The Moderna COVID‑19 vaccine, sold under the brand name Spikevax, is a COVID-19 vaccine developed by American company Moderna, the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). Chinese scientists put the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus online on Jan. 11. Over the next two days, the NIH and Moderna used it to plot out a vaccine.
Afeyan remembers getting a key call about the development of the Covid-19 vaccine. “January 21st, my daughter’s birthday.... I got a call from Davos [during The World Economic Forum] from the CEO of Moderna,” he says. Bancel had been approached by a number of public health groups at the conference “urging” him to work on a vaccine. We literally decided overnight...to try and do this,” Afeyan said at MIT. Moderna delivered the first doses of its Covid-19 vaccine to the NIH for testing on Feb. 24, 2020, and “the first Moderna shot went into a volunteer’s arm in Seattle on March 16, 2020,” according to Afeyan.
So then whose idea was it to do the cancer component? NIH? NIAD? BARDA? Moderna on it's lonesome?
Nobody knows who did it. As I explained to two questioners, this sequence does not establish causality.
Let's say that someone robs a bank and has a shirt with "STEGIEL" on it. It does not mean that it was you (your username). It is just a piece of text. It is not the time to arrive at firm conclusions.
Ok. Fair. Only don't know. Following bread crumbs then brought me to this puff piece.
Moderna co-founder Noubar Afeyan understands the hesitation to get a new vaccine. “The vaccines came out in such a [short] timeframe that people assumed automatically, it can’t possibly be safe,” Afeyan said during a talk at a Solve at Massachusetts Institute of Technology event in May.
“In fact, many, many people were on television espousing the view that — experts for that matter — that if it’s done in less than five years, it’s got to be unsafe, all of which is untrue.
And "What people might not understand is that extensive research was being done on mRNA technology and other mRNA vaccines for years. That decade plus of experience and the innovation of mRNA technology itself is what allowed Moderna to produce its Covid mRNA vaccine so quickly as the pandemic struck. And it could also change the future of medicine."
What a laugh... Moderna developed 7 different mRNA products over 10 years of research, and NOT ONE was safe enough to gain approval from the FDA. Somehow, though, this blitzkrieg of effort gave us a functioning, safe, human-ready "Vaccine" -- for a COMPLETELY UNKNOWN illness -- in only four weeks. Such things are achieved only in a world with flying pigs.
The analogy makes sense. But someone knows, just not us. We know the shirt was manufactured by someone as opposed to something that occurred naturally and somehow made its way on to the robber by dumb luck.
Friendly reminder that Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel deleted his Twitter account recently.
From Heavy:
Of course, it’s important to confirm that a username actually belongs to the person people claim it does. Heavy first was able to confirm this by tracking down a post by Moderna on Twitter, which has Twitter’s blue checkmark verification. In this post from November 2021, (Moderna's) Twitter tagged Bancel’s Twitter account and wrote, “Congratulations to our CEO, @sbancel, for being awarded the Strategist Prize 2020 by @LesEchos for leading Moderna’s #COVID19 vaccine strategy, deemed as the most relevant industrial strategy of the past year.”
What if the vaccine contains not just the virus, but is effectively an IED of the worst things we're aware. When I heard that special conditions had to be arranged, within the human biology, to deploy the MRNA into the cell to provide the "3d printer" blueprint to the cell for Spike -- I knew something was going on. Almost like a magician distracting the crowd (Immune System) while his hands (Spike and its download) do the trick.
I've had a working theory that herd immune is actually significantly more hyper active than we are aware. I think one of the most critical things to consider is the meaning of words has been changed and distorted over time. There is conversation that herd immunity takes time to build, etc.. but what if herd immunity was gainable within a much quicker time frame.
Social distancing, never understood this from the get go. Unless you had prior knowledge that herd immunity was actually spread by a duration of time. Let's say 15 minutes -- since some math went out early that X minutes beside a person could spread the virus.
What if herd immunity is much, much more powerful than we are aware?
We know people in poor health and sanitary conditions, living close together, can spread disease and so forth. What do people in great health and clean (but not sterile) conditions for each other? Is the biological impact merely the potatoes and the spiritual/psychological/metaphysical self the meat?
Just like early Covid with a total lack of advice on food, sunlight, exercise, etc.. immediate resignation that nothing could be done until a vaccine could be developed.
What was interesting early on was the desire to contain the manufacturing process. What if Moderna's "Vaccine" made it into the shot, but was part of a pipe bomb of other things?
Studying insurgency activity in desperate places, they'd make a bomb out of anything they could find. That is also true of individuals who have lost their minds over the years.
Has ANY data come out on the manufacturing process? Why did that need to be so tightly controlled?
Fauci apparently used the”Key HIV Component” in COVID-19.
And a group of honest Medical Scientists in India found it! That’s right, autoimmune disease can be caused by HIV. And HIV, can cause allot of other problems.
Fauci Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19
By Dr. Jerome Corsi| April 28th, 2020
Why does Dr. Anthony Fauci's name appear on 4 U.S. patents for a key glycoprotein that appears to have been inserted into a SARS virus chassis to create the current COVID-19 epidemic?
The legal portal Justia.com lists the following "patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci" involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.
This same glycoprotein, identified as Glycoprotein 120, or simply as GP120, has also been found to be a key component of the current COVID-19, a disease that appears to combine a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system, with SARS CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS ("Severe Acute Respiratory System") that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS CoV-2 in medical scientific literature.
The four patents on which Fauci is named as an inventor are the following:
Patent Number: 9896509, patent granted August 3, 2016. "Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV120 and ?4?7 integrin.
Publication Number: 20160333309, patent application filed August 3, 2016. "Use of Antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.
Patent Number: 9441041, patent granted September 13, 2016. "Use of antagonists between HIV GP120 and ?4?7 integrin."
Publication Number 2016007586, patent application filed September 21, 2015. "Use of antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin."
An article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag."
In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: "We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature."
The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.
The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci.
I appreciate all your efforts. You’re doing what I would have referred to in a previous life as “god’s work.” In this particular life, I can’t seem to find him.
I really appreciate your in depth work on this, but especially as this binding group is commonly used it raises the chances that this happened as either A: Chance or B: That there was no malevolent intent on the part of researchers, who thought this would do what, exactly? I think they'd have plausible deniability at any rate. I had a recent experience of chance that was completely unrelated: I checked a memoir I had mostly written years ago for plagiarism. The reason I did this was because I had shared parts of it with a few groups of people over 10 years ago, and I wanted to check to see if what I had written was shared by someone else more widely on the Internet. I got back odd results: most was not out there, but a single sentence "When I was 14 years old my best friend's name was Beth" WAS supposedly plagiarized. This led me to backtrack to a 2014 linked webpage, oddly enough a discussion group about what coincidences had happened in your life that really stood out to you. Among all the posts I found a gal who did indeed use my exact sentence word for word in a long unrelated diatribe of her own. It was total chance. Apparently I wasn't the only once 14 year old who had a best friend named Beth or who found this relevant somehow to something. I am not claiming this is what happened with the Moderna patent, but I need a little more information to convince me it couldn't have happened...like why did they insert that code that way?
Amy, you brought up a great example. In your long memoir, a minor sentence said something relatively unimportant: "When I was 14 years old my best friend's name was Beth" -- and it turns out that the same sentence was somewhere else.
So your example points out that there are coincidences in unrelated texts.
But the Moderna story is different. The genetic sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is not a minor, unrelated junk sequence -- it is the most centrally important part of the Sars-Cov-2 genome, the furin cleavage site.
Similarly, it appears not in some patent, but in a cancer patent. Further, spike protein in Sars-Cov-2 does have cancer-causing effects similar to the effects of MSH3 mutations.
All of these are possibly "just coincidences". Weird things happen. But they are possibly NOT coincidences.
We need to keep looking, keep an open mind and ask probing questions.
Or it could be ignorance and hubris, a nasty deadly combination.
Remember the Challenger disaster?
Engineers voiced concerns about the the o-ring and were shot down by the people at the top and in fact it took a special investigation panel led by the physicist that ALL physicists knew was smarter than any of them, to point out the simple fact.
An expert commentator (either an ex-astronaut or nasa scientist) working for the network I was watching nailed the o-ring failure right after the explosion happened.
Yes, it was below freezing that morning. Some kind of water leak had covered the shuttle/tower assembly with ice. The whole thing was a mess, but they decided to go with the launch anyway.
That last paper you referenced (Johnson et al) seems to say that a mutant spike protein minus the PRRAR amino sequence (the FCS and the end product of the Moderna nucleotide sequence) still produced "robust protection" (their words). Need to dig into the paper but the implication is that there was no need to include the sequence in the vax, yet Moderna (and presumably BioNTech) did include it.
Still can't get past the fact that Moderna must have recognized their sequence during vax development and said nothing. On top of that, they could have deleted it but didn't. Really don't like the looks of this.
I'll admit I haven't done my homework, this may already have been done, or for some reason may not be applicable, or it may just pop out from standard genetic sequencing tools (not my field). But I'm throwing it out there.
I've seen the argument that goes something like: sequence of 19, four possibilities so a 1 in 4^19 possibility of random occurrence, no way it is random. But if matching is to be cited as causal evidence then another question must be asked. What is the probability any sequence of 19 in the virus match a sequence of 19 in the patent. Then it is a variation of matching birthdays in a room of people problem. Described here: https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-birthday-paradox/ So how long is the patented sequence and how long is the viral sequence.
It is complicated. For example, consider a sentence "I totally agree with you". It is a 24 character string. The chance of it appearing in RANDOMLY generated junk typed by drunk monkeys, is astronomically infinitesimal. 0.000000000000000000001 or whatever,
The chance of it appearing in a random substack comment is perhaps 1/20.
I'll check it out. The analogy explains how because of context a match can be far more likely than random without having causal significance. I trust though that isn't the intended interpretation...but rather a match in a key location is far less likely than a match at any location.
The key here is that this genetic sequence, unlike "I totally agree with you", actually does NOT appear everywhere. It only appears in one place, the moderna patent. (I believe that it also appears in some bacteria, but SarsCov-2 could not interact with those bacteria)
A mysterious 19-codon addition to the COVID viral sequence, cannot be found anywhere else in the world's genetic databases -- except in a Moderna patent filed in 2016.
The odds against this happening naturally are one in 3 triliion.
Part of the mystery sequence makes the spike protein more infective to humans.
Thanks. ok I have newbie questions and apologies if I missed info that may already be posted. Have the odds been calculated of this happening by random chance? How about the odds of any arbitrary string if the same length appearing at any oostion (as the reverse complement)? What is the significance of the length of this string.
It is the NIH-Davos Industrial Complex that worries me. I recall reading about a Chinese virologist that released the genetic sequence, both of which had a short life span, thanks to Chinese transparency. But for the NIH and Moderna to have put out a safe vaccine between Jan 11,2020
and Feb 24, 2020 requires a strong dose of KoolAid. We are just now starting to see a lot of the
serious side effects of the mRNA vaccines; it really does take at least 5 years (Fauci says 10).
The connection that puzzles me is that Moderna got their code line patent in 2018. How did they
know there was going to be a pandemic? If someone can view the video of Fauci's talk before
the World Economic Forum dated Oct 2019 it shows him recommending "vaccines" to his well-
heeled audience as a great investment, even saying someday there could be a viral pandemic.
Thank you Igor for your dedication in digging into this stuff and getting the word out to the rest of us.
The Moderna COVID‑19 vaccine, sold under the brand name Spikevax, is a COVID-19 vaccine developed by American company Moderna, the United States National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA). Chinese scientists put the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus online on Jan. 11. Over the next two days, the NIH and Moderna used it to plot out a vaccine.
Afeyan remembers getting a key call about the development of the Covid-19 vaccine. “January 21st, my daughter’s birthday.... I got a call from Davos [during The World Economic Forum] from the CEO of Moderna,” he says. Bancel had been approached by a number of public health groups at the conference “urging” him to work on a vaccine. We literally decided overnight...to try and do this,” Afeyan said at MIT. Moderna delivered the first doses of its Covid-19 vaccine to the NIH for testing on Feb. 24, 2020, and “the first Moderna shot went into a volunteer’s arm in Seattle on March 16, 2020,” according to Afeyan.
So then whose idea was it to do the cancer component? NIH? NIAD? BARDA? Moderna on it's lonesome?
Nobody knows who did it. As I explained to two questioners, this sequence does not establish causality.
Let's say that someone robs a bank and has a shirt with "STEGIEL" on it. It does not mean that it was you (your username). It is just a piece of text. It is not the time to arrive at firm conclusions.
Ok. Fair. Only don't know. Following bread crumbs then brought me to this puff piece.
Moderna co-founder Noubar Afeyan understands the hesitation to get a new vaccine. “The vaccines came out in such a [short] timeframe that people assumed automatically, it can’t possibly be safe,” Afeyan said during a talk at a Solve at Massachusetts Institute of Technology event in May.
“In fact, many, many people were on television espousing the view that — experts for that matter — that if it’s done in less than five years, it’s got to be unsafe, all of which is untrue.
And "What people might not understand is that extensive research was being done on mRNA technology and other mRNA vaccines for years. That decade plus of experience and the innovation of mRNA technology itself is what allowed Moderna to produce its Covid mRNA vaccine so quickly as the pandemic struck. And it could also change the future of medicine."
Moderna has been working with mRNA technology “since its inception in 2010 for myriad therapeutic areas,” including cancer therapies, Afeyan tells CNBC Make It (by way of a spokesperson), and with clinical development of mRNA-based antiviral vaccines since 2015. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/03/how-moderna-made-its-mrna-covid-vaccine-so-quickly-noubar-afeyan.html
What a laugh... Moderna developed 7 different mRNA products over 10 years of research, and NOT ONE was safe enough to gain approval from the FDA. Somehow, though, this blitzkrieg of effort gave us a functioning, safe, human-ready "Vaccine" -- for a COMPLETELY UNKNOWN illness -- in only four weeks. Such things are achieved only in a world with flying pigs.
In only TWO DAYS -- and you know how well it worked out
https://www.businessinsider.com/moderna-designed-coronavirus-vaccine-in-2-days-2020-11?op=1
(and I do not believe it was 2 days)
then there's another obivious question:
since Moderna can make such a perfect vaccine in just 2 days, why they havn't made any more working vaccines for variants yet?
why they have kept asking people to use the already leaking old one?
unlesss...they can't?
Moderna intends to boost more more more.
The analogy makes sense. But someone knows, just not us. We know the shirt was manufactured by someone as opposed to something that occurred naturally and somehow made its way on to the robber by dumb luck.
Yes and I will write about it in the next article
Friendly reminder that Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel deleted his Twitter account recently.
From Heavy:
Of course, it’s important to confirm that a username actually belongs to the person people claim it does. Heavy first was able to confirm this by tracking down a post by Moderna on Twitter, which has Twitter’s blue checkmark verification. In this post from November 2021, (Moderna's) Twitter tagged Bancel’s Twitter account and wrote, “Congratulations to our CEO, @sbancel, for being awarded the Strategist Prize 2020 by @LesEchos for leading Moderna’s #COVID19 vaccine strategy, deemed as the most relevant industrial strategy of the past year.”
LOL.
The moderna patent was in the virus first and the vax second.
You're asking the wrong question
What if the vaccine contains not just the virus, but is effectively an IED of the worst things we're aware. When I heard that special conditions had to be arranged, within the human biology, to deploy the MRNA into the cell to provide the "3d printer" blueprint to the cell for Spike -- I knew something was going on. Almost like a magician distracting the crowd (Immune System) while his hands (Spike and its download) do the trick.
I've had a working theory that herd immune is actually significantly more hyper active than we are aware. I think one of the most critical things to consider is the meaning of words has been changed and distorted over time. There is conversation that herd immunity takes time to build, etc.. but what if herd immunity was gainable within a much quicker time frame.
Social distancing, never understood this from the get go. Unless you had prior knowledge that herd immunity was actually spread by a duration of time. Let's say 15 minutes -- since some math went out early that X minutes beside a person could spread the virus.
What if herd immunity is much, much more powerful than we are aware?
We know people in poor health and sanitary conditions, living close together, can spread disease and so forth. What do people in great health and clean (but not sterile) conditions for each other? Is the biological impact merely the potatoes and the spiritual/psychological/metaphysical self the meat?
Just like early Covid with a total lack of advice on food, sunlight, exercise, etc.. immediate resignation that nothing could be done until a vaccine could be developed.
What was interesting early on was the desire to contain the manufacturing process. What if Moderna's "Vaccine" made it into the shot, but was part of a pipe bomb of other things?
Studying insurgency activity in desperate places, they'd make a bomb out of anything they could find. That is also true of individuals who have lost their minds over the years.
Has ANY data come out on the manufacturing process? Why did that need to be so tightly controlled?
GP130 mutations can cause liver tumors. I believe GP120 mutations can cause HIV. Please validate Igor!
It may not be exactly so but close, yes
Is close, close enough?
Fauci apparently used the”Key HIV Component” in COVID-19.
And a group of honest Medical Scientists in India found it! That’s right, autoimmune disease can be caused by HIV. And HIV, can cause allot of other problems.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1.full.pdf<------------------
Fauci Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19
By Dr. Jerome Corsi| April 28th, 2020
Why does Dr. Anthony Fauci's name appear on 4 U.S. patents for a key glycoprotein that appears to have been inserted into a SARS virus chassis to create the current COVID-19 epidemic?
The legal portal Justia.com lists the following "patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci" involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.
This same glycoprotein, identified as Glycoprotein 120, or simply as GP120, has also been found to be a key component of the current COVID-19, a disease that appears to combine a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system, with SARS CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS ("Severe Acute Respiratory System") that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS CoV-2 in medical scientific literature.
The four patents on which Fauci is named as an inventor are the following:
Patent Number: 9896509, patent granted August 3, 2016. "Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV120 and ?4?7 integrin.
Publication Number: 20160333309, patent application filed August 3, 2016. "Use of Antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.
Patent Number: 9441041, patent granted September 13, 2016. "Use of antagonists between HIV GP120 and ?4?7 integrin."
Publication Number 2016007586, patent application filed September 21, 2015. "Use of antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin."
An article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag."
In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: "We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature."
The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.
The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci.
https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/66481
If the patents above explain the difference (Close). You will have everyone looking!
Can you show your work? please
I appreciate all your efforts. You’re doing what I would have referred to in a previous life as “god’s work.” In this particular life, I can’t seem to find him.
He's still there, just focused on something else for now.
Knowing that the entire Corona Op was planned many ears in advance, none of it is surprising
The Olympics Rituals of 1992/2012 "Predicted" The Corona Operation
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-corona-end-game-addendum
We are the Virus they want to eliminate, using all means to justify their End goal - a new order of the ages without Humans made in the image of God
Could it be that COVID-19 is actually a “breakthrough” infection caused by experiments using aggressively more virulent spike proteins…
…soon we will see the INFECTIOUS Cancers they are creating
Raccoon City here we come…
Thanks Igor, appreciate it as always.
Hopefully you saw this too... https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/how-to-blast-your-way-to-the-truth?utm_source=url
That was an amazing article! I will put a link to it in my previous article (which gets a ton of views still)
I really appreciate your in depth work on this, but especially as this binding group is commonly used it raises the chances that this happened as either A: Chance or B: That there was no malevolent intent on the part of researchers, who thought this would do what, exactly? I think they'd have plausible deniability at any rate. I had a recent experience of chance that was completely unrelated: I checked a memoir I had mostly written years ago for plagiarism. The reason I did this was because I had shared parts of it with a few groups of people over 10 years ago, and I wanted to check to see if what I had written was shared by someone else more widely on the Internet. I got back odd results: most was not out there, but a single sentence "When I was 14 years old my best friend's name was Beth" WAS supposedly plagiarized. This led me to backtrack to a 2014 linked webpage, oddly enough a discussion group about what coincidences had happened in your life that really stood out to you. Among all the posts I found a gal who did indeed use my exact sentence word for word in a long unrelated diatribe of her own. It was total chance. Apparently I wasn't the only once 14 year old who had a best friend named Beth or who found this relevant somehow to something. I am not claiming this is what happened with the Moderna patent, but I need a little more information to convince me it couldn't have happened...like why did they insert that code that way?
Amy, you brought up a great example. In your long memoir, a minor sentence said something relatively unimportant: "When I was 14 years old my best friend's name was Beth" -- and it turns out that the same sentence was somewhere else.
So your example points out that there are coincidences in unrelated texts.
But the Moderna story is different. The genetic sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is not a minor, unrelated junk sequence -- it is the most centrally important part of the Sars-Cov-2 genome, the furin cleavage site.
Similarly, it appears not in some patent, but in a cancer patent. Further, spike protein in Sars-Cov-2 does have cancer-causing effects similar to the effects of MSH3 mutations.
All of these are possibly "just coincidences". Weird things happen. But they are possibly NOT coincidences.
We need to keep looking, keep an open mind and ask probing questions.
The strange thing is that there is no plausible reason to use it in bat research as far as I can tell.
The spike protein acts on p53.
https://t.co/HDDU9etLMD
Possibly in the same way as the protein that the moderna patent was related to, but I doubt it as its such a small sequence
Why did they insert the code that way? Mass population reduction was/is an agenda.
Or it could be ignorance and hubris, a nasty deadly combination.
Remember the Challenger disaster?
Engineers voiced concerns about the the o-ring and were shot down by the people at the top and in fact it took a special investigation panel led by the physicist that ALL physicists knew was smarter than any of them, to point out the simple fact.
An expert commentator (either an ex-astronaut or nasa scientist) working for the network I was watching nailed the o-ring failure right after the explosion happened.
The commentator was likely aware that engineers had expressed concern before launch.
Yes, it was below freezing that morning. Some kind of water leak had covered the shuttle/tower assembly with ice. The whole thing was a mess, but they decided to go with the launch anyway.
There does not seem to be any Feynman figure around anymore - sign of the times.
That story everybody should go read on Amy's stack. It is shattering and poignant.
That last paper you referenced (Johnson et al) seems to say that a mutant spike protein minus the PRRAR amino sequence (the FCS and the end product of the Moderna nucleotide sequence) still produced "robust protection" (their words). Need to dig into the paper but the implication is that there was no need to include the sequence in the vax, yet Moderna (and presumably BioNTech) did include it.
Still can't get past the fact that Moderna must have recognized their sequence during vax development and said nothing. On top of that, they could have deleted it but didn't. Really don't like the looks of this.
I'll admit I haven't done my homework, this may already have been done, or for some reason may not be applicable, or it may just pop out from standard genetic sequencing tools (not my field). But I'm throwing it out there.
I've seen the argument that goes something like: sequence of 19, four possibilities so a 1 in 4^19 possibility of random occurrence, no way it is random. But if matching is to be cited as causal evidence then another question must be asked. What is the probability any sequence of 19 in the virus match a sequence of 19 in the patent. Then it is a variation of matching birthdays in a room of people problem. Described here: https://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-the-birthday-paradox/ So how long is the patented sequence and how long is the viral sequence.
Read the Frontiers article https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
It is complicated. For example, consider a sentence "I totally agree with you". It is a 24 character string. The chance of it appearing in RANDOMLY generated junk typed by drunk monkeys, is astronomically infinitesimal. 0.000000000000000000001 or whatever,
The chance of it appearing in a random substack comment is perhaps 1/20.
This is why context s important.
I'll check it out. The analogy explains how because of context a match can be far more likely than random without having causal significance. I trust though that isn't the intended interpretation...but rather a match in a key location is far less likely than a match at any location.
The key here is that this genetic sequence, unlike "I totally agree with you", actually does NOT appear everywhere. It only appears in one place, the moderna patent. (I believe that it also appears in some bacteria, but SarsCov-2 could not interact with those bacteria)
Bacteria, says you. https://www.researchgate.net/post/COVID-19_CCTCGGCGGGCACGT_PRRAR_AA_Furin_cleavage_site_at_23603-23617_of_the_MN908947_Genbank_Genome_Matches_Mostly_Bacteria_COVID-19_in_BLAST
I am guessing now
Whether or not the virus bioweapon had the arrogant insertion, the hacksxxxine does have it.
The arrogant insertion means the victims have their genes altered and the Harmaceuticals own their d n a
Since they own us, they can turn us off
Or, program our bodies to turn themselves off
My question about the Arrogant insertion is
1. How we gonna depopulate planet into any improvement? That is sheer arrogance to save it for those who ain't murderered
I mean the Arrogant insertion is intended to kill and it shall
2? How they gonna enslave those of us who survive?
3. Will they just nuke the world now since they failed with hacksxxxines, or is it considered a success that will soon be killing folks apace ?
4. Was the Arrogant insertion intended to sterilize womanity? This appears to be occurring with hacksxxxine
5. The ropeworms growing ....what will the embalmers say about the Arrogant insertion?
A mysterious 19-codon addition to the COVID viral sequence, cannot be found anywhere else in the world's genetic databases -- except in a Moderna patent filed in 2016.
The odds against this happening naturally are one in 3 triliion.
Part of the mystery sequence makes the spike protein more infective to humans.
Lay article
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10542309/Fresh-lab-leak-fears-study-finds-genetic-code-Covids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html
Scientific article
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
the Modera patent, filed 2016
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en
reaction
https://i.gifer.com/1ckN.gif
Thanks. ok I have newbie questions and apologies if I missed info that may already be posted. Have the odds been calculated of this happening by random chance? How about the odds of any arbitrary string if the same length appearing at any oostion (as the reverse complement)? What is the significance of the length of this string.
Calculating the odds is complicated but the Frontiers article estimated the chance as 1 in 300,000,000,000, if I recall correctly.
So you're saying there's a chance... 😁
That Apple can go up, maybe not for long given the probabilities. Gotta look quick.
Excellent stuff once again Igor.
It is the NIH-Davos Industrial Complex that worries me. I recall reading about a Chinese virologist that released the genetic sequence, both of which had a short life span, thanks to Chinese transparency. But for the NIH and Moderna to have put out a safe vaccine between Jan 11,2020
and Feb 24, 2020 requires a strong dose of KoolAid. We are just now starting to see a lot of the
serious side effects of the mRNA vaccines; it really does take at least 5 years (Fauci says 10).
The connection that puzzles me is that Moderna got their code line patent in 2018. How did they
know there was going to be a pandemic? If someone can view the video of Fauci's talk before
the World Economic Forum dated Oct 2019 it shows him recommending "vaccines" to his well-
heeled audience as a great investment, even saying someday there could be a viral pandemic.
This guy was onto this two months ago. Might be worth reaching out?
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/vladimir-dumitrean_ctcctcggcgggcacgtag-gainoffunction-activity-6880141068831096832-zorQ/
i just did