Igor, This "paper" does not follow the scientific method. Full STOP.
There were NO controls. NONE. ZERO.
The exact same trypsin/digesting/PCR process which was done to these 81 "Long Covid" blood samples MUST also be done to at least 81 regular "Non-Long-Covid" people in order to confirm that the process ITSELF is not …
Igor, This "paper" does not follow the scientific method. Full STOP.
There were NO controls. NONE. ZERO.
The exact same trypsin/digesting/PCR process which was done to these 81 "Long Covid" blood samples MUST also be done to at least 81 regular "Non-Long-Covid" people in order to confirm that the process ITSELF is not causing these supposed "fragments" which are being detected by mass spectrometry analysis.
(If these scientists keep insisting on make-believe "viruses", then the least they could do is find some "NON-Covid-Virus-infected" CONTROL samples to include in their magical spike protein "study"...)
What am I missing? Is it a budget thing? Would the "experiments" have cost twice much in order to do an additional 81 "non covid" control samples? If so, then why not just use 40 "sick" subjects and 40 "non-sick" subjects so that we can at least have a real scientific study with an actual CONTROL GROUP?
Furthermore, No "spike protein" was ever found. A "fragment" of something they are claiming is PART of the supposed "spike protein" was supposedly "detected" in a blood sample after it was "digested" with "trypsin" and went through a whole bunch of other PCR processing stuff. (which was only detected in 2 samples BTW)...
And speaking of "tryptic fragment"...what is that exactly?
What percentage of the WHOLE "spike protein" is this supposed "fragment"?
As an analogy, The Star Wars Millennium Falcon Lego set has 7000 pieces. Let's call this the WHOLE "spike protein". After we "digest" or break up the Lego set with "trypsin", (and then add some other PCR prep stuff), then what is the "fragment" that supposedly confirms the presence of the Falcon and not another Lego spaceship?
Igor... it gets worse...
"The study included a total of 81 patients with long-COVID syndrome. Clinical data were available for 70 patients (Table I)."
Why only 70? Why not ALL 81? (As it is, 81 is already a ridiculously small sample size? It's either purposefully left out or it's scientific incompetence).
81 "long covid" blood serums....
ZERO "NON-long Covid" control blood serums!
Lastly, this "research paper" contains several "cover my ass" type of declarations which absolve the authors of any liability or scientific integrity:
"Statistical analysis was not performed due to the descriptive design of our study."
"Having detected the vaccinal protein in two subjects and the viral protein in one subject in a cohort of 95 patients, this study has mainly a descriptive function."
"However, the exact cause of long-COVID and the factors contributing to its diverse symptomatology are still not fully understood."
What if....Scientists identified 81 American houses that were "infected" with "Long Christmas Presents". Then, using the classic "leave-cookies-and-milk-out-for-Santa-technique", scientists were able to confirm the presence of "Santa". (NOTE: Houses that did not celebrate Christmas were not used as control groups, because everyone knows that Santa eats cookies and Santa brings presents).
At the very minimum, this magical "spike protein experiment" should be completely started over....
420 blood samples from "long covid" people,
420 blood samples from NON long covid people. (CONTROL GROUP)
Scientific Method...Simple AS...
Same Team Bro!
(And that would be, "Team Pursuit of Truth ALways")
What "spike protein"?
Igor, This "paper" does not follow the scientific method. Full STOP.
There were NO controls. NONE. ZERO.
The exact same trypsin/digesting/PCR process which was done to these 81 "Long Covid" blood samples MUST also be done to at least 81 regular "Non-Long-Covid" people in order to confirm that the process ITSELF is not causing these supposed "fragments" which are being detected by mass spectrometry analysis.
(If these scientists keep insisting on make-believe "viruses", then the least they could do is find some "NON-Covid-Virus-infected" CONTROL samples to include in their magical spike protein "study"...)
What am I missing? Is it a budget thing? Would the "experiments" have cost twice much in order to do an additional 81 "non covid" control samples? If so, then why not just use 40 "sick" subjects and 40 "non-sick" subjects so that we can at least have a real scientific study with an actual CONTROL GROUP?
Furthermore, No "spike protein" was ever found. A "fragment" of something they are claiming is PART of the supposed "spike protein" was supposedly "detected" in a blood sample after it was "digested" with "trypsin" and went through a whole bunch of other PCR processing stuff. (which was only detected in 2 samples BTW)...
And speaking of "tryptic fragment"...what is that exactly?
What percentage of the WHOLE "spike protein" is this supposed "fragment"?
As an analogy, The Star Wars Millennium Falcon Lego set has 7000 pieces. Let's call this the WHOLE "spike protein". After we "digest" or break up the Lego set with "trypsin", (and then add some other PCR prep stuff), then what is the "fragment" that supposedly confirms the presence of the Falcon and not another Lego spaceship?
Igor... it gets worse...
"The study included a total of 81 patients with long-COVID syndrome. Clinical data were available for 70 patients (Table I)."
Why only 70? Why not ALL 81? (As it is, 81 is already a ridiculously small sample size? It's either purposefully left out or it's scientific incompetence).
81 "long covid" blood serums....
ZERO "NON-long Covid" control blood serums!
Lastly, this "research paper" contains several "cover my ass" type of declarations which absolve the authors of any liability or scientific integrity:
"Statistical analysis was not performed due to the descriptive design of our study."
"Having detected the vaccinal protein in two subjects and the viral protein in one subject in a cohort of 95 patients, this study has mainly a descriptive function."
"However, the exact cause of long-COVID and the factors contributing to its diverse symptomatology are still not fully understood."
What if....Scientists identified 81 American houses that were "infected" with "Long Christmas Presents". Then, using the classic "leave-cookies-and-milk-out-for-Santa-technique", scientists were able to confirm the presence of "Santa". (NOTE: Houses that did not celebrate Christmas were not used as control groups, because everyone knows that Santa eats cookies and Santa brings presents).
At the very minimum, this magical "spike protein experiment" should be completely started over....
420 blood samples from "long covid" people,
420 blood samples from NON long covid people. (CONTROL GROUP)
Scientific Method...Simple AS...
Same Team Bro!
(And that would be, "Team Pursuit of Truth ALways")
-Boostershots
Hi! long time no see
Do you believe in unicorns?