7 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Markker's avatar

Quite afew have made presentations on the difference between Relative Rate Reduction which is the figures used to claim efficacy and Actual Rate Reduction which is the true rate. They being Pfizer and Moderna both claimed around 95% RRR but ARR for Pfizer is just 0.8% and 1.2% for Moderna. I may have transposed those but you can see there is no benefit, just harms, mentally, phyically not to forget all tax monies being sucked up by these parasites on all levels that have enabled this global coup. Not yet content, they instigate a war to impoverish us further. Go see my other post I made. Also, why did all nations have orders placed for "Covid 19 Test Kits" in 2017/18 when the terrorist who heads up WHO, Tedros, only gave it a name in March 2020? Some people say it really means Certificate of Vaccination 19. And with undisclosed top secret ingredients in them which they don't have to reveal under EAU, I am very concerned about the nanorouters/technology found in all of them by several independent scientists who managed to get vials from across the globe. I believe this is the purpose of the injections.

Expand full comment
Daithi's avatar

I agree. Naomi Wolf has done tremendous work on analysing the Pfizer data released after the court orders, and the harms are very clear and match much of what we see now with the "died suddenly" people.

As to Igor's question about why governments are doing nothing - simple answer is money. They will slow roll everything until class action lawsuits similar to the tobacco and asbestos lawsuits from some years ago are filed, then they will continue to obfuscate, deny, drag it out some more, until most people who were part of the class action are dead. Read one of John Grisham's early books, The Pelican Brief and you will get the general idea.

Expand full comment
Cornwall Marc's avatar

It's exactly like the haemophiliac scandal from the 70s in the UK. A national disgrace and still not sorted out. Utterly disgusting the way that the govt have behaved whilst the victims die in poverty. Shame on UK.

Expand full comment
James Beck's avatar

The Legal system is being bought off.

You will not see the expected injury lawsuits that you think will commence.

When the healthcare system collapses by bankruptcy, doctor & nurse covid deaths and jailed healthcare workers, just where do you think you will get your healthcare when you need it ?

Expand full comment
Satan's Doorknob's avatar

I feel obligated to add: Rarely if ever is there consideration of adverse effects. These almost always exist or at least in a cautious world, would be assumed to do so. Problems: even if the investigator is impartial and unbiased, which of course is very rarely the case when Pharma is paying their salary, it is difficult to quantify what those risks are. Only long term trials on large populations will produce those data. As we're discussing here, there seems to be very little desire to account for what seems to be rather serious casualties from the jabs.

Expand full comment
Markker's avatar

They knew beforehand from previous attempts on animals. This time humans are lab rats. As all these products are described as "prototype countermeasures" and not pharma products, none of the rules apply including any actual monitoring.

Expand full comment
Ray Alford's avatar

Yes indeed! The incriminating evidence here might exceed that of the two towers! And that's a mountainous heap!

Ray

Expand full comment