Also in moderna study, after that high hospitalization ratio-unrelated might be related after all, maybe kid was agitated with sore throat caused by its vaids induced condition and shove something in the throat in toddler-attempt of relief, you never know! Same goes with egg allergy, was it new or old, if old is it always so intense to take kid to hospital? We will never know bc study data is not shared transparently!
If HMOs cared, they should be able to easily parse their internal data for children "vaccinated" versus left "unvaccinated" or "unknown" in their database, and while not an RCT (and thus somewhat confounded), it should paint a strong picture one way or the other. Also, for the 6 month-4 year cohort, I'm guessing no one was vaccinated out of network, so there should be good data.
Sep 17, 2023·edited Sep 17, 2023Liked by Igor Chudov
"they trusted the wrong people"
I am sorry but these are the same people, mostly, who were trying to coerce or force a shot on others. The people I am sympathetic to are the people who had to jab for a job, kid going to school, etc. These people were willing, and with their kids, to drink the Kool-Aid. The next group to be sympathtic are the ones to reconize the danger after they got it and refuse any more boosters (which is probably the majority of the country now).
Does Pharma or any FDA in any country ever compare apples to apples in studies or do they always adjust the parameters to make things look rosy, safe and effective?
Is this deception done purposely or is it the standard they always use?
What I found interesting, was "We didn't test it." They didn't test it before they injected an experimental drug into adults and children. All of this for a disease that didn't effect children/teenagers/and adults under the age of 45.
In my opinion, the fact that they didn't run extensive tests before injecting people violates the Nuremburg code, and all these pharma corps, Drug agencies, and governments should be tried for violating that code.
Just because you have a mystery bug doesn't mean that you rush to inject the world.
You don't lock down whole societies, while letting political groups protest.
You quarantine the sick and let those not sick go about their lives.
You do not lock them down for two years, like prisoners.
Big, but I do think it's strategically unwise to call it "VAIDS", as it makes it sound like the vaccine is causing the specific disease AIDS, which the evil overlords with their odious "fact checks," can dismiss as untrue, which would be technically true even though the experimental gene therapy mislabeled a vax is compromising children's immune systems which is vile and evil. We have to be scrupulously careful and precise with our language if we want to defeat these demons in human form. Shoddy wording for clicks isn't helpful.
Great article. Don’t wait to learn about fenbendazole for cancer. In Remission, In Danger. Since traditional chemotherapy can spawn cancer stem cells it is especially important to self-treat with fenbendazole, the only substance that appears to safely, inexpensively and effectively eradicate cancer stem cells. Cancer stem cells are the cells that form intractable distant tumors that result from chemotherapy. So, those in remission after traditional chemo are in a critical period where CSCs may develop and be fatal Learn more https://fenbendazole.substack.com/p/cancer-stem-cells-and-fenbendazole
Most of these studies are now merely an exercise of word twisting, omissions, etc. Finding any medical benefit from the injection of bioweapons in the majority of the world population is like trying to find nutrition in a cesspool. Where are the studies proclaiming an improvement in global health, lengthening of life span and rise of reproduction since the introduction of the "vaccines"? After all, we have been spared the ill affects of the wet market bat virus. Maybe they can be found in the fiction section of your local library, assuming there is room with the addition of all the new kiddy porn.
I've read their "BCG" study, and investigated age, a little.
The subjects in the BCG study were neonates, in the first days of their life. The HepB vaccine was co-administered in that time frame. Thus the authors said "The results of our study should be interpreted as BCG vaccination and hepatitis B vaccination, compared with hepatitis B vaccination alone." I'd expect this would affect the quality of comparisons, assuming HepB alone would also impact the cytokines.
(I suppose it would've been *unethical* to deny the infants the HepB shot, since it was recommended. ;) [NB - This shot had been put on the schedule in time for my third child. I turned down the offer on advice from other mothers that it upset their babies.])
Eight of the 51 participants in this covid-19 pfizer vax trial got their 2nd vax as part of their 'usual vax program' (? the flu shot?) so this may have influenced some results too. The participants were enrolled in the BCG(+HepB) study in 2014-2015, as neonates, so when the covid-19 vax trial was conducted in 2022 they would've been ~7 or 8.
There is a lot of immune system maturation that goes on between neonate and age 7 (for example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554489/). One would expect to see differences in the absolute values of the cytokine responses 7-8 years later. I don't know how age would impact vax-induced reductions.
It's informative to look at the changes over 6 months, although data was only collected on 8 children.
Fascinating that the researchers insisted it was unethical to have a control group, while many also often argued that human challenge trials were unethical and so none were conducted before the rollout—yet the vaccine rollouts first targeted frontline health care workers (regularly exposed to infected patients), the elderly (whose participation in the trials was very limited), the immuno-compromised and pregnant (not included in the trials at all), then they immediately unblinded the control group, thus eliminating it.
Though you're probably right that the unidentified object in the lungs is not related, I must say that amyloid clots have been found in the airways of a few of the vaccinated. This is not strictly a circulatory phenomenon.
Also in moderna study, after that high hospitalization ratio-unrelated might be related after all, maybe kid was agitated with sore throat caused by its vaids induced condition and shove something in the throat in toddler-attempt of relief, you never know! Same goes with egg allergy, was it new or old, if old is it always so intense to take kid to hospital? We will never know bc study data is not shared transparently!
If HMOs cared, they should be able to easily parse their internal data for children "vaccinated" versus left "unvaccinated" or "unknown" in their database, and while not an RCT (and thus somewhat confounded), it should paint a strong picture one way or the other. Also, for the 6 month-4 year cohort, I'm guessing no one was vaccinated out of network, so there should be good data.
"they trusted the wrong people"
I am sorry but these are the same people, mostly, who were trying to coerce or force a shot on others. The people I am sympathetic to are the people who had to jab for a job, kid going to school, etc. These people were willing, and with their kids, to drink the Kool-Aid. The next group to be sympathtic are the ones to reconize the danger after they got it and refuse any more boosters (which is probably the majority of the country now).
Does Pharma or any FDA in any country ever compare apples to apples in studies or do they always adjust the parameters to make things look rosy, safe and effective?
Is this deception done purposely or is it the standard they always use?
What I found interesting, was "We didn't test it." They didn't test it before they injected an experimental drug into adults and children. All of this for a disease that didn't effect children/teenagers/and adults under the age of 45.
In my opinion, the fact that they didn't run extensive tests before injecting people violates the Nuremburg code, and all these pharma corps, Drug agencies, and governments should be tried for violating that code.
Just because you have a mystery bug doesn't mean that you rush to inject the world.
You don't lock down whole societies, while letting political groups protest.
You quarantine the sick and let those not sick go about their lives.
You do not lock them down for two years, like prisoners.
That also violated basic human rights.
Big, but I do think it's strategically unwise to call it "VAIDS", as it makes it sound like the vaccine is causing the specific disease AIDS, which the evil overlords with their odious "fact checks," can dismiss as untrue, which would be technically true even though the experimental gene therapy mislabeled a vax is compromising children's immune systems which is vile and evil. We have to be scrupulously careful and precise with our language if we want to defeat these demons in human form. Shoddy wording for clicks isn't helpful.
Great article. Don’t wait to learn about fenbendazole for cancer. In Remission, In Danger. Since traditional chemotherapy can spawn cancer stem cells it is especially important to self-treat with fenbendazole, the only substance that appears to safely, inexpensively and effectively eradicate cancer stem cells. Cancer stem cells are the cells that form intractable distant tumors that result from chemotherapy. So, those in remission after traditional chemo are in a critical period where CSCs may develop and be fatal Learn more https://fenbendazole.substack.com/p/cancer-stem-cells-and-fenbendazole
We are still not seeing excess death yet though. Once it kicks in, there will be a whole lot less truth deniers to censor us!
HA! What BAD things do NOT happen after taking Fauci's Ouchies? HORRIFIC!
And, we are asked to SURVIVE in this now GENOCIDAL KILLING OF THE WILLING?
Little kids themselves DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE! The worst part of this is that the
5G tech in the jabs and 5G towers may be bio-weapons as reported by researcher
Karen Kingston. The towers can be charged with massive radiation killing the
jabbed (and smart phone users?) instantly! A phone test by FEMA happens on
October 4, 2023 at 2:20 p.m. EST. IT'S A GREAT TIME NOT TO BE ON A 5G PHONE!
I won't be because I only (and will always have) only a land line! I post publicly and
freely on MeWe. Holistic Healing: EarthClinic.com. SURVIVE THEIR EVIL PLANS!
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH'S SAINTS!
Anybody´s called me? I´m V, V for Vendetta, a true commie!
https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/re-inventing-vendetta
Amnesty and forgiveness I will happily grant to them - dangling from the trees!
Most of these studies are now merely an exercise of word twisting, omissions, etc. Finding any medical benefit from the injection of bioweapons in the majority of the world population is like trying to find nutrition in a cesspool. Where are the studies proclaiming an improvement in global health, lengthening of life span and rise of reproduction since the introduction of the "vaccines"? After all, we have been spared the ill affects of the wet market bat virus. Maybe they can be found in the fiction section of your local library, assuming there is room with the addition of all the new kiddy porn.
I've read their "BCG" study, and investigated age, a little.
The subjects in the BCG study were neonates, in the first days of their life. The HepB vaccine was co-administered in that time frame. Thus the authors said "The results of our study should be interpreted as BCG vaccination and hepatitis B vaccination, compared with hepatitis B vaccination alone." I'd expect this would affect the quality of comparisons, assuming HepB alone would also impact the cytokines.
(I suppose it would've been *unethical* to deny the infants the HepB shot, since it was recommended. ;) [NB - This shot had been put on the schedule in time for my third child. I turned down the offer on advice from other mothers that it upset their babies.])
Eight of the 51 participants in this covid-19 pfizer vax trial got their 2nd vax as part of their 'usual vax program' (? the flu shot?) so this may have influenced some results too. The participants were enrolled in the BCG(+HepB) study in 2014-2015, as neonates, so when the covid-19 vax trial was conducted in 2022 they would've been ~7 or 8.
There is a lot of immune system maturation that goes on between neonate and age 7 (for example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5554489/). One would expect to see differences in the absolute values of the cytokine responses 7-8 years later. I don't know how age would impact vax-induced reductions.
It's informative to look at the changes over 6 months, although data was only collected on 8 children.
A translation of the statement the three authors of the Frontiers' study made: We got a call and our funding was threatened.
Fascinating that the researchers insisted it was unethical to have a control group, while many also often argued that human challenge trials were unethical and so none were conducted before the rollout—yet the vaccine rollouts first targeted frontline health care workers (regularly exposed to infected patients), the elderly (whose participation in the trials was very limited), the immuno-compromised and pregnant (not included in the trials at all), then they immediately unblinded the control group, thus eliminating it.
Though you're probably right that the unidentified object in the lungs is not related, I must say that amyloid clots have been found in the airways of a few of the vaccinated. This is not strictly a circulatory phenomenon.