According to some scientists the children of vaxxed mothers (those who actually make it full term) may turn out the be infertile in 20 years time. Some speculate they may not even be able to reach full sexual maturity due to the damage caused to their endocrine systems.
In other news.... the de-gendering of society is racing ahead with a suspicious sense of urgency, including the removal of gendered words from permitted speech and the introduction of 100 new pseudo genders which are more suitable to an infertile population.
There is a very interesting article on the "Universe 25" experiment and its author. You will be surprised what you will learn about the "Universe 25" experiment or HOW an experiment from the 1970s predicts developments in the 21st century.
Rob Schneider, Dr. Robert Malone, Five Times August, Joseph Arthur, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, and more. Join VSRF for a Giving Tuesday Special on Rumble to keep VSRF alive in 2024.
Move over Great Leap Forward, here comes Giant Leap Forward.
The delusions are unbelievable. There is no way they can even begin to do any of this without massive use of force and coercion that will make the Maoists of the Great Leap Forward look like pussy cats. Sounds exactly like forced and rapid collectivization (like in the former Soviet Union/Ukraine, China and Cambodia) only grander and at a global scale. How do they plan to handle conflict zones and countries that refuse to cooperate for some reason. They will be destroyed?
They have succeeded in instilling a certain fear of air travel. First through covid measures and now through constant horror stories of pilots having heart attacks, unruly flyers, nazi flight attendants and wild hordes brawling at airports. We are definitely not getting around like we used to, which makes our lives smaller. I have noticed and intend to be less susceptible. A major commercial airline pilot relation of ours did not corroborate any of the issues btw.
This is just eugenics rebranded. I've written about that in an essay that will appear in an anthology forthcoming from Skyhorse Publishing, "Down the Covid Rabbit Hole," which will feature top scientists writing about the pandemic. In it I write about a recent documentary, Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics, which does a deep dive into the history of the eugenics movement as overtly manifest since Francis Galton and Thomas Malthus in the 19th century. What’s striking about this film is how much of the modern history of eugenics programs since the early 20th century has been hidden from public view. Sterilization of the "unfit" began in the early part of that century but continued up until the 1960s. Promotion of the trans movement and "overpopulation" memes, plus the Covid jabs that destroy some women's fertility, is just an extension of this eugenics program. https://www.shotseugenics2pandemics.com/
Thank you Igor for the deep thoughts and wide analysis.
While this topic is way more complex for my taste than having any firm opinion, one thing is for sure: anything that power hungry psychopaths will force upon us along any ideology, is not just bound to fail, but also to cause a much worse society and a lot of suffering for billions. Unfortunately, the more complex the issue, the more difficult to see the nefarious intents of their lunatic plans and ability to adjust or seize their plans: this is not just a vaccine that can be analysed and people convinced not to take it. Changes in society cannot be pinpointed to their elements, the interaction with millions of factors is simply impossible to trace, unlike a ceteris paribus lab experiment. This planet simply does not have a placebo control alternative.
Much of the issues we face (pollution, overpopulation) are a chicken and egg problem. I used to believe all the documentaries about the issues with growth and still believe that finite resources (especially oil, with its extremely dense energy content) are enabling an unhealthy economy of obsolescence that should not continue. But it may also simply be that it is not the availability of energy but human Greed that is fueling new ways of finding alternatives that can sustain this obsolescence consumption society. So any alternative we find, will in the end be used by those who merely increase their wealth. As long as this human trait is present, we will always face the same problems.
In that sense, I am not optimistic: we will not be able to erase psychopathic traits from humanity, as it is a necessary evil (think surgeons, soldiers) to do the "dirty" work that most people are unsuitable for, we all have our task on this planet and diversity is a strength. As such, as long as technological advancement remains (fueled by efficient energy use), we are constantly spiraling towards destruction. Of the environment, health, values, you name it. We cannot undo history and snap our fingers to get rid of all knowledge how to make weapons of mass destruction. Forget about bombs, even simple guns are way too destructive for our own good, where a simple squeeze of a finger can erase a life. We cannot make the resources and materials disappear either. It would take a lot more to reverse such destructive progress that humanity was able to live without for probably hundreds of thousands of years but that our brains were able to invent and now we are stuck with the responsibility of what to do with what we have.
I may be a pessimist, but I think we are heading for a collapse of global society. Not because of the topical issues raised by those who want to extract even more wealth and power from scaremongering about climate change, weapon use, migration, etc., but because of the collective societal state of mind of the world, where the problems we cause are attempted to be solved through the same mindset. You cannot solve a material problem with the same material thinking that led to it.
At core is no belief in a higher state of being, a purpose that benefits all of society.
A loss of God?.. Maybe that is the core issue.
I'm afraid the only "solution" is the cyclical one that haunts nature: a collapse, destroying the impossible endless upward spiral. I do not believe that we can maintain our lifestyles, because a certain percentage of humanity is simply flawed and will always abuse power to cause harm. Perhaps not less resources, but less energy and lower technology would deprive them from exerting global power. For that however, a collapse is required. Judging by how they are driving us towards such a collapse at great speed, I think it will eventually happen.
What rises from such a collapse, that is the question. A Mad Max type of wasteland, deprived of resources, that downgrades us to basic animal instincts, but no learning or mental enlightenment?
Or a utopistic, improved society, where humanity has learnt its lesson and needs to start ground-up, hands in the soil, in harmony with nature and being content with what we have, through hard work rather than easy energy?
I hope the latter. So perhaps it would not be so bad if such a collapse happened sooner than later. I just don't see this shift in mentality take place while our society is intact. It may be a disaster to have billions dying to achieve a better world, but if we consider the current state of mind of humanity, with depression, criminality, purposelessness just ramping up, perhaps we would be better off indeed with a reset. Not the type of Global Economic Reset that the likes of Schwab have in mind, but a spiritual reset.
There is something extremely concerning about this. For not related reasons I've been researching lately about the Great Chinese Famine (1959 - 1961), where 15 to 55 million people died. And you are not going to believe this but (from wiki) "The major contributing factors in the famine were the policies of the Great Leap Forward (1958 to 1962)".
They are using the same wording, the "Giant Leap" forward??? What do they mean by that? It seems to be that Great is not going to be enough, the numbers must be gigantic this time? I find this "coincidence" extremely concerning, as I said. They don't choose their titles by chance and sure they know about the Great Leap Forward and what it did.
PS: If you find some connection, let me know. It is also interesting that you are researching the Giant Leap at the same time that I am researching the Great Leap Forward. Thank you for your hard work, your substack is really very useful.
The really objectionable part of these social engineering projects using extrapolations from caged laboratory animals, is that they violate the very essence of what it means to promote maximising human potential. Not every human born reaches their potential in intellectual or spiritual dimensions, however, the 'modern-economies-in-democratic-societies' project was supposed to enable more and more humans to be able to do so. Despite what the 'woke' community believes, I think there was, alongside the advances in technology that made human economies more complex and diverse, a great flowering of cultural and intellectual pursuits in the 20th century - creating both urban and rural environments that were more pleasant and comfortable than could ever have been imagined, and allowing a proliferation of creative delights - literature, philosophy, music, sculpture, architecture, sports, cultural exchanges. In such an environment, human minds could come into their own and reach their highest selves. There was also a lot of crap created, but that's the price we have to pay for progress. And, at the same time as all this took place, the most developed societies already reduced their fecundity due to the costs associated with increased education etc - to the point where the governments of for instance Australia and France were begging people to have an extra child - only 15 or so years ago - so that we could maintain the level of population that made all the comforts and services possible. Now that the ultra-elite has (in K Schwab's words) 'infiltrated' all the governments of the developed world, they having 'calculated' the amount of bodies they WONT need to provide the goods and services that are required for THEIR comfort, we are suddenly being subjected to global psy-ops that are tinkering with our very perception of ourselves as the pinnacle of evolution (or God's reflections on Earth, depending on religious viewpoint). Suddenly our whole social evolution is being presented to our young people as a diseased, disgusting, endless parade of societal and thought-crimes, racism, elitism, capitalism, sexism etc etc, and now, parasitism on the Earth itself. Now we are being 'steered' in the direction where we are not autonomous and self-realising creatures, but actually just lab-animals that still have, for reasons of current economic necessity, to be allowed to roam outside of our cages, with the caveat that soon this will no longer necessary. The more this message and self-image becomes ingrained in people, the more they will be willing to enter into their cages on a permanent basis - lured there by a sense of fear, and held there by a deep sense of existential guilt. The debate should not even be focused on the numbers of humans on the planet - the overpopulation arguments are made with as little actual scientific justification as the 'climate catastrophe' arguments - or indeed the projections of the 'pandemic catastrophe' four years ago. That last one could be proven completely bat-shit crazy in a short time - these other projections, unfortunately are going to be much longer in the development to the 'proof-of-the-pudding' stage. However, we can be reasonably certain of one thing - with the drastic reduction in numbers of those at the bottom of the heap, it will be so much easier for those that occupy the top, to control and limit the evolution of higher impulses and consciousness by the rest of humanity. These actions amount to deliberate intellectual stunting and moral slavery of their fellow-humans. And when it comes to having children, I believe it is just as innate a human impulse as it is for other creatures - and do not see that a self-appointed elite has any more right to dictate who should and who shouldn't be 'allowed' to fulfil that primal urge - than that elite which, in the 19th century determined that women should not have the vote or the right to work outside the home. It's completely antithetical to freedom of expression for humanity to be limited by imposed parameters that actually should, at worst, only apply to laboratory animals. When will the elite understand that we are not mice, or rats?
I have 5 children from age 17-26. None attend/ed university(not 1 dime in college debt). The folks in my lilly white town in Teller County, CO have, drastically reduced breeding over the past 2 decades. My older children had to scratch for $7/hr summer jobs, while my youngest now get asked to work for $15.50/hr. The military recruiters offer them $50,000 enlistment bonuses to do any job they choose, because standards have dropped for the best jobs-my 25 y/o daughter whose salary is $82K/yr is getting a $25K/yr raise in January. My youngest are thriving in the much easier competition for resources; my oldest has 3 youngins; all born very cheaply on Medicaid. I tell every 20 year old I can to marry, make love and fill the Earth. When social security dies, I expect children & grandkids will help us. It feels like the GOLDEN AGE of large, never-divorced families--am I wrong? Please correct me if I am.
I think Gail Tverberg of https://ourfiniteworld.com/ is right. The earth’s population is presently overshooting the energy available to sustain it. Collapse looms. So I kind of applaud the efforts of earth4all to avert collapse. But only kind of. Here’s Sandrine Dixson-Declève, co-president and project lead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP7JdtGXs0o. At just past the 5 minute mark she says that governments realized they had to protect their entire populations from Covid, not just the rich. Huh? That’s not what happened on the planet I live on. On my planet they tried very hard to make us all play Russian roulette.
But what do you do with millions of African Muslims, with low IQ, that are told to have large families and spread political Islam through multiplication of foreign soil (Trojan Horse strategy)?
"Giant Leap" -- a Plan To Reduce Birth Rates By 81% in the Next 70 Years
earth 4 all butt not 4 u
According to some scientists the children of vaxxed mothers (those who actually make it full term) may turn out the be infertile in 20 years time. Some speculate they may not even be able to reach full sexual maturity due to the damage caused to their endocrine systems.
In other news.... the de-gendering of society is racing ahead with a suspicious sense of urgency, including the removal of gendered words from permitted speech and the introduction of 100 new pseudo genders which are more suitable to an infertile population.
WOW! THEY have already greatly reduced birth rates with Fauci's Ouchies!
Methinks are THEY about ready to head for their underground bunkers?The
people of Earth are today's sheeple. Will they "WAKE UP!" before going into
that shower a.k.a. "gas chamber?" Please STAY WELL NATURALLY. I post
publiclly and freely on MeWe. ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH"S Saints!😁
There is a very interesting article on the "Universe 25" experiment and its author. You will be surprised what you will learn about the "Universe 25" experiment or HOW an experiment from the 1970s predicts developments in the 21st century.
https://dig-deeply.com/2023/09/15/experiment-universum-25-und-der-weg-in-eine-technokratische-zukunft/#anchor-universe-25
Rob Schneider, Dr. Robert Malone, Five Times August, Joseph Arthur, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, and more. Join VSRF for a Giving Tuesday Special on Rumble to keep VSRF alive in 2024.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/rob-schneider-dr-robert-malone-five
Move over Great Leap Forward, here comes Giant Leap Forward.
The delusions are unbelievable. There is no way they can even begin to do any of this without massive use of force and coercion that will make the Maoists of the Great Leap Forward look like pussy cats. Sounds exactly like forced and rapid collectivization (like in the former Soviet Union/Ukraine, China and Cambodia) only grander and at a global scale. How do they plan to handle conflict zones and countries that refuse to cooperate for some reason. They will be destroyed?
We need predators and a natural attrition rate from disaster. The Israelis are doing the Gazan fertility and reproductive rate a huge favour here.
They have succeeded in instilling a certain fear of air travel. First through covid measures and now through constant horror stories of pilots having heart attacks, unruly flyers, nazi flight attendants and wild hordes brawling at airports. We are definitely not getting around like we used to, which makes our lives smaller. I have noticed and intend to be less susceptible. A major commercial airline pilot relation of ours did not corroborate any of the issues btw.
No, I don't think this artificial, technocratic stuff will ever work as these people have one i common they don't really know what real life is.
Societies without children are dead.
I think on the other hand we should not invest to much energy into analysing their ideas but to create our own.
This is just eugenics rebranded. I've written about that in an essay that will appear in an anthology forthcoming from Skyhorse Publishing, "Down the Covid Rabbit Hole," which will feature top scientists writing about the pandemic. In it I write about a recent documentary, Shots: Eugenics to Pandemics, which does a deep dive into the history of the eugenics movement as overtly manifest since Francis Galton and Thomas Malthus in the 19th century. What’s striking about this film is how much of the modern history of eugenics programs since the early 20th century has been hidden from public view. Sterilization of the "unfit" began in the early part of that century but continued up until the 1960s. Promotion of the trans movement and "overpopulation" memes, plus the Covid jabs that destroy some women's fertility, is just an extension of this eugenics program. https://www.shotseugenics2pandemics.com/
Thank you Igor for the deep thoughts and wide analysis.
While this topic is way more complex for my taste than having any firm opinion, one thing is for sure: anything that power hungry psychopaths will force upon us along any ideology, is not just bound to fail, but also to cause a much worse society and a lot of suffering for billions. Unfortunately, the more complex the issue, the more difficult to see the nefarious intents of their lunatic plans and ability to adjust or seize their plans: this is not just a vaccine that can be analysed and people convinced not to take it. Changes in society cannot be pinpointed to their elements, the interaction with millions of factors is simply impossible to trace, unlike a ceteris paribus lab experiment. This planet simply does not have a placebo control alternative.
Much of the issues we face (pollution, overpopulation) are a chicken and egg problem. I used to believe all the documentaries about the issues with growth and still believe that finite resources (especially oil, with its extremely dense energy content) are enabling an unhealthy economy of obsolescence that should not continue. But it may also simply be that it is not the availability of energy but human Greed that is fueling new ways of finding alternatives that can sustain this obsolescence consumption society. So any alternative we find, will in the end be used by those who merely increase their wealth. As long as this human trait is present, we will always face the same problems.
In that sense, I am not optimistic: we will not be able to erase psychopathic traits from humanity, as it is a necessary evil (think surgeons, soldiers) to do the "dirty" work that most people are unsuitable for, we all have our task on this planet and diversity is a strength. As such, as long as technological advancement remains (fueled by efficient energy use), we are constantly spiraling towards destruction. Of the environment, health, values, you name it. We cannot undo history and snap our fingers to get rid of all knowledge how to make weapons of mass destruction. Forget about bombs, even simple guns are way too destructive for our own good, where a simple squeeze of a finger can erase a life. We cannot make the resources and materials disappear either. It would take a lot more to reverse such destructive progress that humanity was able to live without for probably hundreds of thousands of years but that our brains were able to invent and now we are stuck with the responsibility of what to do with what we have.
I may be a pessimist, but I think we are heading for a collapse of global society. Not because of the topical issues raised by those who want to extract even more wealth and power from scaremongering about climate change, weapon use, migration, etc., but because of the collective societal state of mind of the world, where the problems we cause are attempted to be solved through the same mindset. You cannot solve a material problem with the same material thinking that led to it.
At core is no belief in a higher state of being, a purpose that benefits all of society.
A loss of God?.. Maybe that is the core issue.
I'm afraid the only "solution" is the cyclical one that haunts nature: a collapse, destroying the impossible endless upward spiral. I do not believe that we can maintain our lifestyles, because a certain percentage of humanity is simply flawed and will always abuse power to cause harm. Perhaps not less resources, but less energy and lower technology would deprive them from exerting global power. For that however, a collapse is required. Judging by how they are driving us towards such a collapse at great speed, I think it will eventually happen.
What rises from such a collapse, that is the question. A Mad Max type of wasteland, deprived of resources, that downgrades us to basic animal instincts, but no learning or mental enlightenment?
Or a utopistic, improved society, where humanity has learnt its lesson and needs to start ground-up, hands in the soil, in harmony with nature and being content with what we have, through hard work rather than easy energy?
I hope the latter. So perhaps it would not be so bad if such a collapse happened sooner than later. I just don't see this shift in mentality take place while our society is intact. It may be a disaster to have billions dying to achieve a better world, but if we consider the current state of mind of humanity, with depression, criminality, purposelessness just ramping up, perhaps we would be better off indeed with a reset. Not the type of Global Economic Reset that the likes of Schwab have in mind, but a spiritual reset.
Hi Igor, fabulous reporting.
There is something extremely concerning about this. For not related reasons I've been researching lately about the Great Chinese Famine (1959 - 1961), where 15 to 55 million people died. And you are not going to believe this but (from wiki) "The major contributing factors in the famine were the policies of the Great Leap Forward (1958 to 1962)".
They are using the same wording, the "Giant Leap" forward??? What do they mean by that? It seems to be that Great is not going to be enough, the numbers must be gigantic this time? I find this "coincidence" extremely concerning, as I said. They don't choose their titles by chance and sure they know about the Great Leap Forward and what it did.
PS: If you find some connection, let me know. It is also interesting that you are researching the Giant Leap at the same time that I am researching the Great Leap Forward. Thank you for your hard work, your substack is really very useful.
The really objectionable part of these social engineering projects using extrapolations from caged laboratory animals, is that they violate the very essence of what it means to promote maximising human potential. Not every human born reaches their potential in intellectual or spiritual dimensions, however, the 'modern-economies-in-democratic-societies' project was supposed to enable more and more humans to be able to do so. Despite what the 'woke' community believes, I think there was, alongside the advances in technology that made human economies more complex and diverse, a great flowering of cultural and intellectual pursuits in the 20th century - creating both urban and rural environments that were more pleasant and comfortable than could ever have been imagined, and allowing a proliferation of creative delights - literature, philosophy, music, sculpture, architecture, sports, cultural exchanges. In such an environment, human minds could come into their own and reach their highest selves. There was also a lot of crap created, but that's the price we have to pay for progress. And, at the same time as all this took place, the most developed societies already reduced their fecundity due to the costs associated with increased education etc - to the point where the governments of for instance Australia and France were begging people to have an extra child - only 15 or so years ago - so that we could maintain the level of population that made all the comforts and services possible. Now that the ultra-elite has (in K Schwab's words) 'infiltrated' all the governments of the developed world, they having 'calculated' the amount of bodies they WONT need to provide the goods and services that are required for THEIR comfort, we are suddenly being subjected to global psy-ops that are tinkering with our very perception of ourselves as the pinnacle of evolution (or God's reflections on Earth, depending on religious viewpoint). Suddenly our whole social evolution is being presented to our young people as a diseased, disgusting, endless parade of societal and thought-crimes, racism, elitism, capitalism, sexism etc etc, and now, parasitism on the Earth itself. Now we are being 'steered' in the direction where we are not autonomous and self-realising creatures, but actually just lab-animals that still have, for reasons of current economic necessity, to be allowed to roam outside of our cages, with the caveat that soon this will no longer necessary. The more this message and self-image becomes ingrained in people, the more they will be willing to enter into their cages on a permanent basis - lured there by a sense of fear, and held there by a deep sense of existential guilt. The debate should not even be focused on the numbers of humans on the planet - the overpopulation arguments are made with as little actual scientific justification as the 'climate catastrophe' arguments - or indeed the projections of the 'pandemic catastrophe' four years ago. That last one could be proven completely bat-shit crazy in a short time - these other projections, unfortunately are going to be much longer in the development to the 'proof-of-the-pudding' stage. However, we can be reasonably certain of one thing - with the drastic reduction in numbers of those at the bottom of the heap, it will be so much easier for those that occupy the top, to control and limit the evolution of higher impulses and consciousness by the rest of humanity. These actions amount to deliberate intellectual stunting and moral slavery of their fellow-humans. And when it comes to having children, I believe it is just as innate a human impulse as it is for other creatures - and do not see that a self-appointed elite has any more right to dictate who should and who shouldn't be 'allowed' to fulfil that primal urge - than that elite which, in the 19th century determined that women should not have the vote or the right to work outside the home. It's completely antithetical to freedom of expression for humanity to be limited by imposed parameters that actually should, at worst, only apply to laboratory animals. When will the elite understand that we are not mice, or rats?
I have 5 children from age 17-26. None attend/ed university(not 1 dime in college debt). The folks in my lilly white town in Teller County, CO have, drastically reduced breeding over the past 2 decades. My older children had to scratch for $7/hr summer jobs, while my youngest now get asked to work for $15.50/hr. The military recruiters offer them $50,000 enlistment bonuses to do any job they choose, because standards have dropped for the best jobs-my 25 y/o daughter whose salary is $82K/yr is getting a $25K/yr raise in January. My youngest are thriving in the much easier competition for resources; my oldest has 3 youngins; all born very cheaply on Medicaid. I tell every 20 year old I can to marry, make love and fill the Earth. When social security dies, I expect children & grandkids will help us. It feels like the GOLDEN AGE of large, never-divorced families--am I wrong? Please correct me if I am.
I think Gail Tverberg of https://ourfiniteworld.com/ is right. The earth’s population is presently overshooting the energy available to sustain it. Collapse looms. So I kind of applaud the efforts of earth4all to avert collapse. But only kind of. Here’s Sandrine Dixson-Declève, co-president and project lead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP7JdtGXs0o. At just past the 5 minute mark she says that governments realized they had to protect their entire populations from Covid, not just the rich. Huh? That’s not what happened on the planet I live on. On my planet they tried very hard to make us all play Russian roulette.
But what do you do with millions of African Muslims, with low IQ, that are told to have large families and spread political Islam through multiplication of foreign soil (Trojan Horse strategy)?