The news is just marketing the vax, like salesmen given a script. All you have to do is pay them handsomely. The NYT was reporting on vax injuries at first, until the “consortium” thing, that’s when the money changed hands
The news is just marketing the vax, like salesmen given a script. All you have to do is pay them handsomely. The NYT was reporting on vax injuries at first, until the “consortium” thing, that’s when the money changed hands
When there isn't a story on the news about people getting infected with or dying from covid, does that mean "they" didn't pay the NYT? Or does it mean they *did* pay them? I'm confused.
Who gives the news the script? Who pays Fox to buy the script?
In July 2019 the BBC spearheaded a so-called "Trusted News Initiative (TNI)", just months before the covid pandemic began. (What a coincidence.) The stated purposes for the TNI are to ensure advertisers that "false or misleading news" will not be associated with their advertisements and also to protect voters from false information during elections. But given the coordinated messaging we've seen with covid and the vaccines, the initiative also seems well positioned to deliver special-interest propaganda and even coordinated censorship.
Partners in the initiative include global media outlets such as The Washington Post, Reuters, The Associated Press, AFP, the Financial Times and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), plus Big Tech partners such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft. It also includes all of the companies owned by these companies, which boils down to literally every mainstream media information service. It's not hard to imagine how big advertisers, for example, could influence the news choices made by dozens of major outlets.
Pharmaceutical advertising is enormous and MSNBC shows had a frequent "sponsored by Pfizer" notice. The govt. paid for the ads and the ads were used to sponsor the shows, and this wasn't disclosed. It's a trough.
The news is just marketing the vax, like salesmen given a script. All you have to do is pay them handsomely. The NYT was reporting on vax injuries at first, until the “consortium” thing, that’s when the money changed hands
When there isn't a story on the news about people getting infected with or dying from covid, does that mean "they" didn't pay the NYT? Or does it mean they *did* pay them? I'm confused.
Who gives the news the script? Who pays Fox to buy the script?
In July 2019 the BBC spearheaded a so-called "Trusted News Initiative (TNI)", just months before the covid pandemic began. (What a coincidence.) The stated purposes for the TNI are to ensure advertisers that "false or misleading news" will not be associated with their advertisements and also to protect voters from false information during elections. But given the coordinated messaging we've seen with covid and the vaccines, the initiative also seems well positioned to deliver special-interest propaganda and even coordinated censorship.
Partners in the initiative include global media outlets such as The Washington Post, Reuters, The Associated Press, AFP, the Financial Times and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), plus Big Tech partners such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft. It also includes all of the companies owned by these companies, which boils down to literally every mainstream media information service. It's not hard to imagine how big advertisers, for example, could influence the news choices made by dozens of major outlets.
Pharmaceutical advertising is enormous and MSNBC shows had a frequent "sponsored by Pfizer" notice. The govt. paid for the ads and the ads were used to sponsor the shows, and this wasn't disclosed. It's a trough.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/review-the-federal-government-paid-media-companies-to-advertise-for-the-vaccines