2. Peter Daszak "Killed 6 Million People with a Deadly Virus He Designed"
I couldn't disagree more. First of all, Sars-Cov-2 is not a "deadly virus" any more than the common cold or flu is. Nor was it novel. Nor did 6 million people die of covid - unless you wish to include deaths in …
2. Peter Daszak "Killed 6 Million People with a Deadly Virus He Designed"
I couldn't disagree more. First of all, Sars-Cov-2 is not a "deadly virus" any more than the common cold or flu is. Nor was it novel. Nor did 6 million people die of covid - unless you wish to include deaths in car crashes and deaths from cancer. The PCR tests were deeply flawed, the tracking of deaths was hopelessly flawed, and the death certificates were made to say "Covid" in a medically incorrect way.
Further, you cannot prove Sars-Cov-2 was made in a lab, and there are many problems with that theory. And even if it was, Daszaks proposal had nothing to do with it. 3 times in a row Daszak asserted that his work did not have pandemic potential, once in a private correspondence before submitting it, once in it, and once in the Lancet. Besides, his proposal was rejected.
Finally, what killed millions of people in 2020 was the disastrous response: lockdowns, closing businesses, masks, social isolation, failing to treat pneumonia with antibiotics, massive changes to hospital protocols, canceled cancer screenings, and so forth.
So, you’re saying there was no tinkering with the virus a la “gain of function” research in Wuhan? No funding of such? I agree that anyone with a modicum of infectious disease experience would never “lock down, mask up” or attempt to produce a vaccine and such a short time without years of testing. Daszak, however, has a lot to explain, however.
But what potential for causing fear is an invisible, non existent infectious disease threat, which because we’re told it’s spreading everywhere, all at once requires absurd & injurious “countermeasures” to limit deaths & ultimately injections designed to injure & kill?
Please don’t use the word “pandemic” to describe what happened & the lies about “the next pandemic is just around the corner”, because it’s immunologically implausible and consequently, I believe it to be impossible.
The most noted example of respiratory illness pandemic is Spanish Flu of 1918-19.
It didn’t happen the way it’s described.
Allegedly killing more people than WW1, no one younger than 25 (perhaps little older) was taught about it in school. Thee are no monuments to the fallen. It’s not even mentioned in the international health regulations updated in the eariy to mid 1920s, at all.
Those it allegedly killed were mostly young and mostly male, because many victims, I believe of murder, had not yet been demobilised & were in huge encampments. Massive overdoses with aspirin and also injection with a novel substance allegedly a vaccine was administered to prodigious numbers of people.
Experimentation to try to make transmission happen started in earnest during this era.
Despite substantial funding by modern standards, no person to person transmission was ever confirmed. Nor was it subsequently for other acute respiratory Illnesses. The most recent fake pandemic prior to the covid19 fake pandemic was “swine flu” of 2009. Turned out to be nothing more than “a pandemic of PCR based diagnostic tests”.
Sound familiar?
I believe that was the dress rehearsal for the coup d’etat of the world that was covid19, for the existence of which there’s no convincing evidence.
Thank you for saying what I have been thinking for so long. As a 30 year registered nurse, I could not believe what I was seeing at the start of the “pandemic”. People died from medical neglect and dubious medication’s and practices. Needless to say like many of my long-term medical peers we are getting out of this field ASAP. We can no longer take part in it.
Igor, you claim:
1. "Sars-Cov-2 came from a laboratory."
2. Peter Daszak "Killed 6 Million People with a Deadly Virus He Designed"
I couldn't disagree more. First of all, Sars-Cov-2 is not a "deadly virus" any more than the common cold or flu is. Nor was it novel. Nor did 6 million people die of covid - unless you wish to include deaths in car crashes and deaths from cancer. The PCR tests were deeply flawed, the tracking of deaths was hopelessly flawed, and the death certificates were made to say "Covid" in a medically incorrect way.
Further, you cannot prove Sars-Cov-2 was made in a lab, and there are many problems with that theory. And even if it was, Daszaks proposal had nothing to do with it. 3 times in a row Daszak asserted that his work did not have pandemic potential, once in a private correspondence before submitting it, once in it, and once in the Lancet. Besides, his proposal was rejected.
Finally, what killed millions of people in 2020 was the disastrous response: lockdowns, closing businesses, masks, social isolation, failing to treat pneumonia with antibiotics, massive changes to hospital protocols, canceled cancer screenings, and so forth.
For proof, see the following:
Daszak and his proposal:
https://pandata.org/right-off-the-bat-they-were-lying/
No deadly virus in China:
https://pandata.org/revisiting-china-did-a-pandemic-really-start-in-wuhan/
No deadly virus in the world:
https://pandata.org/worldwide-covid-mortality-patterns/
https://pandata.org/covid-mortality-patterns-in-the-usa/
Not a novel virus:
https://pandata.org/was-sars-cov-2-entirely-novel-or-particularly-deadly/
The death numbers are flawed:
https://pandata.org/the-dashboard-that-ruled-the-world/
https://pandata.org/the-non-science-of-whos-weekly-covid-reports/
The PCR tests were flawed:
https://pandata.org/pcr-testing-skewed-and-corrupted-data-on-sars-cov-2-infection-and-death-rates/
So, you’re saying there was no tinkering with the virus a la “gain of function” research in Wuhan? No funding of such? I agree that anyone with a modicum of infectious disease experience would never “lock down, mask up” or attempt to produce a vaccine and such a short time without years of testing. Daszak, however, has a lot to explain, however.
No pandemic has ever really happened.
Lies about pandemics, sure. Not uncommon.
But what potential for causing fear is an invisible, non existent infectious disease threat, which because we’re told it’s spreading everywhere, all at once requires absurd & injurious “countermeasures” to limit deaths & ultimately injections designed to injure & kill?
Please don’t use the word “pandemic” to describe what happened & the lies about “the next pandemic is just around the corner”, because it’s immunologically implausible and consequently, I believe it to be impossible.
The most noted example of respiratory illness pandemic is Spanish Flu of 1918-19.
It didn’t happen the way it’s described.
Allegedly killing more people than WW1, no one younger than 25 (perhaps little older) was taught about it in school. Thee are no monuments to the fallen. It’s not even mentioned in the international health regulations updated in the eariy to mid 1920s, at all.
Those it allegedly killed were mostly young and mostly male, because many victims, I believe of murder, had not yet been demobilised & were in huge encampments. Massive overdoses with aspirin and also injection with a novel substance allegedly a vaccine was administered to prodigious numbers of people.
Experimentation to try to make transmission happen started in earnest during this era.
Despite substantial funding by modern standards, no person to person transmission was ever confirmed. Nor was it subsequently for other acute respiratory Illnesses. The most recent fake pandemic prior to the covid19 fake pandemic was “swine flu” of 2009. Turned out to be nothing more than “a pandemic of PCR based diagnostic tests”.
Sound familiar?
I believe that was the dress rehearsal for the coup d’etat of the world that was covid19, for the existence of which there’s no convincing evidence.
Best wishes
Mike
Thank you for saying what I have been thinking for so long. As a 30 year registered nurse, I could not believe what I was seeing at the start of the “pandemic”. People died from medical neglect and dubious medication’s and practices. Needless to say like many of my long-term medical peers we are getting out of this field ASAP. We can no longer take part in it.