But I stress it again: these aren't vaccines. These are weapons of mass infection and bioterrorist tools. What happens in Romania, which is a veritable "control group" inside EU, fully proves it.
So, I've been reading a lot of very interesting experts who are saying that contagion has actually never been proven... I know, I know, it's very difficult to take that in. But just for the sake of consideration, just let that stand for a moment, and consider this: What if, instead of the jabs being weapons of mass INFECTION, what if they are weapons of mass PLACEMENT, of metallic substances, such as GRAPHENE, which, when the person carrying them is exposed to EMF's, are "activated," and begin to shred the insides of people's blood vessels, or create clots? Or maybe some other thing creates the clots, I don't know... I am speculating. Because if you zap a whole area full of people with radiation, and the symptoms of radiation are the same as "Covid," it can APPEAR to be a contagion event... What do you think? Seriously, I am posing the question with an open mind.
Instead of analyzing data regarding vaccine efficacy, or why boosted individuals are getting reinfections, this article is celebrating a teen going against his parents' decision and getting vaccinated in another city. Do you think the author will acknowledge him if he ends up with myocarditis? https://khn.org/news/article/teen-traveled-to-philly-to-get-vaccinated-against-his-parents-wishes/
I am not sure how many people have adult kids, my feeling is that it is quite a few of us.
Adult kids -- or even teenagers -- are harder to influence, for parents, than some might think.
Even me -- my mom is a provax liberal who watches CNN all day long, and I am the opposite (although I check out CNN every day to stay well rounded, but I always start my day readings with infowars)
My 22 yo government hating son is unvaxxed ONLY because he’s terrified of needles and he says he feels he doesn’t need it…praise the Lord! However, he thinks I’m a nut case for not getting boosted to save my job. He literally hates government but thinks “no way are they culling us”! God help me!!!
My oldest is 23 and is banned from going out in the city. He also has immune thrombocytopenia- likely from a childhood vaccine- which has kept him (along with my relentless begging) from getting it. I fear if he’s banned from society much longer, he’ll give in. It terrifies me.
He lives in Chicago.No restaurants, bars, concerts, etc. The petty tyrant mayor wants life to be difficult for people like him, apparently. Yet 30 minutes away, my county is wide open. Criminals.
Thank you. Interestingly, I have a close friend whose daughter is friends with Maddie- I got to follow her story in real time. Absolutely horrifying. And I showed my 17 and 15 year old how the FDA classified it the day the trial results were published. It’s been a good, scary lesson. They’ve also watched me scour VAERS reports weekly. I know there’s only so much time left for me to influence them, though. I pray this stops before they leave for college. It’s exhausting trying to keep your government from killing you. Sigh...
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 17, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
I can count more times than I care to admit, I went against my parents wishes. I can recall times when later my parents thanked me for taking certain actions against their wishes too.
My question is though, is your mom a Liberal or American liberal, leftist in Liberal clothes? Most don’t even realize/know the difference. And, based on what I read in your columns, I suspect that you are an unpolished Liberal. 😂
Yeah, read it, sound like Nikolas is aright little dick. What an absolute arsehole towards his parents. Still, they should have tried harder to have their child question stuff. Or, maybe they tried too hard and pushed him the other way. It's a tough one to get the balance right. I find the best way is just to let my kids know exactly what I think and explain to them why I think it, and let them make their own mind up. Thank fully they are both anti Covid vax, against woke culture and couldn't give a shit about Covid or face masks. Its kept them sane and happy to be able laugh at how wierd people have become. Having said all that, I recon that story is an absolute load of made up bollocks to give the pro vax liberal ultras a bit of the "antivax are wankers" porn that they love to consume when they are not eating their fear porn
Have you considered that the two shot numbers are so poor because those that get boosters and then get sick in the 14 day period after the booster end up in the two shot category versus the booster one? This would have the effect of hurting the two shot data and helping the boosted data.
The 14 day trick is a key element to their fraud, they always make it look like the last vaccine was not enough and that you desperately need the next one.
Shot four will kick back the deaths and hospitalisations to the shot three tally and will be used to push shot four to the gullible needlers.
I assume the "per 100,000" stats are total population? In a group that is predominantly vaxed, an ineffective vax should show proportionally higher probability of infection among the vaxed group. If 80% are vaxed and 10 get sick, 8 per 100,000 would indicate ineffective vax. Less than 8 would show there's some protection, more than 8 would be negative effectiveness. Seems like we should normalize case stats to account for the different relevant population sizes.
My concern with case counts is most are asymptomatic, or mild symptoms, therefore irrelevant in any practical sense. Only a small fraction of any population gets seriously ill from covid. Similarly, only a small fraction of vaxed people get significant vax injuries. Analysis should focus on relative risk of vax versus virus. And virus risk should focus on why a few are vulnerable while most aren't.
In a rational world, those who don't need the vax wouldn't take it. Those with vulnerabilities to covid that can't be treated successfully should decide based on analysis of those unique risks, not one size fits all. The vax is a reasonable risk for those who need it.
We need evidence of the crime of demanding the vast majority who don't need protection are coerced to assume the additional risk of the flawed vax.
The biggest crime is the prohibition of treatments. That alone accounts for almost all of the death count. That prohibition was a necessary facade to legalize the emergency vax authorizations. Vax injuries are a minor addition to that gruesome count.
The vax injuries are underreported. I know 9 people who've been injured seriously in my circle of family and acquaintances and only one case was reported. I think that's typical. It corroborates Steve Kirsch's hypothesis in microcosm.
It's a big number, but still a small fraction of total vaxed people. Most people are not noticeably injured, and they're frightened so they consider others' injuries acceptable losses if it saves them from death or serious injury. Too many have been misled to believe they have mortal risk from the virus and will die if they don't vax. That lie drives the hysteria, and the irrationality.
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 18, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
It’s interesting how many defenders forget “a shoe on the other foot” test. Most unvaxxed who got covid have been asymptomatic. But that fact would not support vaxxing, so supporters ignore it.
That's the odd part. The saying "since you got the vax you won't get seriously ill" for people who wouldn't have gotten seriously ill anyway. Sadly we don't seem to have a clue regarding those who might get seriously ill (besides obese and diabetic) or even those who seem to resist the infection completely like the woman on the Princess Cruise.
Because we don't understand the immune system well enough to predict who really is at risk (beyond wide guidelines) and who is at zero risk, we create a vaccine that mucks with this immune system we don't understand. Then we give the vaccine to a lot of people. We see some are damaged by the vaccine but ignore them, not wanting to discover what went wrong with their immune system because we don't understand the immune system. Then as the vaccinations begin to wane and place those who had trust at risk, again, we double down. All whilst still not understanding what the vaccine has done to the immune system.
Lots of clues. Apparently those with strong immune systems do fine. Those who don't, don't do as well. Obesity and diabetes reduce immune strength, as does aging, though that's mostly due to accumulated chronic conditions. Combinations increase risk. Well known to those who want to know. Doctors don't address it since maintenance is profitable. Diabetes pills. Diet pills. Procedures. Losing weight is bad for business. And patients ignore the obvious because it's more fun. We actually consider it rude to mention it.
By any rational measure, most covid deaths are self inflicted. Otherwise known as suicide. Like any suicide, they could have been prevented. Lots of accomplices.
At 82 I'm well past my sell by date. And I have my share of chronic conditions. I do see a doctor unlike my 87 yo neighbor who retains much health, but her mind is now wandering a bit. I've survived the removal of parts that I can "live without" - but that has consequences as well. But you are right, I don't exercise as much as I need and witness the strength decline as a result. The workout have never been fun and the gym being closed hasn't helped nor has that stupid mask stuff helped - great excuses of course.
The record is about 124 so you have lots of time left with proper maintenance. And that record is going to be beaten soon. Sergey Young is a venture capitalist spending a lot of money, 100 million so far, to extend our life span. His book, Growing Young, is very optimistic.
I’ve seen estimates of only 1% to 2.5% of side effects reported to VAERS. So VAERS numbers need to be multiplied by 40x-100x to get an approximation of the real numbers.
All that is why after seeing where Omicron best replicates I now use the gargle and nasal cleaning to not allow the virus a foothold. I reject the booster despite being at risk and 82. Whether the infection can be stopped early with daily baking soda (!) water (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX_CYvku1-0) old time stuff, who knows. I await the RCT's.
The surprising thing to me is that UK and handful of other generally quite provax governments have been publishing accurate data at all. I suppose we in the U.S. are leaders in public health corruption, so our data has sucked from the getgo. Our officials knew better than to ever publicize (or maybe even collect) data that could potentially reflect badly on their policies (which they are fully aware are based on agenda more than science). Other countries' officials perhaps naively figured the data would undoubtedly make the vaccines look good?
That's true for the most part NOW, but it wasn't clear people would be so hypnotized earlier on. I think they need to keep at least a superficial plausibility to their narrative. A certain number would keep taking it no matter what, but a large segment of the vaxxed and/or boosted are not true believers, just low information.
They are not even hiding that the entire pandemic was fake:
According To The BC Government Records Hospitalizations and ICU admissions in BC During the Covid-19 Pandemic Did Not Increase Compared to the Previous Years
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 17, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
Well, since authorities have decided to lie through their as-of-yet inkicked teeth we're left with the old stand-bys of anecdotes and word of mouth. (I mean clerks and other functionaires inside agencies, not politicans - as professionals the former tended to reject the politicans' reflexive lying.)
Spoke to an oncologist today, off the record. He's unvaccinated and will stay so, due to him keeping a close eye on side-effects, waning protection and possible weaking of the immune system.
Me, I'm no doctor. I'm not a natural scienctific anything - my forte is the fuzzy subjects. So who am I going to trust? A professional giving his view on the matter in private, or a governement bureaucrat with far less education than myself and no medical training what so ever?
It should be, trained professionals put the data together with the aid of stat-heads, and let the bureaucrat handle the communication side of things. I mean, how a virus or an injection of artificial mRNA works isn't a political question. Even if a minister in charge of national health was briefed by a top level scientist of the appropriate kind, how is that minister to judge the information?
Has been from the start. The SCIENCE says we must lockdown, like China. Epidemiologists know lockdowns can contain a virus. They also know once containment is lost it won't work. The feckless politicians, one after another, fearful of being found in error do what science demanded. The politician is supposed to take advice and consider all the factors which few did. Trump tried but couldn't abide the political attack. DeSantos did the balance but withstood the political flak. Few other politicians were brave enough to follow along. Boris tried and was killed by the attacks, got ill, got re-educated, who knows now.
Sadly our leaders are captured by the mass hysteria along with the people. Most all of us are now emerging and asking what happened. So blame shifting shall commence. Elections are arriving in the US.
Friend of mine, a bricklayer and illustrator/sculptor by trade, has a good explanation for how western leaders and elites have acted since the fall of the Wall:
'Whilst the booster still provides “death protection”
I find this highly unlikely given that the Pfizer 6 month trial data showed 50% higher all cause mortality than placebo along with 5x risk of heart attack death in vaccine over placebo.
They had to kill the phase 3 trial after six months in order to hide how bad things were getting and how much worse they would be if things were allowed to run for the full three years.
I do not want to badmouth UKHSA: they are under tremendous pressure and seem to have some honorable people who are responsible for publishing their data. I can live with greyed out truthful information.
Without the non covid death data we really only get part of the story . What if we took all categories ( hospital , icu, death) and had covid positive and non covid ? Then we might be able to observe if the vaccinated are dying and being hospitalized more with non covid illness as well . This is the missing contextual data
I can't read the article linked below as it is behind a firewall but I think the plan is to scrap the ONS data and I believe that is the UKHSA data you are referring to?
If the flu data was published each year based on how many people get flu and how many end up in hospital etc showing vaccinated/unvaccinated I doubt people would bother to go get a flu jab either. Waning immunity has been known about for years with decreased effectiveness YOY. What is more I have read that even with updating the vaccine for the latest flu strain at best it is 40% 'effective' this then falls to zero within 3 months so by the time most people are exposed to the virus they have no protection . I read that the vaccine didn't even match this years strain but everyone was still told to have it, I guess because what else would the vaccine manufacturers do with it!? So yes of course, as it becomes apparent just how ineffective the vaccines are, what can governments do other than hide the data as they have already have a lot of boosters on order! The last thing governments want is data showing people just how ineffective vaccines are, after all how else will they control the population and covid or any other pandemic in the future, without vaccine passports etc.. This is what surprises me about India /Africa/ South America, I am surprised the vaccine companies weren't right in there to make sure there weren't any stats coming out of unvaccinated countries that would lead to people Q the effectiveness of all these mRNA vaccines. Gates et al are on a roll. Gates wanted vaccine passports for all EU travel long before covid and got the WHO on board and as has been seen they will go to ANY lengths to hide just how ineffective and damaging vaccines are. I read back last year that the covid vaccine had done more damage to public confidence in vaccine than 25 years of anti vax. The UK JCVI said last year that they were worried that public confidence in all vaccines would be damaged by the c19 vaccine. :
This large scale analysis shows that the flu vaccines have zero efficacy.
All they do is injure large numbers of people and make pharma/Doctors richer.
Annals of Internal Medicine
'The data included 170 million episodes of care and 7.6 million deaths. Turning 65 was associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in rate of seasonal influenza vaccination. However, no evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons. The estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.'
Which worryingly confirms that we will have a combined flu/covid mRNA 'vaccine' foisted on us yearly whether it works or not and regardless of whether it actually makes people more vulnerable to disease . Makes me want to SCREAM! Thank heavens for people like Malone/Igor/Steve Kirsch /the Canadian truckers etc etc..
"The vaccine ...is so safe and effective, that it does not need no stinking reporting." Hallelujah!
C’mon, man, c’mon. The science is settled. Don’t ya know?🤔.
I don't repeat what I wrote here: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/public-health-scotland-discontinues/comment/5117601?r=q9aex
But I stress it again: these aren't vaccines. These are weapons of mass infection and bioterrorist tools. What happens in Romania, which is a veritable "control group" inside EU, fully proves it.
https://seemorerocks.is/37666-2/
So, I've been reading a lot of very interesting experts who are saying that contagion has actually never been proven... I know, I know, it's very difficult to take that in. But just for the sake of consideration, just let that stand for a moment, and consider this: What if, instead of the jabs being weapons of mass INFECTION, what if they are weapons of mass PLACEMENT, of metallic substances, such as GRAPHENE, which, when the person carrying them is exposed to EMF's, are "activated," and begin to shred the insides of people's blood vessels, or create clots? Or maybe some other thing creates the clots, I don't know... I am speculating. Because if you zap a whole area full of people with radiation, and the symptoms of radiation are the same as "Covid," it can APPEAR to be a contagion event... What do you think? Seriously, I am posing the question with an open mind.
https://twitter.com/sander_2021/status/1489746293002022912?s=21
Instead of analyzing data regarding vaccine efficacy, or why boosted individuals are getting reinfections, this article is celebrating a teen going against his parents' decision and getting vaccinated in another city. Do you think the author will acknowledge him if he ends up with myocarditis? https://khn.org/news/article/teen-traveled-to-philly-to-get-vaccinated-against-his-parents-wishes/
I am not sure how many people have adult kids, my feeling is that it is quite a few of us.
Adult kids -- or even teenagers -- are harder to influence, for parents, than some might think.
Even me -- my mom is a provax liberal who watches CNN all day long, and I am the opposite (although I check out CNN every day to stay well rounded, but I always start my day readings with infowars)
My 22 yo government hating son is unvaxxed ONLY because he’s terrified of needles and he says he feels he doesn’t need it…praise the Lord! However, he thinks I’m a nut case for not getting boosted to save my job. He literally hates government but thinks “no way are they culling us”! God help me!!!
Your situation is great!
My oldest is 23 and is banned from going out in the city. He also has immune thrombocytopenia- likely from a childhood vaccine- which has kept him (along with my relentless begging) from getting it. I fear if he’s banned from society much longer, he’ll give in. It terrifies me.
Outright scary, where does your 23 year old live?
He lives in Chicago.No restaurants, bars, concerts, etc. The petty tyrant mayor wants life to be difficult for people like him, apparently. Yet 30 minutes away, my county is wide open. Criminals.
There are many places in the world where we don't want to live. Lots of better places.
Perhaps show him some footage of Maddy de Garay and ask him if Pfizer hid the damage done to this young woman what else are they hiding?
Is he prepared to risk paralysis for the ability to go out for a few months until they demand he takes another shot?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eNDLOrq3nGmW/
Thank you. Interestingly, I have a close friend whose daughter is friends with Maddie- I got to follow her story in real time. Absolutely horrifying. And I showed my 17 and 15 year old how the FDA classified it the day the trial results were published. It’s been a good, scary lesson. They’ve also watched me scour VAERS reports weekly. I know there’s only so much time left for me to influence them, though. I pray this stops before they leave for college. It’s exhausting trying to keep your government from killing you. Sigh...
I can count more times than I care to admit, I went against my parents wishes. I can recall times when later my parents thanked me for taking certain actions against their wishes too.
My question is though, is your mom a Liberal or American liberal, leftist in Liberal clothes? Most don’t even realize/know the difference. And, based on what I read in your columns, I suspect that you are an unpolished Liberal. 😂
Yeah, read it, sound like Nikolas is aright little dick. What an absolute arsehole towards his parents. Still, they should have tried harder to have their child question stuff. Or, maybe they tried too hard and pushed him the other way. It's a tough one to get the balance right. I find the best way is just to let my kids know exactly what I think and explain to them why I think it, and let them make their own mind up. Thank fully they are both anti Covid vax, against woke culture and couldn't give a shit about Covid or face masks. Its kept them sane and happy to be able laugh at how wierd people have become. Having said all that, I recon that story is an absolute load of made up bollocks to give the pro vax liberal ultras a bit of the "antivax are wankers" porn that they love to consume when they are not eating their fear porn
No, I really doubt any AE at all would be reported.
Have you considered that the two shot numbers are so poor because those that get boosters and then get sick in the 14 day period after the booster end up in the two shot category versus the booster one? This would have the effect of hurting the two shot data and helping the boosted data.
The 14 day trick is a key element to their fraud, they always make it look like the last vaccine was not enough and that you desperately need the next one.
Shot four will kick back the deaths and hospitalisations to the shot three tally and will be used to push shot four to the gullible needlers.
I assume the "per 100,000" stats are total population? In a group that is predominantly vaxed, an ineffective vax should show proportionally higher probability of infection among the vaxed group. If 80% are vaxed and 10 get sick, 8 per 100,000 would indicate ineffective vax. Less than 8 would show there's some protection, more than 8 would be negative effectiveness. Seems like we should normalize case stats to account for the different relevant population sizes.
My concern with case counts is most are asymptomatic, or mild symptoms, therefore irrelevant in any practical sense. Only a small fraction of any population gets seriously ill from covid. Similarly, only a small fraction of vaxed people get significant vax injuries. Analysis should focus on relative risk of vax versus virus. And virus risk should focus on why a few are vulnerable while most aren't.
In a rational world, those who don't need the vax wouldn't take it. Those with vulnerabilities to covid that can't be treated successfully should decide based on analysis of those unique risks, not one size fits all. The vax is a reasonable risk for those who need it.
We need evidence of the crime of demanding the vast majority who don't need protection are coerced to assume the additional risk of the flawed vax.
The biggest crime is the prohibition of treatments. That alone accounts for almost all of the death count. That prohibition was a necessary facade to legalize the emergency vax authorizations. Vax injuries are a minor addition to that gruesome count.
it is rate per 100,000 boosted -- allows for direct risk comparisons
The vax injuries are underreported. I know 9 people who've been injured seriously in my circle of family and acquaintances and only one case was reported. I think that's typical. It corroborates Steve Kirsch's hypothesis in microcosm.
It's a big number, but still a small fraction of total vaxed people. Most people are not noticeably injured, and they're frightened so they consider others' injuries acceptable losses if it saves them from death or serious injury. Too many have been misled to believe they have mortal risk from the virus and will die if they don't vax. That lie drives the hysteria, and the irrationality.
'Most people are not noticeably injured'
Yet.
It’s interesting how many defenders forget “a shoe on the other foot” test. Most unvaxxed who got covid have been asymptomatic. But that fact would not support vaxxing, so supporters ignore it.
Probably need to register credentials to get access.
That's the odd part. The saying "since you got the vax you won't get seriously ill" for people who wouldn't have gotten seriously ill anyway. Sadly we don't seem to have a clue regarding those who might get seriously ill (besides obese and diabetic) or even those who seem to resist the infection completely like the woman on the Princess Cruise.
Because we don't understand the immune system well enough to predict who really is at risk (beyond wide guidelines) and who is at zero risk, we create a vaccine that mucks with this immune system we don't understand. Then we give the vaccine to a lot of people. We see some are damaged by the vaccine but ignore them, not wanting to discover what went wrong with their immune system because we don't understand the immune system. Then as the vaccinations begin to wane and place those who had trust at risk, again, we double down. All whilst still not understanding what the vaccine has done to the immune system.
What a fine mess.
Lots of clues. Apparently those with strong immune systems do fine. Those who don't, don't do as well. Obesity and diabetes reduce immune strength, as does aging, though that's mostly due to accumulated chronic conditions. Combinations increase risk. Well known to those who want to know. Doctors don't address it since maintenance is profitable. Diabetes pills. Diet pills. Procedures. Losing weight is bad for business. And patients ignore the obvious because it's more fun. We actually consider it rude to mention it.
By any rational measure, most covid deaths are self inflicted. Otherwise known as suicide. Like any suicide, they could have been prevented. Lots of accomplices.
At 82 I'm well past my sell by date. And I have my share of chronic conditions. I do see a doctor unlike my 87 yo neighbor who retains much health, but her mind is now wandering a bit. I've survived the removal of parts that I can "live without" - but that has consequences as well. But you are right, I don't exercise as much as I need and witness the strength decline as a result. The workout have never been fun and the gym being closed hasn't helped nor has that stupid mask stuff helped - great excuses of course.
The record is about 124 so you have lots of time left with proper maintenance. And that record is going to be beaten soon. Sergey Young is a venture capitalist spending a lot of money, 100 million so far, to extend our life span. His book, Growing Young, is very optimistic.
The VAERS is self-reporting db. Why don’t you report the rest of your circle?
These are all (potential) adverse effects in friends of mine or siblings of friends of mine, ages 35-58:
-hearing loss- needs hearing aids now.
-crippling tinnitus
-reversible cerebral vasoconstriction
-breast cancer dx 8 weeks post Pfizer, already in lymph nodes despite being religious about mammograms
-one blood clot (4 months post JNJ, survived)
-one fatal heart attack (4 months post Pfizer)
-one fatal bilateral PE’s (6 months post Moderna)
The first three were confirmed to be vax related. The remainder are suspicious. I’m not sure any have been reported. Horrifying.
I’ve seen estimates of only 1% to 2.5% of side effects reported to VAERS. So VAERS numbers need to be multiplied by 40x-100x to get an approximation of the real numbers.
All that is why after seeing where Omicron best replicates I now use the gargle and nasal cleaning to not allow the virus a foothold. I reject the booster despite being at risk and 82. Whether the infection can be stopped early with daily baking soda (!) water (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX_CYvku1-0) old time stuff, who knows. I await the RCT's.
Gosh Igor, when are you going to stop "fuel[ling] global vaccine myths"? :)
The surprising thing to me is that UK and handful of other generally quite provax governments have been publishing accurate data at all. I suppose we in the U.S. are leaders in public health corruption, so our data has sucked from the getgo. Our officials knew better than to ever publicize (or maybe even collect) data that could potentially reflect badly on their policies (which they are fully aware are based on agenda more than science). Other countries' officials perhaps naively figured the data would undoubtedly make the vaccines look good?
Perhaps they just know that it doesn't matter.
The vaccines could show 99% lethality and the 1% of true believers would come back for more if the man on the telly told them to.
That's true for the most part NOW, but it wasn't clear people would be so hypnotized earlier on. I think they need to keep at least a superficial plausibility to their narrative. A certain number would keep taking it no matter what, but a large segment of the vaxxed and/or boosted are not true believers, just low information.
Sure they will. That's how they operate Deception and truth hidden in plain sight - in their own documents.
Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-michael-yeadon-this-must-stop
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may
They are not even hiding that the entire pandemic was fake:
According To The BC Government Records Hospitalizations and ICU admissions in BC During the Covid-19 Pandemic Did Not Increase Compared to the Previous Years
A Pandemic of Deceit
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/where-is-the-pandemic-according-to
Well, since authorities have decided to lie through their as-of-yet inkicked teeth we're left with the old stand-bys of anecdotes and word of mouth. (I mean clerks and other functionaires inside agencies, not politicans - as professionals the former tended to reject the politicans' reflexive lying.)
Spoke to an oncologist today, off the record. He's unvaccinated and will stay so, due to him keeping a close eye on side-effects, waning protection and possible weaking of the immune system.
Me, I'm no doctor. I'm not a natural scienctific anything - my forte is the fuzzy subjects. So who am I going to trust? A professional giving his view on the matter in private, or a governement bureaucrat with far less education than myself and no medical training what so ever?
It should be, trained professionals put the data together with the aid of stat-heads, and let the bureaucrat handle the communication side of things. I mean, how a virus or an injection of artificial mRNA works isn't a political question. Even if a minister in charge of national health was briefed by a top level scientist of the appropriate kind, how is that minister to judge the information?
It's all so depressingly stupid.
Has been from the start. The SCIENCE says we must lockdown, like China. Epidemiologists know lockdowns can contain a virus. They also know once containment is lost it won't work. The feckless politicians, one after another, fearful of being found in error do what science demanded. The politician is supposed to take advice and consider all the factors which few did. Trump tried but couldn't abide the political attack. DeSantos did the balance but withstood the political flak. Few other politicians were brave enough to follow along. Boris tried and was killed by the attacks, got ill, got re-educated, who knows now.
Sadly our leaders are captured by the mass hysteria along with the people. Most all of us are now emerging and asking what happened. So blame shifting shall commence. Elections are arriving in the US.
Friend of mine, a bricklayer and illustrator/sculptor by trade, has a good explanation for how western leaders and elites have acted since the fall of the Wall:
They are possessed by Hubris.
I think he's on to something.
'Whilst the booster still provides “death protection”
I find this highly unlikely given that the Pfizer 6 month trial data showed 50% higher all cause mortality than placebo along with 5x risk of heart attack death in vaccine over placebo.
They had to kill the phase 3 trial after six months in order to hide how bad things were getting and how much worse they would be if things were allowed to run for the full three years.
Nature admits reinfections are soaring: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00438-3
They've gone back to greying out the numbers, so one step there!
Yeah they started doing this like a month ago.
I do not want to badmouth UKHSA: they are under tremendous pressure and seem to have some honorable people who are responsible for publishing their data. I can live with greyed out truthful information.
They've been doing it for a while now but last week (I think) the numbers were back in black. Maybe they just forgot. Not this week!
Yes, I'd happily have all the data in grey if it was all there!
Maybe those publishing the report know that the people really digging will still read the greyed numbers and are hoping the overseers won't notice....
Without the non covid death data we really only get part of the story . What if we took all categories ( hospital , icu, death) and had covid positive and non covid ? Then we might be able to observe if the vaccinated are dying and being hospitalized more with non covid illness as well . This is the missing contextual data
This paper looks at that for all-cause deaths (for US and Europe data) - results aren't pretty: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
This paper looks at all-cause severe morbidity (again, not pretty): https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific-1811.pdf
And this one shows higher covid-related deaths are associated with higher jab rates based on data in 145 countries: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-big-data-study-of-145-countries
Sad but its too late for those who volunteered.
This is the way information is going to be hidden from the world, now.
I can't read the article linked below as it is behind a firewall but I think the plan is to scrap the ONS data and I believe that is the UKHSA data you are referring to?
If the flu data was published each year based on how many people get flu and how many end up in hospital etc showing vaccinated/unvaccinated I doubt people would bother to go get a flu jab either. Waning immunity has been known about for years with decreased effectiveness YOY. What is more I have read that even with updating the vaccine for the latest flu strain at best it is 40% 'effective' this then falls to zero within 3 months so by the time most people are exposed to the virus they have no protection . I read that the vaccine didn't even match this years strain but everyone was still told to have it, I guess because what else would the vaccine manufacturers do with it!? So yes of course, as it becomes apparent just how ineffective the vaccines are, what can governments do other than hide the data as they have already have a lot of boosters on order! The last thing governments want is data showing people just how ineffective vaccines are, after all how else will they control the population and covid or any other pandemic in the future, without vaccine passports etc.. This is what surprises me about India /Africa/ South America, I am surprised the vaccine companies weren't right in there to make sure there weren't any stats coming out of unvaccinated countries that would lead to people Q the effectiveness of all these mRNA vaccines. Gates et al are on a roll. Gates wanted vaccine passports for all EU travel long before covid and got the WHO on board and as has been seen they will go to ANY lengths to hide just how ineffective and damaging vaccines are. I read back last year that the covid vaccine had done more damage to public confidence in vaccine than 25 years of anti vax. The UK JCVI said last year that they were worried that public confidence in all vaccines would be damaged by the c19 vaccine. :
https://www.theweek.co.uk/news/uk-news/955751/the-plan-to-scrap-the-uk-ons-covid-survey
This large scale analysis shows that the flu vaccines have zero efficacy.
All they do is injure large numbers of people and make pharma/Doctors richer.
Annals of Internal Medicine
'The data included 170 million episodes of care and 7.6 million deaths. Turning 65 was associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in rate of seasonal influenza vaccination. However, no evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons. The estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.'
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M19-3075
Good article. OAS is at work for seasonal flu. Some more lucky than most depending on first exposure which makes the age issue important.
Which worryingly confirms that we will have a combined flu/covid mRNA 'vaccine' foisted on us yearly whether it works or not and regardless of whether it actually makes people more vulnerable to disease . Makes me want to SCREAM! Thank heavens for people like Malone/Igor/Steve Kirsch /the Canadian truckers etc etc..
Seems Moderna is betting on that combo, but the shares trade lower which suggests the market says no.
Looks like UKHSA may be gone by March in any case
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/17/cabinet-splits-emerge-over-living-with-covid-strategy-and-free-testing