9 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Harrm's avatar

Is anyone on substack surprised by this?

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

Not one damn bit!

Expand full comment
Copernicus's avatar

Right.

Now, I am wondering, how ever in the world could I, or do I somehow find ways to bring this up with my dr friends who are as oblivious as I used to be to these hideous conflicts of interest within the very bodies that purport to dispense recommendations to doctors?I suspect that most of them would find these blatant conflicts of interest so unthinkable as to be, well, unthinkable. Not even possible.

I mean, to basically say that, well, hey, pretty much all the recommendations on which you base your clinical decision making, yeah, it’s all tainted. Not going to be easy to receive or believe.

Expand full comment
Harrm's avatar

(Btw I am not claiming credit for my sisters change of view, but my efforts may have played a part)

Expand full comment
Harrm's avatar

Maybe recommend a podcast on a topic you know they’re interested in by a doctor who also happens to be health freedom. I’ve been doing this w my sister. I try to be subtle about it. After supporting the shots, she recently submitted a religious exemption at her new job so she wouldn’t be required to boost. She didn’t tell me this. Her husband told my husband. I’m a “gently tug on dangling threads” person.

Expand full comment
Porge's avatar

Duh......NO!

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Nope!

Expand full comment
Leslie Benjamini #🟦's avatar

Doesn’t this replacement have to be vetted by Congress? And approved?

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Sure...approved and sanctioned by a congress just as corrupt as big pharma.

Expand full comment