"Over 85% of cases in the UK are among the vaccinated". This is a tricky stat to unwind. For example, suppose the vax was a placebo and did nothing - if 85% of the country was vaxxed then you'd expect 85% of cases to be among the vaccinated. The real data we need is "amongst those who were vaxxed, what % got sick" vs "amongst those who w…
"Over 85% of cases in the UK are among the vaccinated". This is a tricky stat to unwind. For example, suppose the vax was a placebo and did nothing - if 85% of the country was vaxxed then you'd expect 85% of cases to be among the vaccinated. The real data we need is "amongst those who were vaxxed, what % got sick" vs "amongst those who were not vaxxed, what % got sick". I wonder if this info can be extracted from that data above.
"Over 85% of cases in the UK are among the vaccinated". This is a tricky stat to unwind. For example, suppose the vax was a placebo and did nothing - if 85% of the country was vaxxed then you'd expect 85% of cases to be among the vaccinated. The real data we need is "amongst those who were vaxxed, what % got sick" vs "amongst those who were not vaxxed, what % got sick". I wonder if this info can be extracted from that data above.
This is EXACTLY what my report discusses! The case rates in vaxxed vs case rates in UNvaxxed