Thanks for this. I just wrote up a guide for college students walking them through the data on their risk of covid (low) vs. the VAERS data, debunking a lot of the media excuses. I'll add this article to mine - https://wholistic.substack.com/p/how-to-evaluate-risk-vs-benefit-with
The CDC has shown itself to be at best inept but most likel…
Thanks for this. I just wrote up a guide for college students walking them through the data on their risk of covid (low) vs. the VAERS data, debunking a lot of the media excuses. I'll add this article to mine - https://wholistic.substack.com/p/how-to-evaluate-risk-vs-benefit-with
The CDC has shown itself to be at best inept but most likely an extremely corrupt organization. How they can continue to act like there's "nothing to see here" is absolutely mind-blowing.
Interesting that you (and probably most commenters) use the words "inept" and "corrupt" to describe the CDC (and FDA and .....). Do the history books describe Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Josef Goebbels, Josef Mengele, et al as "corrupt"? The language these books use is much harsher than "inept" or "corrupt", given the nature of the crimes which these individuals committed. Why are we using language more appropriate for people in the numbers racket or other illegal gambling to describe what those enabling mass murder are doing?
Look up "Godwin's law." Making comparisons to Hitler may feel satisfying, but as a talking point will immediately shut down the mind of someone who is in the middle but perhaps reachable otherwise.
Hitler might be a huge understatement. If someone follows "Godwins law" they are not reachable at all but beyond help. Such 'law'' is probably made up by someone trying to take cards off the table to protect criminals. It would be like saying you shouldn't mention the Romans when discussing metal poisoning in pipes.
You can't say it's accurate. You are mind reading a malicious intention. I cannot prove that they INTENDED to murder people. It's a possibility, for sure, but it's not proven and doesn't connect well with the people who need to be reached.
There was gas apparently to kill flees and these were the cause of typhus. There is a poster showing that that there was claims of typhus spreading in jewish populations so it could be argued that some people might not have intended to murder but were trying to control a epidemic. Others might have intended to murder. At the time people probably were told that the santiary measures were precautions blah blah. It is like gaslighting to pretend after the fact that it was all just murder with no cover of a supposed epidemic and then say you can't talk about it when more 'sanitary measures' are being imposed. The narc admitting to murder after the fact to cover up the method so it can be done again. "It was just racism nothing to do with 'vaccines' and 'sanitation'. how dare you denier" In anycase it is a relevant and important historical example. The intent doesnt matter so much as the impact being negative and there being historical examples of how dangerous such claims can be. The old saying about how the road to hell is paved with good intentions. https://www.reddit.com/r/PropagandaPosters/comments/1o2421/beware_of_typhus_avoid_jews_poster_from_the/cco8w41/
I couldn't state that at the beginning, in early 2020, or perhaps even in early 2021. With all the evidence we have now acquired about denial of appropriate and early treatment for those tagged with COVID-19 and about the harm caused by the "vaccine", and with continuation of the "vaccine" promotion, there is no doubt in my mind about intent. David Irving, the WWII revisionist, made numerous statements about Hitler's not knowing about the Holocaust. For some people, all the evidence in the world will not constitute "proof"!
"Now, some of my colleagues on Substack might argue that the 6,688 covid deaths reported for young adults between 18-29 years weren’t all deaths “by” covid but “with” covid"
The data at face value doesn't claim these were "covid deaths". It says "deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19". It is not arguing something but pointing out they are not claiming these are caused by covid but actually say "with". It is only you that have a belief that the data couldn't possibly be so deceptive and worthless. In reality there is no evidence of any 'covid' deaths at all. Not even any evidence anyone had so much as a sneeze because of "covid". https://odysee.com/@halloftruth:c/the-final-refutal-of-virology-dr-stefan-lanka:6
Man...this movement needs more people like you on the frontlines... So here's your chance...
Fix your Bayonet. We're planning a 'bolts-open charge' at the enemy lines. First one of you to capture the machine gun nest, gets a Medal, an increase in rank, a bonus from the Commander, and week of R&R in Paris.
Go get 'em, tiger. Nobody believes in virology like the BigPfharma industrial complex. Keep punching up!
I’m about 3/4 of the way through. Had I known I wouldn’t of vaccinated my 2 adult children. My youngest son is expecting his 2nd child in March, they won’t be vaccinating and have already told the doctors they can shove the hepatitis B vax. It astonishing how many people don’t realize hours old infants, get a vaccine for something they don’t need.
I was shocked to find out about the jabs they give the day of birth and equally shocked at how many vaccines are on the schedule. Over sixty? Who in their right mind would think that's even healthy. It can't be.
Thanks for this. I just wrote up a guide for college students walking them through the data on their risk of covid (low) vs. the VAERS data, debunking a lot of the media excuses. I'll add this article to mine - https://wholistic.substack.com/p/how-to-evaluate-risk-vs-benefit-with
The CDC has shown itself to be at best inept but most likely an extremely corrupt organization. How they can continue to act like there's "nothing to see here" is absolutely mind-blowing.
Stephanie, a great guide! I so wish I had access to it 1.5 years ago!!!
Interesting that you (and probably most commenters) use the words "inept" and "corrupt" to describe the CDC (and FDA and .....). Do the history books describe Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Josef Goebbels, Josef Mengele, et al as "corrupt"? The language these books use is much harsher than "inept" or "corrupt", given the nature of the crimes which these individuals committed. Why are we using language more appropriate for people in the numbers racket or other illegal gambling to describe what those enabling mass murder are doing?
Look up "Godwin's law." Making comparisons to Hitler may feel satisfying, but as a talking point will immediately shut down the mind of someone who is in the middle but perhaps reachable otherwise.
Hitler might be a huge understatement. If someone follows "Godwins law" they are not reachable at all but beyond help. Such 'law'' is probably made up by someone trying to take cards off the table to protect criminals. It would be like saying you shouldn't mention the Romans when discussing metal poisoning in pipes.
It's not a question of feeling satisfied; it's a question of being accurate!
You can't say it's accurate. You are mind reading a malicious intention. I cannot prove that they INTENDED to murder people. It's a possibility, for sure, but it's not proven and doesn't connect well with the people who need to be reached.
There was gas apparently to kill flees and these were the cause of typhus. There is a poster showing that that there was claims of typhus spreading in jewish populations so it could be argued that some people might not have intended to murder but were trying to control a epidemic. Others might have intended to murder. At the time people probably were told that the santiary measures were precautions blah blah. It is like gaslighting to pretend after the fact that it was all just murder with no cover of a supposed epidemic and then say you can't talk about it when more 'sanitary measures' are being imposed. The narc admitting to murder after the fact to cover up the method so it can be done again. "It was just racism nothing to do with 'vaccines' and 'sanitation'. how dare you denier" In anycase it is a relevant and important historical example. The intent doesnt matter so much as the impact being negative and there being historical examples of how dangerous such claims can be. The old saying about how the road to hell is paved with good intentions. https://www.reddit.com/r/PropagandaPosters/comments/1o2421/beware_of_typhus_avoid_jews_poster_from_the/cco8w41/
I couldn't state that at the beginning, in early 2020, or perhaps even in early 2021. With all the evidence we have now acquired about denial of appropriate and early treatment for those tagged with COVID-19 and about the harm caused by the "vaccine", and with continuation of the "vaccine" promotion, there is no doubt in my mind about intent. David Irving, the WWII revisionist, made numerous statements about Hitler's not knowing about the Holocaust. For some people, all the evidence in the world will not constitute "proof"!
Proof that the entire thing is a hoax?
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/march/16/the-coronavirus-hoax/
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/03/ron-paul/the-coronavirus-hoax/
When the virus is a hoax, then the jab must be the malady.
What are you even talking about?
Regardless, if you still believe the State narrative after the last three years, you're pretty gullible.
With this many comments, it doesn't take me back to the branch of the original post, sorry.
But anyway, Epstein didn't kill himself and Hitler didn't either.
Operation Paper Clip.
Fauxi is a Nazi, BTW.
Good point
Their intention may have been to just sterilize and cause miscarriages.
Oh wait, causing miscarriages would be murder, so that's off the table.
I did nazi that coming! ; )
Inept eventually surfaces when you are dealing with a large staff.
Corruption seems to be another issue all together.
Then there is corrupt AND inept. :-)
I have learned to be careful never to attribute to ineptitude that which is attributable to malice.
"Now, some of my colleagues on Substack might argue that the 6,688 covid deaths reported for young adults between 18-29 years weren’t all deaths “by” covid but “with” covid"
The data at face value doesn't claim these were "covid deaths". It says "deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19". It is not arguing something but pointing out they are not claiming these are caused by covid but actually say "with". It is only you that have a belief that the data couldn't possibly be so deceptive and worthless. In reality there is no evidence of any 'covid' deaths at all. Not even any evidence anyone had so much as a sneeze because of "covid". https://odysee.com/@halloftruth:c/the-final-refutal-of-virology-dr-stefan-lanka:6
Yes, well, I was trying to write for more mainstream people. :-)
John. The link doesn’t work. ........
hmm. maybe try on bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jw3D3fexbCij/
I can’t reach this site.
It's likely either your search engine, browser or the server your connecting to.
NO SUCH THING AS A VIRUS WARRIOR - spotted...
Man...this movement needs more people like you on the frontlines... So here's your chance...
Fix your Bayonet. We're planning a 'bolts-open charge' at the enemy lines. First one of you to capture the machine gun nest, gets a Medal, an increase in rank, a bonus from the Commander, and week of R&R in Paris.
Go get 'em, tiger. Nobody believes in virology like the BigPfharma industrial complex. Keep punching up!
I’m about 3/4 of the way through. Had I known I wouldn’t of vaccinated my 2 adult children. My youngest son is expecting his 2nd child in March, they won’t be vaccinating and have already told the doctors they can shove the hepatitis B vax. It astonishing how many people don’t realize hours old infants, get a vaccine for something they don’t need.
I was shocked to find out about the jabs they give the day of birth and equally shocked at how many vaccines are on the schedule. Over sixty? Who in their right mind would think that's even healthy. It can't be.
The hpv vax is only slightly less worse than the Covid jab. Really bad
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=salsa&utm_campaign=CHD+TV&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=31aa47c5-b1ee-413c-8520-7818bbeb3593