4 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
philipat's avatar

They started to report the data because, initially, it proved what they wanted to prove for reasons of serendipity.

Expand full comment
Miko (Socialism Survivor)'s avatar

Actually, it did not. The data was all BS and part of the propaganda push.

Expand full comment
philipat's avatar

That's not what i said! It was before anyone had an idea that HMG would actually manipulate data using the methods we now fully understand - definitions (of vaccinated/unvaccinated and cause of death etc) , cherry-picking time scales. It took all of us some time to get onto it. In the meantime, as I said, it proved what they wanted it to prove. This and midazolam alloed them to get the scam rolling. look up "serendipity" in a dictionary.

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

Take a look at the UK ONS/HMG 'modelling' used to define vaxx "effectiveness."

It is beyond appalling. "Black box" invalid models fusing original corrupt "efficacy" data to post hoc hospitalisations, case numbers and deaths.

Making a reliable mess of the data was key to maintaining chaos and confusion and a viral narrative (pun intended). It ensured that people, doctors, politicians kept circling the drain rather than keeping their eye on the ball. In the end, most were mesmerised in the mass formation described by Mattias Desmet, and they still are.

Expand full comment