Oh disagree wholeheartedly!! She is NOT irrelevant!! She was in a position of PUBLIC authority; that is, people will LISTEN to her! (AND people were paying her what you can BET was a very hefty salary!) It doesn't matter if she had no operational authority: IF she spoken up, then the NORMIES would (okay, might...) start asking un…
Oh disagree wholeheartedly!! She is NOT irrelevant!! She was in a position of PUBLIC authority; that is, people will LISTEN to her! (AND people were paying her what you can BET was a very hefty salary!) It doesn't matter if she had no operational authority: IF she spoken up, then the NORMIES would (okay, might...) start asking uncomfortable questions of the people WITH operational authority! She CLEARLY could not have "believed" the false narrative because she and her wife were injured! So she KNEW there was danger. Wanna just bet as an 'ex-doctor' (it says in the article), she went and looked up the real truth, so she could try to help herself and her mate?! Nope sorry -- there IS not excuse for NOT preventing murders!
No one is so insignificant as to be assured their actions have no effect!
Oh disagree wholeheartedly!! She is NOT irrelevant!! She was in a position of PUBLIC authority; that is, people will LISTEN to her! (AND people were paying her what you can BET was a very hefty salary!) It doesn't matter if she had no operational authority: IF she spoken up, then the NORMIES would (okay, might...) start asking uncomfortable questions of the people WITH operational authority! She CLEARLY could not have "believed" the false narrative because she and her wife were injured! So she KNEW there was danger. Wanna just bet as an 'ex-doctor' (it says in the article), she went and looked up the real truth, so she could try to help herself and her mate?! Nope sorry -- there IS not excuse for NOT preventing murders!
No one is so insignificant as to be assured their actions have no effect!