Also thanks to "The Invisible Rainbow" & "Virus Mania" the public now has access to over 100 years of research proving that viruses do not spread through contagion. In any sense of the meaning of that term. So this is complete garbage.
You all should check out Dr. Sam Bailey. On Odyssey, not Youtube. Yt deletes most of her videos.
I've actually done the work to show everyone why Daszak's name is so well-known. He's a dead end to steal everyone's attention and time. Go ahead and prosecute him. Discovery will be a bitch for you.
Perhaps you can explain your repetitive use of “red herring” but without any clarification . You continue to imply you know something important yet nothing follows.
It's ironic how Petty criminals get exalted to the status of Demi-God to supposedly rule over the masses and the planet. How effective is the long-term trajectory of worshipping false idols?
Still unclear on how people can reasonably believe, from the understanding put forward by virology, how a mRNA has the potential to travel across the world. Regardless of whatever fantastical elements may or may not be placed into its reported sequence.
In the tracking of all these variants and the expanding tree of coronavirus offshoots, I don't believe, but would love to be corrected on the matter, that there is a clear control of what the background or control signal would have been prior to when this tracking started. If we start testing for something, and see it is present, it does not mean it is always there. Better yet, what sequences are being tested, what homology might these have with the background signal?
Frankly, I no longer believe either a lab leak or natural virus was possible. What is possible is using how virology does its research, through stable DNA clones, and changing of how treatments are applied to provide the illusion of a pandemic.
This Peter Daszak nonsense is the plot of a poor movie and relies on a story where mRNA, which is not known to replicate well at all, somehow stably and consistently appeared in many regions.
Remember, we are dealing with something which apparently exploded in small and specific areas, but somehow did not spread or result in remotely the same impact in other parallel areas at all. We are dealing with vague symptoms, "asymptomatic spread", and other nonsense about transmission. At best, the symptoms that aligned with the 'virus' were what was to be expected with the transfections, which would help explain why the symptoms initially attributed to the virus, began appearing in earnest only after people began to receive injections.
Please, if you are looking for a topic, consider focusing on specifically what people died from. There are now countless stories of horrific treatment of those who went to the hospitals being progressed through oxygen administration (which is definitely not harmless) and a cocktail of end of life drugs.
Eco health. In their eyes, humanity is the problem. It is their plan to use any and every means to “thin out” this scourge to the planet. Chemical additives to food, injections, harmful lifestyles, pharmaceutical concoctions-anything to lower the birth rate, shorten lives or cause death in a way that isn’t as graphic as the gas chambers but equally as effective. Same evil, but with better optics.
2. Peter Daszak "Killed 6 Million People with a Deadly Virus He Designed"
I couldn't disagree more. First of all, Sars-Cov-2 is not a "deadly virus" any more than the common cold or flu is. Nor was it novel. Nor did 6 million people die of covid - unless you wish to include deaths in car crashes and deaths from cancer. The PCR tests were deeply flawed, the tracking of deaths was hopelessly flawed, and the death certificates were made to say "Covid" in a medically incorrect way.
Further, you cannot prove Sars-Cov-2 was made in a lab, and there are many problems with that theory. And even if it was, Daszaks proposal had nothing to do with it. 3 times in a row Daszak asserted that his work did not have pandemic potential, once in a private correspondence before submitting it, once in it, and once in the Lancet. Besides, his proposal was rejected.
Finally, what killed millions of people in 2020 was the disastrous response: lockdowns, closing businesses, masks, social isolation, failing to treat pneumonia with antibiotics, massive changes to hospital protocols, canceled cancer screenings, and so forth.
So, you’re saying there was no tinkering with the virus a la “gain of function” research in Wuhan? No funding of such? I agree that anyone with a modicum of infectious disease experience would never “lock down, mask up” or attempt to produce a vaccine and such a short time without years of testing. Daszak, however, has a lot to explain, however.
But what potential for causing fear is an invisible, non existent infectious disease threat, which because we’re told it’s spreading everywhere, all at once requires absurd & injurious “countermeasures” to limit deaths & ultimately injections designed to injure & kill?
Please don’t use the word “pandemic” to describe what happened & the lies about “the next pandemic is just around the corner”, because it’s immunologically implausible and consequently, I believe it to be impossible.
The most noted example of respiratory illness pandemic is Spanish Flu of 1918-19.
It didn’t happen the way it’s described.
Allegedly killing more people than WW1, no one younger than 25 (perhaps little older) was taught about it in school. Thee are no monuments to the fallen. It’s not even mentioned in the international health regulations updated in the eariy to mid 1920s, at all.
Those it allegedly killed were mostly young and mostly male, because many victims, I believe of murder, had not yet been demobilised & were in huge encampments. Massive overdoses with aspirin and also injection with a novel substance allegedly a vaccine was administered to prodigious numbers of people.
Experimentation to try to make transmission happen started in earnest during this era.
Despite substantial funding by modern standards, no person to person transmission was ever confirmed. Nor was it subsequently for other acute respiratory Illnesses. The most recent fake pandemic prior to the covid19 fake pandemic was “swine flu” of 2009. Turned out to be nothing more than “a pandemic of PCR based diagnostic tests”.
Sound familiar?
I believe that was the dress rehearsal for the coup d’etat of the world that was covid19, for the existence of which there’s no convincing evidence.
Thank you for saying what I have been thinking for so long. As a 30 year registered nurse, I could not believe what I was seeing at the start of the “pandemic”. People died from medical neglect and dubious medication’s and practices. Needless to say like many of my long-term medical peers we are getting out of this field ASAP. We can no longer take part in it.
Thanks for this very interesting piece, sheds light on this guy's personality.
Stop pushing the gain-of-function nonsense. Daszak is a very expensive red herring. A waste of time.
Also thanks to "The Invisible Rainbow" & "Virus Mania" the public now has access to over 100 years of research proving that viruses do not spread through contagion. In any sense of the meaning of that term. So this is complete garbage.
You all should check out Dr. Sam Bailey. On Odyssey, not Youtube. Yt deletes most of her videos.
Well aware of this work. Keep spreading the good word.
Perhaps you’re one of the sociopaths Daszak would find so interesting to know.
Sociopath? Don't embarrass yourself.
I've actually done the work to show everyone why Daszak's name is so well-known. He's a dead end to steal everyone's attention and time. Go ahead and prosecute him. Discovery will be a bitch for you.
You’re describing yourself.
Perhaps you can explain your repetitive use of “red herring” but without any clarification . You continue to imply you know something important yet nothing follows.
It means there is no evidence supporting these claims that Daszak was part of creating something that doesn't exist.
It’s time to stop the weed, sober up and start thinking clearly. You’ve proven nothing.
Thinking clearly is making claims backed by no science and pointing fingers at internet villains. You're an idiot.
Now we know what the fella is about. Thanks IGOR
he's a red herring
It's ironic how Petty criminals get exalted to the status of Demi-God to supposedly rule over the masses and the planet. How effective is the long-term trajectory of worshipping false idols?
Still unclear on how people can reasonably believe, from the understanding put forward by virology, how a mRNA has the potential to travel across the world. Regardless of whatever fantastical elements may or may not be placed into its reported sequence.
In the tracking of all these variants and the expanding tree of coronavirus offshoots, I don't believe, but would love to be corrected on the matter, that there is a clear control of what the background or control signal would have been prior to when this tracking started. If we start testing for something, and see it is present, it does not mean it is always there. Better yet, what sequences are being tested, what homology might these have with the background signal?
Frankly, I no longer believe either a lab leak or natural virus was possible. What is possible is using how virology does its research, through stable DNA clones, and changing of how treatments are applied to provide the illusion of a pandemic.
This Peter Daszak nonsense is the plot of a poor movie and relies on a story where mRNA, which is not known to replicate well at all, somehow stably and consistently appeared in many regions.
Remember, we are dealing with something which apparently exploded in small and specific areas, but somehow did not spread or result in remotely the same impact in other parallel areas at all. We are dealing with vague symptoms, "asymptomatic spread", and other nonsense about transmission. At best, the symptoms that aligned with the 'virus' were what was to be expected with the transfections, which would help explain why the symptoms initially attributed to the virus, began appearing in earnest only after people began to receive injections.
Please, if you are looking for a topic, consider focusing on specifically what people died from. There are now countless stories of horrific treatment of those who went to the hospitals being progressed through oxygen administration (which is definitely not harmless) and a cocktail of end of life drugs.
Read Emerald Robinson’s Substack.
Do you have any background in biology? Does not sound like it. Philosophy major venturing into science unprepared?
FYI https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/merrick-garland-chris-wray-proudly-announce-latest-censorship/
Eco health. In their eyes, humanity is the problem. It is their plan to use any and every means to “thin out” this scourge to the planet. Chemical additives to food, injections, harmful lifestyles, pharmaceutical concoctions-anything to lower the birth rate, shorten lives or cause death in a way that isn’t as graphic as the gas chambers but equally as effective. Same evil, but with better optics.
He doesn’t sound very smart to me! How do these schmucks get key jobs that could harm so many?
He didn't. He's a distraction. An expensive one.
My same thought
Damn.
Also, Why did it take more than four years for us to learn this about this guy?
People have been talking about him since 2020. He's a very expensive red herring.
Read Emerald Robinson’s Substack.
This is a sensational find. Amazing.
Igor, you claim:
1. "Sars-Cov-2 came from a laboratory."
2. Peter Daszak "Killed 6 Million People with a Deadly Virus He Designed"
I couldn't disagree more. First of all, Sars-Cov-2 is not a "deadly virus" any more than the common cold or flu is. Nor was it novel. Nor did 6 million people die of covid - unless you wish to include deaths in car crashes and deaths from cancer. The PCR tests were deeply flawed, the tracking of deaths was hopelessly flawed, and the death certificates were made to say "Covid" in a medically incorrect way.
Further, you cannot prove Sars-Cov-2 was made in a lab, and there are many problems with that theory. And even if it was, Daszaks proposal had nothing to do with it. 3 times in a row Daszak asserted that his work did not have pandemic potential, once in a private correspondence before submitting it, once in it, and once in the Lancet. Besides, his proposal was rejected.
Finally, what killed millions of people in 2020 was the disastrous response: lockdowns, closing businesses, masks, social isolation, failing to treat pneumonia with antibiotics, massive changes to hospital protocols, canceled cancer screenings, and so forth.
For proof, see the following:
Daszak and his proposal:
https://pandata.org/right-off-the-bat-they-were-lying/
No deadly virus in China:
https://pandata.org/revisiting-china-did-a-pandemic-really-start-in-wuhan/
No deadly virus in the world:
https://pandata.org/worldwide-covid-mortality-patterns/
https://pandata.org/covid-mortality-patterns-in-the-usa/
Not a novel virus:
https://pandata.org/was-sars-cov-2-entirely-novel-or-particularly-deadly/
The death numbers are flawed:
https://pandata.org/the-dashboard-that-ruled-the-world/
https://pandata.org/the-non-science-of-whos-weekly-covid-reports/
The PCR tests were flawed:
https://pandata.org/pcr-testing-skewed-and-corrupted-data-on-sars-cov-2-infection-and-death-rates/
So, you’re saying there was no tinkering with the virus a la “gain of function” research in Wuhan? No funding of such? I agree that anyone with a modicum of infectious disease experience would never “lock down, mask up” or attempt to produce a vaccine and such a short time without years of testing. Daszak, however, has a lot to explain, however.
No pandemic has ever really happened.
Lies about pandemics, sure. Not uncommon.
But what potential for causing fear is an invisible, non existent infectious disease threat, which because we’re told it’s spreading everywhere, all at once requires absurd & injurious “countermeasures” to limit deaths & ultimately injections designed to injure & kill?
Please don’t use the word “pandemic” to describe what happened & the lies about “the next pandemic is just around the corner”, because it’s immunologically implausible and consequently, I believe it to be impossible.
The most noted example of respiratory illness pandemic is Spanish Flu of 1918-19.
It didn’t happen the way it’s described.
Allegedly killing more people than WW1, no one younger than 25 (perhaps little older) was taught about it in school. Thee are no monuments to the fallen. It’s not even mentioned in the international health regulations updated in the eariy to mid 1920s, at all.
Those it allegedly killed were mostly young and mostly male, because many victims, I believe of murder, had not yet been demobilised & were in huge encampments. Massive overdoses with aspirin and also injection with a novel substance allegedly a vaccine was administered to prodigious numbers of people.
Experimentation to try to make transmission happen started in earnest during this era.
Despite substantial funding by modern standards, no person to person transmission was ever confirmed. Nor was it subsequently for other acute respiratory Illnesses. The most recent fake pandemic prior to the covid19 fake pandemic was “swine flu” of 2009. Turned out to be nothing more than “a pandemic of PCR based diagnostic tests”.
Sound familiar?
I believe that was the dress rehearsal for the coup d’etat of the world that was covid19, for the existence of which there’s no convincing evidence.
Best wishes
Mike
Thank you for saying what I have been thinking for so long. As a 30 year registered nurse, I could not believe what I was seeing at the start of the “pandemic”. People died from medical neglect and dubious medication’s and practices. Needless to say like many of my long-term medical peers we are getting out of this field ASAP. We can no longer take part in it.
Igor -- how you were able to track this nugget down is nothing short of miraculous. I am sharing this far and wide. Un-freaking-believable.
Thanks Igor! You are a blessing.
I presume the 'Madonna Statue' in question was NOT an effigy of Madge Ciccone.
Might be. She would’ve been close to 30 around then
His Wikipedia entry mentions not a word about his criminal past in Bangor. Surprise, surprise.
Connect the dots from modern medical tyranny to the surveillance state to the coming one-world religion https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/patrick-wood-reveals-link-between