21 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
John T's avatar

It might be because he never stopped flying around in his jets since he started this global warming stuff. Like most of them that don't practice what they preach. Just like they fail to tell people that they are destroying the environment by going green. Jungle's are being wiped out to get the material for the electric vehicle batteries. The need for oxygen that trees produce doesn't go away. That used to be important to these people. Protecting the jungles in the world. Now it is making money by destroying the planet through creating fear that we are destroying the planet. God gave us wonderful fossil fuels for a reason.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

good point

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

The Great Plains and farmlands are being polluted by wind turbines which they’ll soon pollute our beautiful waters with?? I truly hope this is dystopian…

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 20, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Help Needed in KS's avatar

??? That's new to me. What is happening?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 20, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Freedomisnotfree's avatar

It is heart wrenching to see those beautiful creatures washing up on the beaches usually dead. Shame on those that cause it.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

But He didn't give us an infinite supply of inexpensive fossil fuels. He gave us a supply that increasingly costs more and more to extract and refine. For example, fracking and the tar sands oil and the "dirtier" forms of coal are harder to extract and prepare for use. There WILL come a point when the cost of the energy required to extract and refine these resources will exceed the capacity of a debt-fueled economy to support it. It's a separate problem from CO2 emission, but related to it and very real, nonetheless.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

So you support Al Gore it sounds like. Get the real facts about CO2 emissions and how low they really are. If you get rid of fossil fuels you get rid of most everyday items we use. There is much debt being created on this green stuff. You can't dispose of solar or windmill parts and they can't be recycled. You destroy rain forests to get the materials for the batteries for electric vehicles and need fossil fuels to charge them. Where is the money in a debt fueled economy to support all of this? Most of the tests on all of these vehicles have failed and they can go average a 100 miles on a full charge. Let's be honest. It is about money and control of us. Kind of like we go from energy independence to importing oil again and higher prices we pay. Make us a socialist system where we have to depend on the government because they say we have to drive these vehicles. Our freedom of choice is being taken away everyday more and more. Let's create more fear to control the narrative and the people.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

I do NOT support Al Gore. I simply point out yet another of the contestants in what I call "the race to chaos". Limited affordable natural resources. Financial collapse. Nuclear war. Weather-related mass migrations. Deadlier pandemics. And so on. Any one of these could induce a kind of chaos that ends with the collapse of civilization as we know it. Actually, I think climate change is running dead last in this race.

It seems to me the WEF leaders and their minions couldn't care less whether climate change were true or not. They will use any topic at hand if it can be used to elicit fear in the people and therefore vulnerability to mass formation and totalitarian control. All they care about is the endless accumulation of wealth and power. I think Rahm Emmanuel forgot to end his famous phrase: "Never let a good crisis go to waste ..,. and if there isn't one handy, manufacture it."

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

I am glad to hear that. China maybe needs to worry about CO2, not the USA. The American people in their slumber allow the government to participate in the race to chaos. The "pandemic" woke a lot of them up and the jabs are waking more up. Actually, worldwide not just in the USA. They play the misinformation game, and we are dumb servants, but there are so many more of us than them. This is all temporary anyway. They are gods only in their minds. They will be reminded of it soon enough how small they really are. This quest for earthly power has no real meaning. They aren't really in control.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

Yes, but I fear many will suffer needlessly while the elites play their worldly games. When it comes right down to it, the only power We the People have left is the power of superior numbers, in the streets, by the millions, for as long as necessary, demanding return to a constitution-based government and an economy that works for everyone. The sociopathic oligarchs currently in charge have coopted all of our other powers.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

There are some very smart people trying to make changes. Mark Levin is one of the constitutional lawyers involved in this organization. They are working with all states to activate Article V powers of The Constitution because of the run away federal government. They have 10 state governments signed up so far this year.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

That's a very good thing, of course. I would just say that these people are going to have to be very smart indeed to get 75% of the states to agree on anything, especially given the level of sophisticated propaganda being wielded by the federal government. Power is never given up voluntarily, without a tooth-and-nails fight.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

If you are following the case the 2 attorney generals vs the government, that case is huge. So much is coming to light and the judge is having none of government denying free speech whether through social media or anywhere. That case could have huge implications all over the country.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

Thanks for these updates! I had not been following this particular story. It does sound promising.

Expand full comment
John T's avatar

I am subscribed to undercoverDC.com

The editor I started following when she just did videos on youtube. She has some great journalists. She is the one that follows court cases herself and gives updates on that one. I just wait for the emails. All the info is good.

Expand full comment
Freedomisnotfree's avatar

No, that is not true. And the fossil fuels do renew of course as organic matter breaks down in the ground.

Everything in moderation. The answer as usual.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

We don't need "an infinite supply", humanity is a long, long way from "infinite". The supply of economical fossil fuels is indeed limited. First by oil, in 10-25yrs, which will force a shift to gas/coal/uranium. Then by gas, in 25-50yrs, which will force a shift to coal/uranium. And then by coal, in 50-100yrs, which will force a shift to uranium/deuterium. Fortunately economical Earth resources of uranium/deuterium are for all intents & purposes unlimited. At least for absurd lengths of times like >100Myrs. And there are vast additional resources on Moon, Mars, the Asteroids.

If you have plentiful energy, you don't really need anything else. You can recycle everything, including water, extract the most low grade resources.

Funny how the PTB have boycotted nuclear energy since the 1970's, or as Alex Epstein called it "criminalized nuclear energy". And done the same to Methanol which is the easiest substitute for oil (gasoline, diesel fuel, fuel oil) and can easily be made from any carbonaceous matter including Forest Overgrowth, Waste, Flue gas, Coal, Stranded Gas or Ocean CO2. They don't want solutions. They are Rent-Seekers and Rent-Seekers just love scarcity. Plentiful energy is their archenemy. They love scams like Wind, Solar, Hydrogen, Agrofuels and ITER.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

Seems to me the logical thing to do is skip right to nuclear energy (next generation and safer). I don't really see much activity in that area.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

The NRC (Nuclear Rejection Commission) was directed by Congress to come up with a new regulatory system for the GenIV reactors to streamline their licensing. It took them 20months and they came up with greatly EXPANDED regulations that will make it MORE difficult to build GenIV reactors in the USSA. Essentially they gave Congress the big middle finger. They should all be fired. Let individual states use their own regulator.

Expand full comment