The only variable is the JAB.
As I'm sure you know, depending on the jab, there are certain windows in which you're considered "jabbed." i.e. Pfizer and Moderna "fully jabbed" windows are 15-89 days post-jab.
If a jabbie dies 0-14 days or 90+ days post-jab, they will be considered "unjabbed," AND ironically be counted as a "virus" death…
As I'm sure you know, depending on the jab, there are certain windows in which you're considered "jabbed." i.e. Pfizer and Moderna "fully jabbed" windows are 15-89 days post-jab.
If a jabbie dies 0-14 days or 90+ days post-jab, they will be considered "unjabbed," AND ironically be counted as a "virus" death. LOL
Anyway, the more jabs these people get, the more their risk for an adverse event goes up.
More likely it's combinations of QA issues in production, transportation and storage. Remember that the original message about the mRNA "vaccines" were that they needed cryptogenic storage and had a very short use by date. The "hot" lots may simply be those that were better produced, transported and stored because a greater portion of the mRNA lipid capsules survived and transfected more cells for the same dose.
Another issue which needs a lot more publicity, is that it's literally 50/50 if you get the correct, full-length protein instructions. When the FDA tried looking they found only 50% were as intended, the other 50% were mangled, misfolded, too long or too short. And no, we have no real idea of the effect of those, other than the high risk of prion disease.
So did they reject and ban immediately?
No, they changed the criteria down to 50%.
That's the "protection" you're getting from government agencies. "50 50? Welp, good enough, fuk em!"
Maria Gutschi is a pharmacist with more than 30 years experience in hospital, community and government. She is an experienced hospital manager and has initiated and managed award winning programs in antimicrobial stewardship and model standards for pharmacy compounding of hazardous (ie chemo) and non-hazardous sterile preparations for patient care.
Someone mentioned that in the course of production, in large stainless vats, where the concoction is mixed together before bottling, that the ingredients are prone to settling, wherein a higher concentration might occur in the vials which were filled from lowest levels. That's criminal negligence on the part of the company, if it is so.
The only variable is the JAB.
As I'm sure you know, depending on the jab, there are certain windows in which you're considered "jabbed." i.e. Pfizer and Moderna "fully jabbed" windows are 15-89 days post-jab.
If a jabbie dies 0-14 days or 90+ days post-jab, they will be considered "unjabbed," AND ironically be counted as a "virus" death. LOL
Anyway, the more jabs these people get, the more their risk for an adverse event goes up.
Also, all jabs are not created equal. Some lots appear to be much more lethal
Correct. Different formulations, dosages, placebos, and simple human error.
More likely it's combinations of QA issues in production, transportation and storage. Remember that the original message about the mRNA "vaccines" were that they needed cryptogenic storage and had a very short use by date. The "hot" lots may simply be those that were better produced, transported and stored because a greater portion of the mRNA lipid capsules survived and transfected more cells for the same dose.
Here's Dr. Ryan Cole's take on the "I feel fine" people. They were LUCKY.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NG49HuyZDMFv/
Another issue which needs a lot more publicity, is that it's literally 50/50 if you get the correct, full-length protein instructions. When the FDA tried looking they found only 50% were as intended, the other 50% were mangled, misfolded, too long or too short. And no, we have no real idea of the effect of those, other than the high risk of prion disease.
So did they reject and ban immediately?
No, they changed the criteria down to 50%.
That's the "protection" you're getting from government agencies. "50 50? Welp, good enough, fuk em!"
Some related videos to the manufacturing process & the incomplete proteins:
Sasha Latypova Interview - We The Patriots USA
September 15, 2022
https://rumble.com/v1jy8fz-vaccine-safety-awareness-marathon-2022-part-20-sasha-latypova.html
Maria Gutschi is a pharmacist with more than 30 years experience in hospital, community and government. She is an experienced hospital manager and has initiated and managed award winning programs in antimicrobial stewardship and model standards for pharmacy compounding of hazardous (ie chemo) and non-hazardous sterile preparations for patient care.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/muB0nrznCAC4/
Dr. Krueger many months ago:
http://enformtk.u-aizu.ac.jp/howard/gcep_dr_vanessa_schmidt_krueger/
Good observation, Hazel!
Someone mentioned that in the course of production, in large stainless vats, where the concoction is mixed together before bottling, that the ingredients are prone to settling, wherein a higher concentration might occur in the vials which were filled from lowest levels. That's criminal negligence on the part of the company, if it is so.
Ray