Well, they haven't... Bill Gates at a few conferences has famously said...CO2 formula is basically...
Future People's carbon usage = Carbon used Per Person * Population Growth Increase* something else. He said in his speech, qualify of life going up and as Africa begins to go through their industrial revolution, the carbon used per person will likely increase. We are seeing it in India, China, etc. So that's not thing we can do much about...but people, they can through aggressive vaccination strategies and health improvements.
Antivaxxers (pre mRNA redefinitioning) went INSANE over that statement. "HE ADMITS! VACCINES ARE DEISGNED TO KILL PPL! OMG!" when the charitable interpretation is vaccines and healthcare improvements are going to reduce infant mortality rates in Africa so people can go from having 6-8 kids to just 2 kids with assurance one child is likely to reach adulthood, pre-emptively "preventing" 4-6 kids from ever existing and if they never exist, their carbon footprint is zero.
Likewise, if you have '1' child instead of '2' your carbon footprint of our offspring is basically halved at the first-step and potentially one-quartered at the second-generation and one-eigthed at the third generation compared to if you had 2 kids, 4 kids, 8 kids. Assuming, your line goes "2 parents -> 1 child -> has 2 children - > has 2 children" (ex replacement 1+2+2 = 5 total kids) versus "2 parents - > 2 children each have two 2 children, each have two 2 children (2, 4, 8 at each generation or a total of = 14 kids) 5 total versus 14 total when accounting for "grandchildren" if you go to the great-grandchildren level, or great-great grandchildren, the disparity grows exponentially in difference in carbon footprint.
Your '5' children through grandchildren, if you were just doing '1 child' then 'replacement' could use double your CO2 footprint and still produce less CO2 than if the footprint had remained flat and each generation doubled in size.
People don’t understand that as living standards increase, women have LESS children.
I could totally see these elite billionaires meeting in secret to discuss ways to pressure governments, possibly even corrupt them. If these poor countries embraced globalism out the Wazoo, it would benefit the gates Siri’s types. Making them much more powerful, and richer while slowing the rate of increase of the population.
If civilization collapses, because of some of the population event, the elites risk everything. They would be left to their own devices and hold absolutely zero power over anyone else. They would be huge targets.
Why would they keep that first half secret?
Well, they haven't... Bill Gates at a few conferences has famously said...CO2 formula is basically...
Future People's carbon usage = Carbon used Per Person * Population Growth Increase* something else. He said in his speech, qualify of life going up and as Africa begins to go through their industrial revolution, the carbon used per person will likely increase. We are seeing it in India, China, etc. So that's not thing we can do much about...but people, they can through aggressive vaccination strategies and health improvements.
Antivaxxers (pre mRNA redefinitioning) went INSANE over that statement. "HE ADMITS! VACCINES ARE DEISGNED TO KILL PPL! OMG!" when the charitable interpretation is vaccines and healthcare improvements are going to reduce infant mortality rates in Africa so people can go from having 6-8 kids to just 2 kids with assurance one child is likely to reach adulthood, pre-emptively "preventing" 4-6 kids from ever existing and if they never exist, their carbon footprint is zero.
Likewise, if you have '1' child instead of '2' your carbon footprint of our offspring is basically halved at the first-step and potentially one-quartered at the second-generation and one-eigthed at the third generation compared to if you had 2 kids, 4 kids, 8 kids. Assuming, your line goes "2 parents -> 1 child -> has 2 children - > has 2 children" (ex replacement 1+2+2 = 5 total kids) versus "2 parents - > 2 children each have two 2 children, each have two 2 children (2, 4, 8 at each generation or a total of = 14 kids) 5 total versus 14 total when accounting for "grandchildren" if you go to the great-grandchildren level, or great-great grandchildren, the disparity grows exponentially in difference in carbon footprint.
Your '5' children through grandchildren, if you were just doing '1 child' then 'replacement' could use double your CO2 footprint and still produce less CO2 than if the footprint had remained flat and each generation doubled in size.
People don’t understand that as living standards increase, women have LESS children.
I could totally see these elite billionaires meeting in secret to discuss ways to pressure governments, possibly even corrupt them. If these poor countries embraced globalism out the Wazoo, it would benefit the gates Siri’s types. Making them much more powerful, and richer while slowing the rate of increase of the population.
If civilization collapses, because of some of the population event, the elites risk everything. They would be left to their own devices and hold absolutely zero power over anyone else. They would be huge targets.