirely of geezers and no doubt most dosed to the hilt. I said "Doesn't it reflect well on our medical system that the new booster has been tested for safety in eight mice?" 🤡
I find it curious they aren't making an exception for kids who already got the first dose, as was done in Denmark's discontinuation of the vax for children. Does it suggest urgency to end this program?
I would think so, yes. There's an argument that, for kids, the second dose adds only a small amount of Covid 19 resistance, but a large amount of heart inflammation risk -- much more than the first dose did. So, a kid who's been jabbed once is better off avoiding the risk of the second shot.
Spot on. Every jab increases the chance of things going really bad, really quick. They have the proper data and even in the "massaged" one, it was clear that there was correlation between the number of jabs and the damage done (probably because it is cumulative).
interesting. maybe the landscape is changing on this. the public discussion of this has gotten to a point where even a pro-vaxx doctor like Paul Offit thinks that the benefit of a third dose to a young male does not outweigh the risks: https://youtu.be/iJ2W-1cKEtk?t=863
Offit's main role is pimping the pediatric vax schedule, period end of story. He's smart enough to know these Covid jabs aren't vaxxes in the traditional sense, are ineffective, and have a terrible safety profile. He's concerned the stink from the Covid shots will taint the pediatric vax schedule in general. He's right to be concerned as it's happening before our eyes.
Unlike defenseless infants and toddlers, adults can describe side effects, demonstrate clear neurologic and physical deterioration, refuse subsequent injections, and file VAERS reports. Healthy adults also aren't supposed to suddenly drop dead unlike infants where this had been hideously normalized as SIDs. The Covid shots are waking people up and making them question just what have we been doing to our kids all this time.
Offit's main concern is Offit, pretty much everything he does needs to be viewed in that light. A dirtbag doesn't change his stripes after 15 years.
I don't know. I mean, I watched that whole interview on YouTube which just came out last month. He's still ok with children getting the Covid jabs. He still argues that children are at risk of serious disease and even death from Covid 19, even if it's just caused by omicron. He does not seem to argue against childhood jabs.
I don't know how he's doing that risk/benefit calculation. He must still believe that the only downside is a very, very low risk of transient heart inflammation.
No question about it. The filth behind this horror have probably been given a very blunt legal advice that suggests that criminal charges are likely - as they should be. Given the amount of money they made from this scam, only the prospect of serious prison time would motivate these lowlifes to change course quickly.
The music industry in Nashville at least was very affected by the government/corporate/institutional party line. Lots of people you might expect to protest did not. Of course Nashville is run by Democrats an Vanderbilt.
I thought Van den Bossche or and Malone Kory and or one of those orther fantastic brave doctors predicted this immedeately after the vaxdamage was done to Bieber (and his wife, what a horror those people went thru..)
Few weeks ago they said Bieber was cured and would start his shows soon.
At that moment I thought: ' hey, that is the first time Malone ea weren't right....'
I hope that Gert is wrong - he predicted a more deadly version of the Omicron Covid that would be affecting the lungs (like the original strain) of the jabbed ones back in May. The next month or will be telling but so far so good.
It has been proven that even the original strain wasn't by far as deadly as they told us, especially not on its own, I mean without other (severe!) illnesses.
So it was not a very killing or deadly virus, and 'deadlier' can still mean 'not very deadly' to most (or all?) of us
I know that it would be something that could be managed by us unvaxed deplorables. However, just about all the people I know around have taken at two jabs and Gert's argument is that they would be the ones paying a high price. Even if 2-3% of the vaxed get into serious strife would change world completely. We would be looking at home detention China style for years so pray that Gert is wrong.
And even the sheep know by now staying at home doesn't work. Chinese sheep are different from our sheep. They have very cruel shepards, like ours, but in a totally different way: chinese sheep were and are much much longer used to torture and being forced to wathever their shepherds want even and they themselves didn't.
That is not compareble to our sheep, in the first place because -they think -they volonteered. And they did because they were frightened to death.
Now they like the mental (!) rewards for getting jabbed.
Our sheep are sheep if they think there is something to earn. And don't think they earn something by locking themselves up, and in fact look extremely stupid when doing so while being jabbed like 4 times probably ironically for regaining their freedom too!
When you think like that, I completely understand.
But the best predictions you can do is in the first place no prediction at all and if you really insist on prediction, the by far most reliable way is to learn from history.
I did and with that -hopefully correct-knowledge, I answered you.
I really hope you take my point of view under serious consideration, because the negative you see things is not good for you, nor your health. It is a waste of good energy you need really badly to support your jabbed friends as well
Considering what happened to him and his wife, I would not want to be in their shoes. Yes, he has money to burn but I think that he would give it all to get back his health. I wonder if he is finally getting some sound medical advice. Both him and his wife are in their 20's and to have those health problems at that age, I would not wish that on anyone.
They both spruiked the jab, and by their actions, I am sure convinced many innocent young folk to have the inoculation and thereby leave themselves at risk of whatever AEs are going to happen.
It is amazing how that dumbass sheep you mentioned in you article appears to be upset she cannot vaccinate her child but she does not question why. I guess the only way to stop some people jumping off a cliff is to physically stop them as there is no way to reason with them or explain the health benefits of NOT jumping off a cliff.
It is not amazing at all - they are way dumber than you can possibly imagine and as you can see, they are happy to provide constant proof of their idiocy.
The fact this 'withdrawal is being done more or less under the radar ( of wider public dissemination) shows the enormity of the scandal of these MRNA jabs and the damage they have already done to the young ( and across other age ranges). Tip toeing back from the wilful criminal push to get these jabs in to ever younger children. Too late....and their footsteps are being doggedly followed now all across the world.
I could be wrong but I thought that the UK was mostly Astra-Zeneca which was adeno-virus (like the JJ jab). It is staggering to see how ALL types of jabs have not only failed completely but also had horrible side effects. Here is OZ, they used both the MRNA & Astra-Zeneca jabs but the results have been awful especially for the MRNA ones.
As a GP I only gave jabs for a few weeks before realising that there was no way any of my patients could give me informed consent. There was never the information available for them to base consent on. I always made this clear.
Sure, they filled out a consent form, but that wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.
I stopped giving any jabs and have never given any to children under 18.
I had a complaint made against me by a father wanting to stab his 14 year old son because I pointed out that the risk from the jab was much higher than from Covid itself. He said I had frightened the lad. I just wish I had scared him a bit more so he had refused.
Madness, and Oz remains the same. I am still not allowed free speech under pain of suspension to say anything counter to the government narrative , although there are a few sprouts of reason starting to show with organisations like the Australian Medical Professionals Association prepared to stand up to the lies put about by the authorities.
The Pfizer jabs have been the predominant 'treatment' although AZ were used initially and many have had AZ. Now they are 'under a cloud' because of the clots in the heart and around the body. 'They' (Pfizer, AZ ),and govt health bodies in many countries, knew the limitations of said jabs (and harms they would go on to cause) but didn't inform the (many) mandated recipients nor those forced fed fear to get them willingly rolling up sleeves. All the best to you and OZ as weeks go on.
To me that the fact that they KNEW from the start shows not incompetence but clear criminal intent. Hence the backtracking now when it is becoming more and more obvious that these shots are causing massive damage. They know what they have done and that they have been caught despite the biggest psy-op in the history of the world.
So my kids were kicked out of their art classes for not taking an experimental genetic treatment they didn't need in the first place and which is now banned in the UK for their age group? Gotcha.
That's science for you
I TRIED TO FOLLOW THE SCIENCE, BUT IT WAS SIMPLY NOT THERE. I THEN
FOLLOWED THE MONEY, AND THAT'S WHERE I FOUND THE SCIENCE.
from P. Alexander substack
Hilarious!
Not sure why this ost reminds me of the rant I saw where POTUS said something like Beat pharma. I didn’t get it or all the people cheering. Hysteria?
He was ranting like a sick dementia patient, he didn’t beat anything, including cornpop.
biden made a deal with phrama. he bought the jabs and they will (maybe) lower a few bucks on some meds to make the old doddery look good for elections. they can do that since they made Billions now.
It's spelled $cience... ;-)
That says it all🙌🏼
It's about as scientific as Scientific Mapp. Remember him?
it is The Science. You got to believe in it to see that it works lol.
"The Science(tm) !
No the Science is a human half god called Fauci.
More like half-human demi-cockroach.🤣
How do you expect them to become interesting and original artists if they won't mindlessly obey government mandates and orders?
BAM 💥
“The trouble with the music Biz is that it’s become so bourgeois. A Middle Class executive business like the police force.”
Mark E Smith
🎯
savage!
... or a scientist, if you dare to doubt the "established science"...
Yes it was wrong but a cheap price for your kids to pay to learn a valuable life lesson most refuse to. They paid the lesser price by far.
Gongratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jippeeejaaaajeeeee!!!
Just like the care workers, and what they tried to do to NHS staff. It's shocking and even worse when children are the victims.
it looks more and more the government of us has to be locked up for the criminally insane. the nuthouse. Under high security.
Yup
This certainly makes me wonder what data they have that they haven't released.
The discontinuation of the vax in pregnant women makes me wonder the same.
Spot on!
I don't think the jab has been discontinued for pregant women. There is some confusion, but so far as I know it's still recommended.
In a document entitled: "Public Assessment Report
Authorisation for Temporary Supply COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2
(BNT162b2 RNA) concentrate for solution for injection" from the UKs MHRA, the recommendation is for pregnant women to not get it due to lack of safety data.
These are both current official advice. I don't agree with it, but that's beside the point.
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/pregnancy-breastfeeding-fertility-and-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination/
"It's strongly recommended that you get vaccinated against coronavirus (COVID-19) if you're pregnant or breastfeeding."
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/no-change-to-mhra-advice-on-the-safety-and-effectiveness-of-covid-19-vaccines-for-those-who-are-pregnant-or-breastfeeding
"No change to MHRA advice on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines for those who are pregnant or breastfeeding
"Our advice remains that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective during pregnancy and breastfeeding"
Thank you, it seems you are right. It appears one of the relevant public health sites left up old information and never updated it to reflect the later recommendation. This was discovered and was assumed to be one of these quiet changes, similar to this one about younger kids. But apparently not? That's very disappointing.
My guess is it’s probably a lot scarier than we know.
I agree
Me too
I have a feeling it's going to get a lot worse as more information comes out.....the information they didn't want to reveal until EVERYONE WAS DEAD!
You don't trust Harrari? Such A Father Knows Best type
Heaven forbid!😬
It don't get creepier. My wife will find me slumped over, dead of massive coronary... Watching a vid of him
That is funny!!
Check is in mail, Mig
I don't understand your answer but I really like to know what you ment!
I was kidding. You said that my comment was funny. I was pretending to say I bribed you for it. Being silly
The FDA in the USA was forced by a court order to release the study data of the mRNA vaccine trials. It is damming to say the least and the pharma companies are already being hit with criminal malfeasance charges. They thought they were going to push off the studies being released for 75 years. It didn’t work out that way so now all these governments around the world will have to answer for blindly following LIES.
Could it be they actually read the Pfizer’s documents?
https://behindthefdacurtain.substack.com/p/pfizer-fda-cdc-hid-proven-harms-to?r=pbrrq&utm_medium=ios
Nobody anywhere read the documents - They were too busy counting their multi million $$ fee money!
And then the U.S. Govt paid pfizer & moderna $55 billion for their poisons! Isn't that about the same as they donated to Ukraine? Amazing - for a country that's SO broke... Ah well, they can always keep printing more. What inflation?
What data?
Data is being collected as we speak, these shots are experimental released under “Emergency Authorization “. Funny, you tell someone to take extra vitamin D or C and they act like it’s rat poison, but will line up and inject some unknown crap in their arm no questions asked…I know of two couples who flew back to Michigan from Florida to get these shots.
I wonder how Biden is gonna skate around the UK data...once he gets to hear from it maybe in many months in a few lucid moments of his maybe...his immidiate repsonse will be TRUMP..that TRUMP he made me do this!!
Great news, thanks! Hopefully the tip of the iceberg as these criminal elements discover the extent of their deeds. Too little, too late.
Good news from the Netherlands tonight: one day after a prominent news article opining the lack of lockdown, curfew and mandatory vaccination measures in our new permanent corona law (why we even need it is beyond me), I enjoyed a very large face to face event with all the parents of new middle schoolers, the selection of which was quite fraught last year in the throes of corona madness. Anyway, bumping into old contacts from across town, one parent who vaxxed herself and her child under duress said to me: so much of what they told us is lies. We cannot maintain the farce for one moment longer. I did a happy dance inside! Even if seeing just one of my posts was a small part of her feeling comfortable enough to say that, I can pat myself on the back. And I know I have an ally if they try to pull this shit for another winter. Well, as long as she has found her backbone for real this time.
Now ask her about Ukraine.
One step at a time insteap of no steps for 2,5 years is massive improvement for blind-sheep-people! I actually started to think it might be impossible.
When people like them have to change their minds, it is not easy, I guess, and the person in casu problaby needs like another 2,5 years for being able to see to what the Ukraine 'war' is really about;-))
right? that's a step too far for so many people...
the rest of us are questioning everything nowadays, as we should be.
Yes it is! And of course you don't want to fight over it on your childrens school, because you want to be a good example to them, and or you have far better things to do etc
Given how compliant people are these days receiving a "not recommended" label from the government works as if it was banned. Basically the government is telling doctors they are on their own from now on, which is a powerful deterrent as what doctors want most in life is to avoid liability.
Yes, being closer is what I was reacting to. But for them to backtrack this much is impressive for a start.
Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation document is labelled as "guidance".
And so be it!
Next question -- what makes it appropriate for someone 12 years and one second old to get the shot, when not the moment prior? Is there some special biological process that makes the mRNA "safe and effective" at age 12?
My thoughts exactly, why is it good for a 13yr old? Or a 20yr old? Etc….this concept reminds me of the “minimum wage” issue here in the states and if $15 is enough well why not $20….frustrations that there is no answer
or a 51 year old
Anyone with DNA needs to avoid these toxic substances and a lot more.
Yes
And also 'anything'...
As a matter of fact...if anything breathing water and drinking oxygen would ask my advice, I wouldn't recommend the toxines either
And yes
Or $2.15 which I earned as a tipped employee in 1981 and is still in effect with little change in several states at least until recently. It's all fuckery. All of it.
ScIeNcE!¡!
Exactly! The science changed because the science is settled because science is real and men can get pregnant
By women?
Define “women”/“woman”.
Cis gender X/X : )
No sarcasm button available = fail.
X/X cis it is ;)
I just love the one where they say that sex/gender was something pushed on good and pure tribes of completely noble savages by colonists. That shit makes me LOL.
To me it appears like it’s a game to them. Ignore the data, try to force the vaccine, push it to the point where it’s obvious that people have drawn the line… then backtrack after you’ve gotten everyone vaccinated who’s going to take it and say “Oh look, the science has changed! Don’t take it! We’re here to keep you safe!”
It’s a pattern that’s playing out in a lot of countries….
Yes, a planetary game of chicken.
The zigzag is straight out of the Marxist playbook:
https://robkhenderson.substack.com/p/let-a-hundred-flowers-bloom
Many say Marxist, many Nazi-style. But tyranny is after all tyranny.
Well it helps to define the enemy. And the enemy ain’t Nazis…. It’s Bolshevism. Define Bolshevism and you see the same playbook being used.,,
Deceivers gotta deceive. And yes it's a fun game to them.
Welp. Working their way up I hope... 12-17 have worse adverse events due to an arbitrarily higher dosage
I also hope so
Indeed!!!!
Saw your attempt to establish a dialogue with AB on his Substack re: Ivermectin. Thank you for your class and humility. I hope at some point the two of you will have a discussion. We need more open-minded dialog like this.
Echoing you comment as I just caught that too! Classy indeed. Alex ain’t all bad either. We all have our blind spots.
I am going to sound harsh and I do agree that we all have blind spots or maybe short sighted BUT he has a huge following. He has a responsibility . When called on it he ignored it, just like a child. I like at his stuff but that’s about it. I completely understand that other people have completely different opinions. I respect that. I may change my mind. I think we just had a substack on being open minded.
I consider this a fair criticism.
Dr Linda (btw, my pronoun this week is JIM THORPE)
You don't sound harsh enuf. Take it up 2.5 notches
Here's my reality this week:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-21mwr2zfKE
It seems clear in hindsight that Alex Berenson is part controlled opposition and part grifter.
How so?
Igor likes all my posts... So off the charts.
I directly anathematize Berenson on one issue and he doesn't respond to anything (his belief abortion is bad, but what are we going to do? He could be a bullshit traitor theology teacher at bullshit Georgetown)
I don't
He doesn’t listen about IVM.
Berenson is a Bi-polar.
And an arrogant ass.
Which is why the New York Times hired him.
New Yorkers are the best. I'm smarter than berenson, by far.
Go Mets. Go Knicks. Piss on Roger Clements and Yanks
The new Yorkers who pissed on deblasio, only
LOL
I would say the goal would be to have the discussion. It would be worthwhile even without changing AB's mind.
I've been doing some background reading on ivermectin. Today's curious find: In the 2017 edition of the "Physician's Desk Reference," which (I thought) was a prime medical guide, I can find almost no mention of ivermectin. I found* one product, a topical creme for rosacea. I find this rather odd, since we are talking a drug that has been in worldwide use for nearly half a century, millions of users per year. Now granted, tropical parasitic disease is quite rare in the US, but still, thousands of Rx are written for this drug yearly. Hardly discussed in the bible of drugs? Very odd!
*I don't discount the chance I've overlooked something. Nevertheless, I've been able to find other drugs I was interested in.
Well the world outside the us is huge!!!!! In most African countries it’s as common as aspirine...Untill the plandemic was rolled out.
Weirdly enough..
The tide may be turning. Clearly
not safe, undeniably not effective.
so liz truss is now pivoting to freezing the remaining uk kids to death this winter instead?
usa will have schools, jobs and universities mandating a bivalent jab based on nih accepting an inference based on 8 mice who all failed the challenge while having a [variable] display of antibodies.....
You made it sound SO stupid! And 100% spot on
it's also interesting to learn that Paul Offit's objection to recommending the bivalent boosters was that the only evidence for efficacy is that these boosters merely increase antibody levels by a factor of 1.5 to 1.7. that's all we know about them.
and (this is the interesting part), we already know from earlier studies back in December 2020 on the original Moderna and Pfizer vaccines that *even if you DOUBLE the quantity of circulating antibodies, it DOES NOT RESULT IN BETTER CLINICAL OUTCOMES*.
Antibodies are the new electrolytes from Idiocracy
ha. yeah.
and I guess that means that the FDA and CDC are acting like idiots now.
Depends on when you look.
😭🤣
Offit raising any objection at all to the new booster is a very curious about-face. For him to badmouth the miracle potions should be as startling as it would be if the madam of a house of ill repute were to author an op-ed denouncing fornication. Offit is a total vaccine whore, going back decades with Fauci and a frequent face in the media. His name appears at least 62 times in the e-book version of RFK Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci." My speculation: Offit knows the game is up and is trying to cover his ass as best he can.
I also find this really startling. I developed what I would have to call a hatred of Offitt when I was pregnant with my first and did a really deep dive into vaccine stuff. He is not a good guy. And he doesn't care if the vaccine isn't effective -- he might make that claim, but he is worried about far bigger issues than that, like Nuremberg trials.
Unfortunately I doubt there will be any trials for any of these evil bastards!
Exactly. Offit cares about Offit
He's an odd case. He's historically been pro-vaxx, but yet, apparently does sometimes press the brakes. I believe he was also against the recommendation for boosters earlier this year (or late last year) because there again, it didn't make sense to him to just perpetually keep antibodies high given the the new omicron reality: we're all gonna get it.
More interestingly, and this may have been political, but back in the Dubya administration when the anthrax scare happened, there was a proposal to start vaccinating large numbers of people against smallpox out of fear that smallpox bioterrorism might occur somehow. And Offit opposed this publicly because the risks of the smallpox vaccine were too high! (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Offit#Smallpox_vaccine)
Years ago I took my oldest to a normie pediatrician for her 4 month appointment. She had never been vaccinated and the pediatrician and I were discussing a select/delay vaccination schedule
Even the normie ped was like “yeah that one pretty much useless” re: rota vax
Offit is the patent holder of a rotavirus vaccine. So he occasionally puts up a little bit of resistance but he is firmly entrenched
Edit: years later my children have received 0 vaccines
Mine too. They're young adults now. Some of my friends who didn't vax ran into a lot of friction with doctors but I must have come across as intimidating AF (I think I did actually) because I normally met with essentially no resistance. I hope you have had an okay time of it.
Thanks! I found a pediatrician here in DFW that accepts parents that don’t vaccinate and it’s pretty chill it’s just “are you vaccinating today” and I say “no” and that’s it. But honestly I don’t understand people who say “I luuuurve our ped!” Because I just want someone whose presence I can tolerate for 5 min every other year? But maybe I’d feel different if I had sick children. Congrats on your unvaxxed kiddos my oldest is not quit 4 but I’ve been having more conversations with her about getting jabbed: some of her friends are unvaccinated but some of her friends have normie parents who jab. And we talk about my husband’s old job that told him to put a needle in his arm and he said NO. Even today she was asking me if his new job told him to put a needle in his arm 😂 (the answer fortunately is no)
Anyway do you have any advice for how to talk to unvaccinated kiddos about vaccination?
Offit is a hack
i do not know much i am a management scientist who did product acceptance tests on new stuff before fielding.
that said the inferences from nih in all this display a dangerous liberty toward ignoring consumer and producer risk.
well, the producer risk was set at zero, while consumer risk of passing a false inference is way higher than would be accepted if the producer could be sued
I don't understand the language of consumer risk and producer risk. But I think you have an interesting way to analyze what's going on with the vaccines.
When you say that the producer risk was set at zero, does that mean that we assumed the producer would make no mistakes?
consumer risk is the risk of accepting the hypothesis, in vaccine case that it "works" when the vaccine really does not work (or is safe). Short accepting a false statement.
producer risk is the risk of rejecting the hypothesis that is things is safe or works, when the thing actually is safe or works. shorter rejecting a true statement.
The ph 3 tests were such as to have a very low chance of rejecting the vaccines whether safe or not.
same issue are seen in why the f-35 fighter has not passed operational test more than 20 years in development and production!
too many preliminary acceptances were false so the plane cannot pass real tests.
He's adverse to being knocked offit if/when justice comes to call.
Yes, while that's a sobering problem for those who feel compelled to take the jab, I still made sport of the new booster in one of my cliques, composed entirely of geezers and no doubt most dosed to the hilt. I said "Doesn't it reflect well on our medical system that the new booster has been tested for safety in eight mice?" 🤡
What did they say? Anything, or complete silence?
That's just a conspiracy theory you trans hater
I find it curious they aren't making an exception for kids who already got the first dose, as was done in Denmark's discontinuation of the vax for children. Does it suggest urgency to end this program?
I would think so, yes. There's an argument that, for kids, the second dose adds only a small amount of Covid 19 resistance, but a large amount of heart inflammation risk -- much more than the first dose did. So, a kid who's been jabbed once is better off avoiding the risk of the second shot.
Spot on. Every jab increases the chance of things going really bad, really quick. They have the proper data and even in the "massaged" one, it was clear that there was correlation between the number of jabs and the damage done (probably because it is cumulative).
interesting. maybe the landscape is changing on this. the public discussion of this has gotten to a point where even a pro-vaxx doctor like Paul Offit thinks that the benefit of a third dose to a young male does not outweigh the risks: https://youtu.be/iJ2W-1cKEtk?t=863
Offit's main role is pimping the pediatric vax schedule, period end of story. He's smart enough to know these Covid jabs aren't vaxxes in the traditional sense, are ineffective, and have a terrible safety profile. He's concerned the stink from the Covid shots will taint the pediatric vax schedule in general. He's right to be concerned as it's happening before our eyes.
Unlike defenseless infants and toddlers, adults can describe side effects, demonstrate clear neurologic and physical deterioration, refuse subsequent injections, and file VAERS reports. Healthy adults also aren't supposed to suddenly drop dead unlike infants where this had been hideously normalized as SIDs. The Covid shots are waking people up and making them question just what have we been doing to our kids all this time.
Offit's main concern is Offit, pretty much everything he does needs to be viewed in that light. A dirtbag doesn't change his stripes after 15 years.
Paul is a political animal and he smelled sometime ago the stench from this horror. His focus is his own survival so his is going along with the flow.
I don't know. I mean, I watched that whole interview on YouTube which just came out last month. He's still ok with children getting the Covid jabs. He still argues that children are at risk of serious disease and even death from Covid 19, even if it's just caused by omicron. He does not seem to argue against childhood jabs.
I don't know how he's doing that risk/benefit calculation. He must still believe that the only downside is a very, very low risk of transient heart inflammation.
No question about it. The filth behind this horror have probably been given a very blunt legal advice that suggests that criminal charges are likely - as they should be. Given the amount of money they made from this scam, only the prospect of serious prison time would motivate these lowlifes to change course quickly.
It’s a start. Thanks for the info.....
Justin Bieber just cancelled the rest of his world tour for physical and mental reasons relating to his previous Ramsay Hunt Syndrome.
Wish he would go rogue and speak out.
I'm pretty sure his soul was sold long ago, so no chance
Such lack of self respect to just freaking take it.
I'd be screaming. Hey, on other shit I have. Got 3day suspension for screaming at boss.
Besides cops, athletes who gets3day suspension!
I said good, cuz I'm getting new job.
He's a bitch for Taking Their Attempted Murder of him
He never struck me as the critical thinker type and it looks like he will regret that set of jabs for the rest of his life.
The music industry in Nashville at least was very affected by the government/corporate/institutional party line. Lots of people you might expect to protest did not. Of course Nashville is run by Democrats an Vanderbilt.
I thought Van den Bossche or and Malone Kory and or one of those orther fantastic brave doctors predicted this immedeately after the vaxdamage was done to Bieber (and his wife, what a horror those people went thru..)
Few weeks ago they said Bieber was cured and would start his shows soon.
At that moment I thought: ' hey, that is the first time Malone ea weren't right....'
It wasn't. Again...
I wonder if he has myocarditis.
I truly hope not. 20% mortality after 5 years and it only gets worse after that.
Now I am wondering this too..
I hope that Gert is wrong - he predicted a more deadly version of the Omicron Covid that would be affecting the lungs (like the original strain) of the jabbed ones back in May. The next month or will be telling but so far so good.
He is probably not wrong.
It has been proven that even the original strain wasn't by far as deadly as they told us, especially not on its own, I mean without other (severe!) illnesses.
So it was not a very killing or deadly virus, and 'deadlier' can still mean 'not very deadly' to most (or all?) of us
I know that it would be something that could be managed by us unvaxed deplorables. However, just about all the people I know around have taken at two jabs and Gert's argument is that they would be the ones paying a high price. Even if 2-3% of the vaxed get into serious strife would change world completely. We would be looking at home detention China style for years so pray that Gert is wrong.
And even the sheep know by now staying at home doesn't work. Chinese sheep are different from our sheep. They have very cruel shepards, like ours, but in a totally different way: chinese sheep were and are much much longer used to torture and being forced to wathever their shepherds want even and they themselves didn't.
That is not compareble to our sheep, in the first place because -they think -they volonteered. And they did because they were frightened to death.
Now they like the mental (!) rewards for getting jabbed.
Our sheep are sheep if they think there is something to earn. And don't think they earn something by locking themselves up, and in fact look extremely stupid when doing so while being jabbed like 4 times probably ironically for regaining their freedom too!
Agreed.
When you think like that, I completely understand.
But the best predictions you can do is in the first place no prediction at all and if you really insist on prediction, the by far most reliable way is to learn from history.
I did and with that -hopefully correct-knowledge, I answered you.
I really hope you take my point of view under serious consideration, because the negative you see things is not good for you, nor your health. It is a waste of good energy you need really badly to support your jabbed friends as well
Oh, no worries I got your point. I am just hoping for a better future that's all. If it does not turn out that way, it is what it is - life goes on.
What a waste! I’m not a fan girl my feelings toward him are more maternal but what a waste
I can sing better. Send me a list of songs you want.
Negro Spiritual and Clancy brothers my forte
Free Bird?
I'm gonna have to start drinking heavy again. Then I kill it, but everyone walks awsy?
Operas?
Horrific
I was just joking, I had no intention to scare you;-))
No, I wasn't at all. Kidding.
I sing horrible. I try to laugh...
Considering what happened to him and his wife, I would not want to be in their shoes. Yes, he has money to burn but I think that he would give it all to get back his health. I wonder if he is finally getting some sound medical advice. Both him and his wife are in their 20's and to have those health problems at that age, I would not wish that on anyone.
They both spruiked the jab, and by their actions, I am sure convinced many innocent young folk to have the inoculation and thereby leave themselves at risk of whatever AEs are going to happen.
Why would you have any sympathy for them?
Hi Igor- Denmark banned the damn things (damned the banned things?) too.....
Yeah, I know, it is awesome
I want to have word fun too!
Mark hosted the band, The Damned Things, in his den.
It is amazing how that dumbass sheep you mentioned in you article appears to be upset she cannot vaccinate her child but she does not question why. I guess the only way to stop some people jumping off a cliff is to physically stop them as there is no way to reason with them or explain the health benefits of NOT jumping off a cliff.
Jumping off a cliff to your death is 100% effective against Covid. Soon to be mandatory.
Seriously, why would you give them ideas? These people are NUTS enough to go for it.
If the lemmings won't run off the cliff, then they'll just be pushed.
Great analogy
That is correct indeed
Please do not insult the sheep - they are useful, productive animals (milk, cheese, wool).
It is not amazing at all - they are way dumber than you can possibly imagine and as you can see, they are happy to provide constant proof of their idiocy.
The fact this 'withdrawal is being done more or less under the radar ( of wider public dissemination) shows the enormity of the scandal of these MRNA jabs and the damage they have already done to the young ( and across other age ranges). Tip toeing back from the wilful criminal push to get these jabs in to ever younger children. Too late....and their footsteps are being doggedly followed now all across the world.
I could be wrong but I thought that the UK was mostly Astra-Zeneca which was adeno-virus (like the JJ jab). It is staggering to see how ALL types of jabs have not only failed completely but also had horrible side effects. Here is OZ, they used both the MRNA & Astra-Zeneca jabs but the results have been awful especially for the MRNA ones.
As a GP I only gave jabs for a few weeks before realising that there was no way any of my patients could give me informed consent. There was never the information available for them to base consent on. I always made this clear.
Sure, they filled out a consent form, but that wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.
I stopped giving any jabs and have never given any to children under 18.
I had a complaint made against me by a father wanting to stab his 14 year old son because I pointed out that the risk from the jab was much higher than from Covid itself. He said I had frightened the lad. I just wish I had scared him a bit more so he had refused.
Madness, and Oz remains the same. I am still not allowed free speech under pain of suspension to say anything counter to the government narrative , although there are a few sprouts of reason starting to show with organisations like the Australian Medical Professionals Association prepared to stand up to the lies put about by the authorities.
Sir or Madam, you are a person with utmost integrity and you are not alone. May I recommend this post to you:
https://expose-news.com/2022/02/11/breaking-the-silence-about-covid/
As an Australian, thank you so much for resisting. Good luck.
The Pfizer jabs have been the predominant 'treatment' although AZ were used initially and many have had AZ. Now they are 'under a cloud' because of the clots in the heart and around the body. 'They' (Pfizer, AZ ),and govt health bodies in many countries, knew the limitations of said jabs (and harms they would go on to cause) but didn't inform the (many) mandated recipients nor those forced fed fear to get them willingly rolling up sleeves. All the best to you and OZ as weeks go on.
To me that the fact that they KNEW from the start shows not incompetence but clear criminal intent. Hence the backtracking now when it is becoming more and more obvious that these shots are causing massive damage. They know what they have done and that they have been caught despite the biggest psy-op in the history of the world.
Pfizer and Moderna plus Moderna booster ....