This paper is really bad, at least their supplementary data in which they mention possible integration.
(1) the supplement does not seem to be peer-reviewed (supplements often are not) because it contains strange errors. For example, in the S4 figure caption it says "Wild-type Spike Protein sequence alignment with patient genomic sequence" while no protein sequence is shown but a DNA sequence. Or in the caption of Supplementary Table I it reads: "Matching bases in cDNA and
genomic sequences are colored blue and capitalized. Light blue bases mark the boundaries of
gaps in either sequence (often splice sites)". There is no blue or light blue in this table. It looks like no one has critically reviewed this text.
(2) the identities between the PCR amplified sequence and vaccine spike are minuscule, and could easily be explained by chance.
(3) the authors caution that this data is very preliminary.
By the way, the encircled DNA is a commercially available DNA ladder, which is used to estimate DNA sizes in agarose gels, not "Pfizer Vaccine Genes".
My name is Mic Rosado I am an Oncology Nurse of 28 years and now host a daily podcast. Would you be available to come on my show and discuss this study?
If vaccine spike protein is found circulating up to 6 months after injection (the longest it's been looked for), then there doesn't seem to be any option except reverse transcription.
How do we know that vaccines are causing this DNA integration and not the virus itself? Have we ruled out the possibility of a mRNA -> DNA conversion and then integration?
Studies find all kinds of things re the vax but with the laws as they stand we don’t have any legal standing to change the vax or its use. Pissing in the wind day in and day out, just another substack author adding to the pile of studies that have no ability to change anything. Send in your monthly fee so you can read the truth that no one can do anything about. Another continuous aspect of futility is that nothing changes but the level of frustration continues to ratchet up. Guys got to make a living, the truth s daily propaganda - propaganda defined as real information that has no impact on reality in the world we currently live in. What a messenger - like the little boy who cried wolf until the bear ate him.
Igor, This "paper" does not follow the scientific method. Full STOP.
There were NO controls. NONE. ZERO.
The exact same trypsin/digesting/PCR process which was done to these 81 "Long Covid" blood samples MUST also be done to at least 81 regular "Non-Long-Covid" people in order to confirm that the process ITSELF is not causing these supposed "fragments" which are being detected by mass spectrometry analysis.
(If these scientists keep insisting on make-believe "viruses", then the least they could do is find some "NON-Covid-Virus-infected" CONTROL samples to include in their magical spike protein "study"...)
What am I missing? Is it a budget thing? Would the "experiments" have cost twice much in order to do an additional 81 "non covid" control samples? If so, then why not just use 40 "sick" subjects and 40 "non-sick" subjects so that we can at least have a real scientific study with an actual CONTROL GROUP?
Furthermore, No "spike protein" was ever found. A "fragment" of something they are claiming is PART of the supposed "spike protein" was supposedly "detected" in a blood sample after it was "digested" with "trypsin" and went through a whole bunch of other PCR processing stuff. (which was only detected in 2 samples BTW)...
And speaking of "tryptic fragment"...what is that exactly?
What percentage of the WHOLE "spike protein" is this supposed "fragment"?
As an analogy, The Star Wars Millennium Falcon Lego set has 7000 pieces. Let's call this the WHOLE "spike protein". After we "digest" or break up the Lego set with "trypsin", (and then add some other PCR prep stuff), then what is the "fragment" that supposedly confirms the presence of the Falcon and not another Lego spaceship?
Igor... it gets worse...
"The study included a total of 81 patients with long-COVID syndrome. Clinical data were available for 70 patients (Table I)."
Why only 70? Why not ALL 81? (As it is, 81 is already a ridiculously small sample size? It's either purposefully left out or it's scientific incompetence).
81 "long covid" blood serums....
ZERO "NON-long Covid" control blood serums!
Lastly, this "research paper" contains several "cover my ass" type of declarations which absolve the authors of any liability or scientific integrity:
"Statistical analysis was not performed due to the descriptive design of our study."
"Having detected the vaccinal protein in two subjects and the viral protein in one subject in a cohort of 95 patients, this study has mainly a descriptive function."
"However, the exact cause of long-COVID and the factors contributing to its diverse symptomatology are still not fully understood."
What if....Scientists identified 81 American houses that were "infected" with "Long Christmas Presents". Then, using the classic "leave-cookies-and-milk-out-for-Santa-technique", scientists were able to confirm the presence of "Santa". (NOTE: Houses that did not celebrate Christmas were not used as control groups, because everyone knows that Santa eats cookies and Santa brings presents).
At the very minimum, this magical "spike protein experiment" should be completely started over....
420 blood samples from "long covid" people,
420 blood samples from NON long covid people. (CONTROL GROUP)
Scientific Method...Simple AS...
Same Team Bro!
(And that would be, "Team Pursuit of Truth ALways")
No, it doesn't. Amplification occurs with whatever is there and it is not even expected to produce complete forms of DNA. Merely snippets. These are assembled with software giving the final mix. In genetics they usually work with parts of something they only see in completed form in the artificially assembled parts.
"Mistakes were made" is being screamed from the foottops. "Next time we will get it right" because they certainly planning a next one. I mean, nature will... Because of climate change. Of course.
It's the ONLY vaccine that forced people to sign a waiver saying the pharmaceutacal company isn't responsible for injury.
The proof is right there!!!! Brainwash the people with Fear and they ignore the warning signs
https://youtu.be/t4TFbT36Ui0?si=va8iprG2oD16bSIe
This paper is really bad, at least their supplementary data in which they mention possible integration.
(1) the supplement does not seem to be peer-reviewed (supplements often are not) because it contains strange errors. For example, in the S4 figure caption it says "Wild-type Spike Protein sequence alignment with patient genomic sequence" while no protein sequence is shown but a DNA sequence. Or in the caption of Supplementary Table I it reads: "Matching bases in cDNA and
genomic sequences are colored blue and capitalized. Light blue bases mark the boundaries of
gaps in either sequence (often splice sites)". There is no blue or light blue in this table. It looks like no one has critically reviewed this text.
(2) the identities between the PCR amplified sequence and vaccine spike are minuscule, and could easily be explained by chance.
(3) the authors caution that this data is very preliminary.
By the way, the encircled DNA is a commercially available DNA ladder, which is used to estimate DNA sizes in agarose gels, not "Pfizer Vaccine Genes".
Igor Chudov,
My name is Mic Rosado I am an Oncology Nurse of 28 years and now host a daily podcast. Would you be available to come on my show and discuss this study?
micmeow@contiservative.com
Best Regards,
Mic
If vaccine spike protein is found circulating up to 6 months after injection (the longest it's been looked for), then there doesn't seem to be any option except reverse transcription.
NO REFUNDS
What exactly are the "sensitive tests"? This is interesting but the whole of DNA/RNA genetics must be questioned after the Covid "virus" lies.
How do we know that vaccines are causing this DNA integration and not the virus itself? Have we ruled out the possibility of a mRNA -> DNA conversion and then integration?
I will be heading into lab next month to prove the dna integration is happening
Studies find all kinds of things re the vax but with the laws as they stand we don’t have any legal standing to change the vax or its use. Pissing in the wind day in and day out, just another substack author adding to the pile of studies that have no ability to change anything. Send in your monthly fee so you can read the truth that no one can do anything about. Another continuous aspect of futility is that nothing changes but the level of frustration continues to ratchet up. Guys got to make a living, the truth s daily propaganda - propaganda defined as real information that has no impact on reality in the world we currently live in. What a messenger - like the little boy who cried wolf until the bear ate him.
So-in other words, the “proof of concept” of the “transfection” rollout was a towering success...?!!
( thinking of a pyramidal- shaped tower here, like the Trans- America Building, in the infernal Shit Francisco)
What "spike protein"?
Igor, This "paper" does not follow the scientific method. Full STOP.
There were NO controls. NONE. ZERO.
The exact same trypsin/digesting/PCR process which was done to these 81 "Long Covid" blood samples MUST also be done to at least 81 regular "Non-Long-Covid" people in order to confirm that the process ITSELF is not causing these supposed "fragments" which are being detected by mass spectrometry analysis.
(If these scientists keep insisting on make-believe "viruses", then the least they could do is find some "NON-Covid-Virus-infected" CONTROL samples to include in their magical spike protein "study"...)
What am I missing? Is it a budget thing? Would the "experiments" have cost twice much in order to do an additional 81 "non covid" control samples? If so, then why not just use 40 "sick" subjects and 40 "non-sick" subjects so that we can at least have a real scientific study with an actual CONTROL GROUP?
Furthermore, No "spike protein" was ever found. A "fragment" of something they are claiming is PART of the supposed "spike protein" was supposedly "detected" in a blood sample after it was "digested" with "trypsin" and went through a whole bunch of other PCR processing stuff. (which was only detected in 2 samples BTW)...
And speaking of "tryptic fragment"...what is that exactly?
What percentage of the WHOLE "spike protein" is this supposed "fragment"?
As an analogy, The Star Wars Millennium Falcon Lego set has 7000 pieces. Let's call this the WHOLE "spike protein". After we "digest" or break up the Lego set with "trypsin", (and then add some other PCR prep stuff), then what is the "fragment" that supposedly confirms the presence of the Falcon and not another Lego spaceship?
Igor... it gets worse...
"The study included a total of 81 patients with long-COVID syndrome. Clinical data were available for 70 patients (Table I)."
Why only 70? Why not ALL 81? (As it is, 81 is already a ridiculously small sample size? It's either purposefully left out or it's scientific incompetence).
81 "long covid" blood serums....
ZERO "NON-long Covid" control blood serums!
Lastly, this "research paper" contains several "cover my ass" type of declarations which absolve the authors of any liability or scientific integrity:
"Statistical analysis was not performed due to the descriptive design of our study."
"Having detected the vaccinal protein in two subjects and the viral protein in one subject in a cohort of 95 patients, this study has mainly a descriptive function."
"However, the exact cause of long-COVID and the factors contributing to its diverse symptomatology are still not fully understood."
What if....Scientists identified 81 American houses that were "infected" with "Long Christmas Presents". Then, using the classic "leave-cookies-and-milk-out-for-Santa-technique", scientists were able to confirm the presence of "Santa". (NOTE: Houses that did not celebrate Christmas were not used as control groups, because everyone knows that Santa eats cookies and Santa brings presents).
At the very minimum, this magical "spike protein experiment" should be completely started over....
420 blood samples from "long covid" people,
420 blood samples from NON long covid people. (CONTROL GROUP)
Scientific Method...Simple AS...
Same Team Bro!
(And that would be, "Team Pursuit of Truth ALways")
-Boostershots
Thank you Igor! We can always count on you to keep us updated.
A little Integration never killed anyone... right?!
https://postimg.cc/NLdGHgVG
No, it doesn't. Amplification occurs with whatever is there and it is not even expected to produce complete forms of DNA. Merely snippets. These are assembled with software giving the final mix. In genetics they usually work with parts of something they only see in completed form in the artificially assembled parts.
"Mistakes were made" is being screamed from the foottops. "Next time we will get it right" because they certainly planning a next one. I mean, nature will... Because of climate change. Of course.