She never did espouse Dworkin-style female supremacy. Her 'feminist' work tends toward the examination of stereotypes and how this affects women's view of themselves and their bodies. I don't see how that is radical other than talking about how women interact with a society that is now completely warped in it's view of 'normal womanhood'.
She never did espouse Dworkin-style female supremacy. Her 'feminist' work tends toward the examination of stereotypes and how this affects women's view of themselves and their bodies. I don't see how that is radical other than talking about how women interact with a society that is now completely warped in it's view of 'normal womanhood'.
She never did espouse Dworkin-style female supremacy. Her 'feminist' work tends toward the examination of stereotypes and how this affects women's view of themselves and their bodies. I don't see how that is radical other than talking about how women interact with a society that is now completely warped in it's view of 'normal womanhood'.